Partnership Beginning-Level Strategic Tutoring Advanced-Level Strategic Tutoring Building Strategic Tutoring Partnerships Partnership Beginning-Level Strategic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Direct Instruction Also called explicit instruction Widely applicable strategy that can be used to teach both concepts and skills Uses teacher explanation.
A Guide to Implementation
Module 1: Teaching functional skills – from building to applying skills 0 0.
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
Compare and Contrast Lori Nuth & Lori Schenk EDIT 732 Advanced Instructional Design Fall 2005.
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
School Improvement Team (SIT)
Group Seminar Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
The Impact of Immersion in a Local Research Problem on Technology Skills and Use CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY PREPARING TOMORROW’S TEACHERS TO USE TECHNOLOGY.
Direct Instruction Instructional Model. Three Features I. Learner Outcomes Mastery of well structured knowledge (step by step) Skill Mastery II. Environment.
Group Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of consistent.
BUILDING STRONG TEACHERS FOR TEXAS STUDENTS Welcome to TAP Connect.
SIOP: Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Dr. Kelly Bikle Winter 2007.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Promoting Reflective Teaching in Adult ESL through Peer Mentoring.
By Joseph Torres. Teachers are communicators who must express with clarity what they expect of students and how they will support their learning. Teachers.
M ULTIPLE R ESPONSE S TRATEGIES By Euranie Patin Campus Instructional Coach Martin Weiss Elementary School An Approach To Student Engagement.
13 Strategies to Ensure Strong Scaffolding Lloyd, J.W., Kameanui, E.J., and Chard, D. (Eds.) (1997)
SPED 618: Lifelong Integration Empowering the Team.
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
University of East London New Mentor Training (Stage 1 Mentoring – London)
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-Based Reading Instruction K-5 Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform H325A
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Welcome Back to Day Two Q and A Professional Learning Communities SMART Goals Mission Statement for improving parent-school relations Book Study “ The.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
An Introduction to Co-Teaching for Professional Development Schools:
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
Implementing edTPA An Overview.
Scaffolding Students’ Comprehension of Text
Setting Objectives and Providing Feedback
Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017
D2L Refresher Upload content into the Content section in a D2L course
Partnership for Practice
Individual Thinking Time
Adapted from PPT developed by Jhpiego corporation
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
24 Hour Fitness Instructional Plan
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Promoting Inclusion with Classroom Peers
Exeter Model of ITE Induction for ITE Coordinators,
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
Nursing education (Senior electives) Problem Based Learning (PBL) Younas Bhatti Vice Principal Bahawalpur college of Nursing 10/24/2016PROBLEM BASED LEARNING1.
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Mentoring: from Teacher Candidate to Successful Intern
Ed 11: Beginning Field Experience
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Exploring The Power of C!
– Trainees’ Perspectives
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Exploring The Power of C!
Bringing the 4 PLC Questions to Life
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Partnership Beginning-Level Strategic Tutoring Advanced-Level Strategic Tutoring Building Strategic Tutoring Partnerships Partnership Beginning-Level Strategic Tutoring Advanced-Level Strategic Tutoring Paula Lancaster Grand Valley State University/Edge Enterprises, Inc (785)

Collaborations GVSU –Clinical options for our students –Tutor twice weekly with faculty supervision Local School Districts –P-12 students get one-on-one support

ED 101 & credit hour course Students complete Strategic Tutoring CDs Role play practice Groups of 12 meet in schools twice a week Faculty supervise and give feedback Students participate in discussions on social-cultural contexts

ASSIGNMENT TUTORING Tutor InputStudent Input Knowledge of Content Academic Challenge The assignment is completed The learner may be dependent OUTCOMES

Knowledge of Content & Content Transformation Mentoring of Students Knowledge of Strategies Strategic Teaching Skills Academic Challenge Strategic Tutoring Model Immediate Academic Achievement Increased Knowledge Base Good Information Processing “Connected” Students Outcomes TutorStudent Knowledge of Strategies

The Beginning-Level Strategic Tutoring Professional Development Program

Learn New Strategies

The 4 Instructional Phases

Assessing Phase Learn about the assignment Determine the student’s current strategy Review performance on similar assignments Ask if the current strategy is working Provide reasons for learning a new strategy Gain the student’s commitment Make a commitment to the student Think about a known strategy procedure to follow Decide which strategy procedure to follow (weaving or building)

Constructing Phase Weaving –List the steps of the student’s current strategy –Remind the student about the effectiveness of the strategy –Add steps related to an effective strategy –Have the student list the steps of the new strategy on a card –Ask the student to compare the new strategy with the old strategy

Constructing Phase Building –Begin working on the assignment with the student –Stand back and analyze what the tutor and student are doing to complete the task –List the steps of the strategy with the student –Refine the steps of the strategy –Have the student list the steps of the strategy –Ask the student to compare the new strategy with the old strategy

Teaching Phase Model –Explain the student’s role during the modeling –Model the steps of the strategy –Model the “thinking” that accompanies each step –Involve the student during the modeling activity

Teaching Phase Check –Ask the student to name or list the steps of the strategy –Have the student explain the benefits of the strategy, where it could be used, and why each steps is important –Ask the student if she wants to modify the strategy

Teaching Phase Support –Cue the student to use the strategy –Ask guiding questions –Guide the student through assignment completion –Provide positive and corrective feedback –Fade support over time

Transferring Phase Celebrate strategy mastery and progress toward becoming a strategic learner Ask the student to compare current performance to performance before learning the strategy Develop a plan for using the strategy in other settings (be specific) Follow up on student use of the strategy Provide feedback if necessary

Watch Someone Use Strategic Tutoring

The Strategic Tutoring CD Study Tutors 12Experimental 12Control Students 12Experimental 12Control

Strategic Tutoring CD Results: Teacher Results Knowledge TestST Use Test Percentage of Points Earned * * p<.001 *

Strategic Tutoring CD Results: Student Results Knowledge TestStrategy Use Test Percentage of Points Earned ** * * p<.001 ** p<.01

So, what can you expect from tutors after BST? Their knowledge of ST should be pretty strong They will be able to implement about half of the required procedures during any given tutoring session They will have a much greater understanding of what being “strategic” means.

The Advanced-Level Strategic Tutoring Professional Development Program

Session 1: An Introduction to Strategic Tutoring (Welcome)

Session 2: Observe Strategic Tutoring

Session 3: Support Strategic Tutors

Session 4: Creating Learning Strategies

Session 5: Mentoring Students

The AST CD Study Pilot Test –Four Tutors –Eight Students Field Test –14 Experimental Tutors & 14 Students –12 Control Tutors & 12 Students

AST CD: Tutor Results Experimental Tutors –Knowledge of AST –Use of AST –Quality of Instruction –Satisfaction Control Tutors –Knowledge of AST –Use of AST –Quality of Instruction

Tutor Results

AST CD: Student Results Experimental Students –Knowledge of Strategy –Use of Strategy –Think-Aloud Control Students –Knowledge of Strategy –Use of Strategy –Think-Aloud

Student Mean Percentage Scores Knowledge –Exp Pre - Post 23% - 81%** –Control Pre-Post14% - 61%* Use –Exp Pre-Post17% - 91%** –Control Pre-Post14% - 61%* Think Aloud –Exp Pre - Post5% - 61%** –Control Pre-Post8% - 37%*

So, what can you expect from tutors after AST? Increased knowledge Implementing about 80% of ST procedures in any given session A deeper understanding of the importance of being a “strategic” learner A deeper commitment to being a strategic tutor

What we’re studying Feasibility Fidelity of Implementation Effects on all students Satisfaction Predictive value