Agrisure® Viptera TM 3111 GM corn hybrid and its respective isoline provided by Syngenta Agro S.A. de C.V.- Mexico were used. Research was carried out.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LILY LEAF BEETLE RESISTANCE AMONG LILY HYBRIDS Caitlyn MacGlaflin 1, Lisa Tewksbury 1, Dr. Richard Casagrande 1. 1 Department of Plant Sciences, University.
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Genetic modification allows us to manipulate the characteristics of a plant by altering its genome.
Results showed in Figure 1 indicated that WE mean for grain pearl millet was higher 84% than corn and 22% than sorghum for the highland location. WE mean.
Bt corn Saturnina C Halos, Ph.D. Chair, Biotechnology Advisory Team Department of Agriculture.
Host Preferences of the Colorado Potato Beetle Leptinotarsa Decemlineata Erin M. Hitchner 1, Thomas 2 P. Kuhar, Joseph C. Dickens 3 and Rod Youngman 1.
Insecticidal Control of Caterpillar Pests of Cole Crops Alton N. Sparks, Jr. and David G. Riley, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia INTRODUCTION Cole.
Introduction to Regulatory Affairs: Agencies and Permit Process Advanced Biotechnology (c)(8)(A)
Agricultural Entomology. What is Agriculture? The cultivation of plants/animals for Human Use Includes plants used for : Food (Fruits, vegetables, grains.
Insecticide Resistance: Genes For Pest? Donnie Day.
Insect Resistance Management for Corn Rootworm Alan Reynolds, Sharlene Matten, and Tessa Milofsky U.S. EPA/Office of Pesticide Programs, Biopesticides.
GMO PowerPoint By Sharlah Reynolds. Vocabulary.
Genetically Modified Organisms Interactions with Population Health and Safety Chelsea Kadish Tyler Vaughn Ashley Wright.
MICROBIAL POPULATIONS AND ENZYME ACTIVITIES IN SOIL IN SITU UNDER TRANSGENIC CORN EXPRESSING CRY PROTEINS FROM BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS I. Icoz 1, D. Saxena.
GENETICALLY MODIFIED CORN ON Spodoptera frugiperda AND Helicoverpa zea CONTROL IN SINALOA, MEXICO Luis. A. Aguirre-Uribe*, Agustín Hernández-Juárez, Gustavo.
Some Remarks on pest control in Brazil Thanks to Anderson Galvão – Céleres Consultoria and Prof. Marcelo Gravina de Moraes -UFRGS.
Genetically Modified Foods
Mating disruption trials for control of Bonagota cranaodes (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple in Brazil Miryan D.A. Coracini 1, Evaldo F. Vilela 2, Paulo.
Human Impact. Breaking news: World population has reached 7 billion... Can you think of any problems this might cause?
Genetically Modified Foods
CHAPTER 38 PLANT REPRODUCTION AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Section C: Plant Biotechnology.
Genetically Modified Organisms in Agricultural Production.
Risk assessment: Bt corn MON810 Risk assessment: identifying and evaluating possible dangers predicting the chances the danger will occur assessing the.
Genetically Modified Organisms in Portugal. It is understood by genetically modified organism (GMO) any organism which genetic material, by biotechnology.
Lecture 13 Chapter 8 Genes and traits of interest II Neal Stewart.
PROJECT SUMMARY This study will determine the relationship between roadside car pollution, and a tomato crop’s natural defenses against a predator. Although.
Field Evaluation of Some Biorational Insecticides against Yellowmargined Leaf Beetle, Microtheca ochloroma (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Organic Crucifer.
Mass Rearing and Augmentative Releases of Bracon hebetor to Suppress Indianmeal Moth, Plodia interpunctella Populations in Stored Wheat Mukti N. Ghimire.
Background o Pesticides are broadly used by humans to control and eliminate unwanted species of insects and plants. o More than one billion pounds of pesticides.
Workshop on modern biology & its social impacts 2-5 Dec 2007, Xishuanbanna, Yunnan, China Environmental Impacts of GM Crops for Insect-Resistance Yufa.
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) Any microorganism, plant or animal that has purposely had its genome altered using genetic engineering technology.
Genetically Modified Plants Summary Makes changes to the hereditary material of a living organism Biotechnologies are used to develop plants resistant.
Advantage or disadvantage? Consequence of genetic engineeringAdvantageDisadvantage Genetic engineering borderlines on many moral issues, particularly involving.
Genetically Engineered Foods are here!!! What are they? What do they accomplish?
Genetically Modified Plants By: Amy Chen, Bridget Panych
Do Now 3.26 (Week 30) Objective: Describe and evaluate the impact of transgenic organisms on food production. Tasks: 1.Pass forward last week’s Do Nows.
Integrated Pest Management. Learning Objectives 1.Define IPM (Integrated or Insect Pest Management). 2.Describe why IPM is important. 3.Describe what.
Lab practical. Announcements Collections: – Turn in on the last day of Class (Fri. 7 December) Course evaluations: – If you missed, you can fill one out.
{ Bt cotton Bethany Zumwalde.  What is Bt cotton?  How is it produced?  Advantages & limitations  Bt cotton study  Inheritance of an insecticidal.
Side effect of transgenic plants Biology Centre, ASCR, v.v.i. Institute of Entomology Department of Experimental Ecology Oxana Habuštová Biology Centre,
CHAPTER 15 PEST CONTROL -In the US 13% OF ALL CROPS DAMAGED BY INSECTS World Wide 33%
March Against Monsanto. Genes & DNA – life’s code.
Biosecurity in agricultural field within neoliberal policies Schaper and Parada, 2001; Melgarejo et al., 2002; Russell, 2008; Azadi and Ho, 2009; Qaim,
Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.
Field Performance of WideStrike Insect Protection Against Key Lepidopteran Pests in the Mid-South And Southeastern U.S. M. Willrich Siebert, L. B. Braxton,
Development of an Action Threshold for Spodoptera exigua in Tomatoes James E. Taylor and David G. Riley. University of Georgia, Department of Entomology,
13-4: Genetic Engineering. GMOs Genetically Modified Organisms.
Efficacy of Optimum® Intrasect™ Maize Hybrids Against Southern Lepidopteran Pests Matthew W. McKinnon, Jarrod T. Hardke, Robert L. Rorie Pioneer Hi-Bred.
Controversies Surrounding the Introduction of Bt Brinjal in India Monika Leininger-Casper, Wyoming; Social Work Mariah Strike-Pinedale, Wyoming; International.
DNA: THE SECRET OF LIFE By: James Watson Chapter 4: Playing God: Customizing DNA Molecules.
GMO Fact or Fiction?. Fact or Fiction? GMOs are created by injecting chemicals into food AFTER it is harvested Fiction GMOs are developed through genetic.
Ayushi Jain Definition GMO (Genetically modified organism) refers to an organism that has its genetic material altered using genetic engineering.
The population of the Alumbre river sub-watershed in Bolivar, Ecuador (Fig. 1) is increasingly invading fragile areas of the high plains of the Andes (the.
Science of Food Biotechnology
Susceptibility of Cry1F-susceptible and -resistant fall armyworm to transgenic corn plants containing single or pyramided Bt genes Y. Niu1, R. Meagher2,
RAMMOHAN R. BALUSU and HENRY Y. FADAMIRO*
EFFECTS OF SEED STERILIZATION TREATMENTS ON SEEDLING VIGOR AND IN VITRO CALLUS INDUCTION OF FOUR MAIZE INBRED LINES Anita Dutta1, Juan Carlos Martinez2.
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s)
DIFFERENT CONCENTRATION-RESPONSE ESTIMATES FOR ASSESSING HELIOTHINE SUSCEPTIBILITY TO BT INSECTICIDAL PROTEINS M. I. Ali and R. G. Luttrell, University.
Research Scientists Advocating the Use of Bt Corn
Genes and traits of interest II Neal Stewart
Genes and traits of interest II Neal Stewart
Purpose of IPM (= Integrated Pest Management)
Purdue-Indiana Seed Industry Forum
Human Intervention and Evolution
Station 11 Plant Biotechnology.
Standard: Students will analyze how biological traits are passed on to successive generations. Element: Examine the use of DNA technology in forensics,
Safeguarding our Food Supply
GMO Fact or Fiction?.
GMO Fact or Fiction?.
