Cryogenics and cryolines – Crab Cavities for HiLumi LHC Crab Cavity review 10-11 November 2015 CERN – Geneva, Switzerland K. Brodzinski, L. Delprat and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cryogenic system in P4: Possible options S. Claudet & U. Wagner LHC Workshop, “Chamonix XlV” January 2005 (Mostly for RF & beam scrubbing)
Advertisements

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Ofelia Capatina on behalf of the CERN specification team
LHC Experimental Areas Forum - 03/07/ ATLAS Helium Cryogenics Nicolas Delruelle on behalf of the AT / ECR group.
Large-capacity Helium refrigeration : from state-of-the-art towards FCC reference solutions Francois Millet – March 2015.
Cryogenic cavern in Asian site Conceptual design of the cryogenic system Layout of the cryogenic plant for site A & B New layout of the cryogenic system.
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Conceptual Design Study - Cryogenic Requirements How to decide the layout of ILC cryogenic system Conceptual design of cryogenic system Layout of cryogenic.
IHEP 1.3 GHz Cryomodule and Cryogenics IHEP Cryogenic group 2nd Workshop of the IHEP 1.3 GHz SRF R&D Project Dec 2 nd, 2009.
Arnaud Vande Craen (TE-MSC) 27/02/20131 EUCARD : ESAC Review – CEA Saclay.
Cryogenics in SPS & LHC (2 K / 4.5 K) LHC-CC11, 14 November 2011 L. Tavian, CERN, TE-CRG With the contribution of N. Delruelle, G. Ferlin & B. Vullierme.
Cryogenic update before Fermilab meeting (and after the helium tank review) Coordination meeting 6 th May 2015 K. Brodzinski HiLumi-LHC-CC-Cryo-PPT-18_v1.
S. Claudet - 31st May 2007Power refrigeration for LHC Power refrigeration at 4.5K & 1.8K for the LHC S. Claudet, CERN AT-ACR.
Shrikant_Pattalwar TTC 2015 Dec 1, 2015 SLAC 1 Horizontal Tests in a Vertical Cryostat Shrikant Pattalwar STFC Daresbury Laboratory UK.
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Cryogenics for crab cavities – SPS/LHC 2 nd HiLumi LHC meeting – Frascati (Italy) 15 November 2012 K. Brodzinski and L. Tavian on behalf of cryogenic team.
Plan for test station Marta Bajko For the Technical Review of FReSCa2 June 2015 Saclay Paris.
Cryostat & LHC Tunnel Slava Yakovlev on behalf of the FNAL team: Nikolay Solyak, Tom Peterson, Ivan Gonin, and Timergali Khabibouline The 6 th LHC-CC webex.
SM18 cryogenics infrastructure upgrade L. Serio TE-CRG.
LHC Cryostat evaluation Nikolay Solyak Thanks Rama Calaga, Tom Peterson, Slava Yakovlev, Ivan Gonin C11 workshop. FNAL, Oct 27-28, 2008.
MAGNET#1MAGNET#2MAGNET#3 SATELLITE VB#1 SATELLITE VB#2 SATELLITE VB#3 PRECOOLER#1PRECOOLER#2 DISTRIBUTION VALVE BOX DVB CP#1CP#3CP#2 BUFFER DEWAR LHe 5m.
EN-CV Progress EHN1 Extension Project Jérôme Rodary EN-CV-PJ 2016/01/21.
EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities Thermosiphon Cooling Review A. MORAUX PH Dpt / DT Group CERN SEPTEMBER.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
Crab cavities – cryogenics for SPS and LHC LHC-CC13, 6 th LHC Crab Cavity Workshop – CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 9-11 December 2013 K. Brodzinski on behalf.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
SM18 Vertical & Horizontal Test 110/12/2013Mathieu Therasse CERN BE/RF A. Benoit, O. Brunner, E. Jensen, A. Macpherson, P. Maesen, K. Schirm, W. Venturini.
Overview of the ESS Linac Cryogenic Distribution System
Bruno Vullierme Sept LHC-CC09 - 3rd LHC Crab Cavity Workshop Slide 1 CRAB CAVITY INTEGRATION CRYOGENICS INSTALLATION.
A. Perin, TE/CRG, Page 2 CERN-GSI FAIR Project integration/coordination meeting 5 14 th October 2015 A. Perin, H. Derking, L. Stewart, M. Chesi,
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
Crab Cavities SPS cryogenics – progress and requirements Fermilab visit at CERN 02 August 2013 Krzysztof Brodzinski (on behalf of CERN cryogenic team)
ESS | Helium Distribution | | Torsten Koettig Linac – Helium distribution 1.
EN-CV Progress EHN1 Extension Project Jérôme Rodary EN-CV-PJ 2016/01/14.
EN-CV Progress EHN1 Extension Project Jérôme Rodary EN-CV-PJ 2016/02/04.
R. van Weelderen and U. Wagner CERN
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
Cryogenics storage and distribution
CERN – Zanon discussions
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
Crab cavities Cryogenics progress for the SPS
IT-4189 Supply and installation of a cryogenic distribution system
BA6 – crab cavity activities in EYETS
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
Innovative He cycle Francois Millet.
Proximity Cryogenics P&IDs meeting
SPS cryogenic proximity equipment and SM18 validation
CRYOGENICS – strategy, unavailability root causes and limitations
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
CEPC Cryogenic System Jianqin Zhang, Shaopeng Li
CERN Cryomodule Requirements for Crab Cavities
ESS RF Development at Uppsala University
Status of the cryogenic system for B180
The HIE—ISOLDE Cryogenic System, its Infrastructure and Considerations for Phase 3 O. Pirotte (TE/CRG)
Block 4 and Cluster D - Safety
Cryostat design Mechanical design: Thermal screens: Specifications:
Cryogenic cavern in Asian site
ILC Experimental Hall Cryogenics An Overview
Thermohydraulic behaviour of the cryogenic system
Burst Disc Experiences at CEA Test Stand
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

