ATLAS Detector Resources & Lumi Blocks Enrico & Nicoletta.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MHSL - Dolphin Training Class
Advertisements

Clara Gaspar on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration, “Physics at the LHC and Beyond”, Quy Nhon, Vietnam, August 2014 Challenges and lessons learnt LHCb Operations.
1 Databases in ALICE L.Betev LCG Database Deployment and Persistency Workshop Geneva, October 17, 2005.
Peter Chochula, January 31, 2006  Motivation for this meeting: Get together experts from different fields See what do we know See what is missing See.
Reconstruction and Analysis on Demand: A Success Story Christopher D. Jones Cornell University, USA.
70-290: MCSE Guide to Managing a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Environment, Enhanced Chapter 7: Advanced File System Management.
70-290: MCSE Guide to Managing a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Environment Chapter 7: Advanced File System Management.
Maintaining and Updating Windows Server 2008
Business Optix Library Service – Workflow
CLEO’s User Centric Data Access System Christopher D. Jones Cornell University.
70-290: MCSE Guide to Managing a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Environment, Enhanced Chapter 7: Advanced File System Management.
70-290: MCSE Guide to Managing a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Environment Chapter 7: Advanced File System Management.
BOE/BME – MDT: DCS For the 2 BOE, DCS needs to handle 2 x 2 HV (1 ch/multilayer) 2x LV 2x JTAG, associated 2 MDMs/ELMBs Monitoring of T, B and CSM sensors.
HPS Online Software Discussion Jeremy McCormick, SLAC Status and Plans.
Virtual Interaction Manager
Alignment Strategy for ATLAS: Detector Description and Database Issues
All rights reserved, property and © CAD Computer GmbH & Co.KG 2009 Cover page.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
André Augustinus 10 September 2001 DCS Architecture Issues Food for thoughts and discussion.
Databases E. Leonardi, P. Valente. Conditions DB Conditions=Dynamic parameters non-event time-varying Conditions database (CondDB) General definition:
Recent Software Issues L3 Review of SM Software, 28 Oct Recent Software Issues Occasional runs had large numbers of single-event files. INIT message.
Gnam Monitoring Overview M. Della Pietra, D. della Volpe (Napoli), A. Di Girolamo (Roma1), R. Ferrari, G. Gaudio, W. Vandelli (Pavia) D. Salvatore, P.
JANA and Raw Data David Lawrence, JLab Oct. 5, 2012.
RPC DQA but also Monitoring for the DCS group: status and prospective for Marcello Bindi RPC L1MU Barrel DQM - 08/05/2013.
Clara Gaspar, March 2005 LHCb Online & the Conditions DB.
Umesh Joshi Fermilab Phase 1 Pixel Upgrade Workshop, Grindelwald August , 2012 CMS Pixel & HCAL Databases (An Overview)
3rd November Richard Hawkings Luminosity, detector status and trigger - conditions database and meta-data issues  How we might apply the conditions.
Draft of talk to be given in Madrid: CSC Operations Summary Greg Rakness University of California, Los Angeles CMS Run Coordination Workshop CIEMAT, Madrid.
ALICE Pixel Operational Experience R. Santoro On behalf of the ITS collaboration in the ALICE experiment at LHC.
Objectives Understand Corrective, Perfective and Preventive maintenance Discuss the general concepts of software configuration management.
Status of Control Unit Software Cristiano Bozza – 26/8/2015.
Online Monitoring System at KLOE Alessandra Doria INFN - Napoli for the KLOE collaboration CHEP 2000 Padova, 7-11 February 2000 NAPOLI.
Zhen YAN, Muon Offline DQ meeting, 05/10/2015 Signed off runs(express stream) since last Friday meeting Default defects:  MS_RPC_BA_ROD_PROBLEM_1  MS_RPC_BC_ROD_PROBLEM_1.
Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.
Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.
ID Week 13 th of October 2014 Per Johansson Sheffield University.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
Maintaining and Updating Windows Server 2008 Lesson 8.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.
CT-PPS DB Info (Preliminary) DB design will be the same as currently used for CMS Pixels, HCAL, GEM, HGCAL databases DB is Oracle based A DB for a sub-detector.
DB and Information Flow Issues ● Selecting types of run ● L1Calo databases ● Archiving run parameters ● Tools Murrough Landon 28 April 2009.
Online Database Developments ● Overview ● OKS database status and plans ● COOL database developments ● Validating calibrations ● Tools ● Summary Murrough.
THIS MORNING (Start an) informal discussion to -Clearly identify all open issues, categorize them and build an action plan -Possibly identify (new) contributing.
70-290: MCSE Guide to Managing a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Environment, Enhanced Chapter 7: Advanced File System Management.
Savannah to Jira Migration
Slow Control and Run Initialization Byte-wise Environment
Slow Control and Run Initialization Byte-wise Environment
HCAL Database Goals for 2009
Online Database Work Overview Work needed for OKS database
Project Management: Messages
Database Replication and Monitoring
David Adams Brookhaven National Laboratory September 28, 2006
Run Control (and Other) Work
ATLAS MDT HV – LV Detector Control System (DCS)
Online Database Status
Online Software Status
Conditions Database Current conditions folders Proposed new folders
Online Software Status
Level 1 (Calo) Databases
HLT & Calibration.
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
DQM for the RPC subdetector
Spreadsheets, Modelling & Databases
File System Management
Weekend Summary Friday Saturday Sunday C. Gemme, INFN Genova,
Tutorial Introduction to help.ebsco.com.
Overview of Database Framework for GEM Detector at CERN
Offline framework for conditions data
GRP data for online/offline data processing
Presentation transcript:

ATLAS Detector Resources & Lumi Blocks Enrico & Nicoletta

Lumi Block (LB) ATLAS data taking runs divided into intervals of time: Lumi Blocks – 1 minute long last year Data events within a LB (should) have been generated with same conditions – detector status – trigger keys Changes of such conditions must issue a LB change – minimal LB length = 10s – the conditions must be known by the expert system which issue the exceptional LB changes LBs drive – data files closure – IoV for some COOL information – some collections of monitoring data – ATLAS instantaneous luminosity computation – … 2

ATLAS Detector Resources During a run many changes occur to the detector – parts to be removed/reinserted from/into data taking – parts turn off/on If a part of the detector is described in the data taking database (OKS) as a Resource, it can be automatically enabled/disabled from the data taking – status of the resource saved in COOL under /TDAQ/EnabledResources/… – expert system issues a LB change 3

What is a Resource? A resource can represent a different granularity of ATLAS – subdetector itself (e.g. Pixel detector) – a sensor (e.g. 80M) Each (muon) subdetector chose a different granularity – e.g. disable a chamber in MDT does not trigger a LB change, but disable a Pixel Module does it Goals: – agree on a common definition of Resources – store enable/disable status in COOL agree on: folder structure, IoV, content (channel ID & channel name) – define when to issue LB change too small granularity should probably not trigger LB change  risk of too frequent LB change 4

A use case (MDT) A ROD can be: – recovered through a re-synch fast operation, trigger hold no need for change in COOL? True for reconstruction purposes, but not for tracking problems – removed through stopless removal registered in COOL, LB change – rare conditions! Chambers can be dropped during the run – the ROD performs the operation – RCD is informed and publishes chamber status – DCS triggers re-initialization – DAQ informed and chamber re-included by the ROD – no need to stop the trigger – condition to COOL through DCS (and in data) 5

A use case (MDT) Active chambers configuration – active chambers configured via a ROD mask in DCS – no information to resource display when dropped – information to COOL only in DCS Push to define chambers as resources – good to easy user interface to configuration – can be disabled/enabled when recovering – condition can be displayed and consistently updated in COOL – But: recovering a chamber is rather frequent the temporary drop of chambers does not substantially change run conditions – if the number is small and chambers are “well distributed” recovery is rather fast Special resources with thresholds? – is it possible to define resources not triggering LB change? – is it possible to have user-defined thresholds for that? 6

Open Questions Where the COOL information with detector resources status are used? – DQ? – offline? – simulation/MC? If offline uses it, which detector granularity is needed by the reconstruction? Which information are written to COOL only in DCS? – which conditions ended in the data? Are 10s LBs treated by the offline as the 1m LBs? Those questions need to be answered in order to adopt a proper resource description 7

To Be Agreed On Define COOL data – uniform folder structure allows for better use of the information (e.g. web page to display status of resources online) Decide when a change of resource status should trigger a LB change Maybe useful to define two types of Resources in OKS? 1.whose status change issue a new LB 2.whose status change is ONLY recorded in COOL 8