To evaluate the efficacy of adding Oust Extra to site prep applications for HWC the following growing season.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pine-grassland Birds and the Effects of Fire Frequency, Seasonality, and Scale Jim Cox Tall Timbers Research Station.
Advertisements

Returns and Yields 2005 AFA Landowner Clinic April 9, 2005 Magnolia, Arkansas Matthew H. Pelkki University of Arkansas-Monticello School of Forest Resources.
Pumping Lemma Examples
Estimation of vegetation foliage cover (no boles or woody stems) by layer and aerial canopy cover of each growth habit Phase 2 Vegetation Profile Summary.
 Tree- a single- stem, woody perennial plant reaching the height of 12 feet or more.  Some trees such as a birch have several stems, but that is a rare.
Working Lands for Wildlife WLFW. Focal Areas by Species.
Research and Technical Review
Evaluation of Various Insecticide Regimes in Sweetpotato Production for Sugarcane Beetle Control in the Mid-South Larry Adams 1, Randall Luttrell 1 and.
OUST EXTRA COMBINATIONS FOR HERBACEOUS WEED CONTROL AND LOBLOLLY PINE SEEDLING PERFORMANCE J.L. YEISER STEPHEN F. AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY A.W. EZELL MISSISSIPPI.
Microstegium vimineum Management and Impacts on Native Plant Communities Caren A. Judge, Joseph C. Neal, Theodore H. Shear, and Jeffrey F. Derr North Carolina.
Cogongrass: Research results from competition and herbicide studies C. Ramsey, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST National Weed Management Lab Fort Collins, CO.
Introduction to World Agriculture. Define terms related to forestry. Describe the forest regions of the US. Discuss important relationships among forests,
Teff Grass as a Warm Season Forage for Backgrounding Calves in the Shenandoah Valley Brian Jones – Agronomy Jason Carter – Animal Science.
LING 438/538 Computational Linguistics Sandiway Fong Lecture 7: 9/12.
An Overview of Competition Control Methods in Hardwood Management Kyle Cunningham Assistant Professor of Forestry.
New Lower Bounds for the Maximum Number of Runs in a String Wataru Matsubara 1, Kazuhiko Kusano 1, Akira Ishino 1, Hideo Bannai 2, Ayumi Shinohara 1 1.
Restoration of Compartment 46 to promote oak-hickory regeneration, shortleaf pine and native grasses in Sewanee, TN Johnson Jeffers and colleagues in FORS.
1 America’s Longleaf Restoration Initiative Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class Definitions Update Clay Ware US Fish and Wildlife Service April 25, 2013.
Site Preparation Study One Step/Oust Mixtures Drs. Jimmie Yeiser and Rick Williams, Stephen F. Austin State University and University of Florida.
Theory of Automata.
Training Materials Marking Your Site and Individual Plants.
BELT 4 SC (FLUBENDIAMIDE): A NEW INSECTICIDE FOR CONTROL OF HELIOTHINES IN CONVENTIONAL COTTON – 2006 Jarrod T. Hardke 1, Gus M. Lorenz 1, B.R. Leonard.
HWC remains an integral component of pine plantation establishment in the South Any new product requires extensive testing to ensure efficacy, crop tolerance,
Return to FIA Home CURRENT U.S. FOREST DATA AND MAPS CURRENT U.S. FOREST DATA AND MAPS Forest age Forest ownership Timber harvest Urban influence Forest.
Prescribed Fire: Benefits for wildlife Using fire to provide long-term, ecosystem benefits…
HERBACEOUS WEEED CONTROL IN FIRST – YEAR LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS USING OUST XP, OUST EXTRA, OUSTAR, MATRIX, AND STEADFAST A. W. Ezell, J. L. Yeiser,
Silvics Analytic Timing of Site Preparation and Post-Plant Weed Control to Optimize Pine Growth Integration of research results from three region-wide.
Powered By Powered by: Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Dr. David Loftis.
Tolerance of Teff (Eragrostis tef) var. “Tiffany” to Several Selective Herbicides Brian Jones Agronomy Extension Agent September 2009.
CSC312 Automata Theory Lecture # 3 Languages-II. Formal Language A formal language is a set of words—that is, strings of symbols drawn from a common alphabet.
Oat Response to Imazapic Residues E. P. Prostko, T.L. Grey, and R. N. Morgan Department of Crop & Soil Sciences University of Georgia Tifton WSSA
CST229 Week 7 Questions or concerns? Hand back Test#1 & Homework #4 – Test1 Average (45/50) Reading: Chapters 12&13 Chapter 12 – Grammar – production rules.
Zadar, August Learning probabilistic finite automata Colin de la Higuera University of Nantes.
Figure **: Adjusted average student learning score against unit cost Unit Cost (fcfa) Average adjusted student learning score.
Fleshy Fruit Production in Mature and Recently Harvested Upland & Cove Hardwood Forest of the Southern Appalachians.
Plant Specific Fertilization NUEWorkshop Paul Hodgen.
Lecture 2 Theory of AUTOMATA
Silvicultural Prescription Rob Lusk. B All Species PlotTPATPA SD Basal Area BA SD Average Stand Diameter Average Stand Diameter SD Mean Quadratic Diameter.
Gary W. Miller USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Morgantown, West Virginia Intermediate Stand Management – The Crop Tree Approach.
Lecture 02: Theory of Automata:2014 Asif Nawaz Theory of Automata.
Gary W. Miller USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Morgantown, West Virginia Economic Considerations of Hardwood Silviculture.
By Dr.Hamed Alrjoub. 1. Introduction to Computer Theory, by Daniel I. Cohen, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1991, Second Edition 2. Introduction to Languages.
PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
CSC-2259 Discrete Structures
Robert Hane1, Joshua Adams1, Michael Blazier2
One-year Oak Regeneration (Quercus spp
Theory of Automata.
Regular Expressions (Examples)
LESSON 21-2 Accrued Expenses
LESSON 21-2 Accrued Expenses
Interception Interception is the amount of water retained in vegetation It never reaches soil and evaporates back to atmosphere In heavily forested regions.
NATIVE FORESTS Chapter 14.
List of Treatments in 2015 Injection Study
Treated Untreated Wheat Weed Control
Conclusion & Discussion
Controlling Undesirable Species
LESSON 20-1 Promissory Notes.
MA/CSSE 474 Theory of Computation Minimizing DFSMs.
New Lower Bounds for the Maximum Number of Runs in a String
Ecological Succession
Shortleaf Pine Opportunities for Assistance
3 Week A: May 1 – 19 3 Week B: May 22 – June 9
2016 Vacation Cabin Rental Weeks
CSC312 Automata Theory Lecture # 3 Languages-II.
Welcome to ! Theory Of Automata Irum Feroz
Recap Lecture 3 RE, Recursive definition of RE, defining languages by RE, { x}*, { x}+, {a+b}*, Language of strings having exactly one aa, Language of.
Forestry Clipboard Tables
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Finite Automata Part Three
Presentation transcript:

To evaluate the efficacy of adding Oust Extra to site prep applications for HWC the following growing season

South Carolina Mississippi Louisiana

Previous stand = pine-hardwood Harvested 2003/2004 Numerous hardwood seedlings/saplings per acre ( TPA) Established herbaceous cover

Treatments applied early September, 2004 Aerial simulation 10 gpa

Table 1. List of treatments in 2004 DuPont site prep study - MS Trmt. No.Product (Ounces/Acre) ______________________________________________________ 1 Arsenal AC(16) + OE 1 (4) + NIS(16) 2 2Arsenal AC(24) + OE(4) +NIS(16) 3 Arsenal AC(16) + OE(4) + Accord SP (32) +NIS(16) 4Arsenal AC(16) + OE(4) + Accord SP (64) +NIS(16) 5Arsenal AC (24) + OE(4) + Accord SP(32) +NIS(16) 6Arsenal AC(16) + OE(4) + Accord SP (64) +NIS(16) 7 Arsenal AC (16) + OE(3) + NIS(16) +NIS(16) 8 Arsenal AC(24) + OE(3) + NIS(16) +NIS(16) 9Arsenal AC(16) + OE(3) + Accord SP(32) + NIS(16) 10Arsenal AC(16) + OE(3) + Accord SP(64) + NIS(16) 11Arsenal AC(24) + OE(3) + Accord SP(32) + NIS(16) 12Arsenal AC(24) + OE(3) + Accord SP(64) + NIS(16) 13One Step (128) + OE(3) 14One Step (128) + OE(4) 15Arsenal AC(12) + OE(3) + Accord SP (192) 16Arsenal AC (12) + OE(4) + Accord SP(192) 17Untreated Check 1 OE = Oust Extra, 2 NIS = 90% nonionic surfactant (Timberland 90)

