HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review 26.05.2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lot’s of time lost due to cryo problem in IR8. Major impact, therefore review of MD program… Start discussion here, please let us know your input. Will.
Advertisements

Beam Instrumentations: Requirements for Proton and Electron Beams C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements:
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
B.O.S.S. SPS ring and transfer lines Serge Massot for BE-OP-SPS European Organisation for Nuclear Research CERN CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland 27/05/2014CERN.
LPROT Experiment TE/MPE/PE EN/STI EN/MME. Objectives Create the conditions to produce hydrodynamic tunneling. Benchmarking FLUKA-BIG2 simulations. Assert.
LHC Utilities & Facilities WAO Daejeong 12/04 – 16/04/2010 Markus Albert on behalf of LHC Operations.
V. Kain AB/OP1Sep 12, 2007 Summary of Discussion on Injection Protection Issues Injection Protection Issues – meeting 22 nd of June V. Kain, A. McPherson,
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
The Stripping Foil Test Stand in the Linac4 Transfer Line
LHC Sector Test 1 Roger Bailey, Helmut Burkhardt, Paul Collier, Brennan Goddard, Stephen Jackson, Lars Jensen, Rhodri Jones, Verena Kain, Alex.
LIU external beam dump review External beam dump option A: branching off from LSS6 J.L. Abelleira Thanks to: F. Velotti, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, H. Vincke,
6 April 2006Malika Meddahi 1 CNGS Project: primary beam 1.Project Overview 2. Proton beam line overview and status 3. Target status 4. Commissioning preparation.
LHC Injection Sequencing MD 16/23/2009 Injection sequencing / BCM R, Giachino, B. Goddard, (D. Jacquet), V. Kain, M. Meddahi, J. Wenninger.
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
HIGH RADIATION TO MATERIALS: HIRADMAT STATUS HiRadMat Scientific Board, 23/4/2012 Outline  Location  Status  Beam line  Infrastructure  Exp. Area.
ELENA EXTRACTION LINES W. Bartmann, D. Barna, M. Fraser, J. Jentzsch, R. Ostojic ELENA Commissioning discussion, 23th November, 2015.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Transfer Line Test preparation meeting V. Kain, R. Alemany.
Draft MD Planning Thu (3.11.) DayTimeMDMP Thu05:00 Ramp down, cycle 07: GeV: Injection stability and losses – check steering constraints, define.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Tuesday 24 th July - morning 10:15 Operator dump of fill 2873  Initial luminosity: 5.83e33 cm-2s-1  12 hours stable beams  151 pb-1 delivered  Initial.
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Beam transfer considerations for LAGUNA Angelina Parfenova, W. Bartmann, L. Ducimetiere, B. Goddard, V.Kain, M.A. Kowalska, M. Meddahi, B. Puccio, F. Velotti.
AWAKE p+ beam line HWC C. Bracco, J. Schmidt Acknowledgment: MCS, EPC, MPE, SPS-OP, BI, ABP (survey),STI, EA, ACE, RP.
HiRadMat Summary of Phase-I and plans for Phase-II commissioning J. Blanco, N. Conan, V. Kain, K. Cornelis, B. Goddard, C. Hessler, M. Meddahi, C. Theis,
Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
LHC Beam Commissioning Meeting V. Kain & R. Alemany
DRY RUNS 2015 Status and program of the Dry Runs in 2015
Online check lists Half Sector Test
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
Transfer line test: Beam stability measurements
ELENA Overview and Layout Start of ELENA Commissioning Next Steps
AWAKE proposals for BE/BI
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
High Radiation to Materials 16th Project Team Meeting – May 20, 2010
Monday h00: Ramp 10 A/s (chromaticity, crossing angle non-closure, beta-beating): At 7m and 3.5m, put in one by one crossing angles, calculated.
CNGS Proton Beam: Introduction
FCC-hh injection group 7

Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Tue :25 Beams dumped due to RF vacuum interlock
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2010
Summary of week 44 Aims of week 44 J. Wenninger & J. Uythoven
Tuesday Fill 1494 dumped by operations at (~ 0.25 ub-1 in ~6.5 h): LSS6 BPM interlock test 13:00 Fill 1495 dumped by RF dump (cavity quench) 14:00-17:30.
Proton Beam Diagnostics
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)
Tuesday 9th November 10:02 Fill beams dumped
CNGS Primary Beam Results
Monday 24 October hours of 25ns MD
Wednesday 10:00 test of the un-squeeze to 90 m at 4 TeV.
Thursday 04/11 - Morning Access until ~13:00 Pre-cycle Proton checks:
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Beam Line to the HiRadMat Test Facility
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2011
Interlocking strategy
Friday 14th September 03:15 Beta* at 1 km. Optics measurements, see yesterday. 07:00 Dump. 08:00 Refill with 3 nominal bunches for high beta. 11:15 Beams.
LHC - Week 38 Technical stop: Katy Foraz
Sat 18/3 - Ramp to 4 TeV Again glitch on the safe beam flag for beam 2. Cause identified: noise on BCT2B giving values above the safe beam limit (2.4×1010.
Wednesday 23/2 Thanks CRYO!!!.
Another Immortal Fill….
Beam Stability of the LHC Beam Transfer Line TI 8
Monday 152 bunch operation summary
Presentation transcript:

HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi2 Location of HiRadMat

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi3 Beam Line Geometry Beam C. Magnier25 m Experimental area TI 2 TT60 TT66

