A novel time-permuting forecast method Colin Singleton & Billiejoe Charlton 7/11/2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Two-Level Electricity Demand Model Hausman, Kinnucan, and Mcfadden.
Advertisements

Authors: J.A. Hausman, M. Kinnucan, and D. McFadden Presented by: Jared Hayden.
Storage Heaters : Dead or Alive? Kenny Cameron Director of Strategic Development Energy Assets.
A TWO-LEVEL ELECTRICITY DEMAND MODEL. Evaluation of the Connecticut Time-of-Day Pricing Test. By J.A Hausman, M. Kinnucan, D. McFadden Presented By Julius.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
MOVING AVERAGES AND EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING
T T18-06 Seasonal Relatives Purpose Allows the analyst to create and analyze the "Seasonal Relatives" for a time series. A graphical display of.
Overview – Non-coincident Peak Demand
Smart grids and intelligent homes: eBay electricity. Stuart Williams. Global Lead Consultant – Sustainability Logica.
California Energy Commission California Energy Demand Preliminary Electricity Forecast: San Diego Gas & Electric Planning Area July 7, 2015 Malachi.
Khalid Abdulla, The University of Melbourne The Value of System Aggregation in exploiting Renewable Energy Sources Professor Saman Halgamuge The University.
Windmill by GP from The Noun Project Light Bulb by Nathan Thomson from The Noun Project.
How to Help Your Customers Read Their Electric Bills and Apply for Incentives Charley Budd, KEMA.
2016 Long-Term Load Forecast
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement – Interim Report findings 17 th September 2012.
Solar Profiling Interstate Renewable Energy Council presentation to the ERCOT Profiling Working Group Jan. 22, 2008.
Impact of CDCM on unmetered energy 4Mar2010 Presented by Tom Chevalier.
1 Steve Catanach, P.E. City of Fort Collins Light & Power Manager FortZED – RDSI and Smart Grid Investment Grant.
Calculations of Peak Load Contribution (PLC) AND Network Service Peak Load (NSPL) As of 1/1/2016.
Project Nexus UNC Workstream Consolidation of High-Level Principles Fiona Cottam 19 May 2010.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
Is the Weight Worth It? PWG April 27, Introduction The Average Load Factor (AvgLF) used to determine Profile Segment assignment is a weighted.
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
EE5900 Cyber-Physical Systems Smart Home CPS
A Smartbox as a low-cost home automation solution for prosumers with a battery storage system in a demand response program G. Brusco, G. Barone, A. Burgio,
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
8.2 Estimating Population Means
Your meter explained Available through myGuides → Click to start
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
8.2 Estimating Population Means
Emergency Response Service Baselines
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Circuit Diagrams Circuit diagrams use symbols to represent the different components of an electric circuit The most common components of simple electric.
Consumer technology is creating the smart home
Chapter 4.
PLC = Peak Load Contribution (aka “ICAP”)
CASE 29 CLARINDA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL (Inventory Management)
Forecasting with a Trend
2018 VELCO IRP Forecast Preliminary results
Scene 1: Show EV cars charging in a city
EE5900: Cyber-Physical Systems
Making sense of household energy data
Hypothesis Tests for a Population Mean,
It’s a Matter of Time: Analyzing the Effects of Dynamic Rate Designs on Low-Income and Senior Electricity Consumers.
Results of Smart Charging Research
Matthew Rowe Dr William Holderbaum, Dr Ben Potter, Dr Yang Liu
On track to be 100% Renewable
Flexibility of electric vehicle (EV) demand - a case study
Sampling Distribution Models
Forecasting Techniques
Science 9 Electricity Review.
Dr Stephen Haben PDRA Mathematical Institute University of Oxford
Customer Profiles – Analysing the customers of today
Exponential Smoothing
On track to be 100% Renewable
Creative Activity and Research Day (CARD)
T18-08 Calculate MAD, MSE Purpose Allows the analyst to create and analyze the MAD and MSE for a forecast. A graphical representation of history and.
Behavior Modification Report with Peak Reduction Component
Christensen Associates
KIRCHHOFF CURRENT LAW ONE OF THE FUNDAMENTAL CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES
Relationships in Circuits
The Community Energy Future
Transformation of the Energy Grid
Power consumption.
Zero Energy Building(ZEB)
New Opportunities in Local Energy
S2 m6 Supply.
SMART ENERGY GB.
For JSM July, 2019 | Denver, CO By
Exponential Smoothing
Presentation transcript:

A novel time-permuting forecast method Colin Singleton & Billiejoe Charlton 7/11/2012

Why forecast at the household level? Understanding customers' energy usage helps energy suppliers to: communicate and engage with their customers -credible, informative forecasts get customers on-side manage their networks -such as by using smart battery storage to handle peak demand plan for the future -particularly in light of changes brought about by adoption of Low Carbon Technologies With the coming smart meter roll out, the time has come for new ideas about household-level forecasting

Household-level forecasting Suppose we have half-hourly smart meter readings from a household for, say, the N previous Tuesdays: is from the previous week, is from two weeks ago, etc. We want to make a good forecast for next Tuesday’s energy use. But what is a “good” forecast anyway?

But it gives counter-intuitive results: Here, blue forecast is “better”: (2-norm) error for blue forecast: 11.4Kwh, for red forecast: 15.6Kwh The p-norm (often with p=2) is a common way to measure error between forecast F and actual usage A:

What do we want from our forecasts? Subjectively the red forecast is much better than the flat blue one: - it has the right number of peaks, in roughly the right places - peak heights are nearly correct Red forecast more useful for smart control of energy storage systems Red forecast is much more believable to a customer

A better error measure: adjusted error where is the set of permutations that displace components by no more than w half-hours So you can move each forecast value up to places before measuring the error We will take to penalise large errors (missed peaks) much more than small errors, and

Adjusted error in action The forecast (red) is permuted onto the actual usage (green):

A yardstick forecast: the mean We will compare our forecasts to a simple yardstick forecast, the mean of the previous N usage profiles (on the same day of the week): When daily peaks do not coincide, the mean forecast becomes flattened, and hence less informative and would not be believed as a forecast

The mean forecast (in red) is quite flat

The averaged adjustment (AA) forecast Idea: If we shift the peaks to line them up before averaging, the forecast will not be flattened Start with a basis forecast (e.g. mean) Successively merge in each day - permute to make it as close as possible to current forecast - take a weighted average

The AA forecast has a bigger, clearer peak

AA forecast in action

Number of historical days used (same day of the week) Average daily Adjusted Error per household (kWh)

Number of historical days used (same day of the week) RMSE per half-hour per household (kWh)

Issues with the AA forecast The peak forecast by AA is still lower than we would like -Using the mean forecast as the basis drags the height down -But it’s not obvious what a better basis is AA gives recent history much more importance than distant history -because recent days get merged in first

Another forecasting idea Idea: a usage profile F which is “close to” the historical usage profiles (for that day of the week) will make a good forecast One way to interpret “close to”: sum of adjusted errors between F and historical usage profiles is small So forecast: We approximate this with a genetic algorithm (GA) All history days treated equally (we could add weights)

The GA forecast has an even bigger, even clearer peak

Number of historical days used (same day of the week) Average daily Adjusted Error per household (kWh)

Summary We described the adjusted error measure, which captures quality of household-level forecasts better than the 2-norm We illustrated two forecasts which beat the mean under adjusted error: -The averaged adjustment (AA) forecast -A genetic algorithm (GA) based forecast Future work includes refinement of the error measure and forecasts and individualising the forecasts Reference: “A New Error Measure for Forecasts of Household-level, High Resolution Electrical Energy Consumption” Stephen Haben, Jonathan A. Ward, Danica Vukadinovic-Greetham, Peter Grindrod and Colin Singleton