1 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Process Validation Pathogens, Indicators or Surrogates Gary R. Acuff Director, Texas A&M Center for Food Safety Professor, Food Microbiology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recreational Water Sampling. References A.Guidelines for Canadian Recreational Water Quality by Health & Welfare Canada 1992 B.CFP 213 CF Health Manual.
Advertisements

A CLEARER PATH FOR PATHOGEN TESTING. HOST Bill McDowell Editorial Director, Meatingplace MODERATOR Tom Johnston Editor, Meatingplace.
Understanding the Microbiology of Hen Housing Systems Deana R. Jones, PhD Egg Safety and Quality Research Unit USDA Agricultural Research Service Athens,
Bacteriological Examination of water, milk and air
HACCP Validation The FSIS Perspective Charles Gioglio FSIS/OPPD Director, Meat and Poultry Advisory Committee Staff.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03G Fully Cooked Not Shelf Stable Tool Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through.
Effects of mechanical injuries on leafy greens in relation to proliferation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Danyelle Osorio 1, Daniel Labuz 1, Sofia Windstam.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
Perspectives on Controlling FMC Through HACCP Kerri B. Harris, Ph.D. International HACCP Alliance Texas A&M University.
Introduction of Hazards – Slaughter Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 1 May 6, 2002 Introduction of Hazards - Slaughter Gary R. Acuff, PhD Professor of.
V. Microbiology of water V. Microbiology of water A. Waterborne microbial pathogens B. Indicator bacteria for drinking water C. Other indicators for drinking.
Food Microbiology Risk Reduction Program for Rutgers Dining Halls.
Coliform Bacteria in Water
Introduction to Lab Ex. 20: Enumeration of Bacteria - Most Probable Number method Membrane Filter method.
Food Safety Management at the Retail Level Katherine MJ Swanson, PhD Vice President Food Safety May 28, 2008 Campinas, Brazil IAFP Latin American Symposium.
Perspectives on Pathogen Performance Standards Richard C. Whiting FDA, CFSAN College Park, MD December 10, SRA Annual Meeting.
Food Industry Perspective on Non-O157 STEC Jenny Scott Vice President, Food Safety Programs Grocery Manufacturers/Food Products Association.
Efficacy of Produce Wash Product: Use of Fresh Potatoes as Model System for Evaluating Pathogen Control in Produce Processing Peter Gray, Dong-Hyun Kang.
Applied Environmental Microbiology 43 Copyright © McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC. Permission required for reproduction or display.
A Bacterial Analysis of Irradiated and Non-Irradiated Meat Megan Markland Department of Biological Sciences York College, PA Introduction Hypotheses H.
Update On FSIS “Big Six” Non-O157 STECs North American Meat Processors Association.
Deanna Scheff, Jim Burritt, Karunanithy Chinnadurai, and Naveen Chikthimmah University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI Introduction: The United.
Rinse & Chill  Technology: A Novel Intervention for Reduction of Undesirable Bacteria on Beef Carcasses and On-going Protection from E. coli O157:H7 in.
Review of the Compliance Guide HACCP Systems Validation Public Meeting June 25, 2013 Washington, DC Dr. William Shaw Risk, Innovations & Management Staff.
Example (5A) Operationalising a Performance Objective with a Microbiological Criterion for a Risk-Based Approach.
Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes, E. Coli O157:H7 and Salmonella in Frozen Ground Beef Patties by Electron Beam Irradiation ABC Research Corporation.
11 April 2000INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 3 Indicators/Surrogates vs. Pathogens Frank F. Busta Professor Emeritus,
Lab 29 Water labs.
Composting Practices and Pathogen Reduction Joan Jeffrey, Extension Veterinarian University of California School of Veterinary Medicine VMTRC---TULARE,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Loren Lange Deputy Assistant Administrator Office of Public Health Science April.
Non-O157 STEC: New Challenges / Practical Limitations / Next Steps Robert L. Buchanan HHS Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied.
Science-based policy for the food industry: Embracing the BEST Science that’s out there Andrew K. Benson Professor, Department of Food Science Director,
THE CONCEPTS of PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, CUMULATIVE STEPS AND VALIDATION STUDIES Dr. John Kvenberg, Acting Director, Office of Field Programs July 15, 1999.
Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-producing E. coli: Status and Relevance to Food Safety The Food Safety Group U.S. Meat Animal Research Center USDA-ARS Clay Center,
Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 2 HACCP Impacts on Contamination Levels in Meat and Poultry Products: FSIS Perspective Delila R. Parham, DVM Office of.
Umass Food Science EXTENSION RESEARCH
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 HACCP Systems Validation NACMPI September 22-23, 2011 Washington, DC William.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator Office of Field Operations.
FOOD SAFETY STUDY OF LEAFY GREENS IRRIGATED WITH TILAPIA FARM EFFLUENTS IN TAMAULIPAS. Epidemics of Escherichia coli and other related gastro-intestinal.
2.4 Biological Parameters Micro-organisms that bring diseases are called “PATHOGEN”. Their quantities are very small compared to other micro-organisms.
Introduction All pathogenic microorganisms implicated in foodborne diseases are considered enteric pathogens, except S. aureus, B. cereus, C. botulinum.
Data Needed to Measure HACCP Impacts on Public Health Jack Guzewich, R.S., M.P.H. Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 2 May 6, 2002.
Efficacy of a novel bactericide for elimination of biofilm in food processing facilities Tong Zhao Center for Food Safety University of Georgia For 3 rd.
WORKPACKAGE 2.?: DELIVERABLE 2.?.?: PILLAR 2: Control and intervention strategies along the fork-to-farm chain to ensure beef safety Laboratory of Microbiology.
WP 13 and 25 PILLAR 2: Control and intervention strategies along the fork-to-farm chain to ensure beef safety Laboratory of Microbiology & Biotechnology.
1. Food Safety and Inspection Service: Initial Validation Requirements: Understanding the FSIS Compliance Guideline for HACCP Systems Validation Meryl.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Validation – In Plant Findings Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Public Health-Related Performance Standards Currently Under Consideration for.
IMT’s Food QA/QC Assays Andy Moreno Vice President, Microbiology Sales Engineering Cell: FAX:
NACMPI May 23-24, Measuring Establishment Risk Control for Risk-Based Inspection Philip Derfler Assistant Administrator, Office of Policy, Program.
1. Food Safety and Inspection Service: HACCP Systems Validation Training 2.
NEAGU LILIANA Microbiologist for Romanian National Institute of Public Health Dr.A. Leonte 1-3, Sector 5, Bucharest, Romania
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS. Prerequisite Programs Support the HACCP Plan.
Food Safety Challenges and Benefits of New Technology Randall Huffman, Ph.D. Vice President, Scientific Affairs American Meat Institute Foundation USDA-
Chapter 20 Indicators of Foods Microbial Quality and Safety Tsuei-Yun Fang 節錄自 Modern Food Microbiology, 2005Jay, J. M., 7th ed.
Olivier KAMANA (DVM,MSc., PhD)
Fate of Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes during the manufacture of dry cured Westphalian-style Ham S. Balamurugan1,
BTEC 223 Lab Exercise Water Module
Establishing shelf life: Use of Predictive modelling
Water Quality & micro-organisms
PETRIFILMTM PLATES flat dehydrated media on a sheet which forms a rehydrated gel when 1 ml ( or other volume as directed)
Perspectives on Controlling FMC Through HACCP
Bacteria Cultures Biotechnology II.
Thermotolerant coliforms
APIC Greater NY Chapter 13 Journal Club Session November 16, 2016
Microbiology of Water Dr.GulveR.M.
Microbiological Sampling of Dairy Products
Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS)
Presentation transcript:

1 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Process Validation Pathogens, Indicators or Surrogates Gary R. Acuff Director, Texas A&M Center for Food Safety Professor, Food Microbiology

2 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Validation  Does your process control actually work? How well?

3 ©2016, G.R. Acuff How to Use the Data  Performance Objective  The maximum frequency and/or concentration of a hazard in a food at the time of consumption that provides or contributes to the appropriate level of protection.  Performance Objective  The maximum frequency and/or concentration of a hazard in a food at the time of consumption that provides or contributes to the appropriate level of protection.

4 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Performance Objective  H 0 - ∑R + ∑I ≤ PO  PO = Performance Objective  H 0 = Initial level of the hazard  ∑R = Total (cumulative) reduction of the hazard  ∑I = Total (cumulative) increase of the hazard  PO, H 0, R and I are expressed in log 10 units  H 0 - ∑R + ∑I ≤ PO  PO = Performance Objective  H 0 = Initial level of the hazard  ∑R = Total (cumulative) reduction of the hazard  ∑I = Total (cumulative) increase of the hazard  PO, H 0, R and I are expressed in log 10 units

5 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Performance Objective H 0 - ∑R + ∑I ≤ PO 3 - ∑R + 0 ≤ ∑R ≤ -2 ∑R ≤ -5 ∑R ≥ 5

6 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Validation  Does your process control actually work? How well?  Qualitative end product sampling provides insufficient information.

7 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Ideal Situation  Validate Process Control  Measure hazard (pathogen) presence  Pre- and post-CCP  Primary focus  Final product  Also helpful  Requires sufficient levels of pathogen

8 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Example: Validation of Beef Carcass Interventions  Pathogen presence on carcass surface  Inconsistent  Low levels  Insufficient for confirmation of process control  A measureable alternative?  Indicator bacteria  Aerobic Plate Count (APC), Lactic acid bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms, fecal coliforms, E. coli, enterococci

9 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Example: Log Reduction of E. coli O157:H7 and Aerobic Plate Count (Feces) on Beef Carcass Surfaces Log Reductions

10 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Example: Log Reduction of E. coli O157:H7 and Coliforms (Feces) on Beef Carcass Surfaces Log Reductions

11 ©2016, G.R. Acuff A more consistent alternative…  Surrogates  American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)   Biosafety Level 1  Tested against salmonellae & STECs  Accession numbers  BAA-1427 to BAA-1431  Non-pathogenic Escherichia coli Surrogates Indicators Panel (ATCC MP-26)  Why ATCC?

12 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Available Options  Presence/absence of hazard (pathogen)  Detect naturally occurring traditional indicator bacteria  Inoculate and measure reductions  Traditional indicator bacteria (source?)  Surrogates (AskFSIS)

13 ©2016, G.R. Acuff

14 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Validate Process Control  Enumeration of naturally-occurring hazard before and after CCP  Inoculate with hazard  Inoculate with surrogate  Enumerate indicators before and after  Research study conducted in facility  Reference published journal article Increasing Strength