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi4 Beam Parameters ParameterProtonsIons Beam energy440 [GeV]173.5 [AGeV] Bunch intensity3×10 9 to 1.7×10 11 [protons] 3×10 7 to 7×10 7 [ions] Max. pulse intensity4.9×10 13 [protons]3.64×10 9 [ions] Number of bunches1 to Bunch spacing25 [ns]100 [ns] RMS bunch length11.24 [cm] Pulse length7.2 [μs]5.2 [μs] Number of pulses per cycle11 Min. cycle length18 [s]13.2 [s] Transverse norm. emittance (1σ)2 to 4 [μm]1.4 [μm]

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi5 Beam Line Layout Beam Exp. areaSPS extraction point End of common part with TT60 MBS switching magnets MBBQTL 50 m MBSMBBQTL

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi6 Layout of Experimental Area  Flexible optics to provide beam radii of  = 0.1 to 2.0 mm at the focal points.  Focal point longitudinal location continuously variable between positions 1 and 3.  Predefined optics for 3 focal points and 6 beam sizes. BTV Large test object Small test objects

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi7 Beam Optics (1)  Example of a typical beam with  =0.5 mm and focal point at position 1:

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi8 Beam Optics (2)  Example of a typical beam with  =0.1 mm and focal point at position 1:

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi9 Beam Optics (3)  Example of a typical beam with  =2.0 mm and focal point at position 1:

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi10 Trajectory Correction and Orthogonal Steering  Orthogonal steering on target +/- 4 mm independently in both planes. If larger range is needed, the test object will be moved.  Max. accuracy of angle: ~0.05 mrad  = 0.5 mm Example:

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi11 Beam Instrumentation InstrumentTypeQuantity BPM (dual plane)LEP buttons6 BPKG* (dual plane)CNGS1 BTVILHC3 BCTFICNGS1 BLMLHC6 * operated in air BPMBLMBTVIBCTFI L. Jensen and team

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi12 Interlock (1)  Beam interlock controller: Extension of existing interlock system to handle new interlock signals from HiRadMat facility.  New energy flag E_440 for HiRadMat.  FMCMs for main bending magnets.  TBSE in TI 2 to ensure accessibility of TI 2 / LHC during HiRadMat operation.  Interlock system of LSS6 extraction has now exactly the same layout than in LSS4 where CNGS and LHC beams coexist. This system has proven to be very reliable. B. Puccio, M. Zerlauth, V. Kain, J. Wenninger

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi13 Interlock (2) Comparison extraction layout LSS6 (TI 2, HiRadMat) versus LSS4 (TI 8, CNGS): B. Puccio, M. Zerlauth, V. Kain, J. Wenninger

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi14 Interlock (3) System layout: HiRadMat interlock application: B. Puccio, M. Zerlauth, V. Kain, J. Wenninger

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi15 Control Applications (1)  All standard equipment → extension of existing applications:  Steering, logging: Extension of YASP  BTVs, BLMs, BCT: Extension of the corresponding application  New dedicated application for an easy change of the HiRadMat beam line optics: V. Kain

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi16 Control Applications (2)  New dedicated application for requesting beam for HiRadMat. Each pulse sent to HiRadMat must be requested with this application (= 1 pulse per click).  Use will be restricted to authorised operators only (using RBAC). V. Kain Click here to request beam

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi17 Control Applications (3)  The following beam line equipment is logged in TIMBER:  BTVs (also in SDDS)  BLMs  BPMs  BCTFI  Power converter currents  Beam interlocks V. Kain

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi18 Dry Run Results (1)  All magnets powered and polarity checked.  Applications for beam instrumentation have been successfully checked (BTV, BCTFI, BLM). V. Kain, J. Wenninger, J. Blanco BTV applicationBCTFI application

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi19 Dry Run Results (2)  YASP acquires data for TT66.  Logging has been successfully checked.  Interlock successfully tested.  Application for beam optics change successfully tested.  Beam request application successfully tested. V. Kain, J. Wenninger, J. Blanco YASPTIMBER (Logging)

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi20 Extraction Tests on TT60 TED  First extraction of probe bunches with HiRadMat cycle onto TT60 TED (= far upstream the start of TT66): V. Kain, J. Wenninger, J. Blanco

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi21 Beam Commissioning Plan (1)  Different kind of beams to be used:  LHC probe “pilot”: ~5×10 9 to ~8×10 9 p/bunch  LHC2 “nominal”: up to ~1.3×10 11 p/bunch  1 batch of 12 bunches with 50 ns bunch spacing  2 batches of 12 bunches  1 batch of 36 bunches  2 batches of 36 bunches → max. 72 b. per extraction  Beam budget estimate:  1 st period:  24 h of pilot bunches  total # of protons: ~9×10 12  2 nd period:  4 h of multi-bunches, mostly with 1 batch of 12 bunches  total # of protons: ~2×10 14

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi22 Beam Commissioning Plan (2)  Sending beam “LHC Probe” to HiRadMat. Tests to be carried out:  Beam line bare trajectory and steering  Beam instrumentation (incl. calibration, check response, checks of corrector and pickups)  Controls, logging  Steering on target  Interlocking tests (interlock limits)  Aperture checks (knobs needed, to be done with 1 reference optics)  Beam parameters checks  Beam size and focal point position adjustment  Position/intensity stability  Change of beam line optics + repetition of some tests  Some high intensity shots to check the consistency with the nominal beam intensity.

C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi23 Summary  25 magnets installed (+ de and re-installation of 4 TI 2 magnets)  13 power converters installed (+1 new for TT60)  17 beam instrumentation elements installed  ~200 m of new vacuum system installed (+ adaption of TI 2 vacuum system)  ~460 new cables with a total length of 4000 m installed (+ dismantling of 300 old cables) →All was done during 4-day technical stops, the Xmas stop and short accesses between LHC injections. Thanks to all equipment groups! We are looking forward to send the first beam to HiRadMat.