MADSEC June 22, 2016 Janice E. Breton State Director of Special Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhode Island State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Stakeholder Input November 6, 2014.
Advertisements

Navigating the SPR&I Database Oregon Department of Education Fall
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Division of Special Education Overview Alison Lowenthal Idaho State Department of Education Division of Special Education.
Community College Technical Center MIS Race/Ethnicity (R/E) Final Guidance for i mplementing OMB Race/Ethnicity.
Office of the Independent Monitor Update on Progress of MCD Outcomes
State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report SPP/APR State Systemic Improvement Plan SSIP / Indicator 17.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
Improving Outcomes for Students with Disabilities Office of Exceptional Children Cathy Boshamer, Director John Payne, Team Lead November 7, 2013.
CIVIL RIGHTS DATA COLLECTION National Forum: PPI Committee: 2011 MIS Meeting.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Addressing Disproportionality through Technical Assistance: A Case Study of New York Project 405 Team Metropolitan Center for Urban Education New York.
TLS Network March 27, 2015 Check & Connect. Purpose of Consent Decree What Have we Accomplished? Where we are/ FAQ “Tips” for Completing The Career Development.
Special Education Update Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education MASS Summer Conference 2013.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Student Services Support Program (SSSP) and Student Equity Plans ASCCC Leadership Institute 2015 Cheryl Aschenbach Cynthia Rico James Todd.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
Office of the Independent Monitor Monitoring Activities.
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
Oregon’s K-12 ELL/SPED students: Data & outcomes.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Prekindergarten Contacts' Meeting February 3, 2015 Bureau Update.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Exceptional Programs SY Central Consolidated School District.
Fall 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 SPP/APR Updates.
Significant Disproportionality Symptoms, Remedies and Treatments.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
Data on Foster Children Attending Texas Public Schools Updates May 8,
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
Texas State Performance Plan Data, Performance, Results TCASE Leadership Academy Fall 2008.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
Special Education Plan Feedback Sessions. Agenda Welcome and Introductions Department of Student Services Purpose Why are we updating the Special Education.
Annual Desk Audit (ADA) March 31, 2015 Webinar. Agenda  Purpose/Introduction of the ADA  Indicator Reviews  With Five-year trends  Navigating the.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
THE APR AND SPP--LINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION DATA TO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR EDUCATION RESULTS Building a Brighter Tomorrow through Positive and Progressive Leadership.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Oregon Department of Education April 2016 ECR Audits in Consolidated Special Education Spring Collection Data Conference.
1 Ross Santy Director, Performance Information Management Service U.S. Department of Education EDFacts Consolidating and Using K-12 Performance Data within.
IEP Basics. Special Education Laws Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA-2004) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA-2004) Section.
Agenda Part I Recap of the Final Rule Part II Standard Methodology Part III Remedies Part IV Dates Part V Questions.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Educator Equity Resource Tool: Using Comprehensive Equity Indicators
Alfred Daviso, Ph.D. The University of Akron Carol Feldman-Sparber
What is “Annual Determination?”
Public School Monitoring Roadmap
Anne Arundel County Public School District Profile October, 2013
Division of Special Education and Student Services
DISPROPORTIONALITY REGULATIONS
WCPSS Alternative Learning Centers
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Guam Department of Education
TEA Corrective Action Plan
Indicator 13, Secondary Transition IEP Record Reviews
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
EXPLORING THE LEARNING SAFETY NET
Consolidated district performance report (CDPR)
Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
Total Faculty by Race and Ethnicity,
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
The Annual Report to Congress on IDEA
Significant Disproportionality Fiscal Webinar
Significant Disproportionality
Significant Disproportionality
Presentation transcript:

MADSEC June 22, 2016 Janice E. Breton State Director of Special Services

What Guides Us... –Improving outcomes for students with disabilities –Compliance monitoring as needed –Improving transition and timelines –Improvement in fiscal oversight –Providing technical assistance and professional development –Support for the field

Maine DOE Gets Evaluated Too... OSEP implements Results Driven Accountability Designations for support: universal, targeted, intensive Maine receives designations of: –Results (targeted) Participation (4 th and 8 th gr. reading, 8 th math) Performance on NAEP (4 th reading and math) Dropout rate

Evaluation continued –Compliance (targeted) Timely initial evaluation (83.24%) Secondary transition (63.36%) –Dispute Resolution (universal) –Fiscal (universal)

Improving Outcomes for SWD Math4ME –Lewiston, Auburn, RSU 52, Margaret Murphy Scope of project Scaling up over 5 years (2 additional regions) –PBIS UM, USM, UMF 25 schools per year for 5 years

Improving Transition and Timelines –Post-secondary transition FY improved to 88.96% 54.29% for FY14-15

Miscellaneous Other... County jails Dyslexia Alternate assessment will change – ESSA only 1% will be able to participate

Good News! ESSA –Certification problems –Your responsibility to check

Improvement in Fiscal Oversight Fiscal monitoring –MOE and EC MOE eligibility FY18 application MOE compliance FY 16 YE report EC assurance in application EC compliance in YE report –Risk assessment

Providing Technical Assistance and Professional Development Staffing Monitoring and support system redefined

Addressing Needs Maine Educational Center for Deaf and Hard of Hearing –Regionalization (Hancock, Oxford and a new one in Rockland) –Collaboration with Morrison

More Initiatives RTI PostSecondary Transition Corrections including county jails

Update Specific learning disability Implemented - no Revised SLD form – no Resubmitting for upcoming legislative session

Disproportionality Using our current criteria = 0 districts have disproportionality Using OSEP’s proposed criteria = 74 districts would have disproportionality

