Global Standard for CSO Accountability BCSDN WEBINAR, 17.05.2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
Advertisements

Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodia’s development challenges Host of the 2nd Global Assembly for CSO Development.
CSO’s on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals.
CSOs on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals March 2011.
Cambodia Voluntary Certification December 13, 2011 Mr. Soeung Saroeun CCC Head of Program Vision: A strong and capable.
1 Katherine Sierra Vice President, Sustainable Development Network The World Bank April 14, 2008 Proposed Climate Investment Funds (CIFs) Recap.
Achieving Lasting Impacts Understanding the shift to more programmatic approaches in CARE.
Bond.org.uk The Bond Effectiveness Programme: developing a sector wide framework for assessing and demonstrating effectiveness July 2011.
Co-funded by the PROGRESS Programme of the European Union EQUINET – European Network of Equality Bodies 2014 Equinet Annual General Meeting 4 December.
Core Commitments for Children in Humanitarian Action
Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.
The IUCN Programme Nature+ Proposal, May 2011.
The Global Fund- structure, function and evolution February 18, 2008.
Handicap-International Challenges of the Sustainability of physical rehabilitation sector Nepal, January 2013.
1 Consultative Meeting on “Promoting more effective partnership between INGOs and other CSOs” building on Oxfam’s “Future Roles of INGO in Cambodia”, 24.
Strategic Plan Kidsafe NSW Inc.. ‘A Safer World for Kids’ Kidsafe NSW Inc.
Toit: Maputo, mozambique July 31 st to August 2 nd 2012.
CSO Development Effectiveness and Promotion of an Enabling Environment
1 S trengthening accountability for gender equality To learn more visit
The shift to programs in the LAC region. What is a program? A program is a coherent set of initiatives by CARE and our allies that involves a long-term.
T he Istanbul Principles and the International Framework Geneva, Switzerland June 2013.
Defining a Program Approach Understanding the Program Approach and its potential for CIS June 2011.
Education and MDGs The MDGs provided a powerful framework However, there are weaknesses: – Equity – Interconnectivity of issues – Sustainable development.
Aid Transparency: Better Data, Better Aid Simon Parrish, Development Initiatives & IATI Yerevan, 4 October 2009.
Global Standard for CSO Accountability. INGO Accountability Charter Our Ambition: improve NGO accountability and enabling environment Cross sector: members.
Revisions Proposed to the CIS Plan by the Global Office Misha V. Belkindas Budapest, July 3-4, 2013.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
GFG-BACG Meeting: Harnosand, Sweden March 14,
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course Module 1: Introduction to the TDA/SAP Process.
UHC 2030 CSO engagement mechanism Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
Engaging CSOs in UHC 2030 Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
Civil Society Participation and Contribution to the UNCAC Review Process Towards Transparency – TI National Contact Vietnam UNCAC Self Assessment Process:
What Next? Photo: Jodi Bieber/Save the Children. © National Nutrition Council, Madagascar Building on our unique contribution, achievements & learnings,
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
business disability international Charter:
Global Standard for CSO Accountability
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
SAFE toward a WORLD for children Five-Year Strategic Plan
Joint Principles for Adaptation (JPAs) By Marlene/Rudolf
Global Health Competencies for UK Healthcare Professionals
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
On the CUSP of change: Effective scaling for social norms change programming for gender equality. Community for Understanding Scale Up (CUSP)
Key Population Community taking the Lead.
The Global Partnership
SOUTHERN AFRICA INCLUSIVE EDUCATION STRATEGY FOR LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES (SAIES) 23rd November 2016 Coastland Hotel - Durban.
Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture for food security and nutrition
An Overview of the Global Fund and its Architecture
Module 2 The SDG Agenda: No-one left behind
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Agenda for this webinar
Sound Financial Management
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
VIWANGO CERTIFICATION MECHANISM
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
Launch of Towards 2020 GWP Strategy.
On the CUSP of change: Effective scaling for social norms change programming for gender equality. Community for Understanding Scale Up (CUSP)
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
THE independent evaluation office of Undp Independence, credibility and use IPDET, 30 June 2014 Indran A. Naidoo Director.
The JDC Institute for Leadership and Governance
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Public engagement strategy
Community Integration and Development USP Conference May 2013
The role of Supreme Audit Institutions in fragile situations: initial findings Research by David Goldsworthy and Silvia Stefanoni of Development Action.
Global Standard For CSO Accountability
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS FACILITY FOR ASIA AND PACIFIC A framework for promoting lesson learning on the use of country systems.
UHC2030 Private Sector Constituency –
National one Health Strategy( )
Presentation transcript:

Global Standard for CSO Accountability BCSDN WEBINAR,

The Global Standard is an initiative of 9 well-established civil society networks from around the world. The overarching aim of the initiative is to strengthen the effectiveness of CSOs worldwide by devising a collective accountability standard. The networks will over three years cooperate to learn from each other, gain a truly global view on CSO accountability, improve their codes and reduce transaction cost.

