Roadmap to Change: Updating Maine’s Response to the Olmstead Decision Project Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Advertisements

Elementary School Counselor
Using medicaid with HUD’s Homeless Assistance Programs
1 Our priorities for the next three years Close Critical Service Gaps Increase availability of culturally appropriate services and serve more children.
Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.
11 Opportunities to Improve Care for Persons with Disabilities: The Community Living Initiative IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL HEALTH REFORM IN A DIFFICULT ECONOMIC.
Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and FinancingColorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing 1 CCT & MDS 3.0 Section Q Return to the.
Heading Home Hennepin: The Ten-Year Plan to End Homelessness in Minneapolis and Hennepin County Presented by: the Hennepin County and City of Minneapolis.
OPWDD’s Transformation Update
The Indiana Family and Social Services Administration No Wrong Door System 2015 Planning Grant.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
1. Self-AdvocacyObjective 1.1: Increase the number of individuals with developmental disabilities who participate in self- advocacy, leadership and self-determination.
Delaware Health and Social Services Delaware’s Delivery of Long Term Services and Supports The Need for Change Delaware Health Care Commission January.
Helping Families Receive the Best Start in Life.  Check In  AOK History  AOK Communities  Conceptual Framework  Advancing Collaborative Leadership.
1 NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY Subcommittee on Quality Measures for Children's Healthcare in Medicaid and CHIP Overview.
The Transition Process Vickie Kummer UNF SOAR Program Fall 2004.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
1 Long-term Care Vermont’s Approach Individual Supports Unit Division of Disability and Aging Services Department of Disabilities, Aging & Independent.
Addressing The Boom Trends in Aging and Long-Term Care Florida Conference on AgingAugust 31, 2004.
Medicaid and Behavioral Health – New Directions John O’Brien Senior Policy Advisor Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP.
Alaska’s Behavioral Health System Presentation to the Idaho Behavioral Health Transformation Workgroup March 24 th 2010 Bill Hogan Commissioner Commissioner.
Delaware Health and Social Services Fiscal Year 2014 JFC Hearing Legislative Hall Senate Hearing Room February , 2013 Rita Landgraf Cabinet Secretary.
Section 1115 Waiver Implementation Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee May 13, 2010.
Facilitator: Monique Parish Funded by California Department of Mental Health October 2009 Traumatic Brain Injury Grant Project Stakeholder Session.
Department of Public Welfare – Business Review Board Project/System Name Date.
What Minnesota’s Olmstead Plan Means for YOU
Division of Aging Services State Plan on Aging Georgia Department of Human Services Presenter: Jean O’Callaghan Deputy Director Division of Aging Services.
1 1 Michele Goody, Director Cross Agency Integration July 2014 Community First MassHealth Initiatives and Programs.
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Housing Vision Paper November 2013.
The Home and Community Base Services (HCBS) Rule: Transition Plan Update ARRM Business and Finance Forum November 18,
NWD Person Centered Counseling Training and Credentialing 1.
1. What are Long Term Services and Supports (LTSS)? Who Uses LTSS? What is a No Wrong Door (NWD) System? Why Do We Need a NWD System? What Can We Do in.
Oregon: A Leader in Long-Term Care Reform Kathy Wilson, MS, MBA University of Massachusetts Boston American Public Health Association Conference November.
OHIO’S MONEY FOLLOWS THE PERSON DEMONSTRATION Ohio Balancing Efforts February 2011.
Open Minds, Healthy Minds: Transforming Mental Health & Addictions Services in Ontario 1 Presentation to: Ontario Municipal Social Services Association.
GRANTEE MEETING APRIL 26, 2011 VPI and YWD-HR: Draft Theory of Change.
Update on the Balancing Incentive Program and Uniform Assessment Tool “Make Medicare Work” Summit Kelly Cunningham, Deputy Administrator Healthcare and.
1. Agenda  Welcome  February 19 th Meeting Recap  Presentation from ACL/AIDD Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities  Presentation.
Worknet/Community Employment Transition
1.  Overview of the HCBS Settings Final Rule  Implementation Requirements for States  Arkansas’s Transition Process 2.
The Medicaid waiver program
Elizabeth Evans Getzel Virginia Commonwealth University
Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Program (IAP)
MLTSS Delivery System SubMAAC
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Medicaid Managed Long Term Services and Supports – Moving Forward
South Carolina ACCESS Plus (ARDC) Planning Retreat
HHS STRATEGIC PLAN FY 2018 – 2022 AN OVERVIEW
North Carolina’s Dual Eligible Beneficiary Integrated Delivery Model
North Carolina’s Dual Eligible Beneficiary Integrated Delivery Model
HHS Strategic plan fy An Overview
The Arc of the District of Columbia, Inc.
Integrated Data & Analytics Section Chief
Office of Developmental Programs IM4Q Annual Training Quality Management Updates July 28, /18/2018.
Transition: Preparing for Life after High School
Division of ACF / Assisted Living Surveillance
Making Sense of the Home and Community-Based Final Rule
Older American Act Amendments of 2006
OPWDD Accomplishments 2016
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
NC Dual Eligibles Advisory Committee September 23, 2016
About the NCCDD Our Members Our Initiatives November 2017
Autism Law Summit, October, 2018
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
Dana Williamson, Director Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Future of Public Health in Kansas: Local Pilot
What is Community Living?
Amy Westling, Director of Policy
Dignity Fund Service and Allocation Plan Update
Presentation transcript:

Roadmap to Change: Updating Maine’s Response to the Olmstead Decision Project Overview

What is Olmstead? 1999 Supreme Court decision States must provide services to individuals in the most integrated settings appropriate to their needs Values of integration and inclusion

Why is Olmstead Important? The Supreme Court decision has directed the evolution of services for persons with disabilities throughout the U.S. since 1999 It has guided the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) of the federal government in supplying funds to the states The federal Department of Justice has required many states to implement it.

Maine DHHS Vision and Mission Vision: Maine people living safe, healthy, and productive lives in the most independent way possible Mission: To promote safe, healthy, independent lives for all, while ensuring efficient and effective use of resources for Maine’s most vulnerable

Maine Is National LTSS Leader In top 10 LTSS expenditures per state resident nationally – #1 for mental health services – #2 for 1915(c) I/DD waivers – #7 for all 1915(c) waivers – #10 for all LTSS expenditures High proportion of LTSS expenditures on LTSS – #15 for % HCBS v institutional – #7 for growth in HCBS %

Maine’s Response to Olmstead In 2003 Maine DHHS released the Roadmap for Change: Maine’s Response to the Olmstead Decision. Product of 3 years of work by a broad stakeholder group. Provided vision and direction over the last decade for all people with disabilities.

2003 Roadmap Recommendation Areas 1.Voice and self-advocacy 2.Control over services and supports 3.Person-centered 4.No wrong door 5.Coherent IT systems 6.Responsive service coordination 7.Waiting list 8.Funding and planning 9.Direct care providers 10.Quality of services 11.Transportation 12.Housing 13.Jobs

Progress Report Built on 2014 I/DD Olmstead update Analyzed all populations receiving long term services and supports – Aging population – Adults and children with physical disabilities – Adults and children with intellectual/ developmental disabilities and autism spectrum disorder – Adults and children with mental/behavioral disorder – Individuals with substance use disorder

Progress Report Approach and Structure Review secondary source documentation Examine administrative data Conduct stakeholder interviews Conduct survey Progress and opportunities for each LTSS population within 2003 Roadmap recommendation area

Progress Report Findings

Updating Olmstead Roadmap Facilitate meetings with DHHS to define parameters of roadmap changes Facilitate series of external stakeholder meetings Synthesize information collected through meetings and research into report Public comment

Updated Olmstead Roadmap 1.Support individual choice so individuals can effectively make decisions about issues that are important to them – Further develop the system of choice to meet individual needs – Expand person-first, individual-driven treatment/care plans

Updated Olmstead Roadmap 2.Improve systems coordination to improve delivery and management of long term services and supports – Improve statewide access to information and resources – Support seamless transitions – Continue to expand conflict resolution – Improve and integrate information technology systems

Updated Olmstead Roadmap 3.Improve community integration so individuals are able to meaningfully participate in community life – Develop and enhance natural supports – Increase community-based housing options – Increase vocational and employment opportunities – Improve statewide transportation services

Updated Olmstead Roadmap 4.Create efficient and effective policies and regulations to manage the implementation of long term services and support and achieve intended outcomes – Support access to and capacity of innovative services and supports – Support value-based services – Address unique needs of people in remote areas

Updated Olmstead Roadmap 5.Promote continuous quality improvement to ensure high quality long term services and supports and the prudent use of public funds – Increase preventative and evidence- based/informed community services – Invest in workforce development – Increase and improve regulatory and quality review

Where Olmstead Fits in DHHS

Evaluating Implementation What does success look like to you? – Outputs – products or deliverables the organization intends to provide; measured by count or other data – Outcomes: Results or consequences of an action or intervention; represented as short-term (1-3 years) or long term (4-7 years) – Indicators: A measurement of the outcome; outcomes stated in measurable and observable terms to help stakeholders assess achievement toward intended outcome