Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated neutron cross section.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Combined evaluation of PFNS for 235 U(n th,f), 239 Pu(n th,f), 233 U(n th,f) and 252 Cf(sf) (in progress) V.G. Pronyaev Institute of Physics.
EMERALD1: A Systematic Study of Cross Section Library Based Discrepancies in LWR Criticality Calculations Jaakko Leppänen Technical Research Centre of.
Applied Nuclear Physics Group The 2 nd meeting of IAEA CRP Neutron (n,  ) Cross Section and Decay Data for 32 P, 89 Sr, 131 I, 166 Ho,
Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section.
Modeling of Photonuclear Reactions & Transmutation of Long-lived Nuclear Waste in High Photon Fluxes M.-L. GIACRI-MAUBORGNE, D. RIDIKAS, J.-C.
I. Dillmann Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe KADoNiS The Sequel to the “Bao et al.” neutron capture compilations.
Evaluation the relative emission probabilities for 56 Co and 66 Ga Yu Weixiang Lu Hanlin Huang Xiaolong China Nuclear Data Center China Institute of Atomic.
Energy deposition for 10 MeV neutrons in oxygen, carbon, argon and hydrogen gaseous chambers (1mx1mx1m). Energy Deposition in 90% argon (1.782mg/cm 3 )
Joint IAEA-ICTP Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies Student’s presentation Calculation of correction factors for neutron.
Compilation and Evaluation of Beta-Delayed Neutron emission probabilities and half-lives of precursors in the Non-Fission Region (A ≤ 72) M. Birch and.
Boris Pritychenko Nuclear Physics Data Compilation for Nucleosynthesis Modeling, Trento, May 29 – June 1, 2007 MACS and Astrophysical Reaction Rates from.
Evaluation and Use of the Prompt Fission Neutron Spectrum and Spectra Covariance Matrices in Criticality and Shielding I. Kodeli1, A. Trkov1, R. Capote2,
1 CN formation cross section in nucleon induced reactions on 238 U Efrem Soukhovitski, JINER Frank Dietrich, LLNL Harm Wienke, Belgonucleaire Roberto Capote,
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Covariance data: Status and Perspective at BNL D. Rochman, M. W. Herman, P. Obložinský National.
TOTAL CROSS-SECTION MEASUREMENTS AND RESONANCE PARAMETER ANNYLISIS OF 169 TM BELOW 100 EV ICTP, Trieste, Italy 2010/05/14 Presentation in the Workshop.
UKRNDC Activity on Nuclear Data Support to Meet the Requirements Connected with Fundamental Science and Applications Olena Gritzay, Oleksandr Kalchenko.
2nd International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor applications September 29th – October 2nd, 2009 Tuesday 29 th of September
1 Low Neutron Energy Cross Sections of the Hafnium Isotopes G. Noguère, A. Courcelle, J.M. Palau, O. Litaize CEA/DEN Cadarache, France P. Siegler JRC/IRMM.
Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott DESPEC/HISPEC Coll. Meeting, 15th-16th of June 2005-Valencia.
Status of particle_hp Pedro Arce Emilio Mendoza Daniel Cano-Ott (CIEMAT, Madrid)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory PREPRO Accomplishments Dermott “Red” Cullen Presented at the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Technical Conference.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
Walid DRIDI, CEA/Saclay n_TOF Collaboration Meeting, Paris December 4-5, 2006 DAPNIA Neutron capture cross section of 234 U Walid DRIDI CEA/Saclay for.
LLNL-PRES-?????? This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
Status of Nuclear Data Processing Codes at CNDC China Nuclear Data Center(CNDC) China Institute of Atomic Energy(CIAE) P.O.Box ,Beijing.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Update of uncertainty file in the EAF project J. Kopecky 1 and R.A. Forrest 2 1 JUKO Research, the Netherlands 2 EURATOM/UKAEA Association, Culham, UK.
Low Energy Neutron Interactions in Geant4 Jacek M. Holeczek Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland [Adam Konefał’s results also.
NUCLEAR LEVEL DENSITIES NEAR Z=50 FROM NEUTRON EVAPORATION SPECTRA IN (p,n) REACTION B.V.Zhuravlev, A.A.Lychagin, N.N.Titarenko State Scientific Center.
