River Basin Simulation with WEAP Water Evaluation and Planning System David Rosenberg NRM + IWRM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WEAP Water Evaluation & Planning System
Advertisements

LOGO Bangkok, May 2009 Water Resources Management in Ba River Basin under Future Development and Climate Scenarios Presented by: Nguyen Thi Thu Ha Examination.
Active Water Resource Management in the Lower Rio Grande TOOLS FOR A NEW ERA IN WATER MANAGEMENT presented by Peggy Barroll, Hydrologist New Mexico Office.
Basics of Reservoir Operations Computer Aided Negotiations Fall 2008 Megan Wiley Rivera.
Water Budget Modeling: WEAP Kaan Tuncok
International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas Regional Knowledge Exchange on Decision-support Tools and Models to Project Improved Strategies.
Antamina Mine Water Management Model Alan Keizur Golder Associates Roberto Manrique Arce Compañia Minera Antamina User Conference 2006 Background The Antamina.
Climate Change and Water Resources Challenge in California Francis I Chung, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Water Resources.
Department of Water Resources Role in Water Transfers Jerry Johns, DWR
A Climate Driven Model of the Water Resources of The Sacramento and San Joaquin Hydrologic Regions: Model Structure and Data Inputs Brian Joyce, Stockholm.
National IWRM plans; links with Water Supply and Sanitation Palle Lindgaard Jørgensen Technical Secretariat Yerevan, 13 December 2006.
Chapter One Hydrologic Principles Flashlight and globe.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Nathan VanRheenen Richard N. Palmer Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Recasting the Future Developing.
Climate Change and Water Resources Management WEB pages on water management activities Max Campos San Jose – Costa Rica.
Water Systems Mrs. Bader. Water Systems In this exercise, you will learn more about what makes up a watershed, track the movement of water through the.
The Upper Rio Grande. Multi-objective River and Reservoir System Modeling Flood Control Water Supply Navigation Aquatic/Riparian Habitat Recreational.
Dr. David Ahlfeld Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering The Westfield River Basin Optimization Model Demonstration:
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
Demands, Supplies & Priorities. Demand Sectors Irrigation Livestock Mining Industrial Commercial Ecosystems Domestic Total Water Demand Major Cities.
Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.
Modeling Impacts of Policy Responses to Prolonged and Severe Drought in the Upper Rio Grande River Basin Dr. James F. Booker, Siena College Douglas T.
ESET ALEMU WEST Consultants, Inc. Bellevue, Washington.
FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues.
Water Supply Reallocation Workshop Determining Yield and Space Requirement.
Overview of WEAP. Water Evaluation and Planning System WEAP A generic, object-oriented, programmable, integrated water resources management modelling.
WATER AVAILABILITY MODELING for the SULPHUR RIVER BASIN Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Austin, Texas Consultant: R. J. Brandes Company.
Vulnerability and Adaptation of Water Resources to Climate Change in Egypt Dr. Dia Eldin Elquosy
Assign Annual Demand for a Purpose CALSIM Simulation Compare the Long-term Average Annual Friant Unit Delivery to Benchmark Study CALSIM Simulation Completed.
Analytic Vs Numeric Ground Water Models Ray R. Bennett, PE Colorado Division of Water Resources.
South Platte Decision Support System Colorado Water Conservation Board and Division of Water Resources.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Reservoir Simulation Software “Westfield Sub-basin” Presenter – John Hickey, HEC August 2010.
What is OASIS? Water resources simulation/optimization model
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District Real-Time Conservation Pool Storage Accounting for the Falls Lake Project.
Reservoir Operation Simulation D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M7L2 Simulation.
OASIS Basics Computer Aided Negotiations of Water Resources Disputes.
WEAP Demand Management
Futures and WEAP Annette Huber-Lee Stockholm Environment Institute.
CADSWES Engineering Enhancements New Methods and Improved Functionality Steve Setzer.
1 Scenario formulation Scenario-based planning is a structured way of thinking about what might happen in the future Scenarios are descriptions of possible.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
1 januari 2008 RIBASIM input data by Wil N.M. van der Krogt.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
Guide Curve Operations Partition reservoir storage into “pools” Each pool has a separate purpose Release (or avoid releasing) water to reach the “guide.
WaM-DaM: A Data Model to Synthesize and Organize Water Management Data 1 EWRI CONGRESS June 4, 2014 Adel M. Abdallah David E. Rosenberg.
There are three main screens, plus the summary page. The next three pages show each screen with instructions below. A symbol ( ) will appear on the picture.
River Basin Simulation with WEAP Water Evaluation and Planning System David Rosenberg CEE 5460 – Water Resources Engineering.
5th Shire River Basin Conference 22 February 2017 Shire River Basin Management Project Shire Basin Planning Tool Sub-Component A1 Development of a.
Steven Burian and Erfan Goharian Hydroinformatics Fall 2013
Ten Reasons to Use South Carolina’s Surface Water Quantity Models
Lecture 19 Automating Preparing and Entering Model Data in WEAP
Exploring Arc Hydro Capabilities to Represent Water Management Data
River Basin Simulation with WEAP Water Evaluation and Planning System
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
WaM-DaM: A Data Model to Synthesize and Organize Water Management Data
Allocation of Ogallala Groundwater Supplies
Effects of persistent drought on Lake Mead and the Las Vegas Valley
“Whiskey is for drinking, water is for fighting over.”
Water Resources Analysis using WEAP and GIS
The Aral Game.
Multipurpose Reservoirs and Reservoir Systems
Modeling tools Training Module
Water Statistics and Water Account in Jordan
Water Statistics and Water Account in Jordan
Water Resources Q: What water can we use?
WaterWare description
Towards a Water Scarcity & Drought Indicator System (WSDiS)
Systems and Components – A Process for Developing the Total Water Budget Handbook for Water Budget Development - With or Without Models CWEMF 2019 Annual.
WP01 Water issues Izmir | 04 | 05.
Presentation transcript:

River Basin Simulation with WEAP Water Evaluation and Planning System David Rosenberg NRM + IWRM

Learning Objectives Describe reasons to model priority-based water allocations Draw a system schematic (that includes water sources, demand sites, and return flows) Calculate allocations given available water and delivery priorities Add reservoir storage and release priorities Use the WEAP system to set up the schematic, enter data, obtain returns, and define + analyze scenarios 2NRM+IWRM

How much river water can a user use? River flow ≠ Water available to a user Also reach gains/losses, reservoir storage, consumptive use, return flows, groundwater, soil moisture, Delivery targets and water allocation priorities –Appropriation doctrine (first in time, first in right) –By purpose (e.g.: urban demands before environmental) –By location (e.g.: upstream, then downstream, or reverse) Prior withdrawals and deliveries Changes from month to month and year to year NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 3

How much river water can a user use? (cont.) It’s complicated to track We’d like a model to do this WEAP History –First developed in 1992 –WEAP21 version in 2005 –Already 119 published applications (33 in 2010) Key model development steps 1.Draw the system schematic 2.Identify data for system components 3.Enter data and run the model NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 4

Select Applications LocationFeaturesWater PurposesReference(s) Aral Sea 17 reservoirs 28 demand sites Water supply Lake recession; fishing Water quality Raskin et al., 1992 Upper Chattahoochee, Georgia 1 reservoir 24 demand sites 44 transmission links 10 return flows Water supply Drought management Flood protection Johnson, 1994 Steelpoort basin, South Africa 33 demand sites Ag., urban, mining, and stock water supply Ecological reserve Conservation planning Levite et al., 2003 Sacramento River, CA Ag. & urban wat. sup. Env. Flows & hydropower Climate change adaptation Purkey et al., 2008 And many more at NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 5

Draw a System Schematic Identify the major system components –Water sources (surface and groundwater) –Demand sites (agricultural, urban, etc..) –Source connections to demand sites –Outflows from demand sites after use Example 1: A river can supply water to a city and an agricultural district. The outfalls from agricultural drain pipes and the city’s wastewater treatment plant are located downstream of both diversion intakes. NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 6

Draw a System Schematic (cont.) Example 2: A river can supply water to a city and an agricultural district. The city is located upstream of the agricultural district. 40% of the city’s withdrawals are collected, treated, returned to the river, and available for downstream use by the agricultural district. NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 7

Calculate Allocations 1.Draw the schematic (previous slides) 2.Determine delivery targets for demand sites (demands) 3.Assign priorities to demand sites (delivery preferences) 4.Determine water availability  Sources  Return flows 5.Allocate remaining available water to meet delivery target of highest priority demand site 6.Repeat Steps 4 and 5 for next highest priority site. NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 8

Calculate Allocations (cont.) Example 3: A river can supply water to a city and an agricultural district. The outfalls from agricultural drain pipes and the city’s wastewater treatment plant are located downstream of both diversion intakes. NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 9 Demand Site Priority [rank] Delivery Target [ac-ft/yr] City 2 (lower)30 Agricultural 1 (high)60 70 ac-ft is available in the river this year. The table shows demand site priorities and delivery targets. What water volume is allocated to each demand site?