17 Treatments 3 reps (SC and LA) or 4 reps (MS) RCB

6 WAT Brownout Grass, broadleaf, vine cover in May, June, July, August 2005 Hardwood control - September, 2005

Table 2. Average percent grass cover by treatment and time of observation in 2004 DuPont site prep study- MS (Avg. all reps) _______________________________________________________________ Time of Observation Trt. No.MayJune July August Percent ab117.7b24.2ab23.7a 20.5a2.0a5.0a26.2a 30.5a1.0a9.7a25.0a 42.5a5.7a22.5ab45.0b 50.0a5.4a7.5a20.0a 60.0a5.4a10.0a31.2a 78.0a3.5a5.7a22.5a 83.0a3.7a12.5a23.7a 90.5a2.0a6.5a21.2a 100.0a3.2a13.0a42.5b 111.7a17.7b17.2a37.5b 121.3a7.7a17.0a33.7ab 130.7a6.2a13.7a27.5a 1.0a0.0a3.5a12.5a38.7b 150.3a5.0a15.0a16.7a 160.3a2.0a6.5a36.2b c45.0c37.5b38.7b 1 Values in a column followed by the same letter do not differ at 

MAY

JUNE

AUGUST

Table 3. Average percent broadleaf cover by treatment and time of observation in 2004 DuPont site prep study - MS _______________________________________________________________ Time of Observation Trt. No.MayJune July August Percent a 1 3.5a12.0a15.0a 21.2a0.7a5.0a 7.0a 30.7a5.5a12.2a12.7a 40.5a7.0a20.0b36.2c 50.5a3.7a11.7a16.2a 60.2a13.7ab15.0a25.0b 70.2a0.7a3.0a 6.2a 81.0a5.7a7.2a17.5a 91.2a5.5a16.7a18.7a 101.2a8.2a25.0b35.0b 111.0a13.7ab36.5c47.5d 121.5a30.3c41.2c57.5d 131.5a29.2c41.2c57.5d 140.7a8.0a20.0b28.7b 151.0a31.0c40.0c46.2d 160.7a5.7a7.0a20.0ab a17.5b17.5ab15.0a 1 Values in a column followed by the same letter do not differ at 

Table 5. Average percent bare ground cover by treatment and time of observation in 2004 DuPont site prep study - TX (avg. all reps) _______________________________________________________________ Time of Observation Trt. No. MayJune July August September Percent Values in a column followed by the same letter do not differ at  173a 1 57d40ab17cdef8cd 272a60d38ab20bcdef9bcd 383a73abcd58a37abc27ab 491a83ab60a48a40a 572a65bcd45ab32abcd25abc 673a65bcd43ab35abc25abc 783a72abcd45ab13def8cd 878a67abcd38ab18bcdef11bcd 980a62cd25b11ef5d 1090a82abc43ab20bcdef13bcd 1189a83ab45ab23bcde19bcd 1273a65bcd43ab25bcde17bcd 1388a77abcd57a27bcde15bcd 1490a87a50ab32abcd23abc 1582a62cd38ab27bcde10bcd 1672a63bcd45ab38ab27ab 1718b5e2c2f2d

