CBA/Common Assessment Analysis Protocol ILT November 3, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Theory of Action If teachers…. Curriculum: Teach targeted guided Math lessons based on reading data. Ensure student with disabilities are in the general.
Advertisements

Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
Learning targets Learning Goals, Learning Targets, Success Criteria,
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Quarter 1 November 4 th,  Welcome!!  Discuss/review current data  Clarify/agree on next steps.
Competency Area A: Communicating with Paraprofessionals.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
Parent Learning Morning November 6th 2007 October 2009.
Empowering a Learning Community Transforming Our Adult Education World NMUSD Adult School Professional Growth Plan Goals: Empower a professional.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
January 26, 2011 Careers Conference, Madison, Wisconsin Robin Nickel, Ph.D. Associate Director, Worldwide Instructional Design System.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
PLC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY November 17/December 15/January 19 Jeremy Koselak Secondary RtI Coordinator.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Organizational Learning Through Data Review ILT January 12, 2015.
How and Why of Pacing Guides Pacing Guides. PLC Question #1 Question-What do we want our students to learn? PLC Work: Standards-Based Pacing Guide What.
Andrea Miller & Naomi Hodgkins. * Lesson based around pre-assessment – LO’s and teacher’s questioning was specific to gaps and targeted ARE’s * Differentiated.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
EDU 673 Week 3 Assessment and Differentiation Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
Instructional Review and School improvement
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
The Role of Ofsted covering School Inspections in England
J. Sterling Morton High Schools
Step 0: Common Assessments
Digging into the Data Data Protocols in a PLC
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Leveraging the Work of Mathematics Leaders
NGSS-TCT-Writing in Science
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
The Year of Core Instruction
Benchmark Lesson #2 Creating Effective Collaborative Teams
PLC Book Gro.
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
NMUSD Adult School Professional Growth Plan Martha Rankin
Comprehensive Planning
Curriculum Structures
Instructional Meeting November 3, 2010 Instructional Framework
Purpose for Curriculum Mapping
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Lesson-Design Elements That Reflect the College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics and the Standards for Mathematical Practice  
Using the new Teacher-Based Team Protocol
Board Presentations Protocol:
ENG II Teacher Collaboration meeting
Instructional Learning Cycle:
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Assessment Data – May 2018 Year
SIR Observation Preparation and Report Examples
Supporting our students in ocsu
Sustaining Professional Development Initiatives
Old Saybrook Public Schools
TEKS RS Update Focal Documents Assessment Creator Science Assessment Update Science STAAR Analysis Publishing Date.
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Instructional Review and School improvement
Working with processes
Chicago Public Schools
Module 7. Designing Assessment Opportunities
Kentucky Leadership Academy
Data Literacy and Assessment
Module 8. Creating Meaningful Learning Experiences
Module 9. Establishing Mastery of Standards
Parent Interactions: September
Variability, Barriers, & Student Behavior
OTLA Report Writing Training
utilizing Stepping Stones
Betsy Conners and Dan Carroll DATAG Summer 2019
2010 NEASC Self-Study and Evaluation Visit
Presentation transcript:

CBA/Common Assessment Analysis Protocol ILT November 3, 2015

Protocols  What are they?  Agreed upon guidelines for a conversation  Vehicles for building skills and culture necessary to do collaborative work  Why use them?  Provide safe environment to ask challenging questions of one another  Make efficient and effective use of time resources  What are they not?  Task to perform, form to fill out

Levels of analysis  Level of focus  Campus, Course, Teacher  Student subgroup  Individual student  Item  Level of performance results  Student expectation  Item performance and response distribution  Connections and alignment  Assessment  Curriculum  Instructional delivery

Use of this protocol  Users  PLCs  Individual teachers  Other campus teams  Applications  CBAs  Campus common (unit) assessments  Resources needed  Aware reports  Forethought lesson plans and curriculum documents  Other student-level information

Aware reports needed 1, 2, , 7, 8

Strengths 6.9C 7.5A 7.6A 85% 89% 84% What did we do that worked well?How can we continue to improve?

Opportunities for improvement What did we do that didn’t work as well as we hoped? How can we improve this for next time? What can we do now to ensure students master SEs?

Variation between teachers Why is there variation between teachers? How can we improve consistency in the future?

Subgroup performance What can we do now to close learning gaps and keep students from slipping farther behind? Hispanic7.12E

Individual students Why are we concerned? Who are we concerned about? What will we do to intervene?

Item responses What must students know and do? What are stumbling blocks and misconceptions?

Distractors and guessing Distractor

Distractors and guessing Guessing?

Relate items to instruction What must students know and do that may not have been addressed during instruction? How will we make sure to address these issues in the future?

Expectations  PLCs use protocols to guide data discussions  PLCs / teachers use analysis of CBA results and assessment items to:  Inform and align instruction  Calibrate teacher-made or campus common assessments  Target and intervene with low performing groups or individual students

Support  Guidance documents/video  Campus visits by C&I staff upon request