Cryogenics and cryolines – Crab Cavities for HiLumi LHC Crab Cavity review November 2015 CERN – Geneva, Switzerland K. Brodzinski, L. Delprat and S. Claudet on behalf of involved team

CC review_K.Brodzinski General layout Crab Cavity cryogenics Flow scheme Circuits and instrumentation Proximity equipment Some operation aspects and limitations SM18 test requirements Cold box and input for integration BA4 to BA6 relocation and planning projection Conclusions Outlook 2

CC review_K.Brodzinski General layout 3 QSC QSR QSV QSDN QUI L QSI VB EH HeP Surface Shaft Underground QSR Proximity equipment Compressor station Refrigerator Interconnection box Refrigerator CC service box CC cryo-module heater He Pump Cryogenic infrastructure layout for BA6 location. Integration study re-started now for BA6 with G. Vandoni as a new interface for this aspect. Cold box located on surface: + No problem of underground integration, easy access -Complicated process, -Higher heat load = more capacity required from the cold box, -More complex design of the distribution, Cold box located underground: -Limited access, complicated LN2 boost if necessary + standard cold helium handling (no problem of vertical head) + simple shaft piping distribution (only warm HP and LP pipes to be installed) + lower heat load, + lower investment and operation cost CRG preferred solution is to integrate the cold box underground. Study is underway with planned visit in situ before Xmas or during next YETS. CC

CC review_K.Brodzinski Main circuits and operation 4 To compressor LP CC cryostat will be operated in saturated superfluid helium bath at 2 K -cool down and filling at 4.5 K, bypassing HX910 and bypassing 2 K pumps, sending the return gas to LP of compressor station -Normal operation – HX910 in operation, 2 K pumps in operation for 30 mbar pumping QUI VB CC From / To refrigerator

CC review_K.Brodzinski CC cryo-module circuits (2 K) 5 Cool down circuit EHs Normal operation supply line Return / Pumping collector Level gauge pipes Cool down and 2 K normal operation circuits DQW static HL: 12.5 W RFD: static HL: 12 W DQW synamic HL: 18.1 W RFD dynamic HL: 15.9 W Heat Loads from Federico Carra – more details in Federico presentation

