1. Funding a new model of church 2 Welcome Opening Prayer Introductions and video 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Changes to Grant Making in Districts under Team Focus 2008 RMO Forum Workshop, Chris Sissons and Martin Attfield.
Advertisements

Overview of the Global Fund: Guiding Principles Grant Cycle / Processes & Role of Public Private Partnerships Johannesburg, South Africa Tatjana Peterson,
Future Directions on Rent Regulation and Laws affecting Tenants Shelter, Housing and Support Division February 27, 2004.
Housing & Homeless Council began with action in Conference Committee on Church and Society presented a resolution to the Annual Conference asking.
Local Finance and Fiscal Equalization Schemes in a Comparative Perspective: Australia and Canada Presentation to Conference on Making Fiscal Equalization.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada The State of Program Evaluation in the Canadian Federal Government Glenn Wheeler Director, Results Measurement.
HRA Self-Financing Update What it means & what we’ve done Housing Briefing 19 January 2012.
Chapter 70 Massachusetts School Funding Formula. Massachusetts School Revenues FY00-FY12 (in billions) 1/23/ School spending is primarily a local.
LISTENING TEAM REPORT Comprehensive Review Presentation prepared by Jacob Black-Lock.
School District No. 73 (Kamloops/Thompson) Draft Operating Budget DRAFT BUDGET FOR
Neighborhood Enhancement Program Council Study Session July 13, 2015.
Connecticut Conference of the UCC 2014 Budget Hearings Charlie Kuchenbrod Finance & Development Team Leader Our Shared Vision “That they may all be one”
Report of the Synodical Council. Synodical Council Membership Synod President as chairman First and second vice presidents 12 lay members (one from each.
Full Costing An introduction and lessons learnt from the UK and Finland Pierre Espinasse.
WHAT’S CHANGED POST THE FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY INQUIRY? FMG Seminar 27 March 2009 Presented by John Comrie.
Chapter 70 Aid FY14 Budget 7/12/2013. FY14 Chapter 70 Summary Aid 73 districts receive foundation aid to ensure that they do not fall below their foundation.
1 Self-directed Support – Older People’s Service Providers EVOC thinkSpace 20 June 2014.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
1 Fiscal Budget Parameters Prepared for University Senate September 4, 2003.
The Future of the Presbytery of Prospect Hill Three Options.
New Customer Contributions for the Water Sector: Workshop 4 August 2004.
CONNECTIONAL MINISTRIES REACHING FURTHER WITH THE GOSPEL BY SHARING THE LOAD.
Surviving to Thriving United Methodist Leadership Gathering Fall 2016.
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Information Session REMITS 1-4 Structural Change.
Preliminary House 1 Proposal January 25, 2017
Remit 4 Funding a New Model.
Measuring Impact Guide
Health and Social Care Devolution Carol Culley Deputy Treasurer, Manchester City Council NW Finance Directors Friday 15 May 2015 NW Finance Directors.
Remit 1 Three council model
Dr. Luca Cerioni Fair Tax Conference:
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Boston’s Payment in Lieu of Tax Program:
Preliminary House 1 Proposal January 25, 2017
The Forward Focus.
2017 Responsive Grants Conference Call for Prospective Grantees
2018 Preliminary budget and tax levy SEPTEMBER 25, 2017
Towards More Sustainable Programming for Global Health Missions
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
NAME OF CORPS date Our journey to generosity
Steps to Creating or Maintaining a Stewardship Committee
11/15/2018 A NEW FINANCIAL MODEL - OVERVIEW The United Church of Canada L’Église Unie du Canada GC43 webinar - May 29, 2018 Cheryl Stadelbauer-Sampa.
Speech from Becky Hewitt
The Revised SAH Agreement
Welcome Opening Prayer Introductions
Financial Report of Ohio Conference
Accelerate- The Whole Gospel to the Whole World
Sustainability Reporting
Proposal for a new approach to MMF
Church Finances : How does it all work?
Research, Planning and Monitoring Department (RPM)
Workstream 5: Governance Financial overview for Year 5
United Way of Pennsylvania
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Well equipped spaces in the right places?
Can we operate a share scheme which is fair for all?
Church Budget Basics.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
The Implementation of Rural Development Policy in the New Member States: Constraints and Lessons for Romania Dr Robert Ackrill (Nottingham Trent University)
Structure of the PCC The PCC will be responsible for the whole parish as defined in the Constitution of the Church in Wales. The membership shall consist.
Report from the Society Committee on Budget and Finance
Report of Council on Finance & Administration
FINANCIAL BRIEFINGS 2018 Welcome.
Charter School Funding in Massachusetts Policy and Practice
APCM 2018 Our Finances.
Per Capita Task Force Report
REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #16 PROSPECT / BEACON FALLS
Developing SMART Professional Development Plans
COMMON FUND 2019 Ensuring we can live out one mission, many places.
COMMON FUND 2019 Ensuring we can live out one mission, many places.
Presentation transcript:

1

Funding a new model of church 2 Welcome Opening Prayer Introductions and video 2

Funding a new model of church 3 Five principles behind the remit (1) use Mission & Service to fund mission and ministry activities (2) fund governance and support services of other courts/councils by assessing communities of faith/pastoral charges (3) share assessments equitably across the whole church (4) permit Conferences/presbyteries/regional councils to use additional resources for regional purposes (5) encourage sharing of all resources across the church 3

Funding a new model of church 4 Replaces our current assessment, this would not add on top of it Assessment would fund governance and support services across the church Churches provide a proportionate share The size and scope of denominational governance and support services would be directly linked to finances of congregations Voluntary Mission & Service givings would be focused on mission and ministry Fundamental changes in remit 4 4

Funding a new model of church 5 Current funding model Existing assessments fund: Close to 100% of presbytery budgets ( some have investment income) 10% to 60% of Conference budgets ZERO % of denominational budget Mission & Service funds: Six program areas: direct grants and program costs, including staff and support services % of Conference operating costs So why make this change? 5

Funding a new model of church 6 Proposed funding model Proposed assessments fund: Governance and support services at regional and denominational levels Mission & Service funds: Mission and ministry at regional and denominational levels including direct grants and program costs So why make this change? 6

Funding a new model of church 7 The assessment is fair and transparent A more sustainable and compelling model for both (1)denominational governance and support services and (2)mission and ministry Maintain existing levels of global and Canadian granting AND potentially increase it Make funding the work of the church more understandable and compelling to future generations So why make this change? 7

Funding a new model of church 8 There would be a clear line drawn between funds used for (a) governance and support services and (b) mission and ministry Potential for increasing Mission & Service giving which funds mission and ministry A new way to slice the Mission & Service pie 8

Funding a new model of church 9 To date Mission & Service funds are allocated to programming, but as other revenue sources decline, these funds will increasingly be called on to fund governance and support services also. If Mission & Service funds are called upon in the future to fund governance and support services, these services will not be carried evenly across the church. (Currently 42% of resident members who give to their local church also give for Mission & Service.) More reasons for making this change 9

10

Funding a new model of church 11 A fair and transparent model based on revenue Supports “ability to pay” with a transition plan Consistent with other denominations Recognizes how funding churches and giving patterns have changed since 1925 So why an assessment based on revenue? 11

Funding a new model of church 12 Assessment calculation using the Blue Form

Funding a new model of church 13 Both a target and a cap

Funding a new model of church 14 Will this change affect my pastoral charge? Your congregation’s assessment could go down … or up While many congregations will see increases, all congregations will more equitably fund the broader church 14

Funding a new model of church 15 Examples of assessment’s impact Net revenueOld assessmentTARGET new Forest Hill United (Toronto) $200,000 $6,200 $9,000 Tatamagouche PC (N.S.) $108,858 $3,200 $4,898 Long Lake PC (Sask.) $4,343 $ 3,133 $69,613

Funding a new model of church 16 Three-year phase-in approach is available Increase will be limited to a 10% increase over previous year’s total assessments, then frozen for two years All increases can be implemented at once 4.5% is both a cap and aspirational If remit 4 passes, what’s next? 16

Funding a new model of church 17 Depends on other remits too, but cost reduction will continue Greater call on Mission & Service to fund denominational governance and support services Potentially less capacity to fund new mission and ministry initiatives If remit 4 does NOT pass, what’s next? 17

Funding a new model of church 18 (1) use Mission & Service to fund mission and ministry (2) fund governance and support services of other courts/councils by assessing communities of faith/pastoral charges (3) share assessments equitably across the whole church (4) permit Conferences/presbyteries/regional councils to use additional resources for regional purposes (5) encourage sharing of all resources across the church A reminder of the principles behind the remit

Funding a new model of church 19 Still have questions? 19