Managing the Non-WISP Prioritization List Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator April 27, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2014 HUD Data Standards. New & Active Clients All ESG, CoC and SSVF funded agencies are required to begin collecting data on new and active clients based.
Advertisements

CareCentrix Direct Training.
Homeless Assistance in Ohio Changes in the 2012 Consolidated Plan.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Webinar Series SSVF and the 2014 HMIS Data Standards 9/24/2014 Audio can be accessed through the following.
Coordinated Assessment: Understanding Assessment Tools 1 Kim Walker & Norm Suchar November 2013.
 The Purpose of HMIS is NOT the generate Reports for your APR  The purpose of HMIs is to track a client’s progress through the Continuum of care from.
Coordinated Entry.  Helping people move through the system faster  Sends households to intervention best fit from the start  Reduce new entries into.
HPRP Reporting Training For Quarterly Reporting Nov. 20 th wilderresearch.org.
Thursday, September 3, Agenda Status of Post Count Process Common Issues/Errors HMIS data Non-WISP data HIC Deduplication Impact of Service Based.
Coordinated Entry.  A system-wide process that evaluates households for the best housing fit - rather than ‘are you eligible for services here’ it asks.
2016 Emergency Shelter & Housing Assistance Program Information Meeting October 20, 2015.
CAHS Process Flow operator completes pre-screen for shelter eligibility 3a operator transmits screening document over secure network to.
HMIS and PSH: Receiving Referrals from the One List Ending Veteran Homelessness Initiative.
Collaborate. Coordinate. Evaluate. Connecting Communities > Demonstrating Outcomes ™ / I&R Housing Youth & Family Services Older Adult Services ShelterPoint™
INTRODUCTION TO THE COORDINATED ENTRY SYSTEM Wisconsin Balance of State Continuum of Care.
Debriefing Rapid Rehousing Work Groups FRIDAY, 4/15/2016.
Working with the WISP & Non-WISP Prioritization List Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator April 21, 2016.
Balance of State Coordinated Entry List Holder Training Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator Jesse Dirkman, ICA March 10, 2016.
Balance of State Coordinated Entry Non-WISP Referral Form Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator Jesse Dirkman, ICA March 14, 2016.
Thursday, March 1, Agenda Status of Post Count Process Common Issues/Errors HMIS data Non-WISP data HIC Deduplication Impact of Service Based Counting.
ADRC of Oregon Call Module Introduction. Today’s Agenda: Welcome and Introductions Slide Presentation Demo Videos Information Only Call Referral With.
Case Management Updates.  During the of week April 11, 2011, the ETO system experienced technical difficulties.  As of April 13, 2011, the errors have.
Transforming Access to Housing through CEA. The New Team! King County welcomes a new CEA team committed to ensuring a successful transition to coordinated.
Ohio BoSCoC HMIS Visibility Technical Training April 16, 2015.
PATH “Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness” Workflow June,
Regional Approaches to Coordinated Assessment, Prioritization and Housing Placement Eddie Barber, Simtech Solutions Inc. Gary Sanford, Metro Denver Homeless.
Reallocation and Prioritization
Shelter Participation in Coordinated Entry
SchoolSuccess for Coordinators
2017 Continuum of Care: New Project Informational session
Norm Suchar Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
Mountainland Continuum of Care
Returning Student Housing Guide
KYHMIS BOS Quarterly Meeting
“Automated” Tax Notice Best Practices
Building an Effective Homeless Response System
Advocacy Data Collection Form
HMIS Data Standards 2017 Changes
KYHMIS BOS 2017 Data Standards Updates
MDHI and BOS User Group August HMIS User Group MDHI and BOS User Group
SSIS V13.1 Release Training
Types Of Prioritization & Matching Primarily two: Bucket Prioritization Continuous Prioritization.
Bereavement Best Practice.
Balance of State CoC Competition: Scoring Tool and Threshold
Balance of State CE: DLA & LH Mtg.
Advanced Invitations.
Minnesota’s Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)
Understanding Automation Codes Part 2
Maine CoC Coordinated Entry
Ending Family Homelessness in Cuyahoga County
Domestic Violence (DV) Bonus FY 2018 an introduction & REVIEW
Rapid Rehousing Project
HOUSING CONNECTIONS TRAINING 01 Initiate & Enter New Application
KC METRO HMIS Training SSVF, RRH, HP.
Day Services: Changes to the Changes
Let’s get people some bus passes!
KC METRO HMIS Training PATH.
Data Updates.
Ending Homelessness & Coordinated Entry
Mid East Toronto Health Link
Working Together: Domestic Violence and Homelessness Services Coordination: Connecticut’s Approach July 25, 2018.
Ending Homelessness & Coordinated Entry
Hands-On: FSA Assessments For Foreign Schools
2:12 Envisioning an Effective Systemic Response to Rural Homelessness
Advocacy Data Collection Form
Ending Homelessness & Coordinated Entry
CoC Competition FY19 Overview
Coordinated entry Updates, Q&a
HMIS Support.
Presentation transcript:

Managing the Non-WISP Prioritization List Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator April 27, 2016

Agenda Overview Prioritization Review (PSH, TH, RRH) List Holder Rules Review the Chart Communication with members of LCAS Accept or Decline

Coordinated Entry Coordinated Entry is Not:  A specific tool  What you have already been doing  One agency’s responsibility  About putting your clients into your program  A fix for lack of resources  A wait list Coordinated Entry is:  A system  A method of prioritizing clients based on need  An entire local continua’s responsibility  About housing people with the greatest need into any eligible program  An opportunity to discuss community needs and resources  An active list of people in need of housing services

Written Standards – Order of Priority All 3 main project types have written standards and an order of priority. Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH): Chronic status (includes disability and length of homelessness) & VI-SPDAT score (8+) or VI-F-SPDAT score (9+) Transitional Housing (TH): Homeless category (Category 1 or 4), Disability (adult), & VI-SPDAT score (8+) or VI-F-SPDAT score (9+) Rapid Re-housing (RRH): VI-SPDAT (must be at least a 4) The written standards cover more than prioritization. The prioritization is a key component of the coordinated entry process.

List Holder Rules The List Holder CANNOT release the access of the list. The List Holder CANNOT download the list to share. The List Holder CANNOT out the information about the people on the list. The List Holder CAN provide the next highest prioritized person’s information, referring agency, and unique ID. This can be done by or phone.

Requests for Information If a housing provider has an opening and contacts you (as the List Holder) for information about the next highest person on the list, you are allowed to release that information. Information includes: referring agency information, unique ID, VI-SPDAT score, disability, chronic homeless status, homeless category, and length of homelessness. If someone other than a housing provider contacts you (as the List Holder) and wants information about who is on the list, you cannot release that information.

Non-WISP Prioritization List Review Patch After the 1 st client has been added to the list, A patch must be applied to the chart so that it sorts correctly. If you have clients on your list and can see them on the PSH singles list or PSH families list, then you do not need the patch. Opening up List If you are logged in to Gmail and try and open the list, it will not work. The invites were sent to your work (non-Gmail). So, there are 2 options: Option #1 – log off Gmail when you want to open the list Option #2 – with your Gmail address & I will send you a list invite at that

On the Housing Action tab, the above categories are present. Column A – C are automatically inserted. Column D – J, K - N are available to data entry Column J has a formula coded into it so it will calculate for you the days between referral (Column C and Column I).

Non-WISP Prioritization “Updates” If the housing provider with an opening selects a person off the non-WISP prioritization list, the following four things can happen: Potential client can refuse the project or agency offering the service Potential client can accept Potential client can decline as they have already found a solution to their situation Potential client cannot be reached Each situation requires action on the part of the Housing Provider AND List Holder.

