SC4MGV – ESA Contract No. 4000108663/13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop 25 - 28 November 2014, Paris, France ESA SC4MGV Search strategy for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KARTDATA TIL NYTTE FOR SAMFUNNET POSITIONING DATA – FOR SOCIETY’S BENEFIT DETERMINATION OF THE GRAVITY FIELD OVER NORWEGIAN TERRITORIES.
Advertisements

Comparison of full-repeat and sub-cycle solutions in gravity recovery simulations of a GRACE-like mission Siavash Iran Pour, Nico Sneeuw, Matthias Weigelt,
NADIR workshop - October 25-26, 2011page 1 / 16 Density and Winds Inferred from GOCE Accelerometer (thrusters) Data Sean Bruinsma CNES, Toulouse Eelco.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.
Satellite geodesy. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis, b.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
COMBINED MODELING OF THE EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE AND GRACE SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS Robert Tenzer 1, Pavel Ditmar 2, Xianglin Liu 2, Philip Moore.
Joint GSTM and DFG SPP Symposium, GFZ-Potsdam October 2007 ESA’s supporting Activities Related to Mass Transport in the Earth System Roger Haagmans.
VENUS (Vegetation and Environment New µ-Spacecraft) A demonstration space mission dedicated to land surface environment (Vegetation and Environment New.
CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © This research is based on the estimation of the spherical harmonic geopotential.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 1 Gravity Field.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Don P. Chambers Center for Space Research The University of Texas at Austin Understanding Sea-Level Rise and Variability 6-9 June, 2006 Paris, France The.
Resonances and GOCE orbit selection J. Kloko č ník (1), A. Bezd ě k (1), J. Kostelecký (2), R. Floberghagen (3), Ch. Gruber (1) (1)Astron. Inst. Czech.
1 Resolvability of gravity field parameters in a repeat orbit: degree/order limit J. Klokočník 1, J. Kostelecký 2, C. A. Wagner 3, A. Bezděk 1 1 Astronomical.
Using GRACE to estimate changes in land water storage: present limitations and future potential John Wahr, Sean Swenson, Isabella Velicogna University.
Assessment of Basin-scale Terrestrial Water Storage Variations from Reprocessed GRACE Gravity Fields for Climate Model Validation L. Zhang, H. Dobslaw,
ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)
1 Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE gravity field models Jürgen Kusche, Roland Schmidt with input from Susanna.
Hydrological mass changes inferred from high-low satellite- to-satellite tracking data Tonie van Dam, Matthias Weigelt Mohammad J. Tourian Nico Sneeuw.
Sea Level Change Measurements: Estimates from Altimeters Understanding Sea Level Rise and Variability June 6-9, 2006 Paris, France R. S. Nerem, University.
1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.
1 Geoid and Geoid Change: Discussion Topics Roger Haagmans, Boulder, 21October 2009.
A SATELLITE CONSTELLATION TO OBSERVE THE SPECTRAL RADIANCE SHELL OF EARTH Stanley Q. Kidder and Thomas H. Vonder Haar Cooperative Institute for Research.
Alaskan Mountain Glacial Melting Observed by GRACE 2006 WPGM, July , Beijing, China G32A-02 Wed. 11:05 AM J.L. Chen 1, B.D. Tapley 1, C.R. Wilson.
Water storage variations from time-variable gravity data Andreas Güntner Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section.
Solar Orbiter Mission (ESA) - The near-Sun phase  approach the Sun as close as 48 solar radii (~0.22 AU). At these distances, the angular speed of a spacecraft.
Meeting challenges on the calibration of the global hydrological model WGHM with GRACE data input S. Werth A. Güntner with input from R. Schmidt and J.
EGU General Assembly 2011, 3 rd – 8 th April 2011, Vienna, Austria EGU EIGEN-6 A new combined global gravity field model including GOCE data from.
GRACE Mascons and Hydrological Data for the Continents: GRACE ACCESS D. Rowlands (1), F. Lemoine (1), S. Luthcke (1), S. Klosko (2), D. Chinn (2), K. Akoumany.
Progress in Geoid Modeling from Satellite Missions
