Inclusive SUSY Searches at CMS with Emphasis on Detector Systematics R. Cavanaugh (on behalf of CMS) University of Florida SUSY06 CMS Detector Background.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search for Large Extra Dimensions at the Tevatron Bob Olivier, LPNHE Paris XXXVI ème Rencontre de Moriond Mars Search for Large Extra Dimensions.
Advertisements

Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Guoming CHEN The Capability of CMS Detector Chen Guoming IHEP, CAS , Beijing.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
July 22 nd, 2005 A.Canepa, SUSY 2005, Durham 1 Search for chargino and neutralino in trilepton final states Anadi Canepa (Purdue University IN, USA) for.
ADR for Massimiliano Chiorboli Universita’ and INFN Catania
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
Status of CMS and the road to first physics results Jordan Nash For the CMS Collaboration – ICFA Seminar – SLAC October 2008.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
1 Perspectives for quarkonium production in CMS Carlos Lourenço, on behalf of CMSQWG 2008, Nara, Japan, December 2008.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Jet Energy Scale at CMS Anwar A Bhatti June 8, 2006 XII International Conference on Calorimetry Chicago IL, USA.
17 April. 2005,APS meeting, Tampa,FloridaS. Bhattacharya 1 Satyaki Bhattacharya Beyond Standard Model Higgs Search at LHC.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
1 Top Quark Pair Production at Tevatron and LHC Andrea Bangert, Herbstschule fuer Hochenergiephysik, Maria Laach, September 2007.
KIRTI RANJANDIS, Madison, Wisconsin, April 28, Top Quark Production Cross- Section at the Tevatron Collider On behalf of DØ & CDF Collaboration KIRTI.
Il Trigger di Alto Livello di CMS N. Amapane – CERN Workshop su Monte Carlo, la Fisica e le simulazioni a LHC Frascati, 25 Ottobre 2006.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
LHC France 2013, 3 rd April ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair production cross section in dilepton channel Frédéric Derue, LPNHE Paris Rencontres.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
María Cepeda (CIEMAT, Madrid) Valencia, II CPAN days 1.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
December 3rd, 2009 Search for Gluinos and Squarks in events with missing transverse momentum DIS 2013: XXI. International workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
SUSY08 Seoul 17 June 081 Daniel Teyssier RWTH Aachen University Searches for non-standard SUSY signatures in CMS on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Jessica Leonard, U. Wisconsin, December 19, 2006 Preliminary Exam - 1 H->  Jessica Leonard University of Wisconsin - Madison Preliminary Examination.
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
SUSY Searches at the Tevatron Rencontres de Moriond, QCD March 2006 Else Lytken, Purdue University for the CDF and D0 collaborations.
SUSY LHC Darin Acosta University of Florida On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Randall- Sundrum Gravitons and Black Holes at the LHC Kevin Black Harvard University For the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Summary of Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal, University of Udine Top Working Group, CERN October 29 th, 2003.
W / Z / Drell Yan Physics in the first year of CMS Roberto Tenchini INFN – Pisa CTEQ Workshop "Physics at the LHC: Early Challenges“ W.K. Kellogg Biological.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Search for the SM Higgs Boson in H->ZZ* and H->WW* at the LHC Sinjini Sengupta University of Minnesota CMS Collaboration The 16 th International conference.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
DPF Conf., Oct. 29, 2006, HawaiiViktor Veszpremi, Purdue U.1 Search for the SM Higgs Boson in the Missing E T + b-jets Final State at CDF V. Veszpremi.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
SESAPS November 11, B. Scurlock, University of Florida1 Bobby Scurlock Darin Acosta Paolo Bartalini Richard Cavanaugh Alexey Drozdetskiy Guenakh.
Data Driven study for Same Sign Dileptons July 31 st 2009, “CMS SUSY Leptonic Meeting” 1 Sanjay Padhi.
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
Early EWK/top measurements at the LHC
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Prospects for sparticle reconstruction at new SUSY benchmark points
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Top quark production cross section Top quark mass measurement
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Inclusive SUSY Searches at CMS with Emphasis on Detector Systematics R. Cavanaugh (on behalf of CMS) University of Florida SUSY06 CMS Detector Background Calibrations Inclusive Search Strategies Detector Systematics Results

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY062 CMS Detector MUON BARREL Drift Tube Chambers ( DT ) Resistive Plate Chambers ( RPC ) SUPERCONDUCTING COIL IRON YOKE Silicon Microstrips Pixels TRACKER Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC ) Resistive Plate Chambers (RPC) MUON ENDCAPS Total weight : 12,500 t Overall diameter : 15 m Overall length : 21.6 m Magnetic field : 4 Tesla CALORIMETERS ECAL Scintillating PbWO4 crystals HCAL Plastic scintillator/brass sandwich

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY063 SUSY Signature: MET + Jets + … Squark gluino production Full Geant4 Detector Simulation 6 hard jets leptons 2 LSPs + 4 ’s

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY064 Jet/MET Reconstruction Performance Jets Low luminosity Pileup included E T Resolution Stochastic term  125% / √E T Constant term  3% Angular Resolution High E T Jets: better than calo cell size (  x  = x 0.087) Missing Transverse Energy Low luminosity Pileup included from QCD Stochastic term  123% / √  E T  1700 GeV  E T   700 GeV P T dijets   50 GeV observed MET MET  Resolution Low MET : approaches Jet size High MET : approaches calo cell size QCD MET Jets CMS

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY065 MET Cleaning from Tevatron MET is very powerful SUSY discriminator Difficult part is to convince yourself that there is a real excess! Tevatron teaches us MET is not easily understood! Non-collisional backgrounds Beam halo Cosmic muons Detector Effects Instrumental Noise Hot/dead channels (DQM) D. Tsybychev, Fermilab-thesis Run II V. Shary CALOR04 Run II junk jets e/ 

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY066 Early Study of MET Cleaning in CMS (of course, Real Data will be different!) Apply clean up cuts to remove fake high MET events (inspired by CDF & D0)  1 central jet (|  |<1.7) with  4 tracks  1 vertex F em > 0.1 (Event Electromagnetic Frac.) F ch > (Event Charged Fraction) Affect on SUSY Signal CMS Response to Beam Halo Simulation of LHC Point 5 tt full sim. Pileup not included Pileup included CMS

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY067 QCD Multijet Background Dijets typically back to back MET from jet E mismeasurement Suppress by requiring Well separated Jet & MET objects Typically  3 jets Cut on H T (~ 2 p Hat T ) Muon triggers (include isol.) helps…a lot!  Prescaled jet triggers extract the low E T shape and normalisation directly from data No cuts “  Trigger” “  Trigger” + E T Jet1 >900 GeV “  Trigger”+ E T Jet1 >900 + MET>200 GeV Level 1 CMS

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY068 Electroweak Multijet Backgrounds: Z  Standard Candle Large MET and  3 Jets expected from Z(  ) +  3 jets W(  (e) ) +  3 jets W(  ) +  2 jets Z + n-Jets x-sect   s N Measure from  2 Jets Data Z(  ) +  2 jets Z(  ee) +  2 jets Normalise MC to Data for  3 Jets Assume lepton universality For W + n-jets, use Reduces / Avoids Systematics due to QCD Scale, PDFs (possibly), ISR/FSR, Jet Energy Scale, etc Major Syst. Become Luminosity, Measurement of R, Uncertainty on  (N jet ) Still requires tuning MC to Data for kinematic dists. 5% precision (~lumi) expected to be achieved with 1.5 fb-1 CMS Z(  ) +  2 jets Z(  ) +  2 jets (Z peak normalised) Z(  ) +  2 jets (Z peak) CMS See Marc Buehler’s talk from D0, yesterday

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY069 Benchmark Test Points Basis of detailed studies in soon to be released CMS Physics TDR Vol. 2 Low mass points for early LHC running but outside Tevatron reach High mass points for ultimate LHC reach Indirect constraints from WMAP for strict mSUGRA exclude most except LM1, 2, 6, 9 Benchmark Optimisation Point

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0610 Inclusive Jet + MET Search Selection Criteria MET>200 GeV + Clean-up  3 jets: E T > 180, 110, 30 GeV Indirect lepton veto Cuts on  between jets and MET H T /M eff =E T1 +E T2 +E T3 +MET>500 GeV Results: LM1 efficiency is 13%, S/B ~ 26 : Number of events (below) for 1 fb -1 ~6 pb -1 for 5  discovery Lower jet multiplicity requirement reduces sensitivity to higher-order QCD corrections CMS

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0611 Inclusive Muon + Jet + MET Search Add muon  clean trigger Cuts ( LM1 )  1 isolated muon p T > 30 GeV MET > 130 GeV  3 jets: E T > 440, 440, and 50 GeV |  |< 1.9, 1.5, and 3 Cuts on  between jets and MET Backgrounds (10 fb -1 ) LM1 Signal (10 fb -1 ) 311 events Single-  “OR” Di-  p T of leading muon (GeV) Trigger Efficiency mSUGRA LM-1 No Cuts HLT + Pre-selection SUSY LM1 SM Backgrounds CMS

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0612 Inclusive SS Dimuon + Jet + MET Even cleaner signature Low background due to same sign requirement Concentrate here on Identifying the SUSY diagrams giving prompt muons Strong muon isolation & tight quality cuts Selection Critera Muon trigger Muon isolation Muon track parameters High PT jets Large Missing Transverse Energy Background (10 fb-1) 1.5 (ttbar) events LM1 Signal (10 fb-1) 341 events 65% efficient at identifying SUSY diagrams, 90% pure

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0613 Jet Energy Calibration/Systematics Direct photon production: qg → q  (90%) qqbar → g  (10%) p T (Jet) = p T (  ) use peak position to eliminate effect of tail from ISR Estimated Jet Energy Scale Uncertainty: Between 3% and 10% for P T  [20, 50] GeV ttbar  WWbb  jjl bb Rescale jet with relative energy shift  C Fit resulting W mass spectrum & constrain to world avg. m W (  C|data) = M W PDG Compare with Monte Carlo For ~6 fb-1:  C meas = ± 0.26 % (  C true = %) Requires well understood b-tag (tracker) Limited by pileup syst. uncertainty: 3% measured shift  C meas  C(%) t JES Systematic Uncertainty for P T > 50 GeV  jet CMS

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0614 MET Shape Systematics CMS Study effect of non-Gaussian tails in jet E T resolution contributing to fake MET Approx. 15% of all jets are mismeasured Exaggerate non-Gaussian Tails Weight each jet (up to 3) in event Jet in Non-Gaussian tail: 1.15 Jet in Gaussian peak : 1.00 Combine into one event weight Three different scenarios 3 jets under measured 2 jets under measured 1 jet under measured Overall Systematic Effect :  7% t

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0615 Expected CMS Reach for 1 fb -1

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0616 Expected CMS Reach for 10 fb -1

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0617 Conclusion CMS has recently completed several inclusive SUSY analyses for potential discovery Full detector simulation, reconstruction All backgrounds included Estimate low P T QCD from pre-scaled jet triggers Estimate EW from Z  Standard Candle Systematic uncertainties Jet Energy Scale, MET Shape, Misalignment, etc Results to be published in CMS Physics Technical Design Report Vol. 2 With 1fb -1, CMS can discover (or exclude) all of the low mass benchmark points Including expected systematic effects Low mass SUSY visible almost immediately Provided systematic effects are under control Current CMS focus is now on commissioning and startup scenarios

Backup Slides

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0619

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0620 The CMS Calorimeters EM calorimeter |  | < 3 : PbW0 4 crystals 1 longitudinal section/preshower 1.1  =  Central Hadronic |  | < 1.7 : Brass/scintillator Hadronic Outer – long. sections (|  | =0)  =  Forward calorimeter 2.9 <  < 5: Fe/quartz fibers  = ~0.175  0.17 Hcal barrel and EndCap EM barrel and EndCap Very Forward Calorimeter Endcap Hadronic 1.3< |  | < 3 : Brass/scintillator +WLS 2/3 longitudinal sections 10  = ~0.15  0.17 Hadronic Outer

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0621 Muon System 1.6 ME4/1 restored MB1 MB2 MB3 MB4 ME1 ME2 ME3

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0622 Early Jet Energy Calibration Require at least one of the two leading jets to have |  |<1. Call it the “barrel jet”, the other jet is called the “probe jet”. If both jets have |  |<1 then they are both barrel and probe jets. Require “Barrel Jet” P T = “Probe” Jet P T Can be used at Startup! “Data” shown here could be taken in 1 low lumi running Single day’s data taking could calibrate CMS with decent precision. A statistical error of better than 0.5% for every 0.1 unit of eta in the Barrel. A statistical error of better than 2% for every 0.1 units of eta in the Endcap and HF dijet CMS

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0623 Use Track and Muon System ( Z  ) to Calibrate Calorimeter (MET) Variation on a Z  Candle theme Derive MET corrections from Z  Sample Apply to SUSY Sample (to test) Some fine tuning required But basically works CMS SUSY LM1

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0624 Inclusive Search Strategies Use Missing Transverse Energy (MET) as the key signature for SUSY in analyses presented here R-parity conservation, neutral LSP SUSY benchmark points studied in detail using GEANT-based detector simulation and full reconstruction algorithms Consider all backgrounds as well as lepton fakes QCD multi-jets, W/Z+jets, t-tbar, diboson Optimize significance to determine cuts at a particular benchmark point(s) Anticipate systematic effects and estimate uncertainties Determine 5  reach in mSUGRA space using fast simulation

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0625 Inclusive OS Dilepton + Jet + MET Cuts ( LM1 ): 2 OS SF isolated leptons (e,µ) p T > 10 GeV MET > 200 GeV  2 jets: E T 1 >100 GeV E T 2 >60 GeV |  | < 3 Background (1 fb -1 ) 200 events, mostly t-tbar Systematic uncertainty 20% LM1 Signal (1 fb -1 ) 850 events Subtract different favor leptons m ll max = 80.4  0.5 (stat)  1.0 (misalign) GeV

14 June, 2006R. Cavanaugh, Florida, SUSY0626 Effects of Misalignment Misalign Tracker and Muon System separately Evaluate the impact on the dilepton end point Two scenarios: First Data, 6 months, 100 pb -1 to 1 fb -1 di-muon efficiency decreased by ~30% di-electron efficiency decreased by ~10% Long Term, >6 months, >1fb -1 di-muon efficiency decreased by ~13% di-electron efficiency decreased by ~2% CMS