ACD Down-Select Criteria and Time Scales for HLRF ML-KOM FNAL September 27 、 2007 S. Fukuda, KEK & Ray Larsen, SLAC For the ILC HLRF Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CFS TIME SCHEDULE EDR - CFS Europe – Kick-Off Meetings Kick-Off Meetings, CERN, 3, 4, 5 September ILC PROJECT ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT CFS Europe.
Advertisements

Homework of HLRF 1 Shigeki Fukuda KEK 2012/4/23 HLRF Homework1 in KILC12 (Fukuda) 1.
1 LHC-DFBX Procurement Strategy Joseph Rasson LBNL Presented at the DFBX Production Readiness Review October 2002, LBNL Brookhaven - Fermilab - Berkeley.
April SCRF Meeting FNAL08 S.Fukuda 1 HLRF Summary and Work Assignment S. FUKUDA KEK.
Question 27: Outline the key steps for industrialization of machine components and the likely remaining vulnerabilities in achieving them. Achieving industrialization.
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Report of HLRF KOM S. Fukuda. Project Management Structure Area: Main Linac Technology (to be completed) Regional/Intsitutional Effort: - Director-US:
Report from ILC GlobalGroup 5: Cost and Engineering (Updates since Snowmass) Wilhelm Bialowons, Peter Garbincius and Tetsuo Shidara · GDE December 8, 2005.
Global Design Effort BDS KOM Opening remarks/comments from EDR Project Management SLAC Marc Ross / Nick Walker.
From Research Prototype to Production
High Level RF Technical System Review GDE Cost Review July Vancouver Canada Shigeki Fukuda & Ray Larsen For the HLRF Cost Team C. Adolphsen,
Report from GG5, Dec. 20, 2005 Report from ILC GG 5: Cost and Engineering (Updates since Snowmass) Wilhelm Bialowons, Peter Garbincius and Tetsuo Shidara.
RDR Report Writing Nan Phinney SLAC for RDR team of editors.
LCFOA Meeting at SLAC Linear Collider Forum of the Americas 1 LINEAR COLLIDER FORUM OF THE AMERICAS CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES OVERVIEW Victor R. Kuchler.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Cryomodule Design and R&D during the EDR phase Robert Kephart With input from the T4 CM Collaboration.
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
PLANNING ENGINEERING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT By Lec. Junaid Arshad 1 Lecture#03 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT.
RDR Report Writing Nan Phinney SLAC. 7/20/06 VLCW06 Global Design Effort 2 GLC Report Working model is the 2003 GLC Report ch 4-7
BAW1 RDR Confg For Mntn Rgn (S. Fukuda) 1 RDR configuration for Mountain Region S. Fukuda/KEK.
Parallel session summary ML/SCRF L. Lilje, H. Hayano, N. Ohuchi, S. Fukuda, C. Adolphsen (with help of Chris Nantista) TILC09,
Summary of TDR Cost Reviews at KILC-12 G. Dugan KILC-12 4/26/12.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
Americas Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS X.9 Resource Proposal.
Date 2007/Oct./25 FNAL-GDE-Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Report N. Ohuchi KEK 1.Cryomodule & Cryogenics KOM 2.GDE-meeting discussion I.Interface.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
SLAC NLC & ILC Cost Modeling Ray Larsen January 28, 2006.
TILC09 SCRF Session Global Design Effort 1 EU Status TILC09 SCRF Session Lutz Lilje DESY.
Global Design Effort - CFS DESY Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ACCELERATOR INTEGRATION AND DESIGN MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
HL-LHC Crab Cavity Review Debriefing Comments from LARP June 30, 2014.
SCRF Cavity WebEx Meeting May 17, 2010 Reports from PM (10 min.) – Brief report from ILC-PAC – Industrialization workshop as IPAC satellite meeting, Kyoto,
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
Detail plan of S1-Global H. Hayano (KEK),
Proposed LCLS-II SCU Schedule Soren Prestemon (LBNL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting December 16, 2014.
Report of HLRF KOM/ALCPG07 S. Fukuda(KEK) R. Larsen(SLAC)
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
Main Linac Technology (MLT) Meeting To be held through WebEx July 13, 2007.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
K. Long, 25 June, 2016 IDR: structure and overall timeline: Slides are to introduce discussion of how we prepare IDR. Propose to revise slides as we discuss.
Global Design Effort Controls LLRF EDR Kick Off Meeting View from the Project Management Office Fermilab / ANL August 20, 2007.
Tests on production cryomodules Bob Kephart Sept 30, 2006.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC CFS & Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC CFS & GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP CFS Status.
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting March 9, Report from PMs (15 min.) 1.Acknowledgements for completing S1-Global cold/RF test (A. Y.) 2.GDE meeting plan.
ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop
SCRF WebEx Monthly Meeting Agenda and Reports from PM
S1G Experiment Schedule Plan
Preparation for DESY Meeting
Conventional Facility & Siting (CF&S) Overview for the Positron Source
Value Estimate for the ILC Superconducting Modules and High Level RF
Crab Cavities Contribution from the U.S.
ILC-SCRF Test Facilities considerations
LCWS11 AWG9 PARALLEL SESSION SUMMARY
Evolving an ILC focused SCRF Facility from the XFEL Infrastructure
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
EDR HLRF Work Packages Draft Summary
Notes on Ramp-Up and Production
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
ILC PROJECT ENGINEERING DESIGN REPORT CFS Europe – KICK OFF MEETING
BAW Prep S1 Global Status Pilot Plant Status
Yamamoto WG3: ML-SCRF Parallel Session,
General presentation about recent status of DRFS
FIVE PROJECT PHASES 5C-3 Sun. 8:00-10:00am 21/ 2/2016.
Nick Walker (DESY) EU GDE Meeting Oxford
RF System (HLRF, LLRF, Controls) EDR Plan Overview
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

ACD Down-Select Criteria and Time Scales for HLRF ML-KOM FNAL September 27 、 2007 S. Fukuda, KEK & Ray Larsen, SLAC For the ILC HLRF Collaboration

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 2 HLRF Collaboration Spokesperson & Asia HLRF Technical System Lead: S. Fukuda, KEK Americas HLRF TS Lead: R. Larsen, SLAC Contributors: - DESY: W. Bialowons, S. Choroba - KEK: M. Akemoto, H. Hayano, T. Shidara - FNAL: B. Chase, C. Jensen, J. Reid, M. Champion, O. Nezhevenko, H. Pfeffer, D. Wolff - SLAC: C. Adolphsen, R. Cassel, C. Corvin, C. Nantista, M. Neubauer

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 3 Outline Many slides are based on the Ray’s talk in DESY, June 14, More detailed discussion will be performed at HLRF KOM held in Oct.1-2, 2007 I. EDR Working Definition II. Proposed HLRF Work Packages III. Example Work Package IV. Industrialization Assumptions V. HLRF Factory Model Assumptions VI. Conclusions

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 4 I. EDR Working Definition EDR should be completed in two years, i.e. 2010(?). Detailed technical and cost plans are to be considerably more mature than RDR. Schedule, new cost estimate, funding profile are clarified. We should provide solid basis for international funding requests, implying –Technology down-selects recommendations in hand –Industry based cost estimates in hand to compare with estimates V. EDR Work Packages

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 5 EDR Tasks R&D to Pre-Production, Management Level Tasks 1.Develop Work Packages for R&D 2.Develop specifications as basis for bid packages 3.Identify industrial vendors for advanced prototypes (Design for Manufacture, DFM) 4.Procure pre-production prototypes 5.Complete EDR documentation 6.Recommend technology down-selection

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 6 EDR Tasks 2 R&D to Pre-Production, R&D Tasks (in parallel) 1.Complete Alternate Conceptual Design prototypes 2.Complete DFM designs, specifications, bid packages 3.Evaluate industrial DFM prototypes

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 7 II. Proposed Work Packages (WP’s) Prepare Separate WP’s for Modulator, Klystron, Distribution –Common WP’s for BCD and ACD in the three regions How to establish the regional collaboration? Common WPs are made by Project Manager. Real WP is deeply related by DOE budget profile in USA, while other region (ex. Japan) has a different style. Especially treatment of human resource is quite different. Example (Next slide)

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 8 - Example Green shows the contribution supported by some budgets, and C Shows the central contribution for the WP’s technology.

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 9 Proposed Work Packages (WP’s)- Cont. Prepare Separate WP’s for Modulator, Klystron, Distribution –Develop DFM design, build prototype, execute test program How to establish the regional collaboration? –Develop specifications for bid packages –Ideally each region lets bid for evaluation unit or units, shares costs, testing experience NML(FNAL)/ SLAC/ STF(KEK)/ XFEL(DESY) –Note: These could be different designs! –Procure, test, apply to L-Band test programs –Modify bid packages for pre-production quantity procurement

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 10 Proposed WP’s -cont. Charger system, Controls-Interlock system also WP candidates for delivery of pre-tested integrated systems –Could also be part of modulator, klystron systems respectively

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 11 III. Work Package Table (Lutz table) -1

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 12 Work Package Table (Lutz table) -2

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 13 Work Package Table (Lutz table) -3

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 14 Work Package Table (Lutz table) -4 (Additional ACD)

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 15 IV. HLRF Industrialization Assumptions All major system components will be provided by industry Industrialization has at least two meanings: –1. Development & deployment of industry process for new designs of an exotic nature, e.g. SCRF structures, Sheet Beam Klystron, etc. –2. Identification & qualification of vendors for new designs of non-exotic nature, e.g. Modulator, Charging System, Controls & Interlock Protection System

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 16 General Procurement Strategy ILC is developing and will own designs from ACD process Specifications will be developed for “Build to Spec” procurement Vendors may choose to offer any design that meets specifications including ACD designs Owning designs important for long term future: –Modulators, Distribution have virtually no follow-on business so future procurements could be problematical –Klystrons have significant follow-on business but much smaller; owning a design is excellent insurance against future vendor ability to deliver (e.g. PEPII experience) HLRF cost models assumed procurement split between 2 vendors. (Actual ratios would vary.)

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 17 V. HLRF Factory Model Assumptions Factory Models developed for Modulators, Klystrons and Distribution for cost modeling in 2006: –Factories to provide fully tested units essentially ready for final prep and installation to tunnels –Factories to be provided with necessary test equipment, support personnel –ILC inspectors at factory sign off on testing before shipment allowed –Delivery to on-site staging area for nominal inspection that no damage occurred in shipping, plus final prep before releasing to installation

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 18 HLRF Factory Models 2 Some Details: –All components to be built to specifications (electrical power, cooling, mechanical form factor, drive requirements, test procedures) –Modulator factory to be provided with fully instrumented test stations, test loads –Klystron factory to be provided with klystron test stations, RF driver system, water loads –Integrated Distribution systems to be delivered packaged for quick final assembly, mounting on cryo-module in staging area for cold tuning prior to moving to tunnel

September 27, 2007 ML-KOM S.Fukuda/R.Larsen 19 VI. Conclusions EDR is window of opportunity for strong inter- regional growth in ILC HLRF –HLRF has strong Alternate R&D program to improve costs, availability –Strong inter-region contributions can be advanced through shared Work Packages –WP’s for major HLRF components R&D, industrialization proposed for discussion –Early collaboration agreements & commitments necessary for EDR success