Introduction of my work AYAKO HIEI (AYA) Hiroshima Univ 2008/5/30 me.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
US CMS H1/H2 Issues1 H C A L Dan is interested in the calibration of the HCAL for jets. He defines “R” as the measured energy of a pion, probably in ADC.
Advertisements

Measurement of charmonia at mid-rapidity at RHIC-PHENIX  c  J/   e + e -  in p+p collisions at √s=200GeV Susumu Oda CNS, University of Tokyo For.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
1 The Study of D and B Meson Semi- leptonic Decay Contributions to the Non-photonic Electrons Xiaoyan Lin CCNU, China/UCLA for the STAR Collaboration 22.
Feb High-pT Physics at Prague1 T. Horaguchi Hiroshima University Feb. 4 for the 4 th International Workshop.
03/27/'07T. ISGC20071 Computing GRID for ALICE in Japan Hiroshima University Takuma Horaguchi for the ALICE Collaboration
JSPS Research Fellow / University of Tsukuba T. Horaguchi Oct for HAWAII /10/15HAWAII
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
PHENIX Fig1. Phase diagram Subtracted background Subtracted background Red point : foreground Blue point : background Low-mass vector mesons (ω,ρ,φ) ~
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
Summary of PHOS Internal Notes (part I) Rafael Diaz Valdes 10/25/20151.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Olivier RavatLes Houches/June 3rd Higgs associated production at LHC : Thecase Olivier Ravat, Morgan Lethuillier IPN Lyon Les Houches 2003 : Physics.
Ian Ross Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Mentor: Dr. Richard Teuscher University of Toronto ATLAS Group ATLAS Calorimetery: Cosmic Ray Commissioning.
Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.
T. Sugitate / Hiroshima / PHX031 / Nov.01 The Photon Spectrometer for RHIC and beyond PbWO 4 Crystal Density 8.29 g/cm 3 Radiation length 0.89 cm Moliere.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
2008 Oct. Tsukuba 1 Misaki Ouchida Hiroshima University For the PHENIX Collaboration ω ω ω e+e+ eーeー γ γ π+π+ π0π0 γ πーπー π0π0 γ γ Low mass vector.
PHOS offline status report Dmitri Peressounko ALICE offline week,
Calibration of the PHENIX Lead Scintillator Calorimeter H.Torii for the PHENIX Collaboration Kyoto Univ./RIKEN Contents Lead Scintillator Calorimeter(PbSc)
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
Hycal Energy Resolution, Timing, &Trigger Efficiency, A cumulative study. Chris Mauney.
2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)
Search for the  + in photoproduction experiments at CLAS APS spring meeting (Dallas) April 22, 2006 Ken Hicks (Ohio University) for the CLAS Collaboration.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
Feasibility study of Heavy Flavor tagging with charged kaons in Au-Au Collisions at √s=200 GeV triggered by High Transverse Momentum Electrons. E.Kistenev,
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.
2008 Oct. Tsukuba 1 Misaki Ouchida Hiroshima University For the PHENIX Collaboration ω ω ω e+e+ eーeー γ γ π+π+ π0π0 γ πーπー π0π0 γ γ Low mass vector.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
December, Calibration of electromagnetic calorimeter of Hall A DVCS experiment Eric FUCHEY Ph.D Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire.
High Performance PbWO 4 - Lead Glass Hybrid Calorimeter at Jefferson Lab M. Kubantsev ITEP, Moscow, Russia/Northwestern University, Evanston, USA A. Gasparian.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Jan. 13, 2004Tomoaki Nakamura - Hiroshima Univ.1 Measurement of Fluctuations in Event-by-Event N ch -N γ Balance Tomoaki Nakamura and Kensuke Homma for.
9/11/2003Tomoaki Nakamura - Hiroshima Univ.1 Event-by-event charge/neutral fluctuation at RHIC-PHENIX Tomoaki Nakamura / Kensuke Homma Hiroshima University.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
gamma ray polarisation measurement
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
The h double helicity asymmetry and cross section
Mickey Chiu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Search For Pentaquark Q+ At HERMES
STAR Geometry and Detectors
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
BESIII EMC electronics
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Mickey Chiu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kazuya Aoki For the PHENIX Collaborations. Kyoto Univ. / RIKEN
The Pentaquark Q+ Search
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
Quarkonium production in p-p and A-A collisions: ALICE status report
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction of my work AYAKO HIEI (AYA) Hiroshima Univ 2008/5/30 me

