ACCURACY ASSESSMENT SOUTH AMERICA, NORTH AMERICA KAMINI YADAV DR. RUSSELL CONGALTON.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use the list above each map to correctly identify the crop being shown in each map.
Advertisements

Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
North American Croplands Richard Massey & Dr. Teki Sankey.
Accuracy Assessment Error Matrix Program Kamini Yadav and Russ Congalton.
SEReGAP Land Cover Mapping Summary and Results Southwest Regional GAP Project Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah US-IALE 2004, Las Vegas, Nevada:
AA_Vis_1. Using the software “MultiSpec,” students follow protocols to prepare a “clustered” image of their GLOBE Study Site.
February 15, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors
Accuracy Assessment and Reference data Collection Kamini Yadav Dr. Russ Congalton.
Global Croplands Project Remote Sensing of Global Croplands and their Water Use for Food Security in the Twenty-first Century Prasad S. Thenkabail
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior GFSAD30m Global Cropland Extent Products of Nominal 250 m (GCE V2.0) Updates Pardhasaradhi.
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior GFSAD30m Global Cropland Extent Products of Nominal 250 m (GCE V2.0) Updates Pardhasaradhi.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Methods of Validating Maps of Deforestation and Selective Logging Carlos Souza Jr. Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia—Imazon.
Ten State Mid-Atlantic Cropland Data Layer Project Rick Mueller Program Manager USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service Remote Sensing Across the.
Mapping of mountain pine beetle red-attack forest damage: discrepancies by data sources at the forest stand scale Huapeng Chen and Adrian Walton.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
North American Croplands: US Updates 21 May 2015 Richard Massey; Dr. Teki Sankey.
Reference Data Collection & Accuracy Assessment Dr. Russ Congalton & Kamini Yadav GFSAD30 Meeting, Wisconsin, 14 th -16 th July, 2015 Reference Map 1.
Classification & Vegetation Indices
Phase I Forest Area Estimation Using Landsat TM and Iterative Guided Spectral Class Rejection Randolph H. Wynne, Jared P. Wayman, Christine Blinn Virginia.
Seto, K.C., Woodcock, C.E., Song, C. Huang, X., Lu, J. and Kaufmann, R.K. (2002). Monitoring Land-Use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM.
EROS Data Center 1.br.ini. 5/11/95 GLC-2000 North America: Classification and Results Validation Chandra Giri SAIC, EROS Data Center Zhiliang Zhu USGS,
National Mapping Division EROS Data Center U. S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Operation Systems (EROS) Data Center World Data.
Module 2.7 Estimation of uncertainties REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module 2.7 Estimation of uncertainties.
GEO Agriculture Subtask Updates: Building a Best Available Cropland Product (IIASA) Production Area Yield Database (UMD) Inbal Becker-Reshef University.
Accuracy Assessment Having produced a map with classification is only 50% of the work, we need to quantify how good the map is. This step is called the.
Crop area estimation in Geoland 2 Ispra, 14-15/05/2012 I. Ukraine region II. North China Plain.
Selection of Multi-Temporal Scenes for the Mississippi Cropland Data Layer, 2004 Rick Mueller Research and Development Division National Agricultural Statistics.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Update: 11/20/2014.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey GFSAD30 Field Work Planning: Progress in Australia Pardha, Prasad, and Jun GFSAD30 monthly meeting,
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey GFSAD30 Monthly Meeting Status Review Prasad GFSAD30 monthly meeting, September 25 th, 2014, Webex\Telecon.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management California Department of.
Crop Mapping in Stanislaus County using GIS and Remote Sensing Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of.
Accuracy of Land Cover Products Why is it important and what does it all mean Note: The figures and tables in this presentation were derived from work.
North American Croplands: Updates Richard Massey; Teki Sankey.
August 20, 2015 Mapping croplands using Landsat data with generalized classifier over large areas Aparna Phalke and Mutlu Ozdogan Center for Sustainability.
Chuvieco and Huete (2009): Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing, Taylor and Francis Emilio Chuvieco and Alfredo Huete Fundamentals of Satellite Remote.
Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy
Reference Data Standard Protocols Kamini Yadav Dr. Russ Congalton.
Reference Data Standard Protocols Kamini Yadav Dr. Russ Congalton.
Croplands.org Aiming to release to public in next couple weeks. There will likely be a separation of work space from public space.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Update: 8/21/2014.
Accuracy Assessment: Building Global Cropland Reference Data Updates for March 2015 Kamini Yadav and Russ Congalton.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey GFSAD30 Field Work Planning: Progress in Australia Pardha, Prasad, and Jun GFSAD30 monthly meeting,
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
MODIS-based Cropland Classification in North America Teki Sankey and Richard Massey Northern Arizona University.
INTRODUCTORY LECTURE 3 Lecture 3: Analysis of Lab Work Electricity and Measurement (E&M)BPM – 15PHF110.
1 Global Mapping, Approaches, Issues, and Accuracies Russ Congalton & Kamini Yadav University of New Hampshire January 16, 2014 Menlo Park, CA.
North American Croplands Teki Sankey and Richard Massey.
Mapping Canada’s Rangeland and Forage Resources using Earth Observation Emily Lindsay MSc Candidate – Carleton University Supervisors: Doug J. King & Andrew.
Reference data & Accuracy Assessment Dr. Russ Congalton Kamini Yadav.
Cropland mapping in South America
Cropland Extent Mapping in South America Global Food Security - Support Analysis m Chandra Giri, Ying Zhong January 19 th, 2016.
Housekeeping –5 sets of aerial photo stereo pairs on reserve at SLC under FOR 420/520 –June 1993 photography.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Chandra Giri Ying Zhong 7/15/2015 Cropland Extent Mapping in South America.
Dr. Russ Congalton & Kamini Yadav GFSAD30 Meeting, Menlo Park 19 th -21 st January, 2016 Reference Data Collection & Accuracy Assessment: Some Results.
Accuracy Assessment Accuracy Assessment Error Matrix Sampling Method
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps THEMATIC ACCURACY.
US Croplands Richard Massey Dr Teki Sankey. Objectives 1.Classify annual cropland extent, Rainfed-Irrigated, and crop types for the US at 250m resolution.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
EOFI Service Trial 1: UN-IFAD – Crop Acreage
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
The GISCO task force “Remote Sensing for Statistics”
Housekeeping 5 sets of aerial photo stereo pairs on reserve at SLC under FOR 420/520 June 1993 photography.
Assessment of data quality
Workshop on Pesticide Indicators
(Presented at SCGIS Conference, Monterey, US, 2016)
Presentation transcript:

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT SOUTH AMERICA, NORTH AMERICA KAMINI YADAV DR. RUSSELL CONGALTON

SOUTH AMERICA First call on May 20 th, 2016 Need more discussion on training and validation data Some points need further discussion: Tile Classification (12 tiles) Cropland Mask (Giri and Long, 2014); Cropland classification limited to other vegetation and also to barren land in Tile 71 Need more information on how training samples have been collected such as sample size, year of data collection

TRAINING SAMPLES Training samples- Different size polygons Distribution of Samples- Random..?? How homogeneous different polygons are? Stratification- how different tiles are differentiated based on cropland?? (Share the source or the shape file) Sample Size – Number of crop/No- Crop samples Any validation by mapping team?? Any statistical information on crop/no- crop estimates from other sources??

BRAZIL IRRIGATION DATA Green: Training 30m Cropland map (Giri and Ying) Zones/Strata within Brazil Accurate Cropland Extent Remove training samples Select Validation samples

NORTH AMERICA: CROP/NO- CROP 350 SAMPLES Zone 11 Reference Data CroplandNo-CropSum PointsUser Accuracy Map Data Cropland % No-Crop % Sum Points Producer Accuracy % Reference Data CroplandNo-CropSum PointsUser Accuracy Map Data Cropland % No-Crop % Sum Points Producer Accuracy 93.75%99.68% 99.14% Zone 12 *No Omission and Commission errors No-Crop No-data Crop

CROP TYPE ASSESSMENT ZonesCorn-SoyabeanWheat-BarleyPotatoAlfalfaCottonRiceOther CropsFallowTotal Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Total2,7751, , ,537 Number of samples in each zone for each crop type based on minimum distance and area proportional criteria Blue: Required samples Red: Insufficient samples

Reference Data AlfalfaCorn-SoybeanRiceCottonPotatoWheat-BarleyOther-CropsFallowTotalUser Accuracