View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Using periphyton communities to indicate nutrient levels in Pacific Northwest streams Dan Sobota 1, Shannon Hubler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of Instream Flow Science in the Southeastern US Mary M. Davis, Ph.D., Technical Advisor Southern Instream Flow Network.
Advertisements

Periphyton Data from National-Scale Assessments Can Inform Nutrient Criteria Development for Southeastern States R. Jan Stevenson Michigan State University.
Predicting the likelihood of water quality impaired stream reaches using landscape scale data and a hierarchical methodology Erin Peterson Geosciences.
Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program University of Missouri-Columbia The Missouri’s Lakes and Reservoirs The Missouri Department of Natural Resources Region.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO NUTRIENTS Utah Division of Water Quality Snake Creek, Heber Valley, 2014.
Limnology 101 Dan Obrecht MU Limnology
Reactive nitrogen (N) is essential to life, making up compounds such as proteins and nucleic acids. Technology now allows us to create N fertilizers, increasing.
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
The relationship between riparian areas and biological diversity A comparison of streams in eastern Colorado and southwestern Virginia By Ann Widmer
US EPA National Rivers and Streams Assessment (NRSA) LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER (Louisiana) Dugan Sabins, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Gary.
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Plan Mark Osborn October 20, 2005.
km Landsat TM and ETM from the Minthorn Springs node on the Umatilla River, Oregon. Assessing scales of thermal influence in alluvial floodplains.
1 Accounting for Spatial Dependence in Bayesian Belief Networks Alix I Gitelman Statistics Department Oregon State University August 2003 JSM, San Francisco.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Effects of Climatic Variability and Change on Forest Resources Dave Peterson Forest Service – PNW Research Station Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Lab UW.
NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Region Protected Resources Division Santa Rosa, California Science, Service, Stewardship Melanie D. Harrison, Ph.D Technical.
Site Classification for Re-calibration of the Alabama Index of Stream Macroinvertebrate Condition Ben Jessup and Jen Stamp Tetra Tech, Inc. SWPBA November.
Science, consensus, and monitoring strategies : the art of revising a long-term benthic monitoring program Heather Peterson California Department of Water.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Quantifying tolerance indicator values for common stream fish species of the United States Michael.
MJ Paul Tetra Tech Inc. Center for Ecological Sciences RTP, NC USING BIOLOGICAL RESPONSES IN NUTRIENT CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT: APPLICATIONS, OPPORTUNITIES,
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Summer Synthesis Institute Vancouver, British Columbia June 22 – August 5 Overview of Synthesis Project Synthesis Project Descriptions Summer Institute.
Climate of North America 101 What are the major controls on North American climate? What is the dominant flow pattern across North America in winter? How.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
The hydrological cycle of the western United States is expected to be significantly affected by climate change (IPCC-AR4 report). Rising temperature and.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
Biologically based urban response models for the South Atlantic gulf and Tennessee River basins T.F. Cuffney, E.M. Giddings, and M.B. Gregory North Carolina.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
CWWUC Presentation April 8, 2009 Application of the Integrated Impact Analysis Tool.
ORSANCO Biological Programs Extra-curricular Updates EMAP-GRE ORBFHP NRSA.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Assessment of Aquatic Biological Communities Along a Gradient of Urbanization in the Willamette Valley Ecoregion, Oregon and Washington Ian Waite, Kurt.
Seasonal and elevational variation of surface water  18 O and  2 H in the Willamette River basin J. Renée Brooks 1, Parker J. Wigington 1, Jr., Carol.
NAWQA Nutrient Synthesis Past, Present, and Future USGS Workshop on Nutrient Processes in the Upper Mississippi River Basin UMESC, LaCrosse, WI March 25.
NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office Fisheries Ecosystem Modeling Efforts Howard Townsend, Hongguang Ma, and Maddy Sigrist NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office National Ecosystem.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
Ecological Principles of Diversity 1. Principle of Limiting Similarity - There is a limit to the similarity of coexisting competitors; they cannot occupy.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Developing relations among human activities, stressors, and stream ecosystem responses for integrated regional, multi- stressor models R. Jan Stevenson.
National Water Quality Monitoring Conference Session E4 April 29, 2014 Jonathan Witt & Britta Bierwagen, ORD/USEPA Jen Stamp & Anna Hamilton, Tetra Tech,
SFS Sacramento May 23, 2016 Special Session Introduction: Traits-Based Vulnerability Assessment and Monitoring Under Climate Change Britta Bierwagen (EPA/ORD),
Interactive Effects of Climate Change, Wetlands, and Dissolved Organic Matter on UV Damage to Aquatic Foodwebs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Global.
THE USE OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE TRAITS TO ASSESS CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSES AND VULNERABILITIES Anna Hamilton (Tetra Tech), Britta Bierwagen (US EPA),
What oysters can tell us about the sources of pollution in Monie Bay, Chesapeake Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Ben Fertig August 11, 2009.
Approach in developing PnET-BGC model inputs for Smoky Mountains
Watershed Health Indicators
Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Resources
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Watersheds and Hydrology
Kiran Chinnayakanahalli
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Using Multiple Lines of Evidence to Assess Biostimulatory.
US Environmental Protection Agency
Identify: What do I see on the graph
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
A (prototype) Shiny app for QCing continuous stream sensor data
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Watersheds and Hydrology
Cain, DJ, Carter, JL, Buchwalter, DB, and Luoma, SN
Chad Larson - WDOE Daniel Marshalonis - EPA Region 10
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
IBI’s: An Introduction
The Four Phases Phase 1: Teach Phase 2: Collect Phase 3: Report
Presentation transcript:

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Using periphyton communities to indicate nutrient levels in Pacific Northwest streams Dan Sobota 1, Shannon Hubler 1, Mike Paul 2, and Rochelle Labiosa 3 1 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Portland, OR 2 Tetra Tech, Raleigh, NC 3 US Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA Society for Freshwater Science Annual Meeting, Sacramento, CA, May 24, 2016

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Nutrient pollution in Pacific Northwest streams Slide 2

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Nutrient pollution in Pacific Northwest streams Common throughout the region Slide 3 Photo by Bonnie Lamb Rogue River, western OR Deschutes River, central OR Powder River, eastern OR

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Common throughout the region Causes water quality impairments Nutrient pollution in Pacific Northwest streams Dissolved Oxygen Standard

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Common throughout the region Causes water quality impairments Screening tools to focus monitoring needed Nutrient pollution in Pacific Northwest streams

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Biological indicators of water quality

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Integrate environmental conditions over space and time Biological indicators of water quality

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Integrate environmental conditions over space and time Oregon already uses macroinvertebrates to indicate maximum temperatures and fine sediments Biological indicators of water quality

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Integrate environmental conditions over space and time Oregon already uses macroinvertebrates to indicate maximum temperatures and fine sediments Periphyton used as indicators of nutrients in several states Biological indicators of water quality Kurt Carpenter, USGS

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Conceptual model Slide 10

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Conceptual model Slide 11

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Conceptual model Slide 12

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Conceptual model Slide 13

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Nutrient Scientific Technical Exchange Partnership and Support (N-STEPS) EPA program to support state agencies in nutrient work State works with contractor (Tetra Tech) on analysis Slide 14

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Oregon N-STEPS project objectives Slide 15

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Oregon N-STEPS project objectives Compile periphyton and nutrient data from streams & rivers Develop statistical models relating periphyton to nutrients Use models to infer nutrient and water quality conditions Slide 16

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Project outline Slide – 2015 Completed 2016 – 2017 Underway

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Data compilation Unfiltered total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) - 4 weeks or + 2 weeks of periphyton sample Benthic standing stocks of chlorophyll a and ash-free dry mass (AFDM) 90 distinct periphyton community composition metrics (Stevenson et al. 2008; Potapova and Charles 2007) Slide 18

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Slide 19 Data compilation Level III EcoregionSamples Blue Mountains135 Cascades140 Coast Range114 Columbia Plateau155 Eastern Cascades32 Klamath Mountains91 Northern Basin and Range119 Willamette Valley142 Total:928

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Slide 20 Spatial distribution - nutrients

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Spatial autocorrelation – periphyton indices Slide 21

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Watershed size – periphyton biomass & nutrients Slide 22

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Slide 23 Nonmetric multidimensional scaling by project Species assemblage by project

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Stressor Response Methods Linear and nonlinear regression models –AFDM and chlorophyll a with TN and TP –Periphyton community metrics with TN and TP Treed Regression to examine ecoregion differences –Begin to explore interactions with other variables Slide 24

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Biomass & chlorophyll a vs. nutrients Slide 25

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Slide 26 Nutrients and periphyton nutrient indices

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Treed regression – OptCat_NutMMI vs. TP Weighted average nutrient multivariate optima Level III Ecoregion Latitude (°) Watershed Area (km 2 ) Elevation (m) Log 10 (TP (mg/L)) Coast Range Cascades Willamette Valley East Cascades Slopes and foothills Columbia Plateau Blue Mountains Klamath Mountains Northern Basin and Range

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Take home messages Slide 28

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Take home messages Biomass metrics do not correlate well with nutrients alone Slide 29

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Take home messages Biomass metrics do not correlate well with nutrients alone Community metrics show better correlations with nutrients alone; but still pretty variable Slide 30

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Take home messages Biomass metrics do not correlate well with nutrients alone Community metrics show better correlations with nutrients alone; but still pretty variable Breaking up by ecoregion gives insight on other factors that could be important to take into account –Phase II of the project –Also will try to link with water quality impairments in ecoregions Slide 31

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Acknowledgements Jacques Oliver, US EPA HQ Chauncey Anderson & Kurt Carpenter, USGS Bonnie Lamb, Deb Sturdevant, Gene Foster, & Aaron Borisenko, ODEQ Jon Harcum and Diane Allen, Tetra Tech NSTEPS program (funded by US EPA) Slide 32

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Slide 33 Questions?

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading What influences periphyton communities? Changes to limiting factors Increased nutrient loading Warmer temperatures More light input Trophic cascades Altered hydrologic regimes Slide 34 ODFW HW Paerl

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Conceptual model Slide 35

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Conceptual model Slide 36

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading State Factors pH & DO sensitivities benthic nutrients Interspecific competition Facilitations & mutualisms Palatability Resources Light Nutrients Biology Species pool Climate Temperature patterns Habitat Substrates Gradient GW – SW Exchange Chemical conditions Time/ hydrology Position on hydrograph Ecosystem model Δ ecosystem metabolism Δ community characteristics Δ biomass / chlorophyll a Periphyton Community

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading Distribution of projects and site replication Slide 38

View “Slide Master” To Change Heading NMS – Periphyton species Slide 39