Action Research Special Education Department of Springfield Middle School 2007-08.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promoting Positive Student Behaviour Our commitment is to every student. This means ensuring that we develop strategies to help every student learn,
Advertisements

Assistance Team Procedures East Iredell Middle School Sept 15, 2010.
Accommodations Strategies, human supports or equipment that allows a student to understand the curriculum or demonstrate their learning Accommodations.
Benchmark assessment data generated from the Edusoft Assessment Management System is a powerful tool for informing classroom instruction, and ensuring.
Autism Support Team “Putting the Pieces All Together”
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.
EFFECTIVE SCHEDULING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Planning for Special Education Service Delivery in the Least Restrictive Environment.
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
ENGAGING OUR STUDENTS DAHNKEN, MCDONALD, SUMMERLIN.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports, 2008 December, 2008.
Developing a Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plan for the Virginia Grade Level Alternative (VGLA) Adapted from the Virginia Department of Education Division.
Theme: Teaching and Learning Goal: Provide quality curriculum and instruction that engages and meets the needs of all students in a diverse learning community.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
Grading Special Education Students Elementary, Middle School, and High School Ages “Research suggests that grading practices vary considerably among.
The Framework of Support For Students with Special Needs Keith Haring.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Strategies for Classroom Management: Organization and Planning CHAPTER 2.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
White Hill Middle School Special Education Program Education Specialist Model Plan for school year.
Florida Social Studies Sunshine State Standards Grade Level Expectations FLStandards.org.
Math teachers create multiple problems. 75% of students will be proficient on the summative assessments (end of the unit tests). Department Goal:
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Educational Benefit Review (EBR) Purpose Determine if the student’s IEP is reasonably calculated for the.
D 4 Understanding the Common Core State Standards & Assessment Katie McKnight, Ph.D.
20 Strategies for successful IEP meetings
WHS Implementation Guide for Special Education IEP’s
WELCOME! Kimberly Morse’s Classroom
Grading/Progress Reports to Parents
Special Education Program Study
Definition and Considerations
Magothy River Middle School
Professional Development Program Design
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
Educational Context 22 third grade students ages 8-9
Hartford Jt. 1 School District
Courtney Mills Principal, Midlands Middle College
2010 PSSA RESULTS.
ALGEBRA 2 – 1st and 5th Hour GEOMETRY – 2nd, 6th, and 7th HOUR
Prepared by: elt. supervisor ABDELRHMAN AHMAD
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
Standards-aligned IEPs
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams
Please, try: Your mobiles Participate Feel free.
Definition and Considerations
Title I Schoolwide Programs
Narrative and Response to Literature Genres
Issues.
Planning Professional Development
Spatial STEM - C Evaluation of a Model Spatial Thinking Curriculum for Building Computational Skills in Elementary Grades K-5 A collaboratvive project.
1:1 Aides 1/29/2016.
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
The Technology Integration Planning Model
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
Family Engagement Policy
Proficiency & Achievement
Grading Students with Disabilities
Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
RCS Middle School Science
Coherence: “The Quality of Being Logically Integrated”
Week 23: Language Arts 1/22-1/25
WHS Implementation Guide for Special Education IEP’s
Scope and Sequence in Math
Scope and Sequence in Math
Presentation transcript:

Action Research Special Education Department of Springfield Middle School

The Question? Will applying content- area support have a greater impact on student achievement than grade level support?

The Rationale: *More and more impetus to move special education students into a general education curriculum *Need to provide support to students as well as to general education teachers in the form of “team teaching” during class hours with high percentage of special education students.

Strategies: 1 st Marking Period  Survey students to get an understanding of their current comfort level.  Assess first marking period grades to determine a baseline prior to schedule changes  Collect MEAP data on students for future planning

Strategies: 2 nd Marking Period  Alter schedules of both students and teachers in order to:  Provide support to general education teachers in classes with high percentage of special ed teachers  Align student’s schedules to be sure that all students are being served with special education support in high need classes  Schedule teachers so as to have a learning lab available every hour of the school day.

Preliminary data  Data was collected following the end of the second marking period and compared with data from first marking period.  Additional data was collected from 3 rd marking period.

The Initial Data

Second Marking Period Grades 6 th Grade 67.5% of LD students maintained or raised grade during 2 nd MP 80% of the grades among LD students were a “C” or better. 7 th Grade 59% of LD students maintained or raised grade during 2 nd MP 91% of the grades among LD students were a “C” or better **Outliers removed from data

Third Marking Period Questions arise about the increase in number of missing assignments at all grade levels…

Where do we go from here?  Collect MEAP data next year for comparison purposes**  Conduct a follow-up attitude survey among special education students at the end of 3 rd marking period  Continue to collect data and “tweak” schedules as necessary.  Continue to stress need for general education teachers to recognize that special education students are everyone’s students.  Continue to educate general education teachers on modification strategies and IEP requirements. ** Other strategies are in the works for addressing MEAP struggles by special education students.

Variables that may impact…  Student boredom with “success school” process?  Increase in complexity of required work as year goes on?  Increase in number of assignments required in classes?  Other???

Other questions and considerations…  Is it “team teaching” or extra learning lab support that makes the most difference with student learning and success?  What combination of these will achieve the best results for students?  How do we best support the general education teachers in their quest to support special education students?  How do we make time available for special education teachers to assist general education teachers in development of appropriate strategies?  What additional considerations need to be given in order to support the special education student in taking MEAP and other like tests?

Planning for next year… Work and consideration as to how best support the students with IEP’s has already begun…