Microphysics observations from MICRO-SCOPE J. Crosier, Z. Liu, J. Taylor, K. Bower, T. Choularton University of Manchester COPE meeting - Leeds - April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Crown copyright Met Office Met Office flying during DIAMET: EXT&MIX Richard Cotton.
Advertisements

Exploiting VERITAS Timing Information J. Holder a for the VERITAS Collaboration b a) School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, UK b) For full.
One Sample T-tests One sample t-tests are used in the following two situations The size of a sample is less than 25 The population standard deviation is.
Uncertainties and Limitations of the FCDP measurements during ATTREX 2011 Sara Lance Presented at the ATTREX Science Meeting Boulder, CO June 2012.
1 START08 Heymsfield/Avallone UTLS PSDs Stratospheric PSDs Population-mean ice crystal densities Crystal shape information (SID-2) Extinction estimates.
Measurement of particle size by direct imaging, including defocus effects Julian Kashdan, John Shrimpton Thermofluids Section, Department of Mechanical.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright The User-Requirement Document Damian Wilson, Met Office Jean-Marcel Piriou, Meteo-France.
Flight 1 Date: 2 nd November 2004 Time: 11:45-14:30 GMT Flight Duration 165 minutes Data Collected 21.8 Mb Recording Rate: 10 Hz* Airspeed: 80 m s -1 Deployment:
Observational approaches to understanding cloud microphysics.
PPA 415 – Research Methods in Public Administration Lecture 8 – Chi-square.
Daniel Grosvenor, Thomas Choularton, Martin Gallagher (University of Manchester, UK); Thomas Lachlan Cope and John King (British Antarctic Survey). Daniel.
CalWater2 Workshop NOAA P-3 and G-IV Jim McFadden, Jack Parrish and LCDR Justin Kibbey NOAA Aircraft Operations Center 1.
Microphysics of SPARTICUS and MacPex Clouds Paul Lawson.
Measurements of microphysical properties of convective clouds in the tropics and the mid-latitudes.
Topic #6: Ice/liquid mass partitioning in mixed phase cloud Co-leaders Greg McFarquhar (in-situ) Johannes Bühl (remote sensing) Participants In-situ: Bundke,
1 Cloud microphysical properties in cirrus during ATTREX Sarah Woods 1, Sara Lance 1, Eric Jensen 2, Nick Krause 1, R. Paul Lawson 1, Bruce Gandrud 1,
1 On the use of radar data to verify mesoscale model precipitation forecasts Martin Goeber and Sean Milton Model Diagnostics and Validation group Numerical.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Hurricane Microphysics: Ice vs Water A presenation of papers by Willoughby et al. (1984) and Heymsfield et al. (2005) Derek Ortt April 17, 2007.
Dual-Polarization and Dual-Wavelength Radar Measurements Vivek National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado I.Polarization and dual- wavelength.
I was mostly famous for the first theoretical calculation of pi, which I estimated between 3, 10/71, 31/7 and 223/71.
OVERVIEW OF THE DATA OBTAINED DURING ASTAR 2007 (ARCTIC MIXED-PHASE CLOUDS) & CIRCLE-2 (MID-LATITUDE CIRRUS) Alfons Schwarzenboeck, Guillaume Mioche, Christophe.
Distribution of Liquid Water in Orographic Mixed-Phase Clouds Diana Thatcher Mentor: Linnea Avallone LASP REU 2011.
DoD Center for Geosciences/Atmospheric Research at Colorado State University Annual Review March 8-9, Mixed-phase clouds and icing research. Part.
A study of ice formation by primary nucleation and ice multiplication in shallow precipitating embedded convection T. Choularton 1, I. Crawford 1, C. Dearden.
