Proposed 2012 Methodology for Determining Ancillary Service Requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
October 7, 2013 QMWG Ancillary Services Methodology Changes Bill Blevins Manager, Operations Planning.
Advertisements

FEBRUARY 14, 2013 RELIABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING Steve Weaver SYSTEM OPERATIONS In-Day Reserves & Supplemental Procurement.
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 April, 2010 Report to WMS 21 April, 2010 David Detelich - Chairperson.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
Ancillary Services Methodology Changes for 2015 Sandip Sharma Bill Blevins Dan Woodfin.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
John Dumas Director of Wholesale Market Operations ERCOT Operating Reserve Demand Curve.
Wind Cost Allocation Task Force Update to WMS February 17, 2009.
Coincident Peak Load Forecasting Methodology Prepared for June 3, 2010 Meeting with Division of Public Utilities.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Strategic Pricing Plan Central District Power Accountants Association Franklin, Tn. March 19, 2015.
1 Ancillary Services Requirements for Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis FAS/SIRS Meeting September 21, 2015.
August 17, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting Updated Analysis of Non-Spin Deployments and RUC John Dumas Director Wholesale Market Operations.
ERCOT Long-Term Demand and Energy Forecasting February 20, 2007 Bill Bojorquez.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 External Web Services Update Nodal Implementation Team Presentation July 7, 2009.
Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2012 ERCOT Dynamic Ratings Application.
PRS - RPRS Task Force Status Summary - August 14, PRS RPRS Task Force Status Summary Prepared for WMS and PRS August 2006.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6.1 EDS 3 Release 6 LFC Workshop October 10, 2007.
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 7 November, 2008 Report to WMS 19 November, 2008 David Detelich - Chairperson.
Regulation Energy Management Overview CPUC Energy Storage Workshop March 9, 2011.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
MAPE Publication Neil McAndrews For Bob Ryan of Deutsche Bank.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 TPTF Update for TAC March 8, 2007 Trip Doggett.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 EDS 3 R6.2 Testing Overview Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 LFC WebEx.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Analysis of ERCOT Regulation Service Deployments during 2011 David Maggio Market Enhancement Task Force Meeting 3/29/
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS June 12, 2013.
Operational Issues & Risks ERCOT Operations Planning August 22, 2008.
Ancillary Services Methodology Changes Bill Blevins Manager, Operations Planning.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes November 10, 2009 Report to WMS November 18, 2009 Jennifer Troutman – Vice Chair.
Preliminary Report on ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 12th, 2013.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
July 15, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing John Dumas Director Wholesale Market.
Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis Overview Julia Matevosyan February 1, 2016 FAS Workshop.
Multi-Interval Real-Time Market (MIRTM) Updates SAWG Sean Chang Market Analysis February 22, 2016 ERCOT Public Version
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
Alerts & Reserves. December, Objectives Maintain reliability –Ensure that adequate reserves are available Market Clearing Price of Energy is synchronized.
California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July,
Generation to be Dispatched(GTBD) Analysis For the purpose of discussion only PDCWG/QMWG Joint Meeting 11/02/2012.
Wind Management at MISO
Analysis of the Effects of a Flexible Ramping Ancillary Service Product on Power System Operations Ibrahim Krad Eduardo Ibanez Erik Ela.
RTDF Overview of Data Analysis & Status of “Consesus Items”
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services
Chapter 4.
Do you know all these facts?
Further Information on MISO FTR Auctions
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
Year 2 Autumn Term Week 12 Lesson 1
LDZ System Charges – Structure Methodology 26 July 2010
30 Minute Reserves EPFSTF January 4,
        CALCULATING THE MATURITY DATE 1 2 CALCULATING INTEREST
2300 (11PM) September 21 Blue line is meridian..
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
April May April May June July July June August Sept August
Sandip Sharma ERCOT Manager, Operations Planning
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Year 2 Autumn Term Week 12 Lesson 1
Revenue Cycle Update November 14, 2016
MONTHS OF THE YEAR January February April March June May July August
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Do you know all these facts?
Performance Review Process and Responsibilities Group HR
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
Production Month Sun Hours K Monthly Kwh Tou Peak Value After Kwh
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

Proposed 2012 Methodology for Determining Ancillary Service Requirements

2 Regulation Service – Review of Current Methodology Inputs for determining the monthly Regulation Service requirements include the following: –Last 30 days of Regulation Service deployments –5 minute net-load changes from the last 30 days and from the same month of the previous year –Regulation Service requirement for the same month of the previous year divided by 2 The division by 2 is intended to account for the fact that Regulation moved from a 10-minute product in Zonal to a 5-minute product in Nodal

3 Regulation Service – Proposed Methodology Changes A number of changes made during the last iteration of the document were done in preparation for the market transition –Historical data from the Zonal Market would not necessarily be relevant or appropriate for the Nodal Market The proposed changes are as follows: –The Regulation Service deployments from the same month of the previous year will be considered along with the deployments from the last 30 days –The Regulation Service requirement for the same month of the previous year divided by 2 will no longer be used as an input

4 Non-Spin Reserve Service – Review of Current Methodology For determining the monthly requirement: –Break up the hours of the day into groups –Calculate the 95 th percentile of the day ahead net-load forecast error –Set the requirement such that the combination of Non-Spin and Regulation Up Service will cover 95% of the net-load forecast error –If it has been determined that the forecasts have shown a tendency to be conservative, that bias will be removed from the load forecast and added to the NSRS requirement This attempts to remove bias from forecasts while ensuring that reliability in maintained –Both a floor and ceiling are placed on the requirement Floor during on-peak hours of single largest unit Ceiling of 2000 MW during all hours

5 Non-Spin Reserve Service – Proposed Methodology Changes Under the Nodal Market, Market Participants are more easily able to self commit Resources closer to Real-Time –Because of this it may not be necessary to procure Non-Spin to protect against 1600 day ahead forecast error Proposal is to use net-load forecast error from midnight instead of the 1600 day ahead error –This should better align the ancillary service requirements with Nodal timelines –The Regulation Up requirement will continue to be subtracted from the forecast error to determine the Non-Spin requirement

6 Effects of Proposed Methodology on NSRS Requirement The overall effect is that slightly less NSRS would be procured on average –This varied by month –The average effect on the value subtracted from the MTLF was insignificant Month Average Change in Non-Spin Requirement (*) Average Change in Value Subtracted from the MTLF (**) February March April May June July August * A positive number means that more Non-Spin would be procured under the proposed methodology ** A positive number means that a larger number would be subtracted from the MTLF under the proposed methodology

7 Proposed Non-Spin Methodology Examples – March ‘11 Current MethodologyProposed Methodology IENSRS Requirement Net Error Subtracted from Load Forecast IENSRS Requirement Net Error Subtracted from Load Forecast

8 Proposed Non-Spin Methodology Examples – May ‘11 Current MethodologyProposed Methodology IENSRS Requirement Net Error Subtracted from Load Forecast IENSRS Requirement Net Error Subtracted from Load Forecast

9 Proposed Non-Spin Methodology Examples – July ‘11 Current MethodologyProposed Methodology IENSRS Requirement Net Error Subtracted from Load Forecast IENSRS Requirement Net Error Subtracted from Load Forecast