TPC data David Adams BNL March 23, 2016 DUNE 35t sim/reco.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Citavi – Adding References – Articles from EBSCOhost Databases
Advertisements

RPC & LVL1 Mu Barrel Online Monitoring during LS1 M. Della Pietra.
To figure out which tubes are working fine… Compare 24 to 2.6 and 2.51 to 2.6 by taking the ratio of counts. In general, 2.4 had the most problems, and.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
GLAST LAT Project Calibration and Analysis Meeting, 28 Nov 2005 E. Grove et al. 1 Proposed Flight Trigger Configuration: Engines and Scheduler Table J.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Oct, 3, 2007.
M. Ellis - 11th February 2004 Sci Fi Cosmic Light Yield 2 views 3 views.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
Identifying anomalous strips David Stuart, Noah Rubinstein University of California, Santa Barbara June 18,
An offline look at TIF data David Stuart UC Santa Barbara May 2, 2007.
HORIZONT 1 TWS/WebAdmin Tips & Tricks HORIZONT Software for Datacenters Garmischer Str. 8 D München Tel ++49(0)89 /
GODIAN MABINDAH RUTHERFORD UNUSI RICHARD MWANGI.  Differential coding operates by making numbers small. This is a major goal in compression technology:
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
Cube Measurements Tent Crew. Scintillation BNL 241 Am Semi- collimated  Spectralon Diffuse UV Reflector SBD  -Trigger Scint. Light Poisson.
Some notes on ezTree and EMC data in MuDst Marco van Leeuwen, LBNL.
Create Lists in Millennium Jenny Schmidt SWITCH Library Consortium.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
G.Corti, P.Robbe LHCb Software Week - 19 June 2009 FSR in Gauss: Generator’s statistics - What type of object is going in the FSR ? - How are the objects.
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
This document gives one example of how one might be able to “fix” a meteorological file, if one finds that there may be problems with the file. There are.
TELL-1 and TDC board: present status and future plans B. Angelucci, A. Burato, S. Venditti.
Analysis trains – Status & experience from operation Mihaela Gheata.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 11 Modified by Donghui Zhang Jan 30, 2006.
1 DAQ Update MEG Review Meeting, Feb. 17 th 2010.
David Adams ATLAS DIAL: Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL August 5, 2002 BNL OMEGA talk.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
Pixel DQM Status R.Casagrande, P.Merkel, J.Zablocki (Purdue University) D.Duggan, D.Hidas, K.Rose (Rutgers University) L.Wehrli (ETH Zuerich) A.York (University.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.
Javier Castillo 1 Muon Embedding Status & Open Issues PWG3 - CERN - 15/02/2011.
Status of MAPMT FEE Electronics Boards Connector board – have 5 boards, 1 assembled Readout board (“MUX” board) – layout completed 12/2, but unfortunately.
L1Calo EM Efficiencies Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Joint Meeting, Stockholm 29/06/2011.
LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project RCT/CTP7 Readout Isobel Ojalvo, U. Wisconsin Level-1 Trigger Meeting June 4, June 2015, Isobel Ojalvo Trigger Meeting:
Preliminary Analysis of mTPC pulser data D. A. Jensen May 30, 2007.
Effects of Endcap Staging/Descoping D.Acosta University of Florida.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
L1Calo EM Efficiency Maps Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Weekly Meeting 07/03/2011.
New DetSim module David Adams BNL January 14, 2016 DUNE collaboration Far detector simulation and reconstruction.
Default zero suppression in simulation David Adams BNL November 18, 2015 DUNE 35-ton simulation, reconstruction and analysis Updated 15:50 EST.
New zero suppression in simulation: current status David Adams BNL November 25, 2015 DUNE 35-ton simulation, reconstruction and analysis.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
ST Analysis: Introduction M. Needham EPFL. Outline Aims of the meeting Releasing code Performance Monitoring Results (IT and TT): Active fraction, noise.
New zero suppression in simulation: current status David Adams BNL November 30, 2015 DUNE DAQ Updated: 13:20 EST.
Ysterious apping ess Florian Lütticke On behalf of the test beam crew 20th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and.
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
Jonathan Walpole Computer Science Portland State University
Cleveland SQL Saturday Catch-All or Sometimes Queries
Module 11: File Structure
OptiSystem applications: SER & BER analysis of QAM-PSK-PAM systems
FVTX High Multiplicity Trigger for Run15
HORIZONT TWS/WebAdmin DS TWS/WebAdmin DS Tips & Tricks
David Adams Brookhaven National Laboratory September 28, 2006
ALiBaVa A brief overlook of Liverpool software changes, common issues and questions. A. Affolder, A. Greenall, I. Tsurin, G. Casse, V. Chmill, M. Wormald,
BNL electronics: first tests
James K Beard, Ph.D. April 20, 2005 SystemView 2005 James K Beard, Ph.D. April 20, 2005 April 122, 2005.
Instructor: Prasun Dewan (FB 150,
IQCare Tab Mapping Tool
Digital Acquisition of Analog Signals – A Practical Guide
CPM plans: the short, the medium and the long
BESIII EMC electronics
Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Memory Hierarchy: Virtual Memory
Dilepton Mass. Progress report.
Shaped Digital Readout Noise in CAL
Building a healthy nation is what we do. Sidra Supplier Bid Submission.
Presentation transcript:

TPC data David Adams BNL March 23, 2016 DUNE 35t sim/reco

Introduction Initial goals I would like to study efficiency and resolution in the 35-ton TPC For a given set of trigger counters, how often so we find a TPC signals? o In each of the three views Given a signal in one view, how often do we find signals in the others? What are the ratios of signal amplitudes in the three views Later goals Later look at SSP efficiency for these signals With self-triggered SSPs, repeat the above studies using SSPs in place of external counters D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23, 20162

Introduction (2) Procedure Mostly working in my own analysis module: DXDisplay o Repository: o Develop and ask for tools that can be used in this and other environments Identify and resolve issues (see following slides) o Event identification o Channel map o Bad channels o Stuck bit mitigation o Noise mitigation o Trigger identification o Datasets o Presplit production D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23, 20163

Bad channels I still need a list of bad channels I want to automate search for interesting events and regions I.e. find ROIs (regions of interest) where there are tracks This is “zero suppression” Must identify and ignore bad channels We have a channel status service But lists are in FCL Move these to text files Does this vary with run? o We may want to deliver these with IOV web service as for pedestals D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23, 20164

Stuck bit mitigation Stuck bits distort spectra Present approach to interpolate between nearest good ticks o Code in module (requiring copy of data) o Plan to move this to a service Plan to move this to a service to avoid duplicating full raw data Other approaches? Later. D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23, 20165

Noise mitigation 35t data is pretty noisy Some coherence but complicated structure o See following plots for an example o Now for a recent “low noise” run Primary coherence is in groups of 32 channels o I think this is what Brian’s code uses Brian’s code is available in module o Again like to put this in a service where it is easily shared D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23, 20166

Trigger identification Trigger information is in the splitter events In ExternalTrigger data product Mix of actual triggers and individual counters o Latter have ID < 100 o Triggers are 110, 111, 112, 113 I started looking at these and found about half the events do not have a trigger (they do have counters) o Less (30%?) in later runs This is being actively investigated Ghosts are still present in run taken March 15 D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23, 20167

Datasets Classify by HV gain shaping time Trigger including prescale and timing o PTB prescale setting of N gives prescale factor of N+1 o Also possible to prescale in NIM Untriggered (aka self-triggered) PD readout (missing so far) Noise level LAr purity What else? Following page has list of those identified so far All exclude noisy runs Run lists are available for each o Dataset number is the number of the first run in the list D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23, 20168

Datasets: List D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23, ds /29 (RCEs 01-08, 11-15) (66.7 kV) (trigger ) ds /29 Change trigger timing to keep 5000 ticks before instead of 4000 ds /1 (RCEs 01-08, 11-15) (66.7 kV) (trigger ) (add NIM prescale) ds /2 (RCEs 01-08, 11-15) (66.7 kV) (trigger ) (replace NIM w/ PTB prescale) ds /3 Trigger offset back to 4000 ticks ds /10 APA3 is out, RCEs 9-10 are in, self-triggering ssps, SSP1,3-6 ds /10 all-APA (APA3 is in) ds /10 APA3 back out ds /12 SSP3-6 (drop SSP1) ds /14 telescope trigger with PS=120, others are PS=5 (6X), APA3 is out, RCEs 9-10 are in ds /15 telescope PS=160 ds /15 turn off horiz trigs, telescope has NIM prescale=100 ds /16 telescope NIM prescale set to 120 ds /16 HV off ds /16 pull ssp03 out, have ssp02,04-07, still HV=0 ds /16 Trigger timing changed 5-->6, drop ssp02, now ssp04-07, HV turned on during DS ds /16 RCE00-11, SSP04-07, telescope trigger (presumably NIM prescale 120), HV 66.9, LAr dirty? ds /17 Drop SSP03, now SSP04-07 ds /17 Add SSP03, Drop SSP06, now SSP03-05,07 ds /17 RCE00-11, SSP01-07 ds /18 Add horiz trigs with prescale 4?, Def1=-1.0 kV and Def2=-1.0 kV ds /18 Unspecified change in prescale, Def1=-1.0 kV and Def2=-1.0 kV ds /18 Def1 = -1.4 kV and Def2=-1.0 kV ds /18 def1: 1.0 kV and def2: 1.4 kV ds /18 Back to default HVs with 66.7 kV

