“Reading and commenting papers” (Scientific English) Alexis Descatha INSERM, UMS UVSQ- Unité de pathologie professionnelle, Garches.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to assess an abstract
Advertisements

Study Designs in Epidemiologic
Critical Appraisal: Epidemiology 101 POS Lecture Series April 28, 2004.
8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies
1 Case-Control Study Design Two groups are selected, one of people with the disease (cases), and the other of people with the same general characteristics.
Reading the Dental Literature
Elements of a clinical trial research protocol
Dissemination and Critical Evaluation of Published Research Peg Bottjen, MPA, MT(ASCP)SC.
Statistics for Health Care
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Critical Appraisal of an Article by Dr. I. Selvaraj B. SC. ,M. B. B. S
EPIDEMIOLOGY Why is it so damn confusing?. Disease or Outcome Exposure ab cd n.
Quantitative Research
BC Jung A Brief Introduction to Epidemiology - XI (Epidemiologic Research Designs: Experimental/Interventional Studies) Betty C. Jung, RN, MPH, CHES.
STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7: Gathering Evidence for Practice.
Reading Scientific Papers Shimae Soheilipour
Methodology Describe Context & setting Design Participants Sampling Power Analysi s Interventions Outcome (study variables) Data Collection Procedures.
Designing your Research Project Designing your Research Project Ivan J Perry Department of Epidemiology & Public Health University College Cor.
CHP400: Community Health Program- lI Research Methodology STUDY DESIGNS Observational / Analytical Studies Case Control Studies Present: Disease Past:
دکتر خلیلی 1. Lucid the way to “ Research” And Follow an “ Evidence Based Medicine”
Excellence in Nursing Practice Through Research, EBP & Application to Bedside Patient Care Chesapeake Bay Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses Saturday, February.
Study design P.Olliaro Nov04. Study designs: observational vs. experimental studies What happened?  Case-control study What’s happening?  Cross-sectional.
 Is there a comparison? ◦ Are the groups really comparable?  Are the differences being reported real? ◦ Are they worth reporting? ◦ How much confidence.
Research Study Design. Objective- To devise a study method that will clearly answer the study question with the least amount of time, energy, cost, and.
Title Name Institute. Background -1 (Main problem)
Understanding real research 4. Randomised controlled trials.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.
Landmark Trials: Recommendations for Interpretation and Presentation Julianna Burzynski, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS Heme/Onc Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 11/29/07.
VSM CHAPTER 6: HARM Evidence-Based Medicine How to Practice and Teach EMB.
Chapter 2 Nature of the evidence. Chapter overview Introduction What is epidemiology? Measuring physical activity and fitness in population studies Laboratory-based.
How to read a paper D. Singh-Ranger. Academic viva 2 papers 1 hour to read both Viva on both papers Summary-what is the paper about.
Wipanee Phupakdi, MD September 15, Overview  Define EBM  Learn steps in EBM process  Identify parts of a well-built clinical question  Discuss.
Critical Reading of Medical Articles
Making epidemiological evidence more accessible using pictures Rod Jackson Updated November 09.
Guidelines for Critically Reading the Medical Literature John L. Clayton, MPH.
Study designs. Kate O’Donnell General Practice & Primary Care.
1 Basic epidemiological study designs and its role in measuring disease exposure association M. A. Yushuf Sharker Assistant Scientist Center for Communicable.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
Critical Appraisal of a Paper Feedback. Critical Appraisal Full Reference –Authors (Surname & Abbreviations) –Year of publication –Full Title –Journal.
Measures of disease frequency Simon Thornley. Measures of Effect and Disease Frequency Aims – To define and describe the uses of common epidemiological.
Journal Club Curriculum-Study designs. Objectives  Distinguish between the main types of research designs  Randomized control trials  Cohort studies.
Sample Journal Club Your Name Here.
Primary Care Research: An Introduction (To Some Really Important Concepts) John B. Schorling, M.D., M.P.H. Professor of Medicine and Public Heath Sciences.
Critically Appraising a Medical Journal Article
How to read a paper D. Singh-Ranger.
Biostatistics Case Studies 2016
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
Randomized Trials: A Brief Overview
Chapter 7 The Hierarchy of Evidence
Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company
Evidence Based Practice 3
انواع روشهای تحقیق
Diagnosis General Guidelines:
ERRORS, CONFOUNDING, and INTERACTION
Interpreting Basic Statistics
How To conduct a thesis 1- Define the problem
How to assess an abstract
Interpreting Epidemiologic Results.
How To conduct a thesis 1- Define the problem
PICO model for developing EBM questions
Research Techniques Made Simple: Interpreting Measures of Association in Clinical Research Michelle Roberts PhD,1,2 Sepideh Ashrafzadeh,1,2 Maryam Asgari.
Basic statistics.
Introduction to Systematic Reviews
Presentation transcript:

“Reading and commenting papers” (Scientific English) Alexis Descatha INSERM, UMS UVSQ- Unité de pathologie professionnelle, Garches

Acknowledgments Descatha 2 Harvard School of Public Health Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, L Berkman, E Sabbath

WHY and HOW Descatha 3 In the context of « Publish or Perish » and potential conflict of interest, be aware of limitations Read and understand original scientific papers (in English) By doing a structured summary (« abstract ») and Answering to questions 8 papers with corrections

Descatha/Davy method for summarizing an original paper Arthur Davy, Alexis Descatha UFR des sciences de la santé, Université de Versailles St Quentin

!Warning! Descatha 5

IMRaD Background (+/-) and objective (aim/goal) Methods population (sample), intervention (if applicable), exposure and outcome variables of interest, and analyses Results Details of sample Answer to the research question (quantitive) and side effects/ tolerance Conclusion = answer to the question PICO 6 Descatha

Descatha/Davy method TIME Reading Quick reading of title, questions, and the paper And the paper, highlighting in yellow the key sentences Drafting Take 3 « word tables» Cut and paste main sentences Writing Shorten the summary! Descatha 7

Advice Tense = past (present form only for evidence that everyone is agreed upon and future for perspectives) Don’t hesitate to use similar sentences, words … The corrector is not a native English speaker (try to do his best) Scoring / rating table +++ You can look for the abstract given by the authors, but … Training is the key ! Descatha 8

Vocabulary DESIGN++++ Observation Epidemiology+++ Cross sectional / case-control / cohort studies (+ review /meta-analysis/ case report…) Experimentation Clinical trials (randomized) Diagnostic studies (ie accuracy) Descatha 9

RCT Question is clear and very precise Method Design Sampling (including randomisation) => Flow chart Outcomes Number of subjects Analyses Results No difference between the two randomized groups Answer to the question Discussion Limitations, « so what » and perspectives Descatha 10

Accuracy in diagnosis Reliable test If repeated, similar results Valid and accurate: No false negative and no false positive => sensitivity/ specificity Practical considerations Screening vs. confirmatory testing Gold standard (but…) All same protocol, blindness Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratio, ROC curves, AUC-DgOR… Descatha 11

Obervational study Aim and design (cf.) Inclusion criteria Exposure assessment, outcome Risk measurement (ratios and risks) Causality discussion and bias+++++ Descatha 12

Descatha 13 Design Experimentation (+/- randomization) OBSERVATION  Description= Prevalence (Incidence)  « Causation » (association )

Descatha 14 Causative studies Case control Cohort Inclusion of patients AND data Cross sectional Time Inclusion of patients Inclusion data (retrospectively) Inclusion of patients Inclusion data

Descatha 15 Design Experimentation (+/- randomization) OBSERVATION  Description= Prevalence (Incidence)  « Causation » (association )  cross-sectional: prevalence, association OR +/-  Cas control : prevalence, association OR  Cohort : incidence, association RR

Descatha 16 OR RR Disease +Disease -Total Exposedaba+b Not exposedcdc+d Totala+cb+da+b+c+d RR= [a/(a+b]/[c/c+d)], WITH 95% confidence interval OR= a*d/(b*c), with 95% confidence interval P RR (or OR) the CI do not include « 1 »

Statistically significant ? Descatha OR/RR 95%CI CI95% OR/RR 95%CI 1

Bias ? Selection bias Representativness Measurment bias case=case? / exposed = exposed? Confounding other factors not considered, that could explained the observed association Descatha 18

Vocabulary Sampling and intervention Design, observational/ experimental, longitudinal/cross-sectional, prospective/retrospective Participants: settings/Inclusion/ exclusion, case and controls, mono or multicenter (Matched?/paired) Blinding?/ Randomization/ Intention to treat / flow diagram… Measures of the diseases Prevalence/ incidence … Questionnaire, physical examination, laboratory/radiology/pathology findings (data sources) Descatha 19

Vocabulary Analyses Statistical power, number of subject (sample size ) Uni and Multivariate analyses (models) Measures of the effect Association / efficacy or tolerance P<0.05, statistical significance, statistical power Odds ratio, relative risk… Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratio… Limitation and bias (selection, information, confounding => causation?) Generalizability and perspectives Descatha 20

Now it is your turn! Consort, Stard, Strobe statements Pubmed is helpful Internet +++ (most of the “LCA” books have a glossary, including translation) Descatha 21