Technical External Management Requirements Technology Complexity Interfaces Reliability / Performance Quality Planning Controlling Funding / Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interfacing Risk and Systems Engineering – Left Shift Risk Management
Advertisements

Appendix F: Common risk categories for the public sector Insert client-specific photo here.
UNRESTRICTED Infrastructure Assessment as Viewed by Technology Holders IAEA Technical Meeting December 10-12, 2008 R. Godden.
Project What is a project A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product, service or result.
WHY USE A FLUID SEALING SPECIALIST? FOR SAFETY & RELIABILITY BECAUSE…….
1 Fundamental Principles of Solution Design and Implementation Chapter 3.
TEL382 Greene Chapter /27/09 2 Outline What is a Disaster? Disaster Strikes Without Warning Understanding Roles and Responsibilities Preparing For.
The Analyst as a Project Manager
© 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved.© 2014 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved. © 2012 McGladrey LLP. All Rights Reserved. © 2013 McGladrey LLP. All.
Procurement Strategic Planning Process Transformation Procurement Risks and Opportunities Procurement Process Capabilities & Interdependencies Key Strategic.
Syed M. Ahmed, Ph.D. Department of Construction Management Risk Management in Construction Syed M. Ahmed, Ph.D. Department of Construction Management Florida.
Supply Chain Management. It is a cross-functional approach to managing the movement of raw materials into an organization and the movement of finished.
From Research Prototype to Production
ICS321 – Management Information Systems Dr. Ken Cosh.
Introduction Time Quality Cost Project Constraints Success Introduction.
Risk Management in the Built Environment Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Management By Professor Simon Burtonshaw-Gunn – licensed under the Creative.
INNOWATER Introduction to Business Proposition Toolkit July 2013.
Industry SDLCs and Business Climate. Justin Kalicharan Credentials Director and Senior Technology Officer Over 14 years of coding experience in various.
Strategic Decentralization: Centralizing Logistics Paula Nersesian, RN, MPH.
When IT fails? During IT Dev Projects During IT Production Operations Project Sponsors or Senior Managers CANCEL IT development projects because: Budget.
Michael deLamare Requirements Management Program Functions R-9.
Session 3: Project Development Agenda The Voice of a Technologist Utility Project Development Reliability Concepts Residential Project Development Homework.
3 1 Project Success Factors u Project management important for success of system development project u 2000 Standish Group Study l Only 28% of system development.
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
DGS Recommendations to the Governor’s Task Force on Contracting & Procurement Review Report Overview August 12, 2002.
1 SWE 513: Software Engineering People II. 2 Future Experience What will you be doing one year from now? Ten years from now?
Project Risk Management. Risk-Defined A situation involving exposure to danger; “The combination of the probability of an event and its consequences”
Illuminating Britelite’s Internal Services for Success Strategy for Process Improvement.
Safety & Health Considerations in Accommodating Commercial Activties David Loyd, JSC Safety & Test Operations 2013 NASA Safety Directors & Occupational.
Role of Self-Assessment V.C. Agarwal, Director (HR) NPCIL,INDIA.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
INTRODUCTION Mehmet Sait Andaç Web: Office: 431.
Rapid Deployment Project Management Business Perspective
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Draft - Enterprise Risk Management Risk Universe
Chapter 11 Project Management.
Page Headline Project Management Cost & Schedule Review Rob Michnoff.
Introducing pdri for mega projects As a Planning quality Control tool
Jim Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS GRANTEES NEED ASSESSMENT
An Overview of Engineering Design
MAXIMISING VALUE FOR MONEY SUBJECT TO COST CONTAINMENT
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
WBS 1.03 Readout Systems Scope, Cost and Schedule
Information Systems: Concepts and Management
Purchasing supplies at CERN
Decision Support System Development
Costs and Economics of Construction
Project Management.
Identifying and Prioritizing Risks
Developing and Issuing the RFP
MRL 6 Artifacts (at End of TMRR) Page 1 of 6
Enron Energy Services Energy Management Outsourcing Overview
Fix it or Forget it? Dealing with Troubled Projects
Failure Rates. Failure Rates Failure Rates Building, Heavy/Highway, Specialty Trade Contractors % 29.3%
An Overview of Engineering Design
Fast Track Modifications Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna
Risk Management Practice (Case study: Sydney Opera House)
Enterprise Resource Planning, 1st Edition by Mary Sumner
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
Business Continuity Basics
About EverydayComply A Solution designed to:
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
Software Testing Lifecycle Practice
An Overview of Engineering Design
CEM 515 Done by: Abdulkarim Sulais
Delivering Successful Outcomes
TOTAL COST CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Presentation transcript:

Technical External Management Requirements Technology Complexity Interfaces Reliability / Performance Quality Planning Controlling Funding / Resources Estimating Communications Logistics Experience / Capability Collaborators Vendors Regulatory Facilities Risk Breakdown Structure Public Impact Market ES&H Environmental, safety or health issues. Requirements are poorly defined, incomplete, late or continually evolving. Requirements management process is inadequate. Excessive design changes, assembly or commissioning problems. Workers inadequately trained. Design errors or omissions at interfaces within project or with external systems, inadequate systems engineering, assumed tolerances do not work in practice, scope missing at interfaces. Technology is poorly understood, does not meet expectations, is not yet proven, or cannot be commissioned. Flaws or inconsistencies of design or manufacture. Pre-production (/production) quality is worse than prototype (/pre- production) quality. QA/QC process is inadequate or requires excessive time or resources.. Components perform worse after assembly or commissioning. Systems do not meet requirements due to unforeseen technical issues. As-built systems have commissioning issues. Scope, cost, and schedule incomplete or does not match needs. Assumptions are incorrect. Schedule logic is incomplete or wrong. Planning for stakeholder communications, HR, risk, or procurement is inadequate. Cost or activity duration estimates are inaccurate, unrealistic, or do not reflect design maturity. Modeling of risks and associated cost and schedule contingency is inadequate. Funding is inadequate or mismatched to time profile of needs. Required personnel are not available to the Project. Labor disputes. Off project non-personnel resources not available. Scope creep. Configuration is not well established and controlled. Excessive change control. Deficiencies in the system engineering. Stakeholders not all identified. Communications needs not well defined or poorly executed. Cultural issues. Inadequate tools or processes to support project tracking, reporting and reviews. Poor management of supply chains, within Project or external. Loss, damage or delays in transit. Customs and excise. Unforeseen storage needs. Unavailability of logistical resources (storage, transport, lowering equipment, etc.). Management, technical or other personnel lack required skills. Critical skills scarce on the market. Key technical capabilities are not available, within budget and schedule. Partners within the Project (e.g. Universities or Labs) fail to deliver. Problems with International partners (Agencies, Labs, Scientific Collaborations, Universities, Industry). Expected facilities are unavailable or inadequate (e.g. test beam, laboratories, IT resources). Facilities are damaged or otherwise compromised (e.g. IT security violation). Economic factors such as foreign currency exchange rates, escalation, or commodity prices (e.g. metals, energy, chemicals, construction materials and labor, etc.). Limited availability for specialist materials or items. Geopolitical shocks to specific markets. ES&H regulations. Construction permits and regulations. Financial compliance. IP. Import/export controls. Labor laws. IT security and personal data protection. Inadequate planning of procurements. Limited choice of vendors for specialist materials or services. Scope change after contract placed. Cost increases on cost-reimbursable contract. Vendor production problems, delivery schedule, quality and disputes. Vendor problems or failure. Inadequate consultation, communication and engagement with public stakeholders (local communities, general public, and local, state or national government). Failure to address concerns. Loss of reputation. Genuine or perceived risks to the community (e.g. environmental). Insufficient support for the science case.

Technical External Management Requirements Technology Complexity Interfaces Reliability / Performance Quality Planning Controlling Funding / Resources Estimating Communications Logistics Experience / Capability Collaborators Vendors Regulatory Facilities Project Public Impact Market ES&H