Jane Peirce MassDEP  Delisting of impairments  Restoration of beneficial uses  TMDL implementation  Protection of unimpaired.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stormwater Management/ MS4 Permitting International Municipal Lawyers Association 2014 Annual Conference Baltimore, Maryland Gene Tanaka
Advertisements

Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Santa Ana Region Stormwater Permit TMDL Requirements and Costs
Chase Fanning Period 3 AP Environmental Science. Clean Water Acts Clean Water Act of 1977: Officially Amended in National amendment that did the.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Lucia Machado, NPS Coordinator.  Under Section 319 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) ◦ Part (h) provides the grant program.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Welcome to the Alaska Coastal Management Program (ACMP) A Primer for Managing Your District Coastal Management Program.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
The purpose of the San Dieguito Union High School District’s stormwater management plan is to comply with applicable stormwater regulations, educate.
Section 319 Grant Program Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
State Approaches to Funding Local Projects A Survey of RFPs The State/EPA NPS Partnership New Orleans, November 27, 2001.
Region 1 & 2 IR Workshop October 28,  The Water Quality Framework is a new way of thinking about how EPA’s data and information systems can be.
District Department of the Environment st Street N.E Grants Day Presentation Tuesday April 21, 2015 Compton E. Douglas Grants Specialist
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
TMDL Overview Kurt Spitzer 850/ Estimates of Cost of Compliance Florida Consumer Fertilizer.
YOUR SCHOOL AND YOUR WATERSHED LORNA ROSENBERG- US EPA MID-ATLANTIC OCT 1-2, 2014 CHESAPEAKE BAY SCHOOLS WORKSHOP – SHEPHERDSTOWN, WVA.
1 Stormwater Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems and Act 167 Doug Brennan PA DEP September, 2002.
Integrated Regional Watershed Management Plan Presentation – March 12, 2013 HLVRCD.
Update on Wyoming Draft 303(d) List and Changes to Watershed Planning.
Amy Walkenbach Illinois EPA 217/
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
Section 319 Funding  EPA provides funds to the state and state administers.  All projects have a 25% match requirement.  Centennial grant funds are.
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 [Erosion and Sediment Control] Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management February 21,
EPA Storm Water Run Off Review and Reading Assignments.
Resourceful. naturally. Protecting Non-Impaired Resources West Metro Water Alliance September 21, 2011 Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Company.
Stormwater Management William Taylor New Hampshire Wastewater Control Association June 13, 2013.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Illinois Green Infrastructure Grant Program (IGIG) ABC’s and 123’s of Illinois EPA’s newest grant program Jan Carpenter Illinois EPA
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
New Mexico’s Nonpoint Source Management Program and Plan Revision.
Ashley Wendt Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board NPS Project Manager.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS AND GOALS
MS4 and Trading Considerations
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit
Stormwater Management and MS4 Compliance
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Watershed Section Funding
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FOR (Permittee)
Stormwater Best Management Practices
Water Quality Improvement Projects and Engineering Planning Grant
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
Lake Erie HABs Workshop
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Tackling Stormwater Runoff in Puget Sound
Protecting Non-Impaired Resources
Overview of the Clean Water Act
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
CLEAN WATER ACT (1972) EPA DESIGNATED TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) MS4 GENERAL PERMIT ADMINISTERED.
Section 319 Grant Program – writing a proposal that can be funded
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Moving Our Coastal Lakes Into a Healthier and More Resilient Future
EPA Funding Opportunities in the LRGV
Nonpoint Source Program
Local Postal Customer or mailing labels here Delete this text box
Local Postal Customer or mailing labels here Delete this text box
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

Jane Peirce MassDEP

 Delisting of impairments  Restoration of beneficial uses  TMDL implementation  Protection of unimpaired and high quality waters  Other NPS Program priorities

 Half of each state’s allotment is passed through for implementation projects  A portion of the remaining half may be passed through for any work that is consistent with the state’s NPS plan

 EPA continues to require that watershed projects funded with § 319 watershed project funds directly implement a WBP addressing the nine elements.

 § 319 funds may be used to fund any urban stormwater activities that do not directly implement a final municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) NPDES permit

 s.319 guidelines encourage projects previously funded under s.314 Clean Lakes program  However, “Section 319 funds should not be used for in-lake work such as aquatic macrophyte harvesting or dredging, unless the sources of pollution have been addressed sufficiently to assure that the pollution being remediated will not recur.”

 Category 5 – waters requiring a TMDL  Category 4a – TMDL is complete  Category 4c – impairment not caused by a pollutant, TMDL is not required

Learning Russian (or trying to) showed me that in my everyday life, perhaps like many adults, I use my brain mainly for scheming. Ian Frasier, Travels in Siberia

 Read the NPS program plan and other program materials  Talk to the program people  Ask many questions

 Every interaction tells us something about you  Communication with program people  Response to RFR

 If you can’t follow the application instructions, can you complete a project?  Answer all questions  Provide all forms and attachments  Follow instructions for printing, assembly, submittal  Make it easy for the reviewers

 Tighter economy  Problems are increasing in number and severity  More competition  The path to s.319 funds for lakes projects can be overgrown with shrubbery

 s. 314 is specific about watershed-based work  In-lake work is the last part of a long-term strategy  Sometimes the problem isn’t the watershed  Proposal documentation is key

 See slide #2  Answer the “So what?” question  Does your strategy address the problem?  Measurable results

 A nine element plan that parallels a TMDL implementation plan  Every state has a different approach

 Jane Peirce, Mass DEP  Google “MassDEP 319 grants program”