Datasets: Event rates D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23, ds13370 ds14009 ds14085 ds16363

Trigger timing: Feb 29 and earlier D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Trigger timing Feb 29 – Mar 3 D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Trigger timing March 3 D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Trigger timing March D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Trigger timing March 16 D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Trigger timing March D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Presplit samples Raw data Raw data is continuous stream of headers which are populated with TPC (and SSP) data for selected uslices (uslice = 1000 ticks) Current selection is ticks around a (prescaled) trigger There are some selections with no trigger o They are not supposed to be there o Sometimes called “ghost triggers’ o Maybe 30-50% of the data Event splitter is first step in data analysis Converts data from raw format to larsoft RawDigit Can run in two modes: o Triggered keeps a specified range around specified triggers – Trigger skipped if requested range is too large. Be careful. o Untriggered keeps every populated block of a specified size – First tick is the first populated tick D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Presplit samples (2) I would like to presplit data I.e. run splitter over data and use output as start for most an analyses Motivation: o Do the slow splitting once instead of forcing each analyst to repeat o Split files are much smaller (1/4 – 1/3 the raw file) I prefer to use the untriggered mode for the presplit o No need to restrict the tick range around the trigger o Can look at events (e.g. ghost triggers) without trigger bias o Note that the splitter can be run in triggered mode on the presplit data – And will be much faster than running it on the raw data I got what I wanted Karl has been doing sliced production. Thanks! But timing looks bad for about 10% of events o I.e. I get different results when I look at raw and sliced samples o Bug fixed and partial reprocessing planned o Data produced last week still has problem – Wrong release. Re-reprocessing planned. D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Trigger time reading raw file D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Trigger time reading sliced file D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Summary A bit more progress in last week Found trigger timing is fixed again Found timing issue with new sliced samples not quite fixed More comprehensive list of datasets D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Extras Noise and correlation around March 1 Old dataset comments D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Run noise D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Run correlations D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Run correlations 1/4 D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Run correlations 2/4 D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Run correlations 3/4 D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Run /4 D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Datasets (2) Data Feb 29 – Mar 3 Now have five datasets from the week where I was on shift All runs are “low noise” identified by looking at online RCE RMS plots All are “all-APA” runs meaning RCEs 1-8, are in o RCEs 9 and 10 were drawing too much current All have only triggers enabled SSPs are read out only when trigger fires Window is ticks All 14 mV/fC, 3 us. New dataset for each combination of trigger prescale timing o ds13370: No NIM, PTB=1 (2X prescale), 1.6 Hz, 29feb o ds13843: Change trigger timing ~4k  ~5k ticks, 29feb o ds14009: NIM prescale 2X. 0.8 Hz, 01mar o ds14085: NIM prescale out. PTB=2 (3X prescale), 1.0 Hz, 02mar o dx14379: Trigger offset back to 4k ticks, 03mar D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Datasets (3) Data Mar 4-13 Presumably useful data was taken after recovering from power failure Any hint on which time period and what conditions were? Or should I slog through the logbook? D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Datasets (4) Data Mar Telescope (trigger 110) is added I identified one dataset (so far) from this week All runs are “low noise” identified by looking at online RCE RMS plots All are “no-APA3” runs meaning RCEs 1-11 o RCEs 9 and 10 are OK after power problems All have only triggers enabled o Log says prescale is 120 for telescope (120) o What about the others? SSPs are read out only when trigger fires? Window is still ticks? All 14 mV/fC, 3 us? New dataset: o ds13363: 13mar D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,

Datasets: RCE RMS reference plots D. Adams, BNL DUNE 35t sim/reco 35-ton data March 23,