© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 Inter-domain SLA Exchange

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NOPEER Route Attribute Propose a well-known transitive advisory scope attribute Applied by originating AS to route prefixes Interpretable as advice to.
Advertisements

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v MPLS VPN Technology Introducing the MPLS VPN Routing Model.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—5-1 MPLS VPN Implementation Configuring BGP as the Routing Protocol Between PE and CE Routers.
Problem Statement and Architecture for Information Exchange Between Interconnected Traffic Engineered Networks draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-03.txt.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.1 Routing Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 14. CS Summer 2003 MPLS VPN Architecture MPLS VPN is a collection of sites interconnected over MPLS core network. MPLS.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 13. CS Summer 2003 MP_REACH_NLRI Attribute The MP_REACH_NLRI attribute is encoded as shown below:
Interdomain Routing Establish routes between autonomous systems (ASes). Currently done with the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). AT&T Qwest Comcast Verizon.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Implementing Secure Converged Wide Area Networks (ISCW) Module 4: Frame Mode MPLS Implementation.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ROUTE v1.0—6-1 Connecting an Enterprise Network to an ISP Network Considering the Advantages of Using BGP.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—5#-1 MPLS VPN Implementation Configuring OSPF as the Routing Protocol Between PE and CE Routers.
Draft-ni-l3vpn-pm-bgp-ext-00IETF 87 L3VPN1 BGP Extension For L3VPN PM draft-ni-l3vpn-pm-bgp-ext-00 Hui Ni, Shunwan Zhuan, Zhenbin Li Huawei Technologies.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—5-1 MPLS VPN Implementation Configuring Small-Scale Routing Protocols Between PE and CE Routers.
BGP L3VPN Virtual PE draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-pe-01
1 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Session Number Presentation_ID Cisco Easy VPN Solutions Applications and Implementation with Cisco IOS.
1 © 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Session Number Presentation_ID Gopal Dommety Mobile IP VPN Design Team Update.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 BGP AS AN MVPN PE-CE Protocol draft-keyupate-l3vpn-mvpn-pe-ce-00 Keyur Patel,
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 Diffserv Yang Model
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ROUTE v1.0—6-1 Connecting an Enterprise Network to an ISP Network BGP Attributes and Path Selection Process.
1 © 2004 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. L2VPN RADIUS - IETF 62 L2VPN RADIUS Auto-discovery and provisioning draft-ietf-l2vpn-radius-pe-discovery-01.
Virtual Topologies for Service Chaining in BGP IP/MPLS VPNs draft-rfernando-bess-service-chaining-00 (previously draft-rfernando-l3vpn-service-chaining-04)
Lecture 4: BGP Presentations Lab information H/W update.
Chapter 9. Implementing Scalability Features in Your Internetwork.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 Inter-domain SLA Exchange
Inter AS option D (draft-mapathak-interas-option-d-00) Manu Pathak Keyur Patel Arjun Sreekantiah November 2012.
1 Theophilus Benson*, Aditya Akella*, Aman Shaikh + *University of Wisconsin, Madison + ATT Labs Research.
BGP L3VPN Virtual CE draft-fang-l3vpn-virtual-ce-01 Luyuan Fang Cisco John Evans Cisco David Ward Cisco Rex Fernando Cisco John Mullooly Cisco Ning So.
Using BGP between PE and CE in EVPN draft-li-l2vpn-evpn-pe-ce-01 Zhenbin Li, Junlin Zhuang, Shunwan Zhuang (Huawei Technologies) IETF 90, Toronto, Canada.
IETF 81: V6OPS Working Group – Proxy Mobile IPv6 – Address Reservations 1 Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Sri Gundavelli (Cisco)
IETF 81: V6OPS Working Group – Proxy Mobile IPv6 – Address Reservations 1 IP Traffic Offload Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6 111 draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-01.txt.
Support for RSVP in Layer 3 VPNs draft-davie-tsvwg-rsvp-l3vpn-01.txt Bruce Davie François le Faucheur Ashok Narayanan Cisco Systems.
Nov. 8, 2006IDR WG Meeting1 IPv6 Next Hop for IPv4 Prefix In BGP Updates, NH not necessarily of same address family as NLRI Currently deployed examples:
August 2004draft-bocci-2vpn-pnni-mpls-iw-01.txt Signalling Interworking for ATM VPWS draft-bocci-l2vpn-pnni-mpls-iw-01 Matthew Bocci, Mustapha Aissaoui,
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community draft-pmohapat-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-00.
Softwire Security Requirement Update draft-ietf-softwire-security-requirements-02.txt IETF Meeting, Prague March 19, 2007 Shu Yamamoto Carl Williams Florent.
© 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. BGP v3.2—1-1 Course Introduction.
Applicability of Existing Solutions to the Problem Space draft-takeda-l1vpn-applicability-03.txt.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—1 MPLS Lab Physical Connection Diagram.
intra-va-01.txt -01 Draft of: “FIB Suppression with Virtual Aggregation and Default Routes” Paul.
Inter-AS Option C between NVO3 and BGP/MPLS IP VPN network draft-hao-bess-inter-nvo3-vpn-optionc-00 Weiguo Hao Lucy Yong Susan Hares Nov, 2014 Honolulu.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—1 MPLS Lab Physical Connection Diagram.
8 Byte BGP Communities Finding a practical way forward.
1 MTU Extended Community for BGP-4 Q. Zeng, J. Dong (Huawei Technologies) IETF81 IDR July 2011 Quebec draft-zeng-idr-bgp-mtu-extension-00.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.1 Routing Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6.
Draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model S. Litkowski R. Shakir L. Tomotaki K. D’Souza.
Global Table Multicast with BGP-MVPN Protocol
Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6
Discussion on DHCPv6 Routing Configuration
Softwire Mesh Framework: Multicast
Examples based on draft-cheng-supa-applicability-00.txt
MPLS VPN Implementation
Update on Advertising L2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in IS-IS
draft-ietf-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model IETF 94 - Yokohama
Softwire Mesh Solution Framework
PCEP Extensions in Support of Transporting Traffic Engineering Data
Zhenqiang Li Rong Gu China Mobile Jie Dong Huawei Technologies
IETF67 B. Patil, Gopal D., S. Gundavelli, K. Chowdhury
Qin Wu Roni Even Ying Cheng IETF 103 Bangkok, Tailand Oct 12, 2018
Extending MPLS/BGP VPNs to End-Systems
Kireeti Kompella Juniper Networks
Satya Mohanty, Arjun Sreekantiah, Dhananjaya Rao, Cisco Systems
DetNet DetNet Flow Information Model draft-farkas-detnet-flow-information-model-02 Balázs Varga, János Farkas, Rodney Cummings, Jiang Yuanlong and.
An Update on BGP Support for 4-byte ASN
IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Abstract
Export BGP community information in IPFIX draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-01.txt Zhenqiang Li Rong Gu China Mobile Jie Dong Huawei Technologies.
Working at a Small-to-Medium Business or ISP – Chapter 6
PMIP6 extensions for inter-access handovers and flow mobility
BGP VPN service for SRv6 Plus IETF 105, Montreal
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-21 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07 Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Rakesh.
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-21 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-11 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-07 Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Rakesh.
Presentation transcript:

© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 Inter-domain SLA Exchange S. Shah, K. Patel, S. Bajaj, L. Tomotaki, M. Boucadair IETF 86, Mar 2013, Orlando, FL, US

2  Motivation  PE-CE Use case (In today’s deployment)  PE-CE Use case (leveraging draft proposal)  Why BGP a choice of protocol  Proposed Solution  CE-CE Use case  Evaluate re-use of existing IANA types  Questions

3  To address out of band QoS SLA exchange between administrative (or inter-domain) boundaries  Provide In band method for QoS SLA exchange  Cut-down provisioning complexities and cost

4 PE-1 CE-1 AS Community y AS Community x CE-2 AS Community z SP core service contract One of pre-defined templates provisioned on link facing CE Unmanaged: Get on paper PE contract Define QoS policies aligned with PE Managed: Manual or intelligent system overhead to get QoS policies to CE In both cases: Provision QoS policies based on Vendor’s provisioning language

5 PE-1 CE-1 AS Community y AS Community x CE-2 AS Community z SP core service contract One of pre-defined templates provisioned on link facing CE In-band signaling Vendor implementation to react to signaling

6  It is a widely used Inter-domain Protocol  Aligns with the purpose of advertising SLA across administrative boundaries  Cost effective to extend BGP to support such application (instead of defining any new protocol)

7  A new attribute defined in BGP to encompass QoS related parameters o It is an optional transitive attribute o QoS attribute scope generic to hold any future QoS related applications  SLA is defined as a sub-type within QoS attribute o Detailed parameters of SLA are defined in the draft o Traffic-classes and Service-types for each traffic class in each direction  Advertised SLA is from source AS to destination AS in the context of prefix  Example: In the case of SLA for a point to point connection. i.e. for Physical link between BGP peers or Logical link like tunnels prefix is an ip address of the source end-point

8  Hub and Spoke SP core AS Community x AS Community y AS Community z Enterprise VPN Hub Spoke QoS SLA between Hub and Spokes thru BGP updates tunnel

9  RFC IPFIX Information Element ids to represent Traffic Class (IANA Type = IPFIX Information Element Identifiers) Re-use only Element Id + Abstract data-type  RFC5575 – BGP Flow Specification (IANA Type = Flow Spec Component Types) Limited set of traffic class  RFC5975 – QSPEC Template (ref. QSPEC parameters) Parameter ID IANA type Limited set of traffic class Some of the parameters are irrelevant to SLA

10 Questions?