Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low Emittance Tuning (LET). Through Dispersion Free Steering.
Advertisements

Transparent Re-alignment of the Diamond Storage Ring M. Apollonio – Diamond Light Source Ltd ESLS – XXII Workshop, ESRF Grenoble, November 25 th /11/2014M.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
Ultra Low Vertical Emittance at the Australian Light Source Mark Boland on behalf of Rohan Dowd 1.
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
January 15, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity December/January vs September/October -Machine studies and instrumentation -Simulation.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Alignment and Beam Stability
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
June 14th 2005 Accelerator Division Overview of ALBA D. Einfeld Vacuum Workshop Barcelona, 12 th -13 th September 2005 General 10 th September 2005.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Vacuum Issues from the Beam Dynamics Point of View Marc Muñoz.
ILC BDS Static Beam-Based Alignment and Tuning Glen White SLAC 1.Aims. 2.Error parameters and other assumptions. 3.Overview of alignment and tuning procedure.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Methods for reaching ultra-low vertical emittance: the SLS experience Masamitsu Aiba, Michael Böge, Natalia Milas, Andreas Streun, PSI 1. Vertical emittance.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Frequency Map Analysis Workshop 4/2/2004 Peter Kuske Refinements of the non-linear lattice model for the BESSY storage ring P. Kuske Linear Lattice My.
Study and Optimization of Dynamic Aperture for the SuperKEKB LER E.Levichev and P.Piminov, BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
An ultra-low emittance lattices for Iranian Light Source Facility storage ring Esmaeil Ahmadi On behalf of beam dynamics group Iranian Light Source Facility.
Emittance Tuning Simulations in the ILC Damping Rings James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
PEP-X Ultra Low Emittance Storage Ring Design at SLAC Lattice Design and Optimization Min-Huey Wang SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions.
Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Machine Operation and Studies at SSRF Wenzhi ZHANG Dec. 16, 2013 Spain.
11/18/2004 FNAL Advanced Optics Measurements at Tevatron Vadim Sajaev ANL V. Lebedev, V. Nagaslaev, A. Valishev FNAL.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Diamond-II upgrade toward ultra-low emittance T. Pulampong University of Oxford Octoberfest October 2014 Royal Holloway, London.
Low emittance experience at Diamond R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd John Adams Institute, University of Oxford XI SuperB Workshop Frascati, 2 nd.
Damping rings, Linear Collider School Low vertical emittance tuning Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU Accelerator and Beam Physics group Beams Department CERN.
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.
Vertical emittance measurement and modeling Correction methods
Vertical Emittance at the Quantum Limit
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Low Emittance Tuning Tests at the Diamond Light Source (Rutherford Labs) Dec R. Bartolini, S. Liuzzo, P. Raimondi SuperB XV Meeting Caltech, CA,
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Linear and Nonlinear Lattice Correction Via Betatron Phase
ATF2 IP Tuning Task Simulation Updates
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Low Emittance Tuning in CESR TA
The new 7BA design of BAPS
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Low Emittance Tuning David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for
Status of Low Emittance Tuning at CESR TA
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Optics Measurements in the PSB
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron

Overview Lattice and diagnostics overview Alignment and orbit correction Linear Optics from Closed Orbits (LOCO) Vertical Emittance Minimisation Measurements Conclusions

Lattice overview Storage Ring Parameters Energy3 GeV Circumference216 m RF Frequency MHz Peak RF Voltage3.0 MV Current200 mA Betatron Tune (h/v)13.3/5.2 Momentum Compaction0.002 ε x (nominal) 10.4 nm∙rad Double bend achromat 14 Unit cells Combined function dipoles Corrector and skew quad coils on sextupoles. Horizontal emittance varied with dispersion.

