R. Assmann Collimator Functionality, Performance and First View on Set-up and Optimization R. Assmann AB/ABP, CERN External Review of the LHC Collimation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collimation with retracted TCSGs R. Bruce, R. Kwee, S. Redaelli.
Advertisements

Simulation priorities for 2015 R. Bruce for task 5.2.
Critical beam losses during Commissioning & Initial Operation Guillaume Robert-Demolaize (CERN and Univ. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble) with R. Assmann, S.
Collimation MDs LHC Study Working Group Daniel Wollmann for the Collimation-Team, BLM-Team, Impedance-Team, … LHC Study Working Group,
1 Analysis of MD on IR1 and IR5 aperture at 3.5 TeV – progress report C. Alabau Pons, R. Assmann, R. Bruce, M. Giovannozzi, G. Müller, S. Redaelli F. Schmidt,
Sat/Sun 26/27 th March Sat 18h20: Stable beams. Fill #1653. Sun 10h02: Stable beams continued. vdM scans. Length calibrations. 16h59: Beam dump. Delivered.
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Loss maps of RHIC Guillaume Robert-Demolaize, BNL CERN-GSI Meeting on Collective Effects, 2-3 October 2007 Beam losses, halo generation, and Collimation.
LHC progress with beam & plans. Of note since last time Transverse damper Beta beating in the ramp Collimation set-up at 450 GeV & validation LBDS – systematic.
External Review on LHC Machine Protection, CERN, Collimation of encountered losses D. Wollmann, R.W. Assmann, F. Burkart, R. Bruce, M. Cauchi,
Ralph Assmann What Do We Want To Measure (in 2009) R. Assmann S. Redaelli, V. Previtali CERN/BE discussed with W. Scandale CERN/EN26/3/2009CC09  See also.
LHC Machine Protection System Review LHC Machine Protection System Review Oliver Aberle13 April 2005 with input from R. Assmann and R. Losito Ensuring.
Preparation of Review R. Assmann et al CWG, CWG R. Assmann.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
R. Assmann - LTC Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann with W. Venturini and V. Kain LTC Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Simulations of TCT beam impacts for different scenarios R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. RedaelliAcknowledgement: L. Lari, C. Bracco, B. Goddard.
Aperture in case of an asynchronous beam dump with ATS optics R. Bruce, E. Quaranta, S. Redaelli With valueable input from: A. Bertarelli, C. Bracco, F.
R. Assmann Collimators and Beam Absorbers for Cleaning and Machine Protection Ralph Assmann Workshop Chamonix XIV Acknowledgements to the.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
Collimator settings for 2012 R. Bruce, R. Assmann for the collimation team
R. Assmann, June 2009 Operational Experience with the LHC Collimation System R. Assmann, CERN 8/6/2009 for the Collimation Project Team Visit TU Munich.
Β*-dependence on collimation R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann C. Alabau Pons, F. Burkart, M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, M. Giovannozzi, W. Herr, L. Lari, G. Muller, S. Redaelli,
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
Collimation design considerations at CERN (with some applications to LHC) R. Bruce on behalf of the CERN LHC collimation project R. Bruce,
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
Ion Commissioning: Thursday & Friday
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Joint Meeting SPS Upgrade Study Group and SPS Task Force
Plan for Collimator Commissioning
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
Halo scraping and loss rates at collimators
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Machine plans - Alignment workshop
Beam collimation for SPPC
Intensity Evolution Estimate for LHC
Machine availability reaching well over 80%
Remote setting of LHC BLM thresholds?
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland PAC 2003 – Portland, Oregon, USA
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
The 4th International Particle Accelerator Conference, IPAC13
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
LHC Collimation Requirements
The LHC Collimation Project Implementation of a Phased Approach
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
Beam halo and beam losses in IR1 and IR5
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Collimation after LS1: cleaning and β* reach
Saturday 7th May Sat – Sun night
Collimation margins and *
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
Machine plans - CMS startup workshop
Introduction and Requirements
Collimators: Operations - Baseline Assumptions
Collimator Efficiency Study
Collimation qualification during the first weeks of the 2011 run
MD Planning Fri – Sat (1. – 2.7.)
Summary for LPC (March 7th, Ralph Assmann)
Another Immortal Fill….
Integration into MP - Considerations -
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
Presentation transcript:

R. Assmann Collimator Functionality, Performance and First View on Set-up and Optimization R. Assmann AB/ABP, CERN External Review of the LHC Collimation Project June 30 th - July 2 nd 2004 Part of discussions on commissioning of machine protection related system: B. Dehning, B. Goddard, M. Lamont, J. Wenninger, R. Schmidt

R. Assmann Outline Functionality of the LHC collimatorFunctionality of the LHC collimator Performance estimatesPerformance estimates Set-up and optimizationSet-up and optimization ConclusionConclusion

R. Assmann The LHC Type Collimator If we say collimator:We mean a collimator with two parallel jaws! Each jaw controllable in position and angle!

R. Assmann Functionality Side view at one end Motor Temperature sensor Gap opening (LVDT) Gap position (LVDT) Resolver Reference Microphonic sensor Not shown: IN, OUT, ANTI-COLL switches! Calibration: Inside vs outside gap etc

R. Assmann Functionality Side view at one end Motor Temperature sensor Gap opening (LVDT) Gap position (LVDT) Resolver Reference Microphonic sensor Calibration: Inside vs outside gap etc

R. Assmann Basic control in-/output Basic input:Motor setting: jaw position at each end Control position and angle of each jaw independently!  Control position and angle of each jaw independently! Local resolver reading Readings:For each motor:  Local resolver reading Gap width For each end of the jaw:  Gap width Gap position  Gap position Monitoring:Temperature, switches, micro-phonic sensors

R. Assmann For set-up We can guarantee a gap in mm to several 10’s of  m! However, we must set to beam , e.g. 6  for primary collimators! Understand beta function at collimator! Must be known to 20% anyway for aperture before serious commissioning  J. Wenninger!  Collimator gaps can be set to better ± 0.6  from basic aperture tolerances! Major task for collimation set-up:  Centering of gap around the beam!

R. Assmann Inefficiency and Allowable Intensity Allowed intensity Quench threshold (7.6 × TeV) Dilution Length (50 m) Cleaning inefficiency = Number of escaping p (>10  ) Number of impacting p (6  ) Beam lifetime (e.g. 0.2 h minimum) (Luminosity)

R. Assmann How to get collimators going for phase 1 Start at low intensity:  Need for less cleaning efficiency! No collimationPilot bunch Single-stage collimation~ 500 bunches (inj) ~ 20 bunches (top)  -cleaning: 2 primary coll. momentum cleaning: 1 primary coll. Help with local tertiary coll. Limited two-stage collimationIntermediate intensities Bring on secondary coll.  -cleaning: ~ 7 TCS momentum cleaning: ~ 4 TCS Full two-stage cleaningUp to 50% of nom. intensity  -cleaning: 11 TCS momentum cleaning: 4 TCS

R. Assmann Components for the Collimation System (Phase 1) Focus of review Most difficult! Number of objects: spares Per beam: 25 collimators 3 scrapers 12 absorbers

R. Assmann Collimators / Scrapers / Absorbers Components of the collimation system are distinguished by their function: Collimators:beam protons Collimators:Elastic and inelastic interactions of beam protons. Precise devices with two jaws, used for efficient beam cleaning. Small gaps and stringent tolerances. Scrapers:beam shaping and diagnostics Scrapers:Used for beam shaping and diagnostics. Thin one-sided objects. Absorbers:mis-kicked beam showers Absorbers:Absorb mis-kicked beam or products of proton-induced showers. Movable absorbers can be quite similar in design to collimators, but mostly with high-Z jaws. Larger gaps and relaxed tolerances. Precise set-up and optimization in first line affects collimators!

R. Assmann Set-up of single collimator BLM Beam

R. Assmann Set-up of single collimator 1-by-1 procedure: 1. Lower intensity  1 stage cleaning is sufficient. 2. Scraping of beam to ~ 3  3. Move in single jaw. One edge after the other. 4. Second jaw the same way. 5. Collimator to reference position (record) and then out. 6. Next collimator…  No problem of cross-talk (do both beams at same time).  Need good BLM system (B. Dehning, B. Holzer) adjusted to set-up.

R. Assmann Set-up of single collimator BLM Beam Shower

R. Assmann Set-up of single collimator BLM Beam Shower

R. Assmann Set-up of single collimator BLM Beam Shower

R. Assmann Set-up of single collimator BLM Beam Shower

R. Assmann Set-up of single collimator BLM Beam Calibrated center and width of gap, if beam extension is known (e.g. after scraping). Advance with experience! Rely on good BLM system...

R. Assmann Advance procedures Put all collimators to same normalized setting! Assume we want to center gaps...

R. Assmann Advance procedures  Grow beam emittance... Shower

R. Assmann Advance procedures  Grow beam emittance... Shower

R. Assmann Advance procedures  Grow beam emittance... Shower

R. Assmann Advance procedures  Grow beam emittance... Shower

R. Assmann Advance procedures  Grow beam emittance... Shower

R. Assmann Advance procedures  Grow beam emittance... Shower

R. Assmann Advanced procedures In principle we could optimize many collimators at once.In principle we could optimize many collimators at once. Efficient procedures should be prepared!Efficient procedures should be prepared! Can also imagine long orbit bumps through collimation insertions with equal settings  similar to emiitance growth procedure!Can also imagine long orbit bumps through collimation insertions with equal settings  similar to emiitance growth procedure! Do at lower intensity, where one-stage cleaning is sufficient (20 nom. bunches at 7 TeV, more at injection).Do at lower intensity, where one-stage cleaning is sufficient (20 nom. bunches at 7 TeV, more at injection). Maybe less for machine protection!?Maybe less for machine protection!? Detailed simulations for these set-up procedures will be done  required and achievable tolerances (~0.1  or 20  m)!?Detailed simulations for these set-up procedures will be done  required and achievable tolerances (~0.1  or 20  m)!? SPS: Test for single collimator set-up!SPS: Test for single collimator set-up!

R. Assmann Fine tuning of performance Best cleaning efficiency to avoid quenches!Best cleaning efficiency to avoid quenches! Look at places where losses are highest!  Critical BLM’s!Look at places where losses are highest!  Critical BLM’s! Use critical BLM’s for empirical optimization of collimator settings (within limits):  Trial and error procedure!Use critical BLM’s for empirical optimization of collimator settings (within limits):  Trial and error procedure! Similar to regular machine tuining (orbit,...). Just watch out not to get the collimators damaged:  Limits on tuning range (several  ?).Similar to regular machine tuining (orbit,...). Just watch out not to get the collimators damaged:  Limits on tuning range (several  ?).

R. Assmann Loss Maps Around the Ring: Injection Q6 downstream of betatron cleaning: first SC magnet Understand effect of azimuth on quench. Help further with absorbers in IR7! Acceptable!? Understand effect of azimuth on quench. Help further with absorbers in IR7!  S. Redaelli G. Robert-Demolaize Aperture model for 27,000 m LHC with 0.1 m longitudinal resolution: ~ 270,000 loss points! Tertiary halo

R. Assmann Loss Maps Around the Ring: Collision Peaks in all triplets: Cure with tertiary collimators! Work is ongoing... 9 × 10 6 p tracked over 100 turns through each LHC element! 27,000 loss points checked in aperture! Massive computing effort: 9 × 10 6 p tracked over 100 turns through each LHC element! 27,000 loss points checked in aperture! So far only tertiary halo: Include also secondary halo. Future data generated from SIXTRACK! Tertiary halo IR8: Initial optics with  * = 1 m

R. Assmann Conclusion Preliminary thoughts on set-up and optimization.Preliminary thoughts on set-up and optimization. Evolutionary process: no collimation – 1 stage – limited 2 stage – full 2 stage. Help by tertiary collimators!Evolutionary process: no collimation – 1 stage – limited 2 stage – full 2 stage. Help by tertiary collimators! Time scale of months/years  not all collimators needed for day 1. Learn while the LHC performance is being pushed!Time scale of months/years  not all collimators needed for day 1. Learn while the LHC performance is being pushed! Set-up of single collimator: Standard procedure exists and is used successfully at other laboratories (adjust position and angle)! Test with LHC collimator in the LHC!Set-up of single collimator: Standard procedure exists and is used successfully at other laboratories (adjust position and angle)! Test with LHC collimator in the LHC! Advanced procedures: Should work to efficiently set up many collimators!Advanced procedures: Should work to efficiently set up many collimators! All of this will be simulated in detail!All of this will be simulated in detail! Goal: Procedures ready and implemented for LHC start-up in 2007! Then make them work...Goal: Procedures ready and implemented for LHC start-up in 2007! Then make them work...