CC review_K.Brodzinski CC cryo-module circuits (2 K) 6 HOM pick up – HL at ~3 – 3.5 W in total HOM cooling pipes HOM cooling duct

CC review_K.Brodzinski SM top service plate 7 Instrumentation port Service module top plate will be defined by CERN with main parameters of the integrated components: valves, double channel line interface, screen interfaces, instrumentation flange for related connector and security devices. Safety valve Thermal screen bayonet interfaces Contribution from Matteo Chesi Coaxial double channel interface Rupture disc

CC review_K.Brodzinski CC cryo-module – instrumentation 8 2 electrical heaters of 50 W installed on Cu support of 5 mm thick then screwed on the bottom of the helium tanks 2 level transducers covering full depth of the helium tanks, wires to be routed in the pumping line with connector installed on the service box side 1 pressure transducer installed in pumping volume ~10-12 CERNOX temperature transducers – exact location to be defined for understanding of real thermal profile during cool down on the helium tanks One PT100 installed on the screen pipe, additional PT100 for screen mapping to be defined Safety valve with He guard at 1.8 bara + rupture disc at 2.1 bara to be installed on the service module to protect cavities (SV of DN40, RD of DN65 – exact sizing to be done) Rupture disc – fully welded (no need of He guard) Electrical heater – glued on heated surface (CC dimensions 150 x 200 mm) Supra level transducer (d~5 mm), CC required length is 720 mm Instrumentation will be ordered in Q1 2016

CC review_K.Brodzinski CC cryo-module operation 9 87 Requirements: gas speed lower than 5 m/s*, min 50 mm for level regulation, additional buffer for ~ 20 min of operation, compatibility with safety devices for pressure limit requirements. Indications: Diameter of 100 mm (recommended) allows for: -return gas speed below 5 m/s up to ~87 mm of liquid level in the collector (operation regulation level to be set at ~50 mm of LHe in the collector), -buffer volume for transients/unexpected process perturbations (half filled collector allows for ~15-20 min of operation assuming collector length of ~1.6 m and 30 W of thermal load), -compatibility with safety valves sizing is still to be checked ! * Calculation done assuming: collector diameter of 100 mm, He mass flow = 3 g/s, GHe temp = 2 K, GHe press = 20 mbar. 100 mm ~87 mm 0 mm Liquid level ~50 mm Regulation maxi: 5 m/s * Standard design value confirmed by Rob van Weelderen and by T. Peterson on December 2012 Fermilab meeting

CC review_K.Brodzinski Pumping units 10 The check shows that assuming inlet pressure of 20 mbar two pumping units are capable to pump ~2.3 g/s of helium, what gives ~3.5 g/s at 30 mbar (2 K saturation) Capacity >2.85 g/s -> OK for CC SPS test

CC review_K.Brodzinski Heat load study 11 DQW static HL: K DQW dynamic HL: K Cryo prox. equipment: K Required liquefaction rate to cover cryomodule + prox. equipment heat loads is: K with contingency factor of 1.5 (attention! Full cryo infrastructure HL not included since no location for cold box defined)

CC review_K.Brodzinski Heat load study 12 New 4.5 K cold box will allow for using of full capacity of 2 K pumping units (~3.5 mbar) as well as to cover requirements for 80 K screen cooling with helium gas.