Goals of the project 1. Strengthen CSO accountability through improvements in our standards and in our practices of implementing them. 2. Reduce transaction costs of multiple accountability requirements and standards evolution. 3. Contribute to a more enabling environment for CSOs as they demonstrate sound and responsible management that is rooted in collective values.

The Global Standard will be built primarily on the partners own accountability standards and also take into consideration other global initiatives, such as: the Istanbul Principles, the Core Humanitarian Standard, and the Sustainable Development Goals.

What we want to do with this initiative?  Identify collectively what is core to CSO accountability globally and capture this in a reference standard.  Consider existing standards and initiatives when developing the Global Standard.  Work towards aligning our own standards with the Global Standard.  Encourage accountability standards, CSO peak bodies, regulators to use it to improve their practices.  Learn from each other and improve our own practices.  Use the Global Standard to empower civil society by increasing legitimacy and promoting a more enabling environment.  Lobbying and advocacy with donors and governments nationally and globally to achieve a more enabling environment for CSO work.

Nine civil society accountability networks from across the globe have been identified as Project Partners :

The Global Standard will be used as a key reference standard for the eight networks and serve as a global point of orientation for CSO accountability worldwide. It will be written in a concise language and serve as a collective base for CSOs, donors and INGOs.

Content and Format  It will include reference indicators that are verifiable.  It will capture only globally relevant issues of CSO accountability.  It will be written in clear, succinct and powerful language and reflects key messages in order to remain communicative.  It will have guidance notes with a definition of key terms and how to adapt the Global Standard for use in different national and regional contexts.  It will have no inherent verification or certification mechanism – implementation methods are up to the users of the reference code.

Proposal on how the standard will look like

Structure  Commitment  Commitment rationale  3 types of indicators:  What do we do? (actions taken)  What does the organization need to have in place? (policies and structure)  What kind of change do we bring? (feedback and involvement of stakeholders)

The standard covers 3 clusters of commitments: Promotion and contribution for equal rights for all (Commitments 1, 2 and 8) Internal organizational standards/ management and transparency (Commitments 6, 7, 10, 11 and 12) How we work with people, target groups and stakeholders? (Commitments 3, 4, 5 and 9)

Promotion and contribution for equal rights for all 1.Realize human rights to end inequality and exclusion In our work, we ensure to treat people fairly, provide equal access to our activities and support those whose rights are violated. 2.Support women’s rights and gender equity As CSOs we actively oppose injustice (such as unequal treatment for women), strive to empower women and girls, and work towards gender equity. 3.Strive for environmental sustainability The rapid decrease in resources and accelerating climate change is endangering people and nature at an unprecedented scale. At a minimum, we ensure efficient use of natural resources and minimizing the negative impact of our work on the environment. (Commitments 1, 2 and 8)

Internal organizational standards/ management and transparency 1.Provide enriching and enabling work experience Motivated and capable staff, volunteers, activists or supporters working with us are key to success. We are creating an environment for them to thrive in delivering good results for people, the environment and their own experience. 2.Manage finances to optimally profit society We use diverse sources of funding to ensure our independence; we take good strategic investment decisions and we openly share income and expenditure with our partners, funders and the public to judge how well we are doing. 3.Allow for maximum of transparency Full transparency about the intent of an organization / movement, the way it is run and the effects it is having - is key for people to hold it accountable. Where this is not possible due to very restrictive circumstances we will still find a way to disclose this information to those who are directly affected by our work. 4.Ensure mission-driven leadership Our governance and management ensures that it is driven by the mission and vision it was set up to achieve and people’s voices are constantly taken into account when decisions are taken. 5.Place a premium on long term effectiveness We focus our strategies, activities and assessment of success on long term positive effects for society and the environment. (Commitments 6, 7, 10, 11 and 12)

How we work with people, target groups and stakeholders? 1.Build empowering people relationships Our work is guided by people’s ambition and needs. Working with us shall support their ability to take their own decisions and develop leadership. 2.Work as convenor, broker and catalyst to tackle complex challenges The challenges we face are complex, global and interdependent. We optimally coordinate with partners in alliances and coalitions and invest in the effectiveness of the ecosystem to collectively tackle the challenges at hand. 3.Advocate with people for systemic change We have a well-founded oversight of the issues and actors, support people who speak out for a more just and sustainable world and ensure swift course correction when harm is done. 4.Invite feedback, adapt and contribute to public knowledge We have strong systems in place that allow for constant check-in with people and experts to understand changes, flexibility in decision making to adapt and optimally capturing learnings to create public knowledge. (Commitments 3, 4, 5 and 9)

Planned activities for 2016  Refine and adopt BCSDN (internal) Code of Conduct  Organize country consultations of zero draft in 10 countries with member and other relevant organizations (networks) – second half of 2016  Present the draft Global Standard and discuss it with relevant local/country stakeholders (esp. CSOs and cross- sectoral network with Codes of their own)

We urge you to use the Standard’s logic of intervention when commenting our BCSDN Code of Conduct! DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF COMMENTS:

THANK YOU FOR THE ATTENTION! P LEASE SEND US YOUR COMMENTS TO THE Z ERO D RAFT, IF INTERESTED, TO I LINA N ESIK : BALKANCSD. NET