APPR Next Steps NYSUT WNYRO Winter Leadership Conference 2 March 2013 Elizabeth Vignaux SLOs 60 pts TIPs Appeals Best Practices to Survive APPR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
... and what it means for teachers of non-tested subjects Johanna J. Siebert, Ph.D. NAfME Symposium on Assessment June 24-25, 2012.
Advertisements

1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
District General Supervision: The Balancing Act Spring Leadership Meeting March 20, 2012.
1 University of the State of New York State Education Department Differentiated Accountability School Quality Review (SQR)
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Physical Education SLOs: A Clarification of the State Education Department’s 8 Component SLO Template: Grades K-5 Presented By: Laura Shaw – Dows Lane.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR). What are the components of APPR? Teacher Evaluation –60 points (observation*/goal setting) –20 points (State.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Evaluation for Eligibility l 8/26/05 3 Evaluation2 Objectives  To ensure that school staff are aware of evaluation /reevaluation procedures under IDEA.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Writing and Submitting Student Learning Objectives
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Staff Development
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Student Growth Measures
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

APPR Next Steps NYSUT WNYRO Winter Leadership Conference 2 March 2013 Elizabeth Vignaux SLOs 60 pts TIPs Appeals Best Practices to Survive APPR

What we need to do O Make sure teachers understand the process O Make sure teachers are an integral part of the process O Make sure there is ongoing evaluation of the APPR process

O Make sure that teachers are maintaining contemporaneous records of their APPR experience O Make sure that teachers and the union play a role in the ongoing review of the APPR O Make ourselves indispensible to the success of the APPR process

APPR Framework O There is a committee to review the plan and any related district policies/procedures O There is a mechanism to identify and/or create assessments O The district has identified teachers covered by APPR O There is a process to notify teachers of their APPR obligations O Procedures are in place to address unique/unexpected issues as they arise

APPR: Environment O Teachers are viewed as the experts in their content area O All participants are free to share ideas, express concerns, make recommendations and provide feedback O APPR is an evolving process O There is a process in place to identify where the APPR works well and where there can/should be improvement O Teachers have the time to analyze data and solve problems O Professional development is available for everyone involved in APPR

APPR: Preparation O There is an ongoing training program for all affected teachers O The parties continually evaluate and revise (as necessary) the training program

APPR: Data O Student rosters are provided and confirmed in a timely manner O Data necessary for SLO development is available to the teachers O Data is shared between staff members with common student populations

APPR: Assessments O Assessments do not drive the SLO O Teachers are allowed/encouraged to use assessments that measure what they teach O Teachers can determine whether to administer a pre-assessment or use prior year data O There is a system in place to support the development of locally-created assessments O Selection of the type of assessment used is appropriate (paper vs. performance) and teacher-driven O Pre and post assessments are strongly aligned O Assessments do not unduly interfere with instruction (for both teachers and students)

APPR: Targets O Process is understood by teachers O Targets are population-specific O Targets are set by teachers O Teachers understand what they have to do to reach each HEDI category O Targets are based on available data

APPR: SLO Development O The process is transparent O Dates and expectations are clear O Procedures for review are known O There is a process for resolving disputes O Circumstances for changing learning content are identified O District policies governing population issues are clear to teachers O Approvals are timely O Teachers are well-informed of the status of their SLOs

APPR: SLOs as Evidence O Reflection on SLO creation and implementation is part of the teacher’s “60 points” O SLO documentation is used as evidence of teacher practice (artifact collection) O Teachers discuss SLOs on a professional basis (faculty meetings, team/department meetings etc.)

APPR: Observations O Dates are clear O Teachers know what to expect during an observation O Teachers are prepared for pre- observation meetings O Teachers know their rights in an unannounced observation O Teachers know who will be conducting observations O Teachers are provided with appropriate feedback O There is a process to resolve disputes

APPR: Other Evidence O Teachers know how to gather appropriate evidence for an artifact collection O Teachers know how to write a goal O Teachers know how to document self-reflection O Teachers can effectively discuss how their work aligns to the teaching standards O Teachers are prepared for their meeting(s) with evaluators

APPR: Math O HEDI points are calculated correctly O Rubric scores are correctly converted to the 60 point scale O Everything “adds up” O Teachers understand how the scores were established

APPR: TIPS O Teachers are comfortable having the union be part of the TIP development O Evaluators are clear about the reasons for the TIP O The professional development required in the TIP is appropriate O Professional development is differentiated O Teachers are encouraged to actively participate in the creation of the TIP O TIPs include a process for review and alteration

APPR: Appeals O Teachers are aware of their right to file an appeal O The “decider” on appeals is perceived to be objective O Members feel confident that the appeal process is fair