Race/Ethnicity SpEd Identification % for Race/Ethnicity SpEd Identification % for All Other Races/Ethnicities Risk Ratio (Ident for Race/Ethnicity Divided by Ident for All Other Races/Ethnicities) American Indian or Alaska Native 25.42%16.69%1.52 Asian9.73%16.87%0.58 Black or African American 14.90%16.83%0.89 Hispanic/Latino18.56%16.73%1.11 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 10.00%16.77%0.60 Two or More Races17.71%16.74%1.06 White16.81%16.32%1.03 Statewide Risk for Specific Disability by Race/Ethnicity Grades K-12, Data Autism Race/Ethnicity Identification % for Race/Ethnicity Identification % for All Other Races/Ethnicities Risk Ratio (Ident for Race/Ethnicity Divided by Ident for All Other Races/Ethnicities) American Indian or Alaska Native 2.14%1.59%1.35 Asian1.05%1.60%0.66 Black or African American 1.21%1.60%0.76 Hispanic/Latino1.44%1.59%0.91 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 1.05%1.59%0.66 Two or More Races1.83%1.59%1.15 White1.61%1.44%1.11 Statewide Risk for Special Ed Identification by Race/Ethnicity Grades K-12, Data

Intellectual Disability Emotional Disability Race/Ethnicity Identification % for Race/Ethnicity Identification % for All Other Races/Ethnicities Risk Ratio (Ident for Race/Ethnicity Divided by Ident for All Other Races/Ethnicities) American Indian or Alaska Native 3.37%1.22%2.76 Asian0.56%1.25%0.45 Black or African American 1.36%1.24%1.10 Hispanic/Latino1.28%1.24%1.03 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0.53%1.24%0.42 Two or More Races1.48%1.24%1.20 White1.22%1.41%0.86 Race/Ethnicity Identification % for Race/Ethnicity Identification % for All Other Races/Ethnicities Risk Ratio (Ident for Race/Ethnicity Divided by Ident for All Other Races/Ethnicities) American Indian or Alaska Native 0.58%0.43%1.37 Asian0.11%0.43%0.26 Black or African American 0.51%0.43%1.21 Hispanic/Latino0.49%0.43%1.15 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0.00%0.43%0.00 Two or More Races0.35%0.43%0.81 White0.43%0.42%1.03

Specific Learning Disability Other Health Impairment Race/Ethnicity Identification % for Race/Ethnicity Identification % for All Other Races/Ethnicities Risk Ratio (Ident for Race/Ethnicity Divided by Ident for All Other Races/Ethnicities) American Indian or Alaska Native 4.09%3.55%1.15 Asian1.38%3.58%0.39 Black or African American 3.25%3.56%0.91 Hispanic/Latino3.79%3.55%1.07 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 2.63%3.55%0.74 Two or More Races3.45%3.55%0.97 White3.59%3.19%1.13 Race/Ethnicity Identification % for Race/Ethnicity Identification % for All Other Races/Ethnicities Risk Ratio (Ident for Race/Ethnicity Divided by Ident for All Other Races/Ethnicities) American Indian or Alaska Native 7.72%5.16%1.50 Asian2.77%5.22%0.53 Black or African American 4.62%5.20%0.89 Hispanic/Latino6.21%5.16%1.20 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 2.11%5.18%0.41 Two or More Races4.76%5.19%0.92 White5.21%4.94%1.05

Speech/Language Impairment Race/Ethnicity Identification % for Race/Ethnicity Identification % for All Other Races/Ethnicities Risk Ratio (Ident for Race/Ethnicity Divided by Ident for All Other Races/Ethnicities) American Indian or Alaska Native 4.60%2.84%1.62 Asian2.40%2.86%0.84 Black or African American 1.98%2.88%0.69 Hispanic/Latino3.35%2.84%1.18 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 2.11%2.85%0.74 Two or More Races3.80%2.83%1.34 White2.85%2.93%0.97

Looking Ahead... Tiered monitoring and supports –Pilot cohort chosen in16-17 Results Based Accountability

Looking Ahead... Forms –Revisions effective 8/1/16 Speech/language eligibility form – major changes including required use of a matrix SLD (no) Parental consent form –revised language –Recorded webinar this summer –First Listen and Learn in fall

Advocacy Group Topics Transition planning at age 14 Discovering Personal Genius Guidance to the field on state wards/state agency clients and home SAU responsibility –Students receiving a diploma, needing 2 more years of community placement Data on restraint and seclusion Independent living evaluation

Due Process Lisa Whitis – coordinator and back up complaint investigator Kaitlyn Dyer – training to do office support Jon Braff – complaint investigator

Who’s Who at Maine DOE? Data and Finance Team Ted Fournier (Coordinator) –Shawn Collier (data) –Dawn Kliphan (contracts & invoices) –Sheryl Banden (office support) –New Ed Spec II

Who’s Who at Maine DOE? Special Purpose Private Schools and State Wards/State Agency Clients Jon Braff Team –Stacia Fowler –Kari Bickmore

Who’s Who at Maine DOE? School Monitoring –Roberta Lucas (Coordinator) Tammy Holmes Valerie Densmore Ed Spec II (vacant) Ed Spec III (vacant) Kaitlyn Dyer (office support)

Who’s Who at Maine DOE? Special Projects –Beth Lorigan (Coordinator) Jayne Chase - PBIS and Math4ME Lisa Whitis - dyslexia and due process Ed Spec II (vacant) Pat Neumeyer (office support)

Who’s Who at Maine DOE? Colene O’Neill (Director’s Assistant)