Current nuclear data processing status of JAEA JAEA Research Group for Reactor Physics and Standard Nuclear Code System Kenichi Tada 1.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
1 NaI calibrationneutron observation NaI calibration and neutron observation during the charge exchange experiment 1.Improving the NaI energy resolution.
6-1 Lesson 6 Objectives Beginning Chapter 2: Energy Beginning Chapter 2: Energy Derivation of Multigroup Energy treatment Derivation of Multigroup Energy.
Nucleosynthesis in AGB Stars: the Role of the 18 O(p,  ) 15 N Reaction Marco La Cognata.
Luiz Leal, Wim Haeck, GAIA : Nuclear data processing for transport and criticality safety calculations at IRSN Luiz.
Benchmarks for Data Testing of Iron China Nuclear Data Center(CNDC) China Institute of Atomic Energy(CIAE) P.O.Box ,Beijing , P.R.China.
1 n_TOF data-analysis workshop CERN, Geneva, February 2015 Roberto Capote, IAEA Nuclear Data Section www-nds.iaea.org NUCLEAR.
Short Update on Deliverables K. Yokoyama M. Ishikawa Japan Atomic Energy Agency Dec 4, 2015WPEC SG39, Institute Curie, Paris, France1.
Status of particle_hp Pedro Arce Emilio Mendoza Daniel Cano-Ott (CIEMAT, Madrid)
Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) Geel, Belgium CRP Th - U, Vienna December 2004.
ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.
232 Th EVALUATION IN THE RESOLVED RESONANCE RANGE FROM 0 to 4 keV Nuclear Data Group Nuclear Science and Technology Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
G.I. SmirnovMaterials for Collimators and Beam Absorbers, Simulating radiation damage effects in LHC collimators (code development status)
Santa Tecla, 2-9 October 2005Marita Mosconi,FZK1 Re/Os cosmochronometer: measurements of relevant Os cross sections Marita Mosconi 1, Alberto Mengoni 2,
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Modern , d, p, n-Induced Activation Transmutation Systems EURATOM/CCFE.
Pion-Induced Fission- A Review Zafar Yasin Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) Islamabad, Pakistan.
Data Needs in Nuclear Astrophysics, Basel, June 23-25, 2006 Nuclear Astrophysics Resources of the National Nuclear Data Center B. Pritychenko*, M.W. Herman,
KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.
IFMIF d-Li neutron source: Status of codes and nuclear data S.P. Simakov Institut für Reaktorsicherheit, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe IEA Neutronics Meeting,
KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association INSTITUTE for NEUTRON PHYSICS and REACTOR TECHNOLOGY (INR) Nuclear Data for Calculation.
1 Alushta 2016 CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n,α) 63 Ni REACTION at CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n, α) 63 Ni REACTION at E n = 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 MeV I. Chuprakov,
Report (2) on JPARC/MLF-12B025 Gd(n,  ) experiment TIT, Jan.13, 2014 For MLF-12B025 Collaboration (Okayama and JAEA): Outline 1.Motivation.
E. Mendoza, D.Cano-Ott Nuclear Innovation Unit (CIEMAT)
NNDC Services B. Pritychenko National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY , USA.
Relativistic Kinematics for the Binding Energy of Nuclear Reactions
1. Nuclear Data Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
Beginning Chapter 2: Energy Derivation of Multigroup Energy treatment
Measurement of the fission cross-section of 240Pu and 242Pu at CERN’s n_TOF facility CERN-INTC , INTC-P-280 Spokespersons: M. Calviani (CERN),
Bayesian Monte-Carlo and Experimental Uncertainties
Covariance Processing at ORNL Using PUFF-IV/ERRORJ Code
Fernando Mota, Christophe J. Ortiz, Rafael Vila
Complete description of the 12C(n,n'3a) and 12C(n,a)9Be reactions in the High Precision neutron model A. R. Garcia, E. Mendoza and D. Cano-Ott Nuclear.
Covariance Processing at ORNL Using PUFF-IV/ERRORJ Code
A. R. Garcia, E. Mendoza and D. Cano-Ott
Probability Table Method for the Unresolved Resonance Range
Next Version of JENDL General Purpose File
Hadronic physics validation of Geant4
Nathan P. DeLauder Co-author: Lawrence W. Townsend
The TALYS nuclear model code II
Presentation transcript:

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated neutron cross section libraries E. Mendoza and D. Cano-Ott Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas – CIEMAT Avda. Complutense Madrid – Spain

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Nuclear reaction cross sections at low energies (below 20 MeV, which is a “historical” upper energy limit for the evaluated cross section files) can not be calculated with nuclear models with enough ACCURACY. Example: in the simulation of a reactor, the criticality constant “k” should be determined with an accuracy of 1/1000 or better. All possible reaction channels have to be MEASURED and then EVALUATED: Comparison and weighting of all the available experimental data sets. Use of parameter dependent theoretical models for predicting the missing channels (possible at energies above a few hundred keV). Further adjustment of the cross sections with benchmarks and comparison of the subsequent results to accurate measurements in macroscopic nuclear systems (done by evaluation agencies and research centers). Neutron cross sections (III): how do we obtain them?

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop MicroscopicmeasurementsIntegralexperiments Evaluation Design of NuclearSystems

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop ReactionNeutron Energy Range /06 H(n,n)1 keV to 20 MeV 3 He(n,p) eV to 50 keV eV to 50 keV (1987 adopted) 6 Li(n,t) eV to 1 MeV 10 B(n,α) eV to 250 keV eV to 1 MeV 10 B(n,α 1 γ) eV to 250 keV eV to 1 MeV C(n,n)up to 1.8 MeVup to 1.8 MeV (1987 adopted) Au(n,γ) eV, and 0.2 to 2.5 MeV 235 U(n,f) eV, and 0.15 to 20 MeV eV, and 0.15 to 200 MeV 238 U(n,f)threshold to 20 MeV2 to 200 MeV Source: Most of the cross section measurements are commonly referred to standard cross sections. Any revision of the standards will lead automatically to changes in the evaluated files.

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Neutron cross sections are measured at different facilities and by different techniques. -Time of flight method. Pulsed neutron sources. -Activation. Reactors or irradiation facilities. -Monochromatic neutron beams. All the data sets are taken for the “combined” evaluation and the evaluator has to assign an uncertainty to them which is not always the one reported. All reaction channels need to be included. In one experiment one may measure one or a few specific reaction channels. All of them are correlated and thus careful covariance analysis should be made. This is however not the case for most of the data files (very complex problem) and has started to be done recently. The evaluation has to be done in a very wide energy range, from meV up to tens of MeV (~150 MeV in the most recent files). -Resolved resonace region (En < 150 eV – hundreds of keV): R-matrix formalism and data fitting. -Unresolved resonance region: statistical models and nuclear reaction models.

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop E R = 134 eV  n = eV   = eV J  = 1 - l = 0 g J = 3/4 e.g. 109 Ag s-wave at E R = 134 eV (E R,  n,  , J (  ), l )  tot  tot / barn ERER ERER ERER

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop SLBW for low energy s-wave (n,n) and (n,  ) (n,  ) (n,n) Total  (E R,  n,  , J(  ), )

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Parameterisation of neutron cross sections by nuclear reaction theory Ensures consistency between partial and total cross sections Ensures consistency between cross section data in different energy regions Prevents the use and recommendation of unphysical data Reliable calculations of Doppler broadened reaction cross sections Permits inter - and extrapolation into regions were no experimental data are available Permits prediction of reaction cross sections for isotopes not directly accessible to experiments

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Parameterisation of neutron cross sections by nuclear reaction theory URR Statistical Models Res. Par. E Rj,  n,j,  ,j, J j, R High Energy Optical Models Thermal RRR R-Matrix Level Statistics + R D 0, S o, Average Par. D o,1, S o,1,, R Exp. Data

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated cross section files are public and can be downloaded from different on- line nuclear data services: IAEA – free NEA – free BNL – free …. At low energies, the cross section are parameterised in terms of resonance parameters. As soon as the resonance spacing becomes similar to the average level spacing, a point wise description (E n, σ) is provided. There are however effects of the resonant structure of the cross sections which have to be taken into account. The cross sections are distributed in the standard ENDF-6 formatted files. Secondary particle production probabilities for the different reaction channels is also provided. The format is complex (RP + c.s.) and need to be pre-processed before Monte Carlo codes can use them (point wise). Some codes for processing them are restricted (NJOY) and authorisation has to be requested. Some other codes (like PREPRO, distributed by the IAEA are public) are freely distributed.

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop The cross sections are then released in Evaluated Nuclear Data library Files (ENDF): ENDF (USA), JEFF (Europe), JENDL (Japan), BROND (Russian Federation), CENDL (China). There can exist (sometimes severe) discrepancies between them. There are various releases and “new” does not mean “better”. In addition to the cross sections, also the secondary particles produced in a neutron reaction are tabulated: (n,γ) reaction: sorting of γ-ray energies and multiplicity. No correlation between the energies, just mean values. (n,f) reaction: sorting of fission fragments (A,Z), kinetic energies, sorting of neutrons (energy, multiplicity), sorting of γ-rays emitted by the excited fission fragments (energy and multiplicity). Neutron cross sections: life is not perfect

Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluating a cross section file for one isotope requires a very complex task, out of the capabilities of the users. It involves both experimental data analysis and nuclear modelling. Thus, different agencies and geopolitical areas offer their own evaluated files to the users. The files are distributed with no restrictions and this also applies to some processing tools. Monte Carlo codes (and other calculational tools) need to have processed data. The oiriginal ENDF-6 format has to processed (RP, Doppler broadening...) Differences between the ENDF files do exist and can be sometimes large, thus leading to different results in the calculations. Benchmarking is the standard procedure for validating the “correctness” of the files. Therefore, users should have access to all sets of files for a proper systematic uncertainty assessment. Summary and conclusions