12 Motivation : ALICE & PHOS PHOton Spectrometer :is a electromagnetic calorimeter :consist of 5 module. 1 module consist of 56×64 PWO crystal … … 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 2 We have to calibrate each crystal ! (56×64×5=17920) We have to calibrate each crystal ! (56×64×5=17920) Measurement feasible region:5-80MeV energy :3% We can operate PHOS By remote control without being influenced by a magnetic field.

12 How to calibrate energy In General use the incident particle of known behavior to a crystal 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 3 For Example  Test Beam (Energy)  LED (signal level or fluctuation)  Inclination of energy distribution  MIP,Minimum Ionization Particle(Energy) ※ e.g. cosmic ray  Particle by collision (e.g. Invariant mass) etc… π0 invariant mass peak → γ + γ (98%) ※ Short life time π0 θ M γγ E γ1 E γ2 134MeV count Reconstructed invariant mass[MeV]

12 Energy calibration using pi0 mass peak 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 4 π0 θ M γγ E γ1 E γ2 BAD GOOD π0 θ M γγ E γ1 E γ2 GOOD 134MeV count Invariant mass[MeV] 110MeV One of the two is fixed. Dead channel?? mis calibration?? For exsampe

12 In order to make this method establish It is necessary to: – Investigate whether the peak positions are in agreement or not, and then the statistical error. (using simulation) – Investigate how correct can we calibrate using only γ event on simulation, and using only pi0 event. and using collision event. etc 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 5 NOW I try

12 Simulated collision 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 6 pp ONLY PHOS pp collision √S=14TeV Event generator : PYTHIA Event Bias : Minimum Bias Number of Event : 4M Noise with a Gaussian with the RMS=4MeV Assumed a perfect calibration for each crystal noise →I have to apply some “cut”.

12 Reconstructed pi0 mass histogram : NO CUT 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 7 What is this structure?

12 The structure consists of noise mainly. 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 8 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Noise with a Gaussian with RMS = 4MeV

12 Reconstructed pi0 mass histogram : apply CUT 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 9 I apply  pT>1GeV/c  α< ±941 pi0 Statistics are insufficient. for investigating the mass depending on one crystal and SO …

12 The crystals are grouped in 8×7 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work ± [GeV/c 2 ] ± [GeV/c 2 ] The peak position are in agreement with each other within the statistical error Of 1~2%,with the perfect calibration BUT!

12 NOW I investigate the following group 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 11 module x y ※ ALICE Coordinate system 0 54 crystal number ± [GeV/c 2 ] ± [GeV/c 2 ] Maybe a difference comes out most. because of Influence of a shower leak or clustering I want to see! (I have just try it now)

12 There are many things done still more It is necessary to: – Investigate whether the peak positions are in agreement or not, and then the statistical error. (using simulation) – Investigate how correct can we calibrate using only γ event on simulation, and using only pi0 event. and using collision event. etc 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 12 NOW I try

Köszönöm for LISTENING 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work

12 BACK UP : Trigger for cosmic ray 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 14 ALICE COsmic-Ray Detector (ACORD)

12 BACK UP : component E E’ DAQ Data acquisition System Primary Detecting element 2008/5/30 15 AYA / Introduction of my thesis work

12 BACK UP : signal flow Signal Sampling count Number of sample : 70 Sampling frequency : 10MHz 2008/5/30 16 AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 2 Shaper!!!

12 BACK UP 2008/5/30AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 17

12 BACK UP : shower shape 2008/5/30 18 AYA / Introduction of my thesis work 1 GeV electron By Chuman thesis electron cosmic ray hadronic showerpunch through μ