E. Schrama TU Delft, DEOS Error characteristics estimated from CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE derived geoids and from altimetry derived.
Key RO Advances Observation –Lower tropospheric penetration (open loop / demodulation) –Larger number of profiles (rising & setting) –Detailed precision.
TOWARDS THE TIME-VARIABLE GRAVITY FIELD FROM CHAMP M. Weigelt, A. Jäggi, L. Prange, W. Keller, N. Sneeuw TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.
GRACE Science Team Meeting October 15-17, 2007 Potsdam Germany Alternative Gravity Field Representations: Solutions, Characteristics, and Issues Michael.
RIGTC, Geodetic Observatory Pecný The institute's mission is basic and applied research in geodesy and cadastre Designated institute of Czech Metrology.
Parameters : Temperature profile Bulk iron and olivine weight fraction Pressure gradient. Modeling of the Martian mantle Recently taken into account :
Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.
Earth System Data Record of mass transport from time-variable gravity data Victor Zlotnicki 1, Matthieu Talpe 2, F. Lemoine 3, R. Steven Nerem 2, Felix.
Bouman et al, GOCE Gravity Gradients, ESA Living Planet Symposium 2010 GOCE Gravity Gradients in Instrument and Terrestrial Frames J. Bouman, Th. Gruber,
Vermelding onderdeel organisatie A 3-year series of Earth’s gravity field derived from GRACE range measurements Xianglin Liu, Pavel Ditmar, Qile Zhao,
Improved Marine Gravity from CryoSat and Jason-1 David T. Sandwell, Emmanuel Garcia, and Walter H. F. Smith (April 25, 2012) gravity anomalies from satellite.
ESA living planet symposium Bergen Combination of GRACE and GOCE in situ data for high resolution regional gravity field modeling M. Schmeer 1,
OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 On the use of temporal gravity field models derived from GRACE for altimeter satellite orbit determination.
ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.
Orbit Selection for the WATER HM Mission R. S. Nerem CCAR, CIRES, University of Colorado D. P. Chambers Center for Space Research, University of Texas.
4.Results (1)Potential coefficients comparisons Fig.3 FIR filtering(Passband:0.005~0.1HZ) Fig.4 Comparison with ESA’s models (filter passband:0.015~0.1HZ)
DOC-TAS-EN th International GOCE User Workshop UNESCO, Paris, France 28 November 2014 From GOCE to the Next Generation Gravity Mission Stefano.
The ESA call for the 9 th Earth Explorer mission (EE9)
Annette Eicker GRACE and geophysical applications Annette Eicker Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University of Bonn TexPoint fonts used in EMF.
Investigations on (radial) offsets between different Swarm orbit solutions 8 September th Swarm Data Quality Workshop, IPGP, Paris Heike Peter (PosiTim),
GOCE geoids and derived Mean Dynamic Topography in the Arctic Ocean Ole B. Andersen & Per Knudsen. DTU Space – Copenhagen, Denmark.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland * now at PosiTim, Germany 5th International GOCE User.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Observing Mass Distribution and Transport in the Earth System from an ESA Perspective Roger Haagmans, Pierluigi Silvestrin, Rune Floberghagen, Christian.
Detecting Hydrological Loading Effect (HLE) variations from GRACE/GPS over the Amazon basin. S. Melachroinos1, G. Ramillien2, J-M. Lemoine3, F. Perosanz3,
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014
Introduction to geodesy & accelerometry with Swarm
5th Workshop on "SMART Cable Systems: Latest Developments and Designing the Wet Demonstrator Project" (Dubai, UAE, April 2016) Contribution of.
Hyperspectral Wind Retrievals Dave Santek Chris Velden CIMSS Madison, Wisconsin 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Science 8 June 2005.
Chairs: H. Sünkel, P. Visser
D. Rieser *, R. Pail, A. I. Sharov
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
Daniel Rieser, Christian Pock, Torsten Mayer-Guerr
Recent Activities of Ocean Surface Topography Virtual Constellation (OST-VC) Remko Scharroo (EUMETSAT)
The Deorbiting of GOCE – A Spacecraft Operations Perspective
Laser Interferometry for a future GRACE follow-on mission
Presentation transcript:

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France ESA SC4MGV Search strategy for optimal double pair scenarios for future gravity satellite missions - experience from the ESA SC4MGV project - Siavash Iran-Pour, Matthias Weigelt, Michael Murböck, Stefania Tonetti, Pieter Visser, Ilias Daras, Joao de Teixeira da Encarnação, Stefano Cesare, Christian Siemes, Jose van den IJssel, Stefania Cornara, Thomas Gruber, Tonie van Dam, Roland Pail, Nico Sneeuw, Roger Haagmans

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Geodetic Requirements Improved sensitivity (100 times better than the GRACE mission) Higher spatial resolution (down to 150 km) Higher temporal resolution (sub-monthly solutions) Expanding the mission lifetime (at least 11 years) Global coverage of the Earth / good performance over high latitudes Double pair missions

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France a priori criteria Global geoid height error rms (considering polar gap) Looking at individual pair ground-track behaviour and gap evolution posterior criteria Sampling behaviour Spectral evalution Spatial evaluation Time-series evaluation Definition of performance criteria

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Limits - Technical Challenges Launch Non-gravitational forces Formation stability Attitude control Instrument performance Tracking system (e.g. laser pointing) / Inter-satellite distance Mission altitude...

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Gap evolution: Figure of Merit

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Genetic algorithm (GA) An evolutionary algorithm (EA), which generates solutions to optimization problems using techniques inspired by natural evolution, such as inheritance, mutation, selection, and crossover. Start with an orbital parameters’ pre-selection (based on former experiences) Make parameters' (variables’) library Implement GA

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Genetic algorithm (GA) Parameters' space repeat orbit (β/α) of each pair (within h ≥ 340 km), I polar between 88° and 92°, avoiding big polar gap, I inclined within the ranges of 65°–75° and 105°–115°, free ∆Ω and ∆M (0°–360° with step of 15°), ρ intersatellite 75 km to 100 km, avoiding pointing problem!

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Genetic algorithm (GA)

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Genetic algorithm (GA) Result from genetic algorithm (left) and dependence of solution on  and  M (right); Results based on 10 day solutions up to maximum degree L max = 100

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Baseline Scenarios Scenarioβ/αβ/αinclinationaltitudeSub-cycleCfn (L max = 100) [rev./day][deg.][km][days][mm] 1484/31 478/ /32 249/ /32 269/ /29 311/ /11 460/

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Evaluation criteria ClassMeasureLevel Orbit Orbit residuals 1 Sampling and ground track coverage Spectral Degree RMS (including spread of solution) 2 Cumulative geoid errors Signal-to-noise ratio Isotropy Spatial Global RMS Basin RMS Latitude and longitude dependent RMS Correlation Time series Equivalent water height 3 Total water storage Loading

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Evaluation criteria: Degree RMS Degree RMS Gain

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Evaluation criteria: Time-series RMS in term of total water storage change [mm] and degree RMS of the selected SC’s; in the degree-RMS the band denotes the spread of the 1-year time series of 10- day solutions.

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Selected Baseline Constellation Scenarioβ/αβ/αinclinationaltitudeSub-cycle [rev./day][deg.][km][days] 5172/11 460/ Based on posterior analysis:

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Alternative Scenarios Strategy GA results pool Background knowledge / requirements (e.g. Prograde orbits, β – α = odd,...) More emphasis on sampling behaviour (looking inside the pattern evolutions)

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Alternative Scenarios Scenarioβ/αβ/αinclinationaltitudeSub-cycle [rev./day][deg.][km][days] 6493/32 249/ /29 311/ /10 153/ /10 249/ /11 262/

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Alternative Scenarios log 10 Note: Sc. 8 (same groundtrack pattern) Impact of time-variable field

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Alternative Constellation Final decision is postponed to: After de-aliasing and post-processing workpackage blocks (decided at IM2)

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Validation of satellite orbits for baseline constellation

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Stability of orbits Ground track for 1-12 January 1996 for the leading satellite of the polar tandem (full repeat) of baseline constellation Ground track for 1-31 January 1996 for the leading satellite of the inclined tandem (full repeat) of baseline constellation for a selected geographical area

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Stability of orbits Along-track orbit differences for the polar pair. Time is with respect to the epoch of 1 January :00

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Standard processing of baseline constellation

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Standard processing of baseline constellation  Generation of simulated measurements  Generation of noise time series & stochastic models  Standard processing of baseline constellation

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Standard processing of baseline constellation Time variable gravity models

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Standard processing of baseline constellation Error sources Low-low Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking (ll-SST) observation colored noise 1 cm Gaussian orbit errors Accelerometer colored noise Attitude errors (quaternions) Errors in static gravity field: GOCE03S vs. EIGEN6C3 (120x120) Errors in the temporal atmospheric ("A") and oceanic ("O") parts of the full “AOHIS” time series (120x120) Tide model errors: EOT08a vs. GOT4.7 (50x50)

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Standard processing of baseline constellation Parameterization Daily epoch position and velocity for both pairs (6x2) Hourly piecewise-linear along-track and cross-track accelerations (50x2) 120x120 spherical harmonic coefficients (14,640 per period, e.g. 30 or 11 days)

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Standard processing of baseline constellation Impact of error sources – Bender Temporal aliasing hydrology

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France Work in Progress

SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France  Reduction of temporal and spatial aliasing: Methodology & applications  Post-processing (regularization, EOF+KS-Test filtering, …)  Error budget  Final selection of satellite constellation Work in Progress