CC review_K.Brodzinski SM18 test preparation 13 From / to SM18 infrastructure M7 adaptation valve box CC service box CC cryo-module M7 adaptation valve box First CC prototype will be tested at SM18 with its SPS service box (first slot on the adaptation valve box). Second CC prototype will be tested with direct connection to the adaptation valve box (second slot). Third slot is prepared for SPL Remark: with direct connection related security devices must be integrated on M7 valve box

CC review_K.Brodzinski Cold box – input for integration 1/3 14 -Space occupation: L(2.0m) × W(1.6m) × H(2.6m) = 8.3 m 3 ; 2.5 tons (LINDE option) -Mobility aspects: -Vertical / max 45° inclined: standard and preferable -Horizontal: could be a boundary condition but will have to be discussed -In situ accessibility: -1m above + 1m all around the cold box -Removability of the top plate = non-mandatory -Thermal budget: -100m if possible (cavern configuration) for max length of transfer line -150m if surface configuration, but will impose compulsory LN 2 consumption 1 m clearance 2.6 m height 1.6 m width 2.0 m length Control Cabinet 1.9 m height 0.4 m width 0.8 m length Cold Box

CC review_K.Brodzinski Cold box – input for integration 2/3 15 -Space occupation: L(2.6m) × W(1.8m) × H(2.6m) = 12.2 m 3 ; ≈ 2.5 tons (AL option) -Mobility aspects: -Vertical / max 45° inclined: standard and preferable -Horizontal: could be a boundary condition but will have to be discussed -In situ accessibility: -1m above + 1m all around the cold box -Removability of the top plate = non-mandatory -Control Cabinet: already integrated to the cold box here -Thermal budget: -100m if possible (cavern configuration) for max length of transfer line -150m if surface configuration, but will impose compulsory LN 2 consumption 1 m clearance 2.6 m height 1.8 m width 2.6 m length Cold Box

CC review_K.Brodzinski Cold box – input for integration 3/3 16 -Disassembly: -Transport preparation = 2-3 daysWish = 1 week to have the cavern «cleared out» -Back to surface= 2-3 days and the CB on a truck -External interfaces: -Electricity (400V, and 24V for control-command) -Water (raw water only, for cooling of 2K pumping units and turbines circuits) -Compressed air (dry air, 8 bar, mainly for regulation valves) -Control racks (CRG) and ethernet networks (IT) -Deadline: -Installation of these equipments during EYETS ( ) to be operational in 2017

CC review_K.Brodzinski Relocation from BA4 to BA6 17 Significant part of equipment installation work at BA4 was done during LS1 regarding 2 K cooling capability. The 2 K helium pumps have been installed in the SPS cavern at BA4 cooling water circuits installed for pumps cooling – EN/CV support electrical supply pulled from surface to TA4 and BA4 alcove EN/EL support Control racks installed in TA4 (shaft bottom area) – TE/CRG Ethernet network pulled and installed underground for control system – IT support New integration study started for BA6 with BE/RF and EN/MEF colleagues. Cryogenic equipment installed at BA4 will be removed from the cavern during next YETS, stored on the surface and installed at BA6 when all integration work is completed (most probably during EYETS).

CC review_K.Brodzinski Planning projection 18 BA4 equipment removal – YETS 2015 BA6 proximity equipment: technical specification well advanced, equipment to be ordered Q1 of 2016 with delivery beginning of 2017 SM18 adaptation equipment: technical specification to be done, order to be made in Q1 of 2016 with delivery of equipment end of 2016 (tight planning) BA6 integration study started, cold box location to be chosen in Q ECR for BA6 integration to be prepared and approved in Q2/Q3 of 2016 New 4.5 K cold box to be ordered in Q with delivery for installation during EYETS Complete cryogenic infrastructure to be installed at BA6 during EYETS Exact planning is under construction with impact of BA4 to BA6 relocation and open decision for surface or cavern cold box integration. The priority is put on SM18 test preparation.

CC review_K.Brodzinski Conclusions and perspectives Globally, the work on cryogenics is progressing well, however affected with change of SPS location Cryomodule cryogenics well advanced, piping sized, instrumentation definition in final stage, thermal screen still under study, jumper design to be completed (mechanical aspects) Flow schemes: for SM18 – defined, for SPS – advanced but depends on cold box location Cryogenic proximity equipment design: service module top plate definition advanced, technical specification ~80% ready, order during next months Definition of requirements for integration at BA6 transmitted to RF and EN – close collaboration required Thank you for your attention! 19