SEISMIC & WIND ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3D Analysis with AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating
Advertisements

Wind Loads: The ASCE 7 Provisions
Chp12- Footings.
Reinforced Concrete Design-8
Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges
By : Prof.Dr.\Nabil Mahmoud
Loads and Load Paths "Architecture is inhabited sculpture."
Braced frame Bearing wall system Rigid component
Prutkova Eugenia and Ryabchenkov Sergei Represent Report on the theme: JASS-2006.
UNIT-I STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR ROAD BRIDGE
DESIGN OF TRUSS ROOF Chapter 7
Beams Beams: Comparison with trusses, plates t
Concrete (Gravity) Dam Engineering
Chapter 6 Plate girder.
Lecture 5 January 31,  Sudhir K. Jain, IIT Kanpur E-Course on Seismic Design of Tanks/ January 2006 Lecture 5/ Slide 2 In this Lecture Impulsive.
University of Palestine
Reinforced Concrete Design
ERT352 FARM STRUCTURES TRUSS DESIGN
1.
Earthquake Load Some Basic Definitions:
Session 15 – 16 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES
University of Palestine
April 5, 2006CHBDC-S6 Bridge Loading1 Loading Summary for a Slab on Girder Bridge According to the CAN/CSA-S6 Presented By: Andrew Chad 2006.
Driven Pile Design George Goble. Basic LRFD Requirement η k Σ γ ij Q ij ≤ φ g R ng η k – factor for effect of redundancy, ductility and importance γ ij.
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
Bearing Capacity from SPT and PLT
COMBINED LOADING.  Analyze the stress developed in thin-walled pressure vessels  Review the stress analysis developed in previous chapters regarding.
Strength of Materials Malayer University Department of Civil Engineering Taught by: Dr. Ali Reza Bagherieh In The Name of God.
Two loading Conditions
VibrationsandWaves. Ch. 14 examines wave motion and the oscillating, vibrating motion that creates them. This oscillating motion is known as periodic.
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
Built-up Compression Members
Lay-On Gable Frame Connection Overview. Introduction A lay-on gable frame is typically connected from the top during truss placement, but after sheathing.
BRIDGES CAD 449. Design It is the essence of engineering! “… the process of devising a system, component or process to meet desired needs. It is a decision-making.
A SAMPLING OF BRIDGE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA BY MARK YASHINSKY, CALTRANS OFFICE OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Most bridge owners have adopted design criteria.
PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF BEAMS - SANDEEP DIGAVALLI. AT A GLANCE OF THIS TOPIC  BASIS OF PLASTIC THEORY  STRESS-STRAIN CURVE OF PLASTIC MATERIALS  STRESSES.
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridge. contents Bearings Horizontal and transversal wind bracing Classification of bridges.
Table 3 – Value of Dimension D
The Engineering of Foundations
Chapter 15 (1) Slope Stability
Oregon DOT Integral Abutment Design Criteria
Compression Members.
Pure Bending.
MECHANICS OF METAL CUTTING
Seismic Design Impact to
The influence of wind load on a suspended fiber optic cable
Pile Group
Chapter : 01 Simple Stresses
An-Najah National University
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridges.
CHAPTER 4 SOIL STRESSES.
Motion in Two Dimensions
Earthquake Load Formulation using ASCE7-05
Down the Slope Inclined Planes.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 10 TOPIC : 3
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Design Ribbed and Flat Slabs
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
Down the Slope Inclined Planes.
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
Second Order Analysis In the previous classes we looked at a method that determines the load corresponding to a state of bifurcation equilibrium of a perfect.
AIN NIHLA KAMARUDZAMAN Ext: 8968
EAT 415 :ADVANCED STEEL BUILDING DESIGN PLATE GIRDER
Folds are the wavy undulations as a result of plastic deformation developed in rocks by compressive forces acting at or near the surface of the earth crust.
Highway Design CE 424 Cenk OZAN, PhD Assist. Prof.
Motion in Two Dimensions
Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department
Mr. Vedprakash Maralapalle, Asst. Professor
AASHTOWare Bridge Design & Rating (BrDR) 3D FEM Analysis Capabilities
Presentation transcript:

SEISMIC & WIND ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES Based on Recommended LRFD guidelines for Seismic design on Highway bridges (May 2006 ed.)

WIND ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES Pressure specified shall be assumed to be caused by a base design wind velocity VB = 160 Km/hr. For bridges or parts of bridges more than 10,000 mm above low ground or water level, design wind velocity VDZ should be adjusted according to: Where VDZ = Design wind velocity at elevation Z (Km/hr) V10 = Wind velocity at 10 000 mm above low ground or design water level (Km/hr) VB = Base wind velocity of 160 Km/hr at 10 000 mm height Z = Height of structure at which wind loads are being calculated as measured from low ground or water level > 10 000 mm V0 = Friction velocity a meteorological wind characteristic taken as specified in Table below Z0 = Friction length of upstream fetch a meteorological wind characteristic taken as specified in Table below. V10 may be established from basic wind speed charts available for various recurrence intervals, site specific wind surveys or in absence of better criteria, the assumption that V10 = VB = 160 Km/hr

WIND ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES WIND PRESSURE ON STRUCTURES The total wind loading shall not be taken less than 4.4 N/mm in the plane of windward chord and 2.2 N/mm in the plane of leeward chord of truss or arch components and not less than 4..4 N/mm on beam and girder spans.

WIND ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES LOADS FROM SUPERSTRUCTURES Where wind is not taken as normal to the structure, the base wind pressures PB for various angles of wind direction may be taken as specified in table below and shall be applied to the single place of exposed area. The skew angle shall be taken as measured from perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. The wind direction for design shall be that which produces the extreme force effect on the component under investigation. The transverse and longitudinal pressures shall be applied simultaneously.

WIND ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES FORCES APPLIED DIRECTLY TO THE SUBSTRUCTURE The transverse and longitudinal forces to be applied directly to the substructure shall be calculated from an assumed base wind pressure of 0.0019 MPa. For wind direction taken skewed to the substructure, this force shall be resolved into components perpendicular to the end and front elevations of the substructure. The component perpendicular to the end elevation shall act on exposed substructure area as seen in end elevation, and the component perpendicular to the front elevation shall act on the exposed areas and shall be applied simultaneously with the wind loads from superstructure. WIND PRESSURES ON VEHICLES When vehicles are present the design pressure should be applied on both structure and vehicles. Wind pressure on vehicles shall be represented by an interruptible moving force of 1.46 N/mm acting normal to and 1800 mm above the roadway and shall be transmitted to the structure. When wind on vehicles is not taken as normal to the structure, the components of normal and parallel force applied to the live load may be taken as specified in the table below

WIND ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES

Example: WIND ANALYSIS

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES IMPORTANCE CATEGORIES Critical bridges (open to all vehicles immediately after EQ. 2500 year return period) Essential bridges (open to emergency / defense / security vehicles immediately after EQ. 475 year return period event) Other bridges SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ZONE

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES SOIL PROFILE TYPE SOIL PROFILE I: Rock either shale or crystalline in nature. SOIL PROFILE II: Stiff cohesive or deep cohesion less soil. SOIL PROFILE III: Soft to medium stiff clay and sand. SOIL PROFILE IV: Soft clay or silt. ELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES For bridges on Soil profile III & IV & in areas where A is not less than 0.3, Csm need not exceed 2.0 A. For soil profiles III & IV and for modes other than fundamental mode that have period less than 0.3 s, Csm shall be taken as If period of vibration for any mode exceeds 4.0 s the value of Csm for that mode shall be taken as

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES As per AASHTO LRFD Bridges in seismic zone 1 need not be analyzed for seismic loads regardless of their importance and geometry. However the minimum requirements in sections 4.7.4.4 & 3.10.9 shall be applied. Seismic analysis for is not required for single span bridges, regardless of the seismic zone.

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES Seismic analysis required / not required * = No seismic analysis is required UL = Uniform load elastic method SM = Single mode elastic method MM = Multimode elastic method TH = Time history method

Regular & Irregular bridges SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES Regular & Irregular bridges Bridges satisfying the above table requirements may be regarded as Regular bridges otherwise Irregular bridges. Curved bridges comprise of multi simple-span shall be considered as irregular bridge if subtended angle in plan is greater than 20o. Such bridges shall be analyzed by either multimode elastic method or time history method.

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES A curved continuous girder bridge may be analyzed as if it were straight, provided all of the following requirements are meet. 1. The bridge is regular as defined in table above except that for a two span bridge the maximum span length ratio from span to span must not exceed 2. 2. The subtended angle in plan is not greater than 90 deg. 3. The span lengths of the equivalent straight bridge are equal to the arc lengths of the curved bridge. If the requirements are not satisfied then the curved continuous girder-bridge must be analyzed using the actual curved geometry.

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES Where Po = uniform load arbitrarily set = 1 (N/mm) Vs(x) = Deformation corresponding to Po (mm) W(x) nominal unfactored dead load of the bridge superstructure and tributary substructure (N/mm) Then calculate the time period of the bridge structure g = Acceleration due to gravity (m/sec2)