MAE430 Reliability Engineering in ME Term Project I Jae Hyung Cho 20101103 Andreas Beckmann 20156476.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
+ Failure rates. + outline Failure rates as continuous distributions Weibull distribution – an example of an exponential distribution with the failure.
Advertisements

BA 275 Quantitative Business Methods
/k 2DS00 Statistics 1 for Chemical Engineering lecture 4.
Reliability Project 1 Team 9 Philippe Delelis Florian Brouet SungHyeok Lee.
Probability distribution functions Normal distribution Lognormal distribution Mean, median and mode Tails Extreme value distributions.
1 Choice of Distribution 1.Theoretical Basis e.g. CLT, Extreme value 2.Simplify calculations e.g. Normal or Log Normal 3.Based on data: - Histogram - Probability.
1 Engineering Computation Part 6. 2 Probability density function.
Lecture 19: Tues., Nov. 11th R-squared (8.6.1) Review
Continuous Random Variables Chap. 12. COMP 5340/6340 Continuous Random Variables2 Preamble Continuous probability distribution are not related to specific.
Application of reliability prediction model adapted for the analysis of the ERP system Frane Urem, Krešimir Fertalj, Željko Mikulić College of Šibenik,
Means Tests Hypothesis Testing Assumptions Testing (Normality)
Probability distribution functions
1 Statistical Analysis - Graphical Techniques Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow Leadership in Engineering EMIS 7370/5370 STAT 5340 : PROBABILITY AND.
Chapter 7: Statistical Analysis Spreadsheet-Based Decision Support Systems Prof. Name Position (123) University Name.
On Model Validation Techniques Alex Karagrigoriou University of Cyprus "Quality - Theory and Practice”, ORT Braude College of Engineering, Karmiel, May.
Further distributions
SPC for Real-World Processes William A. Levinson, P.E. Intersil Corporation Mountaintop, PA.
Integrated circuit failure times in hours during stress test David Swanick DSES-6070 HV5 Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Summer 2008 Professor.
CE 3354 ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY Lecture 7: Flood Frequency (Bulletin 17B)
CS433: Modeling and Simulation Dr. Anis Koubâa Al-Imam Mohammad bin Saud University 15 October 2010 Lecture 05: Statistical Analysis Tools.
More Continuous Distributions
Exam 1 Review. Data referenced throughout review The Federal Trade Commission annually rates varieties of domestic cigarettes according to their tar,
Probabilistic Forecasting. pdfs and Histograms Probability density functions (pdfs) are unobservable. They can only be estimated. They tell us the density,
POOLED DATA DISTRIBUTIONS GRAPHICAL AND STATISTICAL TOOLS FOR EXAMINING COMPARISON REFERENCE VALUES Alan Steele, Ken Hill, and Rob Douglas National Research.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy George Dodson Spallation Neutron Source Practical Applications of Reliability Theory.
Normal Distribution. Normal Distribution: Symmetric: Mean = Median = Mode.
Chapter 12 Continuous Random Variables and their Probability Distributions.
We would like for you to take a seat and answer a few questions before your minute to win it challenge! We asked how frequently you traveled and what.
Solutions A. Graph B. Women (5-number summary) 101, 126, 138.5, 154, 200. Men: 70, 98, 114.5, 143, 187. C. Women generally score higher than men.
Stracener_EMIS 7305/5305_Spr08_ Reliability Data Analysis and Model Selection Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow Leadership in Engineering.
MAE430 Reliability Engineering in ME Term Project II Jae Hyung Cho Andreas Beckmann
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response Systems Introductory Statistics: Exploring the World through.
Reliability Engineering in Mechanical Engineering Project II Group #1: 천문일, 최호열.
Introduction to Reliability in Mechanical Engineering Project 2 Group 5 Tsung Heng Tsai 03/12/
Introduction to Reliability in Mechanical Engineering Project 1 송민호 Morkache Zinelabidine.
CE 3354 ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY Lecture 7: Flood Frequency (Bulletin 17B)
Research Methodology Lecture No :26 (Hypothesis Testing – Relationship)
Environmental Modeling Basic Testing Methods - Statistics II.
1 Statistical Analysis - Graphical Techniques Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow Leadership in Engineering EMIS 7370/5370 STAT 5340 : PROBABILITY AND.
Term Project 2 Reliability estimations by S-S model Team 2 _ 양지훈 오혜정.
Notes Over 3.1 Solving a System Graphically Graph the linear system and estimate the solution. Then check the solution algebraically.
Introduction to Reliability in Mechanical Engineering Project 2 Group 5 Tsung Heng Tsai 03/12/
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 3 조 구태균 김원식 PROJECT 1.
GIS and Spatial Analysis1 Summary  Parametric Test  Interval/ratio data  Based on normal distribution  Difference in Variances  Differences are just.
EMIS 7300 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS METHODS FALL 2005
Box and Whiskers with Outliers
Introduction to Probability - III John Rundle Econophysics PHYS 250
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Practical Applications of Reliability Theory
Section 11.2 Day 3.
BAE 6520 Applied Environmental Statistics
Chapter 4 Continuous Random Variables and Probability Distributions
BAE 5333 Applied Water Resources Statistics
Review of Descriptive Statistics
Statistical Hydrology and Flood Frequency
Statistical significance & the Normal Curve
Organizing and Displaying Data
Linear Regression.
Transforming to Linearity
Assessing Normality.
Local Linearity.
Local Linearity.
STATISTICS Topic 1 IB Biology Miss Werba.
Continuous Statistical Distributions: A Practical Guide for Detection, Description and Sense Making Unit 3.
Local Linearity.
Indicator Variables Response: Highway MPG
The lognormal distribution
A tool to measure complexity in public health interventions: Its statistical properties and meta-regression approach to adjust it in meta-analysis  N.
Measures of location: The Mode and Modal Class
Presentation transcript:

MAE430 Reliability Engineering in ME Term Project I Jae Hyung Cho Andreas Beckmann

Contents Jae Hyung’s Data Set (n = 63) Andreas’s Data Set (n = 59) Combined Data Set (n = 122) Summary 2

Contents Jae Hyung’s Data Set (n = 63) Andreas’s Data Set (n = 59) Combined Data Set (n = 122) Summary 3

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Linearity Check: Symmetric Simple Cumulative Distribution 4

Linearity Check: Mean Rank 5 Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Linearity Check: Median Rank 6

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Linearity Check: The Other Method 7

Linearity Check Results 8 S.S.C.D.MeanMedianOther NormalOOOO LognormalXXXX WeibullOOOO BiexponentialXXXX S.S.C.D.MeanMedianOther Normal Lognormal Weibull Biexponential Graph Linearity Adjusted R-squared of Linear Fit

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential K-S Test: Symmetric Simple Cumulative Distribution 9 Clearly Failing Low significance levels (α = 0.01, and 0.05) are used throughout our project

Normal WeibullBiexponential K-S Test: Symmetric Simple Cumulative Distribution (Zoomed in) 10 α = 0.01 α = 0.05 α = α = 0.01α = 0.025α = 0.05 Normal003 Weibull003 BiExp001 Number of Outliers

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential K-S Test: Mean Rank 11 Clearly Failing

Normal WeibullBiexponential K-S Test: Mean Rank (Zoomed in) 12 α = 0.01 α = 0.05 α = 0.01α = 0.05 Normal02 Weibull00 BiExp00 Number of Outliers

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Clearly Failing K-S Test: Median Rank 13

Normal WeibullBiexponential K-S Test: Median Rank (Zoomed in) 14 α = 0.01 α = 0.05 α = 0.01α = 0.05 Normal02 Weibull02 BiExp00 Number of Outliers

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Clearly Failing K-S Test: The Other Method 15

Normal WeibullBiexponential K-S Test: The Other Method (Zoomed in) 16 α = 0.01 α = 0.05 α = 0.01α = 0.05 Normal02 Weibull03 BiExp01 Number of Outliers

Median Rank Biexponential K-S Test Results 17 S.S.C.D.MeanMedianOther NormalXXXX LognormalXXXX WeibullXOXX BiexponentialXOOX K-S Test Result for α = 0.05 (O: Accepted, X: Rejected) Adj. R-squared = Comparison with Linearity Test No indication that biexp. distribution fits well A couple of outliers But Linear in General Sufficiently high Adj. R-squared value

Contents Jae Hyung’s Data Set (n = 63) Andreas’s Data Set (n = 59) Combined Data Set (n = 122) Summary 18

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Linearity Check: Symmetric Simple Cumulative Distribution 19

Linearity Check: Mean Rank 20 Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Linearity Check: Median Rank 21

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Linearity Check: The Other Method 22

Linearity Check Results 23 S.S.C.D.MeanMedianOther NormalOOOO LognormalXXXX WeibullOOOO BiexponentialXXXX S.S.C.D.MeanMedianOther Normal Lognormal Weibull Biexponential Graph Linearity Adjusted R-squared of Linear Fit

