45 th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference April 19-22, 2004 Structures TC Session Status Fall TC Meeting Report Steve Engelstad Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Marietta, GA

Summary Conference Overview Structures Review Statistics Special Sessions Technical Sessions

Conference Overview

Chairs 2004 SDM General Chair Patrick J. Goggin Boeing Company 2401 E. Wardlow Rd. Mail Code C Long Beach, CA / C 2004 SDM Technical Chair Donald L. Kunz CDR, USAAMCOM ATTN: AMSAM-RD-AE-A (Donald L. Kunz) Building 4488, Room B-367 Redstone Arsenal, AL / / FAX

Conference Overview Theme –Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials – From Conception to Application Speakers –Industry, Government, Academia, International?

Conference Overview 45 th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 12 th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference (Greg Agnes and Lee Peterson ) There will be two Forums –Non-Deterministic Approaches (Chris Chamis & Levon Minnetyan) –Gossamer Spacecraft (Eric Flint & Rich Pappa) TC’s are responsible for: –Review of all papers in their area –Preliminary Layout of Sessions –List of names/address/ /phone for Session Chairs & Co-Chairs –Prioritization of each Session (give each session a different priority number) –Indicate Plenary Sessions and Student Papers

Abstract Review Procedures & Dates (Includes SDM, ASC, DSM and Forums) Abstract reviews will be handled electronically like last year Abstracts – published due date is 1 Aug 03 All abstracts get three independent reviews Invited vs. encouraged papers – what’s the difference? –The only truly invited papers are the Keynote addresses and the SDM Lecture –All other papers will go through the standard review process Swapping abstracts with other TC’s or Forums as appropriate is encouraged (inform the Technical Chair!)

Program Schedule

Preliminary Session Layout

Latest Planning Schedule September 12: Abstract reviews completed September 26: Session planning completed!!! (SDM Planning Meeting in Palm Springs on this day) October 10: Session chairs & co-chairs assigned October 24: Program completed!!!

Structures Review Statistics

Abstracts Processed –150 Total Structures Abstracts Submitted –0 Accepted (too early to accept/reject) –0 Rejected (too early to accept/reject) –34 Returned for Revision –449 Reviews Assigned –162 Completed Reviews –37% Total Reviews Completed 6 Student Abstracts Placed In Structures Sessions 5 Special Sessions in Structures Program Structures Area Abstracts – SDM 45

Review Process Review Team –36 TC Member Reviewers – Average 5 abstracts (will increase) –33 Friends of TC Reviewers – Average 5 abstracts –33 Volunteer Reviewers – Average 3 abstracts 1 st Abstract Deadline 8/1/03 - around 90 abstracts submitted 2 nd Abstract Deadline 8/15/03 – Shot up to 150 abstracts Conducted initial screening and sent 34 abstracts back for revision –19 were revised –15 were not revised; (will be rejected) –If reject 5 more, would give an acceptance rate of 87% 430 Now under review We are short on reviewers, as I expect some reviewers not to perform; expect to assign these to other reviewers

Special Sessions

Special Session on Aircraft Structures Certification Organized and Chaired by Steve Engelstad and Ben Thacker 5 papers followed by a panel discussion 1.A Hybrid Probabilistic Method for Composite Aircraft Design 2.Evolution of Structures Design Philosophy and Criteria 3.Probabilistic Damage Tolerance Methodology for Reliability Design and Inspection Optimization 4.A Functional Methodology for Assessing Post-Initation Damage in Composite Structures and Bonded Joints 5.An Alternate Certification Approach for Composite Structures

Special Session on Structural Health Management Organized and Chaired by Aditi Chattopadhyay and Michael Enright 1.Damage detection capabilities based on new signal processing approach 2.A Probabilistic Damage-Based Approach to Structural Health Management 3.Monitoring Preload in a Composite-to-Metal Bolted Joint with Fiber Optics 4.Finite Element Modeling for Piezoelectric Smart Composites Including Debonding 5.An Integrated Active Sensing System for Damage Identification and Prognosis 6.Optimal Sensor Placement for Damage Characterization Using Genetic Algorithms 7.Bio-Inspired Embedded Sensory Architecture for Structural Health Monitoring

Special Session on High Energy Impact Considerations Organized and Chaired by Anthony N. Palazotto 1.High Velocity Impacts of Man Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) on Selected Targets 2.Testing Composite Joints Under High Energy Hydrodynamic Ram Conditions 3.A Gradient-Dependent Constitutive Model to Simulate Impact Damage Problem 4.Phase Transitions and Dislocation-Based Plasticity at High-Strain- Rates in Solids 5.Fragment Cloud Impact Response of Woven Carbon Epoxy Composite Plates 6.Numerical Analysis for a Study of the Mitigation of Hypervelocity Gouging 7.Finite Element Simulation of Soft Projectile Impacting Braided Composite Structures

Special Session on Concepts for Morphing and Reconfigurable Structures Organized and Chaired by Sergio Pellegrino 1.Continuous Moldline Technology Flight Demonstration Program 2.Actuation of kagome lattice structures 3.Bi-stable Concepts for Reconfigurable Structures 4.An Asymmetrically-Bistable Monolithic Energy Storing Structure 5.A novel actuated composite tape-spring 6.Multi-Configuration Space Frames

Special Session on Cryogenic Propellant Tanks and Integrated Structures for a Next Generation Reusable Launch Vehicle Organized and Chaired by Ted Johnson 1.Composite Development and Applications for RLV Tankage 2.Measuring Thermal Conductivity at LH2 Temperatures 3.Shortened Qualification Testing Time for Propellant Tanks Of a Reusable Launch Vehicle 4.Thermal–Structural Optimization of Integrated Cryogenic Propellant Tank Concepts for a Reusable Launch Vehicle 5.Trade Study Results for a Reusable Launch Vehicle Composite Hydrogen Tank 6.Prediction of Micro-crack Densities in Cryogenic IM7/977-2 Propellant Tanks 7.Thermal-Mechanical Failure Analysis of Composite Cryogenic Materials Using Multi-Continuum Theory 8.Reliability and Sizing of Propellant Tanks Of a Reusable Launch Vehicle 9. Analysis of TPS Sandwich Panel with Foam Core 10.Polyimide Foam Development and Characterization for Lightweight Integrated Structures

Technical Sessions

Technical Session Roster -- Structures 1.Beams, Plates and Shells I (7) 2.Structural Applications I (5) 3.Structural Mechanics I (7) 4.Design Tradeoffs and Optimization (5) 5.High Energy Impact Considerations (7)** 6.Aircraft Structures Certification (5 and panel) ** ** Denotes Special Session or Panel Session (#) = Number of Abstracts in Topic Monday April 19 (6 session max; 7 last year) Tuesday April 20 (7 session max; 6 last year) 1.High Fidelity Analysis for Failure Initiation and Damage (7) 2.Computational Structural Mechanics I (6) 3.Morphing and Reconfigurable Structures (6)** 4.Structural Health Management (7)** 5.Structural Stability and Postbuckling Behavior (5)

Tuesday April 20 Continued (7 session max; 6 last year) 6.Damage Detection and Evaluation I (7) 7.Cryogenic Fuel Tank Structures I** (5) Technical Session Roster – Structures (Continued) Wednesday April 21 (6 session max; 4 last year) 1.High Fidelity Analysis for Stability Critical Structures (6) 2.Structural Integrity (7) 3.Propulsion and Rotorcraft Structures (7) 4.Damage Detection and Evaluation II (6) 5.Cryogenic Fuel Tank Structures II** (5) 6.Structural Applications II (7) ** Denotes Special Session or Panel Session (#) = Number of Abstracts in Topic

Technical Session Roster – Structures (Continued) ** Denotes Special Session or Panel Session (#) = Number of Abstracts in Topic Thursday April 22 (3 session max; 6 last year) 1.Beams, Plates and Shells II (6) 2.Computational Structural Mechanics II (5) 3.Structural Mechanics II (7)

End of Presentation

Alternate Abstract Review Process Based on Materials TC Approach Distribute Submitted Abstracts to Small TC Review Team –Assess Technical Credibility –Identify Clearly Deficient Abstracts –Return Deficient Abstracts for Revision With Due Date Accept Abstracts That Pass Initial Review Reject Deficient Abstracts If Not Revised Reject Deficient Abstracts Not Revised Satisfactorily NOTE This Approach Is Fair –Allows for Revisions to Occur –Ensures That Authors Who Make An Honest Effort Get Chance to Present This Approach Is More Consistent With the High Acceptance Rates for Abstracts