CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, 24-25 th Oct 2007 RAPID/IES Calibration Status J.A. Davies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview Review of the Goddard method Update on instrument/detector evolution (a purely phenomenological approach) Characterization of the soft proton.
Advertisements

RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
The Non-Flare Temperature and Emission Measure Observed by RHESSI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) J.Klimchuk (NRL)
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemeprature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB)
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemeprature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) ABSTRACT: We present spectral fits for RHESSI and GOES solar.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,
The Non-Flare Temperature and Emission Measure Observed by RHESSI and SXI J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) J.Klimchuk (NRL) Fall 2003 AGU Meeting.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Probability and Statistics in Engineering Philip Bedient, Ph.D.
RBSP-ECT Suite Status: Instrument Status and Instrument Operations Flexibility Harlan E. Spence on behalf of RBSP-ECT Team University of New Hampshire.
Noise Analysis in NaIAD Matthew Robinson Experiment now running reliably therefore time to work on getting the best from the analysis.
Profile Measurement of HSX Plasma Using Thomson Scattering K. Zhai, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Canik, K. Likin, K. J. Willis, D.T. Anderson, HSX Plasma Laboratory,
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
Cube Measurements Tent Crew. Scintillation BNL 241 Am Semi- collimated  Spectralon Diffuse UV Reflector SBD  -Trigger Scint. Light Poisson.
Diana Parno – July 22, 2008 January PREx Test Run: Compton Photon Analysis Diana Parno Carnegie Mellon University HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
SNS neutron background measurements using a portable 3 He LPSD detector.
Final Presentation By Matthew Lewis 17 th March 2006 “To Determine the Accuracy that GOES True Numbers can Reproduce the Full X-ray Spectrum of the Sun”
Chapter 7 Sampling Distributions Statistics for Business (Env) 1.
PET/SPECT Phantom. Side View of Phantom Image Resolution Intrinsic resolution FWHM Intrinsic resolution FWHM Field of view Field of view Measurement:
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
STAFF Report Prepared by R. PIBERNE. 2 1.Status of software development 2.Status of Experiment Calibration / Cross Calibration 3.Status of dataset delivery.
SST- Solid State Telescope ESA - Electrostatic Analyzer Science Measurement and Operational Requirements.
PEACE DAA Status Andrew Fazakerley, Iryna Rozum, Andrew Lahiff, Branislav Mihaljčić & the PEACE ops team 5 November 2009, DAA meeting, Paris, France MSSL.
1 CAA 2009 Peer Review, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March CAA Peer Review: Selected Recommendations.
DAA PEACE Status A. Fazakerley, B. Mihaljčić, I. Rozum, A. Lahiff, G. Watson, D. Kataria UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
9 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March /17 CAA Graphics: Pre-generated/On-demand Panels and Cross-Calibration.
Cluster Active Archive Status of DWP Data Activities Simon Walker, Keith Yearby, Michael Balikhin Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University.
15 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 17th – 19th April 2012, UCL, London PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate.
14 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 5th – 7th October 2011, York, UK PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics.
RAPID calibrations in the radiation belts Elena Kronberg 1 and Patrick W. Daly 1 (1)Max-Planck-Institute for Solar System Research, Katlenburg-Lindau,
CIS Action Items 10 th Cross-Calibration Workshop Observatoire de Paris, Nov
Binomial Distribution Possion Distribution Gaussian Distribution Lorentzian Distribution Error Analysis.
Status of CIS Calibration Work Iannis Dandouras and the CIS Team presented by: Harri Laakso 3 rd CAA Cross-Calibration Meeting MSSL, October 2006.
Investigation of a discrepancy between magnetic field magnitudes determined by the FGM and EDI instruments Jonny Gloag, Edita Georgescu, Elizabeth Lucek,
DAA Status/Progress B. Mihaljčić, A. Fazakerley, N. Doss, G. Watson UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science Laboratory 18 th.
21st CAA Cross Calibration Workshop Leiden, March 2015 WHISPER report WHISPER team LPC2E/CNRS.
CODIF CORSS-CALIBRATIONS C. Mouikis, L. Kistler, K. Genestreti UNH 10th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting L'Observatoire de Paris, Paris, 2-4 November 2009.
26th Oct 2006CAA cross cal meeting, MSSL RAPID Calibration Status RAPID team.
10 th CAA Cross-calibration meeting, 2nd – 4th November 2009, Paris N. Doss, A. Fazakerley, B. Mihaljčić and I. Rozum UCL Department of Space and Climate.
22 nd CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 18 th – 19 th November 2015, Tenerife, Spain N. Doss, A.N. Fazakerley, C. Anekallu, B. Mihaljcic, G. Watson. Presented.
20 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop MPS, Göttingen, Germany Oct Ways of Measuring DC Electric Field: Who Does it Correctly?
CIS Calibration Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Adrian Blagau Iannis Dandouras, Alain Barthe 22 th Cross-Calibration Meeting, Tenerife, November 2015.
A.Zanichelli, B.Garilli, M.Scodeggio, D.Rizzo
Chapter 6 Inferences Based on a Single Sample: Estimation with Confidence Intervals Slides for Optional Sections Section 7.5 Finite Population Correction.
10th CAA Operations Review Annual Report of the CIS Experiment
RAPID/IES Calibration Status Rutherford Appleton Lab
Solar Wind Core Electrons
Status Report of EDI on the CAA
Design of Digital Filter Bank and General Purpose Digital Shaper
Calibration, Simulations, and “Remaining” Issues
AC-9/AC-S data analysis from CDOM Lab
Statistical Inference for the Mean Confidence Interval
EMCal Recalibration Check
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
EMCal Recalibration Check
Simple Linear Regression
Introduction Previous lessons have demonstrated that the normal distribution provides a useful model for many situations in business and industry, as.
UVIS Calibration Update
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
The spectral evolution of impulsive solar X-ray flares
Current status Minjung Kim
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 RAPID/IES Calibration Status J.A. Davies

