Candidate Learning Outcomes. REPORTING AGENCIES STATE BOARD FOR EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION (SBEC) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCTION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transforming Teacher Education through Clinical Practice: A National Strategy to Prepare Effective Teachers - Dr. Dwight C. Watson - University of Northern.
Advertisements

Secondary Certification Program (8-12) Angelo State University Amy M. Williamson, Ed.D. Program Advisor.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
PREPARING FOR NCATE May 19, 2008 Teacher Education Retreat.
Presented by: Sandra Jo Nix April 17, 2010 Division of Educator Standards.
Office of Professional Preparation and Licensure (OPPL) Annual Report.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
DONNA SHEA, PROGRAM COORDINATOR/ADVISER BACHELOR OF ARTS CAREER AND TECHNICAL STUIDES.
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION September 22, Do you know who your education advisor is? Do you visit MAP Works regularly?
Teacher Certification & University Program Accreditation Lynn Steffen Illinois State University
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Introduction to NCATE and PSC Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
Writing Your Program’s SPA Report(s) Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment Chris Geanious, Project Director, College of.
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
Presentation II A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-
East Carolina University’s Conceptual Framework for Preparing Education Professionals.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
College of Education & Human Development Fall 2010 Be sure you have signed in and picked up handouts Welcome ULM Student Teachers.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Preparing Your ELCC Assessments for NCATE Accreditation Missouri Professors of Educational Administration Conference October 10, 2008.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
STANDARDS FOR THE PREPARATION OF TEACHING LEARNING PROJECT 1 SARA HINE.
Update on Program Review Margie Crutchfield AACTE February, 2009.
Deciphering SPA Requirements Kathy Hildebrand, Ph.D., Assistant Dean of Assessment & Continuous Improvement, College of Education Cynthia Conn, Ph.D.,
Physics Gravitation Science and Mathematics Education Research Group Supported by UBC Teaching and Learning Enhancement Fund Department of Curriculum.
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review Antoinette Mitchell Vice President, Unit Accreditation.
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT  EDU 310 Week 1 Individual Assignment Main Factors of Lesson plans EDU 310 Week 1 DQ 1 EDU 310 Week 1 DQ.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Performance-Based Accreditation
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Why We Are Here: The Purpose of the Clinical Faculty Academy and the Importance of Curricular Design in Nursing Education.
Eastern’s Assessment System
Town Hall Meeting November 4, 2013
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Angelo State University College of Education August 17, 2011
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
COE Assessment The “Then” and “Now”.
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review
Failed to Meet Standard 6
Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE April 2008
EDCI Retreat; Aug TJ Oakes Phillip VanFossen
BACHELOR OF ARTS CAREER AND TECHNICAL STUIDES
REPORT CARD ON EDUCATOR PREPARATION
NJCU College of Education
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION February 9, 2017
Nicole Tarr AAAT Meeting, September 2017
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Nice Job!! Programs that place teachers in classroom with little formal teacher preparation prior to taking on a job. Teachers instead learn to teach.
College of Education Meeting Fall 2014
Department of Education.
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Advisory Committees for Educator Preparation Programs
Presentation transcript:

Candidate Learning Outcomes

REPORTING AGENCIES STATE BOARD FOR EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION (SBEC) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCTION (NCATE) SOUTHERN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS (SACS) TITLE II (FEDERAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR UNIVERSITY BASED TEACHER PREPARATION) AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

SBEC TEXAS STANDARDS FOR EDUCATOR PREPARATION TEXAS FRAMEWORK FOR TExES EXAMINATIONS SHOULD HAVE MATRIX FOR EACH PROGRAM SHOWING CROSS WALK BETWEEN PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND STANDARDS TAC: TITLE 19: EDUCATION: RULES: 227.5, , 228.2, 228.3, , , , 229 ALL NEW RULES IN EFFECT FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION – IN TEA/SBEC UPDATE

NCATE SPA STANDARDS EIGHT DATA POINTS PROGRAM ACCOUNTABILITY AND PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT CANDIDATE LEARNING OUTCOMES UNITE STANDARDS CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK SIX STANDARDS FOR ACCREDITATION MUST ADDRESS AFIs in May 2012 report.

SACS UNIVERSITY STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES SEPARATE LEARNING OUTCOMES UNDERGRADUATE LEARNING OUTCOMES GRADUATE LEARNING OUTCOMES FULFILLED THROUGH FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN COURSE LEARNING ACTIVITIES.

US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TITLE II ANNUAL REQUIRED FEDERAL REPORT CAN BE VIEWED AT TITLE II WEB SITE.

AACTE PEDS REPORT MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES FOR TEACHER EDUCATION ANNUAL DATA COLLEGE FROM MEMBER SCHOOLS AN ELEMENT OF ANNUAL REPORTING FOR NCATE DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ABOUT UNIVERSITY, COLLEGE, FACULTY, AND CANDIDATES

CONCEPTUALLY UNIVERSITY STUDENT LEARNING GOALS + NCATE CANDIDATE LEARNING OUTCOMES + SBEC CANDIDATE LEARNING OUTCOMES + EQUAL = UNIT CANDIDATE LEARNING OUTCOMES

1. CANDIDATES WILL DEMONSTRATE THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY BY [PASS THE APPROPRIATE TEXAS EXAMINATION OF EDUCATION STANDARDS (TExES). 2. CANDIDATES WILL DEMONSTRATE THEIR SUBJECT AREA COMPETENCY AS MEASURED BY FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT BY PROGRAM.

UNIT CANDIDATE LEARNING OUTCOMES 3. CANDIDATES WILL DEMONSTRATE THEIR ABILITY TO ORGANIZE AND PLAN FOR INSTRUCTION AS MEASURED BY FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT BY PROGRAM. 4. CANDIDATES WILL DEMONSTRATE THEIR ABILITY TO TEACH STUDENTS IN AN ACCREDITED K-12 CLASSROOM AS MEASURED BY FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE STUDENT TEACHING ASSESSMENT.

UNIT CANDIDATE LEARNING OUTCOMES 5. CANDIDATES WILL DEMONSTRATE THEIR EFFECT ON STUDENT LEARNING IN AN ACCREDITED K-12 CLASSROOM AS MEASURED BY THEIR STUDENT TEACHING PERFORMANCE. 6. PROGRAM SPECIFIC 7. PROGRAM SPECIFIC 8. PROGRAM SPECIFIC

DATA COLLECTION UNIT DATA BASE MAINTAINED BY THE EDUCATOR PREPARATION INFORMATION (EPI) CENTER TASKSTREAM – LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

DATA USE ANNUAL ANALYSIS OF DATA BY PROGRAM IDENTIFY WHAT IS WORKING AND WHAT NEEDS IMPROVING FORMAL REPORT OF PRECEEDING ACADEMIC YEAR DUE DECEMBER EACH YEAR