Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Source Designature Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67 Jan. 25, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Signal Estimation Technology Inc. Maher S. Maklad Optimal Resolution of Noisy Seismic Data Resolve++
Advertisements

4 June 2014© Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All rights reserved1 Reservoir Connectivity and Fluid Uncertainty Analysis using Fast Geostatistical.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
GeoCenter LP SeisUP ® Marine Processing.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Predictive Deconvolution in Practice
Seismic reflection Seismic reflection profiling basically same principle as echo sounding But lower frequency used for greater subbottom penetration Trade.
Establishing Well to Seismic Tie
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.
Reflection Field Methods
Interferometric Extraction of SSP from Passive Seismic Data Yanwei Xue Feb. 7, 2008.
Seismogram Relation between seismic trace and geology Wavelets
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
Beach Energy Ltd Haselgrove 3D Seismic Data Re-processing, 2014 Quash X – Crosspread Adaptive Linear Noise Attenuation Sept 3, 2014.
So where does the ADAPS optimization method fit into this framework? The seismic trace equation does not fit the linear definition, since the values on.
Deconvolution Bryce Hutchinson Sumit Verma Objectives: -Understand the difference between exponential and surface consistent gain -Identify power line.
GENERAL PROPERTIES OF WAVES
Introduction to Deconvolution
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Squelch Tests for Streamer Noise Attenuation Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67.
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
Tuesday, 3/24 Please check your aquarium job for the week!
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Site Specific Response Analyses and Design Spectra for Soft Soil Sites Steven F. Bartlett, Ph.D., P.E. I-15 NATIONAL TEST BED TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2015 Matching Filter to match Transition Zone Airgun Source Wavelet.
Data QC and filtering Bryce HutchinsonSumit Verma Objective: Consider the frequency range of different seismic features Look for low frequency and high.
Reflection seismograms
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Testing the Match between Vibroseis and Dynamite Data Reflection.
Chapter 10 Wave Motion Chapter Opening 10.1 What are waves? 10.2 Types of waves 10.3 Description of wave 10.4 Motion of particles in waves 10.5 Describing.
1 Prestack migrations to inversion John C. Bancroft CREWES 20 November 2001.
Green’s theorem requires the wavefield P and its normal derivative P n on the measurement surface as the input. In marine exploration, an over/under cable.
WAVELET TUTORIAL GENERATION OF DESIGNATURE OPERATORS.
Does It Matter What Kind of Vibroseis Deconvolution is Used? Larry Mewhort* Husky Energy Mike Jones Schlumberger Sandor Bezdan Geo-X Systems.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
EXERCISE 3: Convolution and deconvolution in seismic signal processing.
ET5 June 2007 model answers. A.B A + C S 6 ( 1 0 0) and S 7 ( 1 0 1)
Waves How are waves connected to our big idea of weathering, erosion, and deposition?
ADVANCED MARINE TUTORIAL
Susan L. Beck George Zandt Kevin M. Ward Jonathan R. Delph.
WAVELET TUTORIAL GENERATION OF DESIGNATURE OPERATORS
Dmitri Lokshtanov Norsk Hydro Research Centre, Bergen.
Business Process Modelling
Reflection Seismic Method
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Journal of Vision. 2003;3(7):5. doi: /3.7.5 Figure Legend:
Vladimir Grechka Shell International E&P
New ProMAX modules for reflectivity calibration and noise attenuation
Active Source Seismology
Interference.
MOSRP Multiple Attenuation Review
Convolution and Deconvolution
The Relationship between Uncertainty and Quality in Seismic Data
Waves © D Hoult 2007.
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
Processing of the Field Data using Predictive Deconvolution
Seismic-Well Tie Flow-Chart
Typical Vertical Resolution
Advantages of Three-Phase Rectifiers over Single-Phase Rectifiers
Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Shot Gather For Shot 1 Source Receivers R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 S1
Uses of filters To remove unwanted components in a signal
Jacques JENNY Geo2X Genève
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Processing and Binning Overview
Presentation transcript:

Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Source Designature Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67 Jan. 25, 2014

➢ The Designature Operator was derived using the following method ➢ Input the Source Signature wavelet that was modeled by Fugro and supplied in SEGY format ➢ Create the Minimum Phase Equivalent of the Source Signature and taper the amplitudes to remove the gun bubble pulse which adds low frequencies to the data. ➢ Using the Weiner Matching Filter, create an operator that matches the Source Signature to the tapered Minimum Phase Equivalent. ➢ This operator is the Designature Operator ➢ Test the Designature Operator by applying it to the Source Signature wavelet and check for similarity with the Minimum Phase Equivalent wavelet. ➢ This Designature Operator advances event timing by approx. 2 msec and shapes the wavelet to remove the low frequency seismic waves created by the bubble pulse. ➢ Application of the Designature Operator is recommended.

Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Location of Test Lines

Designature Operator Derivation 1. Source Signature (modeled) 2. Min. Phase Equiv. (bubble removed)

Designature Operator Derivation 3. Designature Operator 4.Convolution Output (check against #2)

Shot Records

Shot Gather 1060, Line B24(shallow water), Squelch, FXSwell Applied Before Designature Applied First break 245 msec

First break 242 msec Shot Gather 1060, Line B24(shallow water), Squelch, FXSwell Applied After Designature Applied

Stacks

Brute Stack, Line B24 (shallow water), Squelch, FXSwell, prelim. NMO applied No Designature Applied

Brute Stack, Line B24 (shallow water), Squelch, FXSwell, prelim. NMO applied Designature Applied

Zoomed Brute Stack, Line B24 (shallow water), Squelch, FXSwell, prelim. NMO applied No Designature Applied

Zoomed Brute Stack, Line B24 (shallow water), Squelch, FXSwell, prelim. NMO applied Designature Applied

Brute Stack, Line B67 (deep water), Squelch, FXSwell, prelim. NMO applied No Designature Applied

Brute Stack, Line B67 (deep water), Squelch, FXSwell, prelim. NMO applied Designature Applied

Zoomed Brute Stack, Line B67 (deep water), Squelch, FXSwell, prelim. NMO applied No Designature Applied

Zoomed Brute Stack, Line B67 (deep water), Squelch, FXSwell, prelim. NMO applied Designature Applied