Charge Subtraction, Weizmann Clusterizer, and Pattern Recognition Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science HBD Fest, Stony Brook, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Thermal Photon Measurement using the HBD in PHENIX :Status and Update Sky RolnickUC RiversideAPS April Meeting 2011.
1 Search for the Flavor-Changing Neutral-Current Decay,   → p     HyangKyu Park University of Michigan, Ann Arbor for the HyperCP collaboration.
HBD studies in Run9 200GeV p+p collisions Jiayin Sun 1.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
D. Peterson, “TPC Detector Response Simulation and Track Reconstruction”, Paris, 22-April For example: TPC: 2.0 m O.R., 0.5 m I.R., 150  m spatial.
Study of the semileptonic decays at 4170 MeV Koloina Randrianarivony Marina Artuso (Syracuse University)
1 Cluster Quality in Track Fitting for the ATLAS CSC Detector David Primor 1, Nir Amram 1, Erez Etzion 1, Giora Mikenberg 2, Hagit Messer 1 1. Tel Aviv.
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
LATEST ANALYSIS WITH THE PHENIX HBD Mihael Makek (University of Zagreb) for the PHENIX Collaboration Thermal Photons and Dileptons in Heavy-Ion Collisions,
Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.
Dealing with central events in Run 10 Au+Au collisions Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science HBD Meeting, 2/6/2010.
HBD Meeting 2010 / 11/ 24 Katsuro 1. confirmation plan for HBD simulation performances 2 HBD charge distribution Red: merged cluster Blue: separated cluster.
A feasibility study for the detection of SuperNova explosions with an Undersea Neutrino Telescope A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S. E. Tzamarias Physics.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
I. Ravinovich Di-electron measurements with the Hadron Blind Detector in the PHENIX experiment at RHIC Ilia Ravinovich for the PHENIX Collaboration Weizmann.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Monitoring of background events in 2010 run Giuseppe Zito 06/11/2015 PFG/MIG Topical meeting on beam background.
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
16-Nov-2002Konstantin Beloous1 Digital Hadron Calorimeter Energy Resolution.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Two Density-based Clustering Algorithms L. Xia (ANL) V. Zutshi (NIU)
Background Subtraction and Likelihood Method of Analysis: First Attempt Jose Benitez 6/26/2006.
Hit Efficiency Study Yukio FUJIYAMA (Tokyo Tech).
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
Thursday, December 17, 2015 Sky D. Rolnick UC Riverside 1 Baseline study for Chiral Symmetry Restoration using the Hadron Blind Detector in the PHENIX.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
HBD Alignment in Run-10 (update) Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science HBD Meeting, 8/12/2010.
NEMO3 analysis and SuperNEMO development Benjamin Richards D14.
6-Aug-02Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX Upgrade mini-Workshop1 Boris Khachaturov, Alexander Kozlov, Ilia Ravinovich and Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann Institute, Israel.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
Kyoto Univ. RIKEN Katsuro Nakamura (Kyoto University) 2012/ 2/ 13 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium 2012/2/131 Kyoto University GCOE Symposium.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
2/18/2016I. Ravinovich1 HBD Run-10 data analysis I. Ravinovich WIS.
Radia Sia Syracuse Univ. 1 RICH 2004 Outline:  The CLEO-III RICH Detector  Physics Requirements  CLEO-III RICH at work… Performance of the CLEO-III.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
N. Saoulidou & G. Tzanakos1 Analysis for new Period 3 Events N. Saoulidou and G. Tzanakos University of Athens, Department of Physics’ Div. Of Nuclear.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
January 13, 2004A. Cherlin1 Preliminary results from the 2000 run of CERES on low-mass e + e - pair production in Pb-Au collisions at 158 A GeV A. Cherlin.
1 HBD Update Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, May 7, 2008 May7, 2008.
C.Clement Eta RegionTraining regionVariable set |  |
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
Measurements of low mass e + e - pairs in p+p and Au+Au collisions with the HBD upgrade of the PHENIX detector Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science.
Monitoring of cell to cell inhomogeneity and transfer into simulation M. Vander Donckt.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Annealing effects in irradiated HPK strip detectors measured with SCT128 chip Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1,Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko.
9/11/2003Tomoaki Nakamura - Hiroshima Univ.1 Event-by-event charge/neutral fluctuation at RHIC-PHENIX Tomoaki Nakamura / Kensuke Homma Hiroshima University.
INFN - PadovaBeauty Measurements in pp with the Central Detector 1 Beauty Measurements in p-p with the Central Detector F. Antinori, C. Bombonati, A. Dainese,
1 The Scintillation Tile Hodoscope (SciTil) ● Motivation ● Event timing/ event building/ software trigger ● Conversion detection ● Charged particle TOF.
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
Ilia Ravinovich for the PHENIX Collaboration
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
DCH missing turn analysis
Software Update Takashi HACHIYA.
Electron -converted photon –pi0 discrimination
Individual Particle Reconstruction
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
fK+K- yield analysis update
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
西村美紀(東大) 他 MEGIIコラボレーション 日本物理学会 第73回年次大会(2018年) 東京理科大学(野田キャンパス)
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Charge Subtraction, Weizmann Clusterizer, and Pattern Recognition Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science HBD Fest, Stony Brook, 2010

HBD occupancy in the most central events > 95 % Subtracted is the average charge per cell:  on event-by-event basis  for each particular HBD module  taking into account pad area Occupancy reduced to ~30 % in the most central events Charge Subtraction before subtraction: after subtraction:

The subtraction is justified by the fact that the number of the scintillation photons grows linearly with number of tracks in CA The example shows this for a single HBD module: HBD – charge subtraction The bars represent the sigma of the gaussian fit to the average charge distribution (for given centrality)

Seed preblobs on pads with q > 3 pe Add the six neighbors if they are above threshold (centrality dependant ~ 0-2 pe) Merge preblobs if they have overlapping pads with the „main“ preblob Match the cluster to the closest hit Weizmann Clusterizer

The charge measured in HBD is obtained after matching cuts on hbddphi and hbddz The background is estimated by swapping (CA tracks projected to a different module, x is swapped) The background is normalized to the matching distributions tail- to-tail and subtracted Weizmann Clusterizer signal+background background

The random matching in HBD is due to the fact that CA electron tracks originating from conversions in and after the HBD backplane have no real matching hit in the HBD The rejection of the random is achieved in three steps: 1.Requirying positional matching of the CA track projection and HBD cluster (3 sigma) 2.Rejection of 1 pad clusters 3.Rejection of clusters with the maximum pad charge below a certain threshold. This threshold is centrality dependent The preblobs with q max > 80 pe are rejected Pattern recognition is done on preblob level Pattern Recognition signal background peripheral central

Pattern Recognition Before p.r.After p.r. S/R ~ 1.1 S/R ~ 2.2 The pattern recognition significantly improves HBD signal to randoms, but costs the efficiency The efficiency is estimated from MC simulation of single electrons embedded with HBD MB data Steps applied Case (MB events)  Pure MC93 % 1 + 2MC embedded with HBD74 % MC embedded with HBD + pattern recognition 67 %

variables monitored, but not as useful: q max -q min q min /q max q min /q tot q max /q tot variables defined but not yet used: (y loc,z loc ) of all pads in the cluster Pattern Recognition

Centrality No of. el HBD/CA Signal /Random Efficiency (embedding) peripheral central Summary Centrality No of. el HBD/CA Signal /Random Efficiency (embedding) peripheral central I. WIS Clusterizer with clustersize>1 && q max <80 II. Pattern recognition + I.