Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check percent proficient.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elementary Principals Meeting Data Presentation August 6, 2010.
Advertisements

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Hamilton County Department of Education NCLB Results 2009.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Adrian School of Performing Arts AYP Report. Trends Overall, the rate of students not meeting required criteria has increased over the past three years;
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD. Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data The New York State Education Department November 12, 2014.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Annual Student Performance Report September
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Goal 1: To successfully educate all students Objective 3 Identify subgroups and content areas which contributed Identify subgroups and content areas which.
State of the School Hapeville Charter Middle School Presented by Ms. Marcia Lowe, principal Ms. Stacy Henry, institutional researcher Ms. Sabrina Barnes,
NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). About AYP  Initiated by NCLB  Student performance and participation rates on ISTEP+ in English/language arts and mathematics.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
Barrow County Schools AYP Results AYP Results out of 13 schools met AYP System did not meet AYP out of 13.
JDES TEST DATA SCHOOL WIDE DATA – ALL SUBJECTS 2013 Reading92% ELA89% Mathematics84% Science75% Social Studies75%
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
AYP consequences are based on the July AYP Report.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
State of the School Hapeville Charter Middle School
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005
PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
How Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Is Determined Using Data
2nd QUARTER DATA REVIEW Pacoima Charter February 2012.
4th QUARTER DATA REVIEW Pacoima Charter June 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check percent proficient on each assessment for all groups. Check percent proficient on each assessment for all groups. Check for progress on additional indicator. Check for progress on additional indicator. elementary school: attendance middle school: attendance high school: graduation rate

Barrow County Elementary Results  Met AYP benchmarks in 176 of 177 areas.  Statham Elementary: 70.5% (or 39.5 out of 56 students) of the Students with Disabilities subgroup met or exceeded standards on the Reading/English Language Arts CRCT and the benchmark is 80%.

SchoolAreaSubgroupComments Prognosis for 2 nd Round AYP SESR/ELA Students With Disabilities (SWD) SES needs only 2 SWD to pass retest to reach Confidence Interval. Results suggest 2 SWD passed Reading on Summer Retest Highly Likely to Meet AMO

Analysis of Barrow County Elementary School AYP Results 95 % Participation Math Reading/ELA Attendance AES BES BRES CLES HES KES SES YES Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Distinguished Elementary Schools  Auburn Elementary School (9 consecutive years meeting AYP)  Bramlett Elementary School (3 consecutive years meeting AYP)  County Line Elementary School (3 consecutive years meeting AYP)  Kennedy Elementary School (9 consecutive years meeting AYP)  Holsenbeck Elementary School (9 consecutive years meeting AYP)  Yargo Elementary School (3 consecutive years meeting AYP)

 Met AYP benchmarks in 78 of 80 areas.  Russell Middle: 55.3% (or 52 out of 94 students) of the Students with Disabilities subgroup met or exceeded standards on the Math CRCT and the benchmark is 75.7%.  Winder-Barrow Middle: 63.1% (or 77 out of 122 students) of the Black subgroup met or exceeded standards on the Math CRCT and the benchmark is 75.7%.

SchoolAreaSubgroupComments Prognosis for 2 nd Round AYP RMSMATH Students With Disabilities (SWD) RMS needs 2 SWD to pass retest to reach Safe Harbor. Results suggest 4 SWD passed Math retest. Highly Likely to Meet AMO

SchoolAreaSubgroupComments Prognosis for 2 nd Round AYP WBMSMATHBLACK WBMS needs 7 Black students to pass retest to reach Safe Harbor. Results suggest 2 passed in Math. Highly Unlikely to Meet AMO

95 % Participation Math Reading/ELA 2 nd Indicator RMS WMS WBMS HMMS Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

 Haymon-Morris Middle School (4 consecutive years meeting AYP)  Westside Middle School (8 consecutive years meeting AYP)

 Met AYP benchmarks in 34 of 40 areas.  Winder-Barrow High School: 64% (or 32 out of 40 students) of the Black subgroup met or exceeded standards in Mathematics and the benchmark is 76%.  Winder-Barrow High School: 79.5% (or 35 out of 44 students) of the Hispanic subgroup met or exceeded standards in English/Language Arts and the benchmark is 90.8%

 Winder-Barrow High School: 75.4% graduation rate for the All subgroup and the benchmark is 85%.  Winder-Barrow High School: 55.7% graduation rate for the Black subgroup and the benchmark is 85%.  Winder-Barrow High School: 74.1% graduation rate for the Economically Disadvantaged subgroup and the benchmark is 85%.  Apalachee High School: 75.4% graduation rate for the All subgroup and the benchmark is 85%.

SchoolAreaSubgroupComments Prognosis for 2 nd Round AYP AHS GRADUATION RATE ALL AHS needs 37 students to transition from non-completer to graduate over the summer term to meet either AMO or Safe Harbor. Highly Unlikely to Meet Target

SchoolAreaSubgroupComments Prognosis for 2 nd Round AYP WBHSMATHBLACK WBHS needs 2 Black students to pass summer Math GHSGT retest. Results have not yet returned. Possible to Meet AMO WBHSELAHISPANIC WBHS needs 2 Hispanic students to pass summer ELA GHSGT retest. Results have not yet returned. Possible to Meet AMO

SchoolAreaSubgroupComments Prognosis for 2 nd Round AYP WBHS GRADUATION RATE ALL WBHS needs 14 non- completers to transition to graduates over the summer term to meet Safe Harbor. Somewhat Unlikely to Meet AMO

WBHS AHS 95 % Participation Math ELA Graduation Rate Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No

ALL academic goals met at the system level ELLs improved from 74.9% to 81.3% on the Math CRCT SWDs improved from 54% to 68.8% on the Math CRCT

All students improved from 82.3% to 85.8% on the Math CRCT All students met AYP attendance goals

System 95 % Participation Math ELA Second Indicator Yes Yes Yes No

75.4% graduation rate for all students. Benchmark is 85% 61.4% graduation rate for black students. Benchmark is 85% 76.2% graduation rate for economically disadvantaged students. Benchmark is 85%

Our system will not be on the Needs Improvement List (in the same subject for 2 consecutive years at both elementary/middle and high school levels)

Questions and Answers