Calculate Allocations (cont.) Example 4: A river can supply water to a city and an agricultural district. The city is located upstream of the agricultural district. 40% of the city’s withdrawals are collected, treated, returned to the river, and available for downstream use by the agricultural district. NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 10 Demand Site Priority [rank] Delivery Target [ac-ft/yr] City 2 (lower)30 Agricultural 1 (high)60 70 ac-ft is available in the river this year. The table shows demand site priorities and delivery targets. What water volume is allocated to each demand site?

Calculate Allocations (cont.) Always use mass balance to determine water available to a user (or at model node) Allocation calculations get more complicated as add demand sites and return flows Computer modeling can really help! NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 11

Adding Reservoirs Reservoirs are just another supply source Reservoir source availability determined by –Storage at end of previous time step –Reservoir release rules –Reservoir inflows, evaporation losses, etc. Partition reservoir storage NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 12

Adding Reservoirs (cont.) In WEAP 1.First use in-stream flows to meet Demand Site targets 2.If in-stream flows inadequate, withdraw from reservoirs 3.Withdrawal a function of reservoir storage 4.Can also assign priorities to refill reservoirs NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 13 Withdraw to meet full delivery target Withdraw reduced amount (buffer coefficient)

WEAP Allocation Math In each time step, WEAP solves a small linear program Maximize Demand Satisfaction 1.Meet supply priorities 2.Obey demand site preferences 3.Mass balance 4.Other constraints Embed the LP in a time-series simulation (psuedo code) NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 14 Such that:

Using WEAP Major Modules –Schematic –Data –Results –Scenario Explorer Introduce modules today Apply & practice in lab exercise NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 15

WEAP Schematic Drag and drop system node components –Demand sites –Reservoirs, etc. Drag, click, and drop system link components –Rivers –Transmission links –Return flows Add GIS layers to help place components Must include all infrastructure you plan to test in Scenario Explorer NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 16

Weaping River Example Schematic NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 17

WEAP Data Module Enter data for each schematic component –Rivers: Headflows for each month of the simulation –Demand sites: activity levels, use rates, losses, consumption, demand priority (1=highest; 99=lowest) –Transmission links: Max flows, supply preference –Return flows: routing (percent returned) –Reservoirs: storage capacity, initial storage, volume- elevation curve, evaporation, pool definitions, buffer coefficients, priority Enter data for a base case or a scenario Enter data or read from input file NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 18

Alternatively, right-click any schematic component to also get to the Data module NRM+I WRM 19

NRM+IWRM Schematic for the Lower Bear River David Rosenberg 20

David Rosenberg 21 NRM+IWRM New Cache Cache Valley Bear River Canal Company Reservoir, proposed Reservoir, existing Wetland Ag. Use Urban Use Box Elder County Bird Refuge Schematic for the Lower Bear River Cutler QX15- South Cache Reach Gain/Loss QX5-Lower Bear QX6-Cache GW QX22- Malad Reach Gain/Loss QX27-Box Elder GW QX61-Malad River South Cache Hyrum QX46-Little Bear QX41- Blacksmith Fork New Box Elder County

Example 5. What flow data need to be entered for the Lower Bear River? Look at the Schematic for the Lower Bear River. a.What locations require headflow data? b.Which reaches require reach flow data? c.Where can you obtain this data? NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 22

WEAP Data Module Enter data for each schematic component –Rivers: Headflows for each month of the simulation –Reaches: Reach gains and losses each month of the simulation –Demand sites: activity levels, use rates, losses, consumption, demand priority (1=highest; 99=lowest) –Transmission links: Max flows, supply preference –Return flows: routing (percent returned) –Reservoirs: storage capacity, initial storage, volume- elevation curve, evaporation, pool definitions, buffer coefficients, priority Enter data or read from input file NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 23

Alternatively, right-click any schematic component to also get to the Data module NRM+I WRM 24

NRM+I WRM 25 Tree view, Buttons, and Tabs to navigate to desired data

WEAP Results Module Click the Results icon and recalculate (all scenarios) Choose results from schematic or dropdown lists Numerous options to view, tabulate, and export NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 26

Water demands by Demand Site NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 27

WEAP Scenario Explorer Define and manage scenarios from the Data module Enter input data here too NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 28

WEAP Scenario Explorer (cont.) Use Scenario Explorer icon to open scenario dashboard NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 29

Conclusions WEAP can simulate priority-based water allocations Drag and drop interface to draw system schematic Enter variety of data for river, demand site, reservoir, return flow, and other system components View results in numerous formats Use scenario tool to test and view results for changes in model inputs Apply principles after Spring Break for Lower Bear River basin lab exercise and ILO-4. NRM+IWRMDavid Rosenberg 30