Beam Diagnostics 2 diagnostic beamlines: X-ray and optical X-ray pinhole used for emittance measurements, but has inherent resolution limit at ~ 10 pm veritcal emittance Interferometer developed on Optical Beamline but small front- end vertical aperture has hindered measurements. Optical Diagnostic Beamline X-ray Diagnostic Beamline

Alignment Alignment error: 26 μm Quadrupoles, 18 μm Dipoles Intrinsic Fiducial and assembly error: 16 μm (Quad) 6 μm (Dipole) Full ring realignment conducted every year. Current ‘natural’ emittance coupling = 0.059%

BPM resolution and Beam Based Alignment Libera BPM electronics BPM resolution ~0.1 um (rms) Resolution of BBA is ~10 um. BPM mechanical alignment resolution <20 um

Orbit correction RMS orbit deviation typically: <20 μm Horizontal, <10 Vertical

LOCO LOCO – Linear Optics from Closed Orbits. Adjusts the linear optics in the model to fit the real machine data Model response matrix – Machine response matrix = Error Minimise error by adjusting the model ‘fit parameters’ Fit Parameters normally include:  BPM/Corrector gains and coupling  Corrector gains and coupling  Quadrupole strengths  Skew Quadrupole strengths

LOCO - Inputs

LOCO - Outputs BPM Gains BPM couplings Skew components Quad Strengths Corrector gains/tilts Full Calibrated model

Realitiy Check – girder rolls Fitted skew components show a consistent spike in Sector 1, girder 3. Alignment metrology data does not show a significant roll Manual measurements using a spirit level confirm the girder does has a large roll

Emittance Coupling minimisation Emittance coupling calculated from LOCO Calibrated model (using beam envelope calculation from particle tracking). Minimisation algorithm used to adjust skew quads to desired emittance coupling. Emittance coupling can be adjusted to arbitrary amounts Set CouplingLOCO Measured Coupling Calculated ε y (pm) 0.0%0.009% %0.12% %0.23% %0.33% %0.43% %0.54% %0.64% %0.74% %0.84% %0.92% %1.04%106.1

Reality Check – Dispersion Minimisation Same method used to minimise vertical dispersion only Clear reduction found in dispersion, but linear coupling increases. ε y/ ε x ~ 0.9% Vertical dispersion reduced from 3.4mm to 0.9mm (rms)

Tousheck Lifetime Tousheck lifetime depends on bunch volume and hence ε y Lifetime measured in 8 mA single bunch – Tousheck dominated Should show dependence on coupling 1/2 LOCO Measured Coupling Measured lifetime (h) 0.009%1.49 ± %3.15 ± %4.13 ± %5.58 ± %6.35 ± %6.76 ± %7.29 ± %8.14 ± %8.55 ± %9.01 ± %9.16 ± 0.50

Tousheck Lifetime vs RF By taking single bunch lifetime over extended period the Tousheck component of the lifetime can be extracted.

Tousheck Lifetime vs RF Tousheck component will also change with RF voltage. Measurements taken at 3 settings – Minimum, natural and 0.1% emittance coupling. 2.1% energy acceptance (measured) Curve fit by varying ε y /ε x, other values fixed. Blue curve fit corresponds to ε y = 1.24 pm

Tune Crossing Separation of Horizontal and Vertical tunes when brought to difference resonance will indicate the level of linear coupling. Table shows tunes at minimal sparation for different coupling settings and the corresponding coupling SettingVxVyCoupling Min (0.01%) <0.0045% Natural (0.06%) % 0.1% % 0.2% % 0.3% % 0.4% % 1.0% %

Conclusions Naturally low coupling achieved by good mechanical and beam based alignment. LOCO is an effective tool for lattice measurements and manipulations Large number of skew quads allows for good control of coupling Tousheck Lifetime Analysis indicate ε y ~ 1-2 pm Direct measurements (interferometer) would be nice.

Australian Synchrotron Master Pres Template AS-PM-0110 Rev0

Additional Slides

Beam tilt analysis. Comparison of model predictions (black) vs measurements (blue) of beam tilt angle at X-ray diagnostic beamline

Optical interferometer