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 PEACE/RAPID Cross Cal PEACE/RAPID Kappa fitting undertaken for a number of intervals The original study found that the fit is very sensitive Two similar distributions result in significant differences in the cross cal parameter. Tried using two kappa distributions (e.g. result of W-P interactions) We always find that the gap between energy ranges hinders direct comparison.

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 PEACE/RAPID Cross Cal Questions highlighted at October Cross-Cal Should we be using the kappa fitting technique to determine the cross-cal parameters or just as a verification of the cross cal from other techniques? Answer: For normal science data, only the latter! Do the new PEACE inter-anode comparisons make any difference? Answer: Does not resolve the differences. Can we use the IES test-mode histogram data to look for intervals where IES and PEACE have an energy overlap ~19 keV. Answer: Yes, but this is proving more complicated than expected! Anything else we can try? Answer: Looking back at ground cal and commissioning data and also looking at cross cal with other spacecraft under special circumstances

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 PEACE/RAPID Cross Cal Difficulties with cross-cal include Pile-up in IES (only important in high count rate regions) Multiple (kappa) populations give too many possible fitting options No energy overlap between PEACE and standard IES products Some hints of inaccurate e-cal in top PEACE and bottom IES channels Instruments on different spacecraft give similar results so any discrepancies likely to be systematic. Bad E cal? PEACE IES Distributions from C2 and C4 look very similar in both PEACE and IES

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 PEACE/RAPID Cross Cal Can we use the IES test-mode histogram data to look for intervals where IES and PEACE have an energy overlap ~19 keV. Answer: In theory yes, but need to consider a number of factors! Using PEACE 3DXnP product and then spin averaging to give distribution best matched to IES histogram data. Only about 20 events over the entire mission when the count rates in IES high enough during histogram intervals. PEACE data on C1 and C3 is usually windowed such that highest energies are not returned (is 3DR an alternative?). PEACE inter-anode recalibrated data only just available. Currently working with two plasma sheet intervals & and a higher count rate interval at the edge of the ring current

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 PEACE/RAPID Cross Cal Issues with using histogram mode data include: Pile-up in IES (as with normal data) Pedestal subtraction issues Energy efficiency fall-off Very limited dataset E fall-off important for direct comparision in the energy overlap range. (n.b. occurs above pedestal subtraction effects) Property of the detectors Will be the same for all detectors May depend on look direction (but second order effect) Expected to be stable with time Four sample averages (dE ~8.8keV) pedestal removed Histogram point (dE ~2.2keV) pedestal removed Histogram points without pedestal being removed Power law tail Fall off in energy efficiency? IES BM Clean data from nearby spin

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 PEACE/RAPID Cross Cal Energy fall-off seen in commissioning and ground cal data. To first order can be expressed as a linear energy loss, increasing with decreasing energy. E loss ~ 14 – 0.08E (E in keV) Currently investigating if this is sufficient to explain in-flight data or if there is an additional count rate efficiency term. This will allow (almost) direct comparison with PEACE for those few events where we have data.

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 Investigation of possible Ground Level Event by Bern Blake Medium energy electron precursor due to neutron decay Should produce a flat spectrum which would be easier to assess inter-calibration between PEACE and RAPID Only a few of these types of event have been identified The current study concentrates on an event on

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 RAPID-IES for Possible precursor signature X-ray signature detected in IES Sun sector

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 ACE supports idea that we are seeing precursor electrons before main energetic component Similar signatures seen in HEO data J.B. Blake

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 J.B. Blake Unfortunately spectrum does not match what is expected in theory

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 Started PEACE/RAPID comparison for this interval…

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 PEACE/RAPID Cross Cal Moments: IDL Software developed for production of RAPID partial moments. Works using the CAA datasets (Cn_CP_RAP_E3DD) Comparison with PEACE using data from CAA (C2_CP_PEA_MOMENTS) Using Cluster 2 data from 2003 tail season. This provides intervals of NM3 data when RAPID is effectively in Burst Mode and returning full 3D electron distribution for extended periods. Also PEACE moments currently only delivered to CAA for C2. The software is being extended to also include the PEACE 3D data products (Cn_CP_PEA_CP3DRH_PSD) to give total electron moments. Focus is on hot plasma so only considering E>100eV to avoid SCP and photo-electron effects. Corrections from the cross-calibration analysis are not yet finalised and so are not included in the current CAA products.

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 PEACE/RAPID Cross Cal Partial Moments PEACE RAPID PEACE RAPID

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 PEACE/RAPID Cross Cal Next steps: Complete the assessment of energy fall-off using ground cal and in-flight data. Look for differences in the off-axis detectors in each head. Further investigation of precursor events to see if they can help with cross- calibration (also scientifically interesting!). For 20 identified intervals investigate near energy overlap region to obtain relative PEACE/RAPID cal as a function of time. Complete development/testing of IDL S/W for combined PEACE/RAPID moments from 3D electron data. Assess RAPID contribution to total moment sums in regions of hot plasma.