The Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Brownfields Response Program Diane Thompson Hazardous Waste Manager Division of Resource Management (218)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TN Regional Water-Supply Planning Technical Working Group Tennessee Regional Water-Supply Planning: General Observations and Conclusions TACIR February.
Advertisements

DEQ Waste and Remediation Division Programs Michael McCurdy Ground Water and Remediation Section Manager Boise Regional Office.
Slide 6- 1 CERCLA Chapter 6 Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act “CERCLA”
Oregon Cleanup Program Top Priorities. Goal: cleanup contaminated property so human health and the environment are protected and contaminated properties.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Environmental Protection Commission Overview Vision: Environmental Excellence in a Changing World.
Managing Hazardous Solid Waste and Waste Sites
Facility Lead Corrective Action Approaches Voluntary Agreements RCRA National Meeting August 13, 2003 Jennifer Shoemaker EPA Region 3.
1 Presented by: Glenn Kistner USEPA Region 9 Brownfields Program Brownfields & Superfund For Tribes Overview.
Leech Lake Brownfields Program Diane Thompson Diane Thompson Hazardous Waste Manager Mario Reyes Mario Reyes Hazardous Waste Technician.
INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF CERCLA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS USDA FOREST SERVICE Grants and Agreements Workshop February 28, 2002 Great Falls,
 Site Assessment and Mitigation Program Department of Environmental Health – County of San Diego.
+ Water Quality & Human Health: From Arsenic Exposure to Biological Response Understanding how contaminants move through the environment UNC Superfund.
Brownfield Grants 101 Jason Seyler VCRA / CALA / Brownfields Coordinator Department of Environmental Quality Remediation Division P.O. Box Helena,
Chapter 4 Environmental Policy and Regulation
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
111 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Budget Presentation FY ’10 & ’11.
Solid Waste Laws. Federal Legislation RCRA (1976)- The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) CERCLA (1980) –The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Under what common law theories can polluters be held liable? Under what common law theories can polluters be held liable? What is an environmental impact.
 Nuisance.  Person liable if they use their property in a manner that unreasonably interferes with others’ rights to use or enjoy their own property.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
1 Mercury Storage Project Desiree M. Narvaez Mercury and other metals programme Chemicals Branch DTIE United Nations Environment Programme.
Tier 1 Module 7 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Establishing a TRP.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dr. Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water April 16, 2007 USGS: Water Resources Program.
Enhancing a Tribal Response Program CERCLA 128(a)Tribal Response Program Training Project.
TURTLE MT BAND OF CHIPPEWA Ray Reed – Brownfield Coordinator EPA-TRP.
A PROGRAM THAT OFFERS CUSTOMIZED ASSISTANCE TO PROPERTY OWNERS & INTERESTED PARTIES WITH THEIR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Voluntary Assistance Program (VAP)
EQSC Presentation on Petroleum Program October 20, 2009 Bruce Palin Assistant Commissioner Office of Land Quality Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Community Development Opportunities for Alaska Brownfields: Tools to Support your Projects Susan Morales Brownfields Program USEPA - Region 10 (206)
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
MassDEP Underground Storage Tank Program Program Requirements for Owners and Operators Winter 2015 Workshops 1.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 18 Environmental Law.
HANNAH WALKER RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT.
Hazardous Waste Any waste that is a risk to the health of humans or other living things.
Reclamation of Abandoned Mine Lands: EPA Perspective.
Environmental Factors In this module, we will discuss: Environmental legislation Environmental hazards Due diligence Conducting an environmental.
Evaluating the Practicality of LNAPL Recovery Jeff Lane, P.G. November 17, 2015 International Petroleum Environmental Conference (IPEC) IPEC 22 Contact.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and 1989 (RCRA) Alex Chenault Period 4.
Division of Waste Management Dexter R. Matthews, Director Mission: to prevent harmful releases of waste to the environment and clean up existing contamination.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
Waste Generation and Waste Disposal Chapter 16. Waste Waste – nonuseful products generated within the system throw-away society Municipal Solid Waste.
Global Warming – The Broad Legal Reach of Initiatives to Reduce Carbon Emissions Worldwide Legal Issues Associated with Carbon Capture and Geologic Storage.
RELEASE REPORTING OBLIGATIONS AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL Mississippi Manufacturers Association October 15, 2015.
Still Afraid of CERCLA? Tools and Techniques to Address Liability Ellen M. Boyle, Esq. AIG Environmental® November 14, 2006.
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Overview Recently Adopted Regulations Proposed Regulations
Redevelopment Authority of the County of Washington O
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)
Intro, Regulations.
The Solid Waste Disposal Act and the Superfund Act
Module 54 Hazardous Waste
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act 1976,1989
Washington State Department of Ecology
CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Site Specific Work: Introduction
Solano County Department of Environmental Management Environmental Health Services Division Hazardous Materials.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA/Superfund) Kelly Chen Period 1 4/22/11.
UNC Superfund Research Program
Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Zoning
Environmental Protection Agency
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Branch Organization Chuck Mueller, Branch Chief
Forum on the strategies for the management and development of contaminated sites in Taiwan Shian-chee Wu October 25, 2007.
Olusola Ayilara, P.E., P.G. PST-DCRP Section, Remediation Division
Revitalization Through TCEQ Brownfields Kristy Livingston, Brownfields Program Manager, Remediation Division, TCEQ.
Introduction to Brownfields
Presentation transcript:

The Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Brownfields Response Program Diane Thompson Hazardous Waste Manager Division of Resource Management (218)

Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Reservation

Development of the Band’s Brownfields Response Program Launched in 2003 Addresses hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants that pose a risk to the health of the Reservation Population and the quality of the Reservation’s Environment Sites vary widely – industrial sites, waste transfer stations, abandoned housing and equipment storage sites, open dumps, and meth labs.

Example No 1: Enbridge Pipeline Spill – Cass Lake Site Discovery: Leaking flange in May of crude oil and other petroleum products – trust or fee land! Release: Following initial remedial efforts, approximately 48,000 gallons of light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) consisting of residual crude oil is currently “floating” on the top of the water table Authority: DRM has asserted regulatory jurisdiction over the Cass Lake Site as it is within the exterior boundaries of the Leech Lake Reservation

Enbridge Site New Wells

Enbridge Working Cooperatively with DRM DRM issued a letter notifying Enbridge of its status as a potentially liable party Enbridge accepted responsibility for the release and cleanup of the site DRM and Enbridge are working collaboratively to identify viable remedial options As an example, at DRM’s request, Enbridge installed additional monitoring wells and hired a new consultant to conduct additional feasibility studies

USGS Study of the Cass Lake Site DRM identified significant data gaps regarding the nature, extent and scope of the contamination; Enbridge agreed more data was needed DRM entered into negotiations with the U.S. Geological Society’s (USGS) Toxic Substances Hydrology Program USGS proposed conducting geological and hydrogeologic studies at the Cass Lake Site Study costs would be split between USGS & DRM DRM applauded Enbridge, which agreed to fund DRM’s half of the study (approx. $100K/first year)

Benefits of the USGS Study Provides a neutral third-party perspective regarding remediation options Provides DRM and Enbridge access to the USGS’ broad scientific expertise and particularized knowledge regarding petroleum contaminated sites Information and analyses generated would provide a highly credible, reliable and useful tool that will be used by DRM to make an informed decision about optimal remedial options for the Cass Lake Site

Enbridge – Next Step USGS developing a scope of work for the study DRM and Enbridge are negotiating an Agreed Order

Example No 2: Tom’s Harbor Site Site involves a leaking underground storage tank on fee land located within the exterior boundaries of the Leech Lake Reservation State of Minnesota initiated an enforcement action Tom’s Harbor will use money from the State’s Petroleum Fund to remediate the site

Tom’s Harbor

Proposed Band-State Communication MOU Both the State and DRM are exerting enforcement authority over the site DRM sent a letter suggesting that the Band and State work collaboratively and share information regarding this site and future sites Proposed MOU designed to improve communication and cooperation between the agencies State met internally recently to discuss the proposal

Conclusion Exerting the Band’s inherent sovereignty and civil regulatory authority at several sites Enhancing the Band’s governmental credibility Strong, positive working relationship with EPA Region 5 The Band, through DRM, is working with EPA and the State to protect its homeland for future generations