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential K-S Test: Symmetric Simple Cumulative Distribution 24 Clearly Failing

Normal Weibull K-S Test: Symmetric Simple Cumulative Distribution (Zoomed in) 25 α = 0.01 α = 0.20 α = 0.05 α = 0.01α = 0.05α = 0.20 Normal002 Weibull000 Number of Outliers

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential K-S Test: Mean Rank 26 Clearly Failing

Normal Weibull K-S Test: Mean Rank (Zoomed in) 27 α = 0.01 α = 0.20 α = 0.05 α = 0.01α = 0.05α = 0.20 Normal000 Weibull000 Number of Outliers

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Clearly Failing K-S Test: Median Rank 28 Clearly Failing

Normal Weibull K-S Test: Median Rank (Zoomed in) 29 α = 0.01α = 0.05α = 0.20 Normal000 Weibull000 Number of Outliers α = 0.01 α = 0.20 α = 0.05

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Clearly Failing K-S Test: The Other Method 30 Clearly Failing

Normal Weibull K-S Test: The Other Method (Zoomed in) 31 α = 0.01α = 0.05α = 0.20 Normal000 Weibull000 Number of Outliers α = 0.01 α = 0.20 α = 0.05

S.S.C.D. Weibull K-S Test Results 32 S.S.C.D.MeanMedianOther NormalXOOO LognormalXXXX WeibullOOOO BiexponentialXXXX K-S Test Result for α = 0.20 (O: Accepted, X: Rejected) Adj. R-squared = Comparison with Linearity Test Best result with Weibull distribution Nice Linearity High Adj. R-squared value

Contents Jae Hyung’s Data Set (n = 63) Andreas’s Data Set (n = 59) Combined Data Set (n = 122) Summary 33

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Linearity Check: Symmetric Simple Cumulative Distribution 34

Linearity Check: Mean Rank 35 Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Linearity Check: Median Rank 36

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Linearity Check: The Other Method 37

Linearity Check Results 38 S.S.C.D.MeanMedianOther NormalOOOO LognormalXXXX WeibullOOOO BiexponentialXXXX S.S.C.D.MeanMedianOther Normal Lognormal Weibull Biexponential Graph Linearity Adjusted R-squared of Linear Fit

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential K-S Test: Symmetric Simple Cumulative Distribution 39 Clearly Failing

Normal Weibull K-S Test: Symmetric Simple Cumulative Distribution (Zoomed in) 40 α = 0.01 α = 0.05 α = 0.01α = 0.05 Normal59 Weibull59 Number of Outliers

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential K-S Test: Mean Rank 41 Clearly Failing

Normal Weibull K-S Test: Mean Rank (Zoomed in) 42 α = 0.01 α = 0.05 α = 0.01α = 0.05 Normal28 Weibull28 Number of Outliers

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Clearly Failing K-S Test: Median Rank 43 Clearly Failing

Normal Weibull K-S Test: Median Rank (Zoomed in) 44 α = 0.01 α = 0.05 α = 0.01α = 0.05 Normal28 Weibull28 Number of Outliers

Normal Lognormal WeibullBiexponential Clearly Failing K-S Test: The Other Method 45 Clearly Failing

Normal Weibull K-S Test: The Other Method (Zoomed in) 46 α = 0.01 α = 0.05 α = 0.01α = 0.05 Normal38 Weibull38 Number of Outliers

K-S Test Results 47 S.S.C.D.MeanMedianOther NormalXXXX LognormalXXXX WeibullXXXX BiexponentialXXXX S.S.C.D.MeanMedianOther Normal Weibull Adjusted R-squared of Linear Fit K-S Test Result for α = 0.01 (O: Accepted, X: Rejected) Every distribution is rejected with the smallest α value Normal and Weibull distributions fit better than the other two Fewest outliers with mean and median rank methods

Contents Jae Hyung’s Data Set (n = 63) Andreas’s Data Set (n = 59) Combined Data Set (n = 122) Summary 48

Results Summary Jae Hyung’s Data Set (n = 63) –Best fitting distribution: Biexponential Distribution –Best CDF estimation method: Median Rank Andreas’s Data Set (n = 59) –Best fitting distribution: Weibull Distribution –Best CDF estimation method: Symmetric S. C. D. Combined Data Set (n = 122) –Best fitting distribution: Weibull Distribution –Best CDF estimation method: Median Rank 49