MTEF BASELINE ALLOCATIONS 2004/ /2007 Year /2004 R’000 Year /2005 R’000 Year /2006 R’000 Year /2007 R’000 Baseline Allocation % Increase10%7%6%
Baseline Allocations per revised programme structure MTEF: 2004/2005 – 2006/ /05 R’ /06 R’ /07 R’ Administration Corrections Security Facilities Apops Capital Works Facility Management 5. After Care Development Care Internal Charges( )( )( ) Total
GEARING FOR REHABILITATION NEW PRISONS – PERSONNEL & OPERATIONAL COSTS PROJECTED PRISONER POPULATION PAROLE BOARDS OPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING
SUMMARY OF OPTIONS 2004/05 R’000 Treasury Recom- mend 2005/06 R’000 Treasury Recom- mend 2006/07 R’000 Treasury Recom- mend Gearing for Rehabilitation Nil Nil Nil New Prisons -Nil Nil Nil Parole Boards Offender Population Total
2003/04 R’ /05 R’ /06 R’ /07 R’000 Number of Current Financed Posts Additional Financed Posts (New prisons) New Additional Posts Total Personnel Total Need- R R R Total Backlog: posts Current Actual Establishment: posts GEARING FOR REHABILITATION
PAROLE BOARDS 2004/052005/062006/07 Total NeedR 30 millionR 32 millionR 34 million Implementation within the ambit of current approved 52 boards which will consist of 52 Chairpersons (DD level) and 104 members from the community. PAROLE BOARDS
Prisoner Population 2004/052005/062006/07 Projected Financed Non Financed Financial Implication R 50 mR 82 mR 91m Probationer/ Parolee Population 2004/052005/062006/07 Projected Financed Non Financed Financial Implication R 2.9 mR 3.6 mR 2.8 m The cost of the option was based on: the direct and indirect incarceration costs, rehabilitation costs and the variance between the financed offender population vs the projected offender population. PROJECTED PRISONER POPULATION 2004/052005/062006/07 Total Offender Population: Non Financed R 52.9 millionR 85.6 millionR 93.8 million
2004/052005/062006/07 Operational Costs-53,97856,677 Start Up Costs Personnel costs Overtime Total NEW PRISONS – PERSONNEL & OPERATIONAL COSTS 4 new Type-3000 prisons. Date of occupation by the Department is 01/10/2005
VOTE 21: ADJUSTED ESTIMATE