National Watershed Boundary Dataset THE WEST VIRGINIA SUBSET.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Data Repository and Water Resource Assessment for the Southern and Northern Piceance Basin Northwest Colorado Oil and Gas Forum June 2008 Jude Thomas,
Advertisements

FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
UNSD-CELADE Regional Workshop on Census Cartography for the 2010 Latin America’s census round Census Cartography: Organizational and Institutional Issues.
Providing Geography for Topology; A Schematic View of the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) James E. Mitchell, Ph.D. IT GIS Manager Kurt L. Johnson.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Action Plan for the Development of Watershed and Sub-Watershed Boundaries for northwestern Mississippi.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Perform raster based network delineation from digital elevation models Perform raster based.
TEXAS COASTAL WETLANDS Surface Water and its link to coastal wetlands loss Christine Otto.
GIS-Data Sources Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
Technology Overview Geographic Information Systems.
Distribution Function Estimation in Small Areas for Aquatic Resources Spatial Ensemble Estimates of Temporal Trends in Acid Neutralizing Capacity Mark.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Sub-Committee on Spatial Water Data 2005 Progress and 2006 Proposed Activities.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: List the essential data needed for water resource modeling Identify sources of water resources.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA September 10, 2003.
Use of GIS in Determination of the Probable Maximum Flood at Nuclear Plant Sites Presented by: Monica Anderson, GISP Tennessee Valley Authority Carrie.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
DEM’s, Watershed and Stream Network Delineation DEM Data Sources Study Area in West Austin with a USGS 30m DEM from a 1:24,000 scale map Eight direction.
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
Washburne HWR203The University of Arizona Watersheds Reading: –Discussion: issues facing Arizona’s rivers Lecture: – How you identify a watershed – Why.
Topographic Maps vs DEM. Topographic Map 1:24,000 Scale 20 ft contour 100 ft contour Stream Center Line.
GIS in Watershed Analysis. Why watershed Analysis with GIS? Concepts Important datasets Analysis Tools.
Delineation of the Texas Hill Country Watersheds with Named Streams Team Members: Justin McInnis: Project Manager Matt Anding: Assistant Project Manager.
Delineation of the Texas Hill Country Watersheds with Named Streams Team Members: Justin McInnis: Project Manager Matt Anding: Assistant Project Manager.
Indiana National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Improvement and Application Workshop NHD Local-Resolution Development.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA April 2, 2002.
Slide 1 National Hydrography Dataset Stewardship Conference April 24, 2007 By Cindy Clark Automated Geographic Reference Center April 24, 2007 Utah Hydrography.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
SSWD Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA September 15, 2004.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Norman B. Bliss, ASRC Federal InuTeq Contractor to the USGS 6/4/2015 A continental view of soil.
Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) – California Experience CALGIS Lorri Peltz-Lewis, WBD State Coordinator CA & NV.
The Effects of Vegetation Loss on the Two Elk Creek Watershed as a Result of the Proposed Vail Category III Ski Area Development CE 394 K.2 By Dave Anderson.
National Elevation Dataset - Hydrologic Derivatives (NED-H) Kris Verdin EROS Data Center
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
Stream and Watershed Delineation from DEM’s David Maidment, Ph.D. and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas.
The Pfafstetter Coding System in Hydrological modeling TANG, Qiuhong.
Gary Darling - GISP Office of the State CIO Acting Deputy Geographic Information Officer Melody Baldwin Division of Flood Management JOC –FOC GIS Unit.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
1 Center for Research in Water Resources The University of Texas at Austin Water Management Information System for the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo Basin Carlos.
Geologic Data Subcommittee -- Update to Coordination Group David R. Soller, Chair Geologist, U.S. Geological Survey (703) July.
Minnesota Hydrography Land of 10,000 Lakes (or so) Mark Olsen Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road N. St. Paul, MN 55155
SUBCOMMITTEE ON SEDIMENTATION Proposal to become a subgroup under the ACWI September 9, 2003.
Design Reservoir Water- Management Data Model By: Adel M. Abdallah Instructors: David Rosenberg and Dr. Jeff Horsburgh Oct. 16, 2012 Hydroinformatics,
SUBCOMMITTEE spatial water data Interagency Development of a Reference Set of Watersheds for the United States WBD.
SUBCOMMITTEE spatial water data Coastal Work Group Meeting April 11, 2001.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
National Hydro Data Programs
History of U.S.G.S Established on March 3, 1879
Find things on the map.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Digital Elevation Models and Hydrology
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
USDA- NRCS Soil Survey Region 6 and West Virginia GIS 2016 Update
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
Refined NIDIS Application for the Upper Colorado River Basin
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Hydrological Feature coding
Rainfall Runoff in the Guadalupe River Basin
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Feature Coding 3rd Workshop on Common GIS Reporting for WISE
IGIC Waters Workgroup Update
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by Ayse Irmak, David R
WISE GIS Group 15 January 2008 John Cima.
Presentation transcript:

National Watershed Boundary Dataset THE WEST VIRGINIA SUBSET

Why a watershed boundary dataset? The watershed is one of the earliest concepts to evolve from American policies for planning and managing water resources. The watershed is one of the earliest concepts to evolve from American policies for planning and managing water resources. The identity of a watershed is directly related to the management problems of concern, from large scale flooding along the Mississippi River to sediment control in small reservoirs. The identity of a watershed is directly related to the management problems of concern, from large scale flooding along the Mississippi River to sediment control in small reservoirs.

As early as the 1920’s and 1930’s watershed based planning practices were adopted by many federal agencies. As early as the 1920’s and 1930’s watershed based planning practices were adopted by many federal agencies. NRCS has the largest national program of watershed management originating from the national concerns in the 1930’s over wide spread soil erosion and sedimentation. NRCS has the largest national program of watershed management originating from the national concerns in the 1930’s over wide spread soil erosion and sedimentation. In the mid 1970’s a standardized hydrologic unit system, referred to as the Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) was developed by USGS under the sponsorship of the Water Resources Council. In the mid 1970’s a standardized hydrologic unit system, referred to as the Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) was developed by USGS under the sponsorship of the Water Resources Council. A Brief History of Watershed Management

A Brief History of Watershed Management (cont.) The underlying concept of the HUC system is a topographically defined set of drainage areas organized in a nested hierarchy based on surface feature size. The underlying concept of the HUC system is a topographically defined set of drainage areas organized in a nested hierarchy based on surface feature size. It divided the country into 21 Regions, 222 Sub-regions, 352 Basins (formerly referred to as Accounting Units), and 2,149 Sub-basins (formerly referred to as Cataloging Units). It divided the country into 21 Regions, 222 Sub-regions, 352 Basins (formerly referred to as Accounting Units), and 2,149 Sub-basins (formerly referred to as Cataloging Units). A hierarchical hydrologic unit code containing 2 digits for each of the four levels was assigned to identify the hydrologic units; these four levels are the basis for the 8-digit hydrologic units code. A hierarchical hydrologic unit code containing 2 digits for each of the four levels was assigned to identify the hydrologic units; these four levels are the basis for the 8-digit hydrologic units code.

A Brief History of Watershed Management (cont.) Although 8-digit USGS hydrologic units were broadly used, the geographic size of the units were sometimes too large to adequately serve many water resource investigations, resource analysis and management needs. Although 8-digit USGS hydrologic units were broadly used, the geographic size of the units were sometimes too large to adequately serve many water resource investigations, resource analysis and management needs. In the late 1980’s NRCS completed mapping of watersheds (Level 5 hydrologic units) for use in natural resource planning. In the late 1980’s NRCS completed mapping of watersheds (Level 5 hydrologic units) for use in natural resource planning.

A Brief History of Watershed Management (cont.) In the early 1990’s NRCS began a national initiative to delineate and digitize watersheds (Level 5) and subwatersheds (Level 6) by GIS that meets national map accuracy standards using standardized and reviewed criteria. In the early 1990’s NRCS began a national initiative to delineate and digitize watersheds (Level 5) and subwatersheds (Level 6) by GIS that meets national map accuracy standards using standardized and reviewed criteria. In the spring of 2000, the member agencies of the Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data of the Federal Geographic Data Committee agreed that a new standard would be written, which supercedes the standard written by NRCS, for hydrologic unit delineation to the 5 th and 6 th level delineating watersheds and subwatersheds. In the spring of 2000, the member agencies of the Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data of the Federal Geographic Data Committee agreed that a new standard would be written, which supercedes the standard written by NRCS, for hydrologic unit delineation to the 5 th and 6 th level delineating watersheds and subwatersheds.

Federal Standards for Delineation of Hydrologic Unit Boundaries NRCS, USFS, USGS and BLM have worked with other federal and state agencies, tribes and the FGDC to author this standard. NRCS, USFS, USGS and BLM have worked with other federal and state agencies, tribes and the FGDC to author this standard. USGS, USFS, BLM and NOAA have assisted NRCS in the review and verification of hydrologic units. USGS, USFS, BLM and NOAA have assisted NRCS in the review and verification of hydrologic units.

Defining the Hydrologic Unit The selection and delineation of HU boundaries was determined solely upon science-based hydrologic principles, not favoring any administrative or special projects nor a particular program or agency. The selection and delineation of HU boundaries was determined solely upon science-based hydrologic principles, not favoring any administrative or special projects nor a particular program or agency. An HU is delineated and georeferenced to the USGS 1:24,000 scale topographic base map meeting National Map Accuracy Standards. An HU is delineated and georeferenced to the USGS 1:24,000 scale topographic base map meeting National Map Accuracy Standards. HU boundaries are determined solely upon hydrologic and topographic features. HU boundaries are determined solely upon hydrologic and topographic features.

An HU is generally subdivided into 5 to 15 units. An HU is generally subdivided into 5 to 15 units. The typical watershed size is 40,000 to 250,000 acres. The typical sub watershed is 10,000 to 40,000 acres. The typical watershed size is 40,000 to 250,000 acres. The typical sub watershed is 10,000 to 40,000 acres.

Started with the original 11- digit (5 th level) NRCS watersheds. Some did not meet new definition due to size. Started with the original 11- digit (5 th level) NRCS watersheds. Some did not meet new definition due to size. Then started with 8-digit (4 th level) sub-basin with 11-digit watersheds outlined and identified possible subwatersheds based on size and identifiable outlets. Then started with 8-digit (4 th level) sub-basin with 11-digit watersheds outlined and identified possible subwatersheds based on size and identifiable outlets.

As a result of defining the subwatersheds (6 th level) the watersheds (5 th level) were also redefined.As a result of defining the subwatersheds (6 th level) the watersheds (5 th level) were also redefined.

What do we do with the “Old Watersheds”, now that there is a new dataset available? Proposal #1 Proposal #1 –Archive dataset for reference to past watershed sampling and monitoring activities. Proposal #2 Proposal #2 –??

Subwatersheds

Watersheds

Sub-basin

The Watershed Boundary Dataset will be in a vector data structure that will be delivered via the USDA Geospatial Data Gateway ( The Watershed Boundary Dataset will be in a vector data structure that will be delivered via the USDA Geospatial Data Gateway ( The dataset should be available by July 1, The dataset should be available by July 1, The dataset will be available for download by either Sub- basin 8-digit (4 th Level) or Subwatershed 12-digit (6 th level). The dataset will be available for download by either Sub- basin 8-digit (4 th Level) or Subwatershed 12-digit (6 th level).

Questions