Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories NECTAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Advertisements

Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Does anyone have concerns about the child’s functioning with regard to the outcome area? D OES THE CHILD EVER FUNCTION IN WAYS THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED.
Data Analysis for Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data 1.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
Update on Child Outcomes for Early Childhood Special Education Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center The National Association.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Lynne Kahn Christina Kasprzak Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes.
Orientation for New Staff Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center Early Childhood Outcomes Center September 2011.
Early Childhood Outcomes ECO Institute Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Robin Rooney ECO at FPG Prepared for the Office of Early Learning and School Readiness.
State Activities in Measuring Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn, Donna Spiker, Melissa Raspa, & Kathleen Hebbeler ECO Center Presented at: International Society.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Highs and Lows on the Road to High Quality Data American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA November, 2011 Kathy Hebbeler and Lynne Kahn ECO at SRI International.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
The Results are In! Child Outcomes for OSEP EI and ECSE Programs Donna Spiker Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International October 13, 2011 (CCSSO-SCASS.
Update on Part C Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center June 2011 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International.
The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International August, 2011.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Outcomes (Indicators C-3 and B-7) Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010 San.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
1 Using a Statewide Evaluation Tool for Child Outcomes & Program Improvement Terry Harrison, Part C Coordinator Susan Evans, Autism Project Specialist.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Child Outcomes: Understanding the Requirements in order to Set Targets Presentation to the Virginia Interagency Coordination Council Infant &
Module 5 Understanding the Age-Expected Child Development, Developmental Trajectories and Progress Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires.
1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress 2007.
2012 OSEP Leadership Conference Leading Together to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education:
Measuring Child Outcomes Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney (ECO) Early Childhood Outcomes (NECTAC) National Early Childhood TA Center Delaware COSF Training,
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement Kansas Division for Early Childhood Annual Conference Feb. 23rd 2012.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement TASN – KITS Fall 2012 Webinar August 31 st, 2012 Tiffany Smith Phoebe.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Kathy Hebbeler Lynne Kahn The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center.
Indicator 7: Measuring Preschool Outcomes Entry Data Collection Using the COS Process Sarah Geldart – MA ESE
Summary Statements. The problem... Progress data included –5 progress categories –For each of 3 outcomes –Total of 15 numbers reported each year Too many.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Parent and National TA Perspectives on EC Outcomes Connie Hawkins, Region 2 PTAC Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn ECO at FPG and NECTAC.
Early Childhood Outcomes Workgroup Christina Kasprzak and Lynne Kahn ECO and NECTAC July 2009.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Child Outcomes Measurement Tools & Process A story of 3 conversions.
Child Outcomes Measurement: Getting to Quality Data
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International AUCD Meeting Washington, DC
Review of Summary Statements for Target Setting on Indicators C3 and B7 Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 9,
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes
Webinar for the Massachusetts ICC Retreat October 3, 2012
The Basics of Quality Data and Target Setting
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO
ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO
Review of Summary Statements for Target Setting on Indicators C3 and B7 Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 9,
Measuring Part C and Early Childhood Special Education Child Outcomes
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009
Welcome to the Workshop!
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Presentation transcript:

Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories NECTAC National TA Meeting Baltimore, MD – August 28, 2007

2 OSEP Reporting Categories Percentage of children who: a.Did not improve functioning b.Improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers c.Improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it d.Improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers e.Maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers 3 outcomes x 5 “measures” = 15 numbers

3 Child Outcomes Summary Form Not an assessment tool Mechanism for converting information from multiple sources (including assessment data) into a common metric Yields ratings for each outcome on a 1-7 scale

4 Child Outcomes Summary From Ratings - Summary of 7 Points 7= Completely – age appropriate 6= Age appropriate, some concerns 5 = Somewhat - Some age appropriate 4 = Between 3 and 5 3 = Emerging - Not age appropriate but has immediate foundational skills 2 = Between 1 and 3 1 = Not yet - Not age appropriate and not immediate foundational skills

5 4 FunctioningFunctioning

6 Entry 5

7 Exit 6

8 EntryExit 7

9 Key Point The OSEP categories describe types of progress children can make between entry and exit Two COSF ratings (entry and exit) are needed to calculate what OSEP category describes a child progress

10 How changes in ratings on the COSF correspond to reporting categories a - e e. % of children who maintain functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers Rated 6 or 7 at entry; AND Rated 6 or 7 at entry; AND Rated 6 or 7 at exit Rated 6 or 7 at exit

11 EntryExit 10

12 EntryExit 11

13 EntryExit 12

14 How changes in ratings on the COSF correspond to reporting categories a - e d. % of children who improve functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND Rated 6 or 7 at exit Rated 6 or 7 at exit

15 EntryExit 14

16 How changes in ratings on the COSF correspond to reporting categories a - e c. % of children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same aged peers, but did not reach it Rated higher at exit than entry; AND Rated higher at exit than entry; AND Rated 5 or below at exit Rated 5 or below at exit

17 EntryExit 16

18 EntryExit 17

19 How changes in ratings on the COSF correspond to reporting categories a - e b. % of children who improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to same aged peers Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND Rated the same or lower at exit; AND Rated the same or lower at exit; AND Scored “Yes” on the progress question (b) Scored “Yes” on the progress question (b)

20 EntryExit 19

21 EntryExit 20

22 EntryExit 21

23 How changes in ratings on the COSF correspond to reporting categories a - e a. % of children who did not improve functioning Rated lower at exit than entry; OR Rated lower at exit than entry; OR Rated 1 at both entry and exit; AND Rated 1 at both entry and exit; AND Scored “No” on the progress question (b) Scored “No” on the progress question (b)

24 EntryExit 23

25 EntryExit 24

26 Key Points Improved functioning is defined as acquiring one new skill or behavior In most cases (especially if the rating is higher than 1), children who receive the same rating at entry and exit will show improved functioning E.g., 4 at entry and 4 at exit The answer to the COSF “b” question (1b, 2b, 3b) is important for distinguishing between OSEP category a and OSEP category b.

27 Conversion COSF ratings to OSEP categories Automatic conversion entry & exit data into categories See Under ECO tools: “calculator” in Excel with programmed decision rules Tutor and handouts explaining algorithm for the conversion

28 COSF Calculator Analytic calculator is only a start – programs/states may want to add more fields and more functions E.g., to look at outcomes by how long the child was in the program. The program is yours to use and modify as you see fit