Presentation transcript:

Agrisure® Viptera TM 3111 GM corn hybrid and its respective isoline provided by Syngenta Agro S.A. de C.V.- Mexico were used. Research was carried out at El Camalote, Culiacan, Sinaloa; Mex., using an complete randomized block design with three treatments and four replicates. Treatments consisted of Agrisure® Viptera TM 3111, its conventional hybrid with two insecticide treatments using emamectin benzoate to control Spodoptera frugiperda during the crop cycle and the same hybrid without chemical control. Visual inspections were preformed every other week, taking 10 plants at random and checking them for the pest to determine the population abundance, frequency and fluctuation. The number of individuals (abundance) of Chaetocnema pulicaria evaluated in each material was analyzed by non-parametric statistic using the Kruskal-Wallis test in order to observe changes in the insect population. Different corn hybrids have been genetically modified (GM) by the insertion of genes that express the ∂-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) (Bruck et al. 2006), in which the plant expresses the protein with insecticidal activity against Lepidoptera and some Coleoptera insects (Silva, 2005). In Mexico, GM corn planting is not authorized for commercial purposes; however, Bt maize planting was permitted experimentally under biosafety conditions to test their pest control effectiveness. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of a GM corn hybrid Agrisure® Viptera TM 3111 with the Cry1Ab and Vip3Aa20 toxins of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) which provides resistance to Lepidoptera and mCry3A to Coleoptera, over abundance of the corn flea beetle Chaetocnema pulicaria, in Sinaloa, Mex. GENETICALLY MODIFIED CORN EFFECT OVER Chaetocnema pulicaria (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) AS A NON-TARGET PEST Agustín Hernández-Juárez &, Luis. A. Aguirre-Uribe*, Mariano Flores-Dávila, Gustavo A. Frías-Treviño, Ernesto Cerna-Chávez, Jerónimo Landeros-Flores. Departamento de Parasitología. Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro # 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo; Coahuila, México. & PhD student, INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Bruck, J. D., Lopez, M. D., Lewis L. C., Prasifka J. R. and R. D. Gunnarson Effects of Transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis Corn and Permethrin on Nontarget Arthropods. J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 23(3): Daly, T. and G. D. Buntin Effect of Bacillus thuringiensis Transgenic Corn for Lepidopteran Control on Nontarget Arthropods. Environ. Entomol. 34(5): Dively, G. P. and R. Rose Effects of Bt transgenic and conventional insecticide control on the non-target natural enemy Community in sweet corn. 1st International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team. United States p. Silva, C. C. A Maíz Genéticamente Modificado. AGRO-BIO. Bogotá, Colombia. 60 pp. LITERATURE CITED Table 1. Abundance of Chaetocnema pulicaria in genetically modified corn Agrisure® Viptera TM 3111 and conventional hybrid in El Camalote, Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mex. Hybrid Abundance Population mean 1 Agrisure® Viptera TM Conventional hybrid +i Conventional Fig.1. Population fluctuation of Chaetocnema Pulicaria in genetically modified corn Agrisure® Viptera TM 3111 and conventional hybrid in El Camalote, Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mex. +i=insecticide; 1 P= 0.932, df=2 Results show that the GM corn expressing the Bt toxin does not have a negative effect on the abundance or changes in population density of C. pulicaria. Dively and Rose (2002) found greater abundance of flea beetle and no adverse effects were observed with Bt corn and mentioned that insecticide control has a negative impact on non-target secondary pests. Daly and Buntin (2005), studied populations of non-target arthropods in Bt corn and found no differences among them indicating that secondary pests such as C. pulicaria presented greater abundance in Bt corn and suggested that they are not adversely affected concluding that GM corn does not present adverse effects over non-target populations in corn. A 100% frequency was found throughout the growing season in the three hybrids evaluated (Fig. 1); population density did not differ among evaluated hybrids (Table 1), although is observed that the GM hybrid had a higher density and abundance than its conventional hybrids. Agrisure® Viptera TM 3111 showed the highest number of C. pulicaria, probably due to a greater availability of food resources. Conventional hybrid with insecticide treatment had the lowest population density with respect to Agrisure® Viptera TM 3111 and the conventional hybrid without insect control, suggesting that chemical control with emamectin benzoate affected the abundance of corn flea beetle, while the same hybrid without insect control, showed a decrease in population density, which was influenced by leaf damage caused by fall armyworm in this hybrid, leading to a reduced availability of food for corn flea beetle.