Client Refuses Regardless of why the refusal occurs, if the client wishes to remain on the Non-WISP Prioritization list – then the housing provider must contact the List Holder with the details. The List Holder will update the Non-WISP Prioritization list. On the Housing Action tab: Column D (Status) – select “Declined.” Column E (Date of Status Change) – enter the date the client declined. Column F (if declined, reason for removal) – enter the reason the client declined. If the person wants to remain on the prioritization list, a new referral must be completed with any updated information. The housing provider who had contact with the person should complete a new Non-WISP referral.

Client Accepts – Part 1 If the client accepts, then the housing provider moves forward with the verification process. The housing provider must contact the List Holder with the details. The List Holder will update the Non-WISP Prioritization list. On the Housing Action tab: Column D (Status) – select “Accepted.” Column E (Date of Status Change) – enter the date the client accepted. Column G (If accepted, provider accepting referral) – enter the name of the housing provider

Client Accepts – Part 2 Once the client is actually housed, the housing provider must contact the List Holder with the details. The List Holder will update the Non-WISP Prioritization list. On the Housing Action tab: Column H (In Permanent Housing?) – select “Yes” Column I (Permanent Housing Move-in Date) – enter the date the client moved into housing Column J (days between referral and move-in) will automatically calculate.

Client Accepts – Part 3 If the client accepts the housing opening, but is never actually housed – the housing provider must contact the List Holder with the details. The List Holder will update the Non-WISP Prioritization list. If the person wants to remain on the prioritization list, the List Holder will follow the instructions to document the decline and re-enter a referral. If the person does not want to remain on the prioritization list, the List Holder will follow the instructions to document the decline and will not re-enter a referral.

Client Declines – found a different solution If the client has found a different solution or no longer wants to remain on the list, the housing provider must contact the List Holder with the details. The List Holder will update the Non-WISP Prioritization list. If the client has found a different permanent housing option, enter the information on the Housing Action tab as follows: Column D (Status) – select “Declined.” Column E (Date of Status Change) – enter the date the client declined Column G (If accepted, provider accepting referral) – enter “none” Column H (In Permanent Housing?) – select “Yes” Column I (Permanent Housing Move-in Date) – enter the date the client moved into housing Column J (days between referral and move-in) will automatically calculate.

Unable to contact person The Balance of State policy is that a housing provider should attempt three separate times over two weeks to contact the person at the top of the list. These three separate time should be documented. This is a minimum time frame. If your LCAS has agreed to a longer time frame, you must following those parameters. After using due diligence, if the housing provider cannot get a hold of the client, then the staff must contact the List Holder with the details. The List Holder will update the Non-WISP Prioritization list. On the Housing Action tab, a note can be added in Column O. The List Holder should also contact the agency that referred the client to indicate that there has been difficulty reaching the person they referred.

90 Days Once a person has been on the Non-WISP Prioritization List for 90 days, the List Holder must contact the referring agency and ask if they have completed a “check in” with the person. The “check in” should include the following: Does the client still want to remain on the list? Has any of the basic information changed necessary to determine prioritization? Has any of the contact information changed? Once the “check in” has occurred, the List Holder marks “yes” and the date the “check in” occurred in Column K. If information must be updated, the List Holder can edit the information on the Form Responses tab.

NOTICE It is prohibited for any HUD-funded homelessness assistance programs to serve individuals and/or families experiencing homelessness or who are at imminent risk of homelessness, without the household first going through the Coordinated Assessment System and receiving a referral to the Prioritization List.

QUESTIONS?

Resources All Balance of State COC information pertaining to Coordinated Entry system is located on the BOS website: This includes: The Coordinated Entry Policy The Coordinated Entry 101 webinar and slides Transitional Housing Prioritization webinar and slides List-Holder/DLA Training: Managing the Non-WISP List webinar & slides NON WISP Referral Form Training webinar & slides BOS Pre-Screen Form (revised) Paper version and fillable version of the VI-SPDAT version 2.0 Paper version and fillable version of the VI-F-SPDAT version 2.0 HUD brief on Coordinated Entry