Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories NECTAC National TA Meeting Baltimore, MD – August 28, 2007
2 OSEP Reporting Categories Percentage of children who: a.Did not improve functioning b.Improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged peers c.Improved functioning to a level nearer to same-aged peers but did not reach it d.Improved functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers e.Maintained functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers 3 outcomes x 5 “measures” = 15 numbers
3 Child Outcomes Summary Form Not an assessment tool Mechanism for converting information from multiple sources (including assessment data) into a common metric Yields ratings for each outcome on a 1-7 scale
4 Child Outcomes Summary From Ratings - Summary of 7 Points 7= Completely – age appropriate 6= Age appropriate, some concerns 5 = Somewhat - Some age appropriate 4 = Between 3 and 5 3 = Emerging - Not age appropriate but has immediate foundational skills 2 = Between 1 and 3 1 = Not yet - Not age appropriate and not immediate foundational skills
5 4 FunctioningFunctioning
6 Entry 5
7 Exit 6
8 EntryExit 7
9 Key Point The OSEP categories describe types of progress children can make between entry and exit Two COSF ratings (entry and exit) are needed to calculate what OSEP category describes a child progress
10 How changes in ratings on the COSF correspond to reporting categories a - e e. % of children who maintain functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers Rated 6 or 7 at entry; AND Rated 6 or 7 at entry; AND Rated 6 or 7 at exit Rated 6 or 7 at exit
11 EntryExit 10
12 EntryExit 11
13 EntryExit 12
14 How changes in ratings on the COSF correspond to reporting categories a - e d. % of children who improve functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND Rated 6 or 7 at exit Rated 6 or 7 at exit
15 EntryExit 14
16 How changes in ratings on the COSF correspond to reporting categories a - e c. % of children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same aged peers, but did not reach it Rated higher at exit than entry; AND Rated higher at exit than entry; AND Rated 5 or below at exit Rated 5 or below at exit
17 EntryExit 16
18 EntryExit 17
19 How changes in ratings on the COSF correspond to reporting categories a - e b. % of children who improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to same aged peers Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND Rated the same or lower at exit; AND Rated the same or lower at exit; AND Scored “Yes” on the progress question (b) Scored “Yes” on the progress question (b)
20 EntryExit 19
21 EntryExit 20
22 EntryExit 21
23 How changes in ratings on the COSF correspond to reporting categories a - e a. % of children who did not improve functioning Rated lower at exit than entry; OR Rated lower at exit than entry; OR Rated 1 at both entry and exit; AND Rated 1 at both entry and exit; AND Scored “No” on the progress question (b) Scored “No” on the progress question (b)
24 EntryExit 23
25 EntryExit 24
26 Key Points Improved functioning is defined as acquiring one new skill or behavior In most cases (especially if the rating is higher than 1), children who receive the same rating at entry and exit will show improved functioning E.g., 4 at entry and 4 at exit The answer to the COSF “b” question (1b, 2b, 3b) is important for distinguishing between OSEP category a and OSEP category b.
27 Conversion COSF ratings to OSEP categories Automatic conversion entry & exit data into categories See Under ECO tools: “calculator” in Excel with programmed decision rules Tutor and handouts explaining algorithm for the conversion
28 COSF Calculator Analytic calculator is only a start – programs/states may want to add more fields and more functions E.g., to look at outcomes by how long the child was in the program. The program is yours to use and modify as you see fit