Kent Peterson Fluid Imaging Technologies, Inc.
INUPIAQ/CLACE 2014 University of Manchester Data availability.
Daniel Grosvenor, Thomas Choularton, Martin Gallagher (University of Manchester, UK); Thomas Lachlan Cope and John King (British Antarctic Survey). Daniel.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Damian Wilson, 12 th October 2005 Assessment of model performance and potential improvements using CloudNet data.
R = Channel 02 (VIS0.8) G = Channel 04r (IR3.9, solar component) B = Channel 09 (IR10.8) Day Microphysics RGB devised by: D. Rosenfeld Applications: Applications:Cloud.
AGENDA Review In-Class Group Problems Review. Homework #3 Due on Thursday Do the first problem correctly Difference between what should happen over the.
Particle Size, Water Path, and Photon Tunneling in Water and Ice Clouds ARM STM Albuquerque Mar Sensitivity of the CAM to Small Ice Crystals.
BBC/4DC meeting Leipzig Structure of microphysical cloud parameters in Cu and StCu clouds during the BBC/4D-Clouds field campaign at Cabauw.
Towards parameterization of cloud drop size distribution for large scale models Wei-Chun Hsieh Athanasios Nenes Image source: NCAR.
Observation vs. Inferences The Local Environment.
Microphysics Measurements During CLACE 2014 G.J. Lloyd 1, R. Farrington, P.Connolly 1 T.W. Choularton 1, M. Gallagher 1 and K. N. Bower 1 1 Centre for.
2D-S Participation in RACORO Brad Baker, Paul Lawson and Qixu Mo.
COnvective Precipitation Experiment- Microphysical and Entrainment Dependencies (COPE-MED) PIs: Jeff French, David Leon, Sonia Lasher-Trapp, Also in field:
COPE PRESENTATION Process Modeling and Ice Nuclei.
Data Intercomparison – FAAM Flight Phil Rosenberg, Angela Dean.
Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP) and Two-Dimensional Imaging Probe (2DC) Al Cooper NCAR.
Aerosol Microphysical Properties (AMP) Measurements for ATom and cloud! 1) Where do particles come from in the remote troposphere? New particle formation.
1 Preliminary Validation of the GOES-R Rainfall Rate Algorithm(s) over Guam and Hawaii 30 June 2016 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
B3. Microphysical Processes
A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017, Pasadena, CA
UND Citation Aircraft OLYMPEX Data
Probing clouds: why its necessary to use multiple instruments.
Production of secondary ice particles and splintering of freezing droplets as a potential mechanism of ice multiplication Annika Lauber, Mona Schätzle,
WP L1, L2 (AIDA, LACIS).
University of Illinois OAP Processing Software
S. Besse, M. A’Hearn and the DIXI team
PIKNMIX-C Cold-air outbreak sorties
Grid Point Models Surface Data.
H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR) , S. Ghan (PNL)
Current State of Processing of the PECAN Microphysics Dataset
OBR: Cloud Physics Research
Cold Air Outbreak: Constrain Case Study
A non-amplification molecular probe approach John Gerdes, Ph. D.
Giant Raindrops in mid-latitude Cumuli
GAP Measurements and Instrumentation
A LATENT HEAT RETRIEVAL IN A RAPIDLY INTENSIFYING HURRICANE
How do you feel?
Composite Method Results Artificial Cases April 2008
Met Office Unified Model and CloudNet
Production Status 39 modules produced
Radar-lidar synergy for the retrieval of water cloud parameters
Science and Planning Workshop: START08/preHIPPO
Instrument errors due to DIFFRACTION and
Dual-Aircraft Investigation of the Inner Core of Hurricane Nobert
3 A Figure 1. Schematic of a conventional scanning tunneling microscope (STM).
Presentation transcript:

Microphysics observations from MICRO-SCOPE J. Crosier, Z. Liu, J. Taylor, K. Bower, T. Choularton University of Manchester COPE meeting - Leeds - April 2014

Probe NameRoleProviderStatus CDP Cloud droplet size distribution 1 – 50 µm FAAMBADC CAS Cloud droplet size distribution 0.7 – 50 µm Phase discrimination UoM CIP15 CIP100 Cloud particle size distribution µm (100 – 7000 µm) Shadow imaging UoM/FAAMBADC 2DS Cloud particle size distribution µm Shadow imaging Dual channel UoMBADC CPI High resolution particle imageryUoM Nevzorov Bulk Liquid/Ice water contentUKMO/FAAMBADC SID-2 Particle size distribution Phase discrimination 1 – 50 µm UKMO??

COPE meeting - Leeds - April 2014 Probe NameRoleProviderStatus CDP Cloud droplet size distribution 1 – 50 µm FAAMBADC CAS Cloud droplet size distribution 0.7 – 50 µm Phase discrimination UoMUnknown CIP15 CIP100 Cloud particle size distribution µm (100 – 7000 µm) Shadow imaging UoM/FAAMBADC 2DS Cloud particle size distribution µm Shadow imaging Dual channel UoMBADC CPI High resolution particle imageryUoMIn progess Nevzorov Bulk Liquid/Ice water contentUKMO/FAAMBADC SID-2 Particle size distribution Phase discrimination 1 – 50 µm UKMO??

COPE meeting - Leeds - April DS and CIP Optical Array Probes Heymsfield and Parrish 1978, JAM

COPE meeting - Leeds - April DS and CIP Optical Array Probes CIP, -11°C, convective region within frontal cloud

COPE meeting - Leeds - April DS and CIP Optical Array Probes 2DS, -13°C, frontal cloud

2DS and CIP Optical Array Probes COPE meeting - Leeds - April DS “Stereo” probe NamePixel Res.Num. pixelsArm SepComments CIP1515 µm6470 mm2 bit images Anti-shatter tips CIP µm6470 mmAnti-shatter tips 2DS10 µm12863 mmDual channel Anti-shatter tips CIP probe

Data processing COPE meeting - Leeds - April 2014 DyDy DxDx D mean = 0.5 * (D y + D x ) Sample volume We use “Centre In” method Increases sample volume of large particles compared to “All-In” Determination of particle size Heymfield and Parrish 1978

“Centre-In” vs “All-in” COPE meeting - Leeds - April 2014 Heymfield and Parrish 1978 All-In No end diodes activated Entire particle is imaged Unambigous particle size Most large particle rejected Centre-In Predict size for partially imaged particles Assumptions on particle shape/symmetry Increased sample volume for larger particles

Particle shape analysis COPE meeting - Leeds - April 2014 Circularity = Perimeter 2 / (4 * Pi * Area) 1 for a perfect circle, >1 for non-circular By setting a suitable threshold of shape factor, we get an estimate of ice particle concentrations However, there is no perfect threshold, and we frequently see “miss-classification”. We are working to improve/quantify this. Determination of particle shape

Sampling artefacts COPE meeting - Leeds - April 2014 Spurious counts can be recorded due to shattering/splashing of ice/liquid particle on instrument tips The use of inter-arrival time and image processing can remove this bias. Can remove some “good” particles. New anti-shatter tips greatly reduce the shattering problem.

Sampling artefacts COPE meeting - Leeds - April 2014 Spurious counts can be recorded due to shattering/splashing of ice/liquid particle on instrument tips The use of inter-arrival time and image processing can remove this bias. Can remove some “good” particles. New anti-shatter tips greatly reduce the shattering problem.

Data availability COPE meeting - Leeds - April 2014 FlightCIP15CIP1002DS*CPI images B783BADC To do B785UnusableBADC To do B786BADC To do B788BADC To do B789BADC Technical delayTo do B790BADC To do B791BADC To do B792BADC (1)Particle images are also available on BADC (2)Particle images from 2DS are from channel 1. Channel 2 will be uploaded by June (3)Due to error in 2DS sample volume, all 2DS concentrations are a factor of 2 too high

Example CPI images COPE meeting - Leeds - April 2014

Revise 2DS dataset to correct for Svol error Finish exporting of CPI images Improve particle classification for OAP probes Any additional data products required? CAS/SID analysis? COPE meeting - Leeds - April 2014 To do…..