Learning for a Better Future The Learning Metrics Task Force April 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This We Believe: Keys to Educating Young Adolescents The position paper of the Association for Middle Level Education.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards
Learning Metrics Task Force Virtual Briefing April 2014.
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
DC CAS Kickoff Tamara Reavis Director Standards, Assessment, and Accountability.
Graduate Expectations. Critical Thinking & Life Management. IBT graduates are expected to: identify and demonstrate the essential employability skills.
The Creative Curriculum Developmental Continuum Assessment System
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Recommendations to the Ministers of Education of Southeast Asian Countries From Seminar on Lifelong Learning Policy Frameworks in the Southeast Asian Countries.
E 9 meeting on Teacher Development for inclusive relevant Quality Education.
Learning Metrics Task Force Phase 2 Consultation Prototype Framework for Measuring Learning Outcomes December 2012 – January 2013.
21st Century Skills. The 21st century skills movement or global transformation The global landscape for learning is reshaping itself.
Learning Metrics Task Force Overview and Results of First In-Person Meeting October 2012.
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION & INSTRUCTION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY LEARNER JUNE 15-17, 2009 HOPE BROWN, HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE, ST. EDMOND, FORT DODGE VALERIE JERGENS,
21st Century Skills Initiatives
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Curriculum Review origins: The National Debate  Support for: – flexibility, breadth and balance – the comprehensive principle  Desire to address: –
A presentation of key findings from a national survey of 800 registered voters conducted September 10-12, 2007.
Early Childhood Development (ECD) Scales: Overview & Lessons Learned Dr. Ghazala Rafique Aga Khan University Pakistan Regional Consultative Meetings on.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Exploring Learning Domains.
An Innovative Public School and Universal Pre-K Partnership.
INEE Regional Tools Launch Washington, DC July 1, 2010.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Learning Metrics Task Force Virtual Briefing October 2014.
Global Learning Metrics: Can we measure learning at a globally comparative level? Kate Anderson Simons Center for Universal Education at the Brookings.
1 Health and Wellbeing For All. 2 Katie Paterson Programme Officer - Education NHS Health Scotland.
Learning Metrics Task Force Catalyzing a Shared Vision for Education and Learning.
A Curriculum for Excellence Routes for Learning study day February 2007 Jessie Wojciechowski Professional Adviser.
Learning Metrics Task Force A Global Vision for Measuring Learning.
Learning for a Better Future The Learning Metrics Task Force.
A Focus on Health and Wellbeing Wendy Halliday Learning and Teaching Scotland.
STEM EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION Barbara McAllister May 2013 INTEL’S MODEL FOR.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Ready to Raise PowerPoint Resource The Work of Early Years Community Developers Please feel free to adapt these PowerPoint slides to your needs. Credit.
Lenore Yaffee Garcia, Head Education and Culture Division Office of Education, Science and Technology V Meeting of the Authorities and Executive Committee.
Curriculum for Excellence Health and Wellbeing. Purpose of this session  To present key aspects of Health and Wellbeing in Curriculum for Excellence.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
21 st Century Skills Jason McLaughlin Kean University EMSE
Carroll County Public Schools Developing 21 st Century Learners In collaboration with the Partnership for 21 st Century Skills.
Bennington County Head Start Child Outcomes Midpoint Data Report.
POPE FRANCIS GLOBAL ACADEMY CURRICULUM PRESENTATION JANUARY 31, 2016.
Learning for a Better Future The Learning Metrics Task Force May 2013.
Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010.
Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi (ITA) Centre of Education and Consciousness Panel: Towards Universal Learning, One Country at a Time: The Results.
Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metric (SEA-PLM) II CONSULTATIVE MEETING.
Alignment between Curriculum and Teaching in Cambodia Presenter : Dr. Kreng Heng.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
The Global Partnership
Assessment and Report Cards
21st Century Skills in the Classroom
Our Children, Our Community, Our Change
DPI 10 Teaching Standards
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
California's Early Learning and Development System Overview
Agenda for monitoring education progress to 2015 and beyond
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
The Scottish Education System
The New Illinois Learning Standards
African Development Forum V
Kuwait National Curriculum
For SEAMEO RECSAM Meetings on Basic Education Standards Emma Pearson,
Bennington County Head Start and early head start Report child outcomes school readiness goals.
Grade 6 Outdoor School Program Curriculum Map
12/11/2015.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
National Literacy and Numeracy Learning Progressions: Overview
Presentation transcript:

Learning for a Better Future The Learning Metrics Task Force April 2013

Project Overview

Overarching Purpose of the Project “…ensuring excellence so that recognized and measurable learning outcomes are achieved by all…” To achieve EFA Goal 6

Improved Learning Outcomes for Children & Youth Improved System Quality & Classroom Practice National Policies, Priorities & Capacity for Measurement Learning Measured Globally Scope of the Learning Metrics Task Force National & Global Hybrid Approach National & Global Hybrid Approach

What does the task force aim to accomplish? Build consensus on improving and measuring learning outcomes among the global education community Develop concrete recommendations for measuring learning at the global and national levels Have recommendations translated into action (including but not only to inform the post-2015 agenda) Long-term: Shift the conversation on education from access to access plus learning, and improve learning outcomes for children and youth

Three Core Questions The task force engages high-level political actors, technical experts and practitioners in an 18-month-long global consultation process in order to build consensus around three questions: 1.Standards: What learning is important for all children and youth? 2.Measures & Methods: How should learning outcomes be measured? 3.Implementation: How can measurement of learning improve education quality?

Working groups of technical experts Co-Chairs Public Consultation Project Structure Task Force Members Secretariat Standards Measures & Methods Implementation UNESCO’s Institute for Statistics; Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution Open, global, online and in person Nat’l govts, regional bodies, civil society, donors, EFA- convening agencies Input through consultation: 1,000 people in 84 countries to date

Task Force Members UN Agencies: UNESCO UNICEF Office of the UN Secretary General UNDP Donors: AusAID DFID Dubai Cares/United Arab Emirates French Agency for Development (AFD) Global Partnership for Education Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) International Education Funders Group USAID World Bank Regional Bodies: African Union Association for Education Development in Africa (ADEA) Arab League of Educational, Cultural, and Scientific Organization (ALECSO) Southeast Asian Minister of Education Organization (SEAMEO) Organisation of Ibero-American States (OEI) Private Sector: Pearson National Governments: City of Buenos Aires, Argentina Govt. of Assam, India Kenyan Ministry of Education Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation Civil Society: ActionAID, representing Northern Civil Society Camfed, representing Southern Civil Society Education International Pratham Queen Rania Teacher Academy, Jordan

We are here Phase I: What learning? Phase II: What measures? Phase III: How to do this? Project Process

In Phases I and II, the voices of nearly 1,000 people in 84 countries have informed task force recommendations. The Consultation Process

Phase I What learning is important for all children and youth?

Key Decisions from Phase I Seven domains of learning Hybrid approach (national and global) The task force will consider existing and to-be- developed measures Recommendations will cover early childhood through lower secondary

Report No. 1: Toward Universal Learning TF response to what learning is important for all children and youth? Presents vision for what every child every child everywhere should learn. Based on task force consensus, working group expertise and research, and input from more than 500 participants in 57 countries. Available online: ports/2013/02/learning-metrics

Phase II How should learning outcomes be measured at the global and national levels?

Seven Domains: Physical Well-Being Social & Emotional Culture & the Arts Literacy & Communication Learning Approaches & Cognition Numeracy & Mathematics Science & Technology Early Childhood Physical health & nutrition Health knowledge & practice Safety knowledge & practice Gross, fine, and perceptual motor Self-regulation Emotional awareness Self-concept & efficacy Empathy Social relationships & behaviors Conflict resolution Moral values Creative arts Self- & community-identity Awareness of & respect for diversity Receptive language Expressive language Vocabulary Print awareness Curiosity & engagement Persistence & attention Autonomy & initiative Cooperation Reasoning & problem solving Early critical thinking skills Symbolic representation Number sense & operations Spatial sense & geometry Patterns & classification Measurement & comparison Inquiry skills Awareness of the natural & physical world Technology awareness Primary Physical health & hygiene Food & nutrition Physical activity Sexual health Social & community values Civic values Metal health & well-being Creative arts Cultural knowledge Oral fluency Oral comprehension Reading fluency Reading comprehension Receptive vocabulary Expressive vocabulary Written expression/compositi on Persistence & attention Cooperation Autonomy Knowledge Comprehension Application Critical thinking Number concepts & operations Geometry & patterns Mathematics application Scientific inquiry Life science Physical science Earth science Awareness & use of digital technology Lower Secondary Health & hygiene Sexual & reproductive health Illness & disease prevention Social awareness Leadership Civic engagement Positive view of self & others Resilience/”grit” Moral & ethical values Social sciences Creative arts Cultural studies Speaking & listening Writing Reading Collaboration Self-direction Learning orientation Persistence Problem solving Critical decision- making Flexibility Creativity Numbers Algebra Geometry Everyday calculations Personal finance Informed consumer Data & statistics Biology Chemistry Physics Earth science Scientific approaches Environmental awareness Digital learning Subset of Competencies To Track Globally

Improved Learning Outcomes for Children & Youth Improved System Quality & Classroom Practice National Policies, Priorities & Capacity for Measurement Learning Measured Globally A Global/National Hybrid Approach The task force is investigating a process for supporting improved assessment at the national level across a larger set of competencies. The task force recommends 6 areas of measurement for tracking at the global level.

Six Areas for Global Measurement* Data should show achievement levels, progress over time, and equity disparities Proposed Areas of Global MeasurementRationale 1.Access to and completion of learning opportunities through enrollment and completion indicators Addresses the unfinished access agenda for out-of-school children and youth and emphasizes the importance of tracking completion, which currently is not done systematically. 2.Exposure to a breadth of learning opportunities across all seven domains (indicator to be developed). Children and youth should have a breadth of learning opportunities that, at a minimum, covers the seven learning domains. 3.Early childhood experiences that result in readiness for primary school, through a school readiness indicator Because of the varying rates at which young children develop, a holistic measure across multiple domains is the best way to capture learning at this stage. 4.The ability to read and understand a variety of texts through: (1) a set of “learning to read” indicators at the early primary level; and (2) a set of “reading to learn” indicators at the end of primary and lower secondary levels. Foundational reading skills necessary for learning to read are critical for functioning in modern society, in addition to the ability to comprehend and analyze complex texts through a variety of media. 5.The ability to use numbers and apply this knowledge to real-life situations through numeracy indicators at the primary and secondary levels. Children must be able to count and understand mathematical concepts both to make informed economic choices and to pursue advanced learning in such disciplines as science, engineering, economics, research, technology, etc. 6.An adaptable, flexible skill set to meet the demands of the 21 st century (indicator to be developed). Children and youth need a variety of skills across the seven learning domains to succeed in the 21st century.

1. Access to and completion of learning opportunities through enrollment and completion indicators. Recognizes the unfinished access agenda. Allows for a broad definition of schooling, including any intentional learning programs (formal, nonformal or virtual). Feasibility: Currently measured in almost all countries in an internationally comparable way DOMAINS COVERED

2. Exposure to a breadth of learning opportunities across all seven domains. Based on national curriculum and potentially instructional practices New measure to be developed Feasibility: Not currently measured globally DOMAINS COVERED

3. Early childhood experiences that result in readiness for primary school, through a school readiness indicator. DOMAINS COVERED A holistic measure across at least 5 domains: Physical well-being Social and emotional Literacy and communication Learning approaches and cognition Numeracy and mathematics Feasibility: Emerging − Currently there is no global measure, but there are several promising efforts that could be scaled up to the global level

4. The ability to read and understand a variety of texts through: (1) a set of “learning to read” indicators at the early primary level; and (2) a set of “reading to learn” indicators at the end of primary and lower secondary levels. Learning to read in early primary Reading to learning at the end of primary and lower secondary Feasibility: Currently measured in most countries, sometimes in an internationally comparable way DOMAINS COVERED

5. The ability to use numbers and apply this knowledge to real-life situations through numeracy indicators. Measured at primary and lower secondary Feasibility: Currently measured in most countries, sometimes in an internationally comparable way DOMAINS COVERED

6. An adaptable, flexible skill set to meet the demands of the 21st century. Measured at lower secondary Indicator to be developed, might include: o Environmental awareness o Collaborative problem solving o Digital literacy o Social responsibility o Other subdomains Feasibility: Currently no global measure, but some components are currently measured. The concept needs further defining and measures to be developed. DOMAINS COVERED

Key Decisions from Phase II 1.Measure six areas at the global level. 2.Support countries to improve learning measurement and outcomes. 3.Develop a process to operationalize points #1 and #2, including exploring the potential role of a multi-stakeholder advisory group 4.Move forward collectively to improve learning outcomes, but also inform the post-2015 process by sharing LMTF recommendations with decision-makers.

Phase III How can measurement of learning improve education quality?

Implementation Working Group Structure Four Subgroups Working Group Chair: Dzingai Mutumbuka ADEA Chair & former Minister of Education of Zimbabwe Subgroup on Existing Measures: Access/completion; school readiness; literacy; numeracy Subgroup on New Measures: Breadth of learning; 21st century knowledge/skills Country-Level Subgroup: Roadmap for decision- making and capacity building Global-Level Subgroup: TOR for the Multi-stakeholder Advisory Group

Phase III Consultation Period From 30 April – 15 June 2013 Proposals of the Implementation Working Group will be considered by the task force at its third in-person meeting on July Consultations on proposals from the subgroups on existing and new measures will be conducted virtually. Consultations on proposals from the country-level and global-level subgroups will be conducted both online and in person.

Abu Dhabi Sample of In-Person Consultations April – June 2013 Dakar Juba Addis Nairobi Pretoria Johannesburg Hong Kong Seoul Bangkok Lahore Peshawar Karachi Lucknow New Delhi Paris Buenos Aires Brasilia Mexico City Washington DC Bogota Panama

The task force welcomes your guidance and input. The following resources are provided to support stakeholder consultations: “Discussion Guide for Implementation” Project Overview Documents: 2-Page Brief PowerPoint Slides and Notes Facilitator’s Guide Consultation Overview Form Consultation Sign-In Sheet Please submit your feedback by 15 June 2013 to inform the final task force recommendations. Phase III Consultation Documents

Thank you! For updates on the Learning Metrics Task Force and information about working groups and consultations, please visit To receive updates on the Learning Metrics Task Force, please send your name, organization, and address to: On On Twitter