MAY

JUNE

AUGUST

Table 6. Average percent vine cover by treatment and time of observation in 2004 DuPont site prep study- MS (Avg. all reps) _______________________________________________________________ Time of Observation Trt. No.MayJune July August Percent b33.7b48.7c50.0c 210.2a10.5a13.7a21.7b 38.0a8.7a11.2a21.2b 45.0a8.7a15.5ab 51.5a13.5a16.7ab30.0b 64.5a6.2a17.5ab23.7b 725.2b15.7a25.5b26.2b 85.2a7.0a24.5b 91.7a3.2a11.5a25.0b 106.0a2.0a3.7a9.7a 111.0a9.0a12.5a13.7a 120.5a1.0a1.7a9.7a 130.5a1.2a2.2a6.2a 141.0a1.2a 4.0a a1.7a 3.0a 160.7a1.7a 4.7a b25.0b33.7b35.0b 1 Values in a column followed by the same letter do not differ at 

Table 7. Average percent woody plant cover by treatment and time of observation in 2004 DuPont site prep study- MS (Avg. all reps) _______________________________________________________________ Time of Observation Trt. No.MayJune July August Percent a5.2a 6.5a 20.5a2.0a3.5a5.0a 30.0a1.7a4.0a6.0a 40.0a2.5a4.5a5.5a 50.2a3.0a5.2a6.5a 61.5a1.2a5.2a6.0a 71.7a3.2a5.2a6.0a 80.5a1.5a5.2a5.5a 91.0a2.5a5.0a7.2a 101.0a3.5a4.2a6.2a 111.7a 3.0a6.0a 120.2a0.5a1.5a5.5a 130.2a3.0a4.5a5.0a 1.0a0.5a2.0a 5.5a 150.0a0.5a2.0a5.0a 160.7a1.2a2.0a4.5a b70.0b75.0b Values in a column followed by the same letter do not differ at 

Table 8. Average percent reduction of principal woody species in 2004 DuPont site prep study- MS (Avg. all reps) ______________________________________________________________ Species 1 Trt. No. POO REO HIC REM TOT Percent a c+50.0d a76.9b 298.2a93.8a58.8b82.3b85.4a 398.7a79.5ab54.7b87.7a85.7a 499.5a84.7a72.0ab83.3ab89.3a a82.2a27.0c89.6a82.8a a89.7a78.5a93.5a88.9a 797.7a94.7a57.8b83.7ab83.9a 898.0a86.7a60.0b97.8a94.3a a74.7b44.4c76.6b82.7a a80.8ab51.3b80.1b81.8ab a85.7a+42.9d84.7ab84.0a a91.5a73.8a92.5a91.8a a95.1a66.7b97.2a93.5a a90.9a86.9a95.3a95.8a a87.7a73.9a93.6a89.6a a94.0a77.8a98.7a94.6a b+8.0d37.2c+70.2c+36.5c 1 POO = post oak, REDO= red oak, HIC = hickory, REM = red maple, TOT = all tree species; 2 values in a column followed by the same letter do not differ at  = 0.05; 3 plus sign = an increase in stems

Table 10. Average percent woody cover and percent reduction of woody species 1 YAT in 2004 DuPont site prep study-LA (Avg. all reps) ______________________________________________________________ Woody Species 1 Treatment SWG MISC ALL COVER Percent SWG = sweetgum, MISC = oak, yaupon, red maple; 2 values in a column followed by the same letter do not differ at  = 0.05; 3 plus sign = an increase in stems AR+OE+AC ( )100.0a ab77.2a16b AR+OE+AC ( )95.8a68.3abc53.4ab14bc AR+OE+AC ( )100.0a86.2ab86.2a12bcd AR+OE+AC ( )88.9a73.7abc45.6abc2d AR+OE+AC ( )92.6a86.3ab76.6a4cd AR+OE+AC ( )80.6a81.5abc64.7ab3d AR+OE+AC ( )90.0a85.2ab58.9ab7bcd AR+OE+AC )100.0a78.8abc67.2ab2d AR+OE+AC ( )94.4a62.2bc32.2bc7bcd AR+OE+AC ( )96.7a85.7ab69.9ab3d AR+OE (16+3)74.8a100.0a55.6ab2d AR+OE (16+4)96.3a87.7ab75.5ab4d AR+OE (24+3)77.8a87.6ab69.6ab3d AR+OE (24+4)100.0a69.9abc66.8ab2d AR+OE (128+3)100.0a89.7ab81.6a1d AR+OE (128+4)100.0a78.6abc72.6ab2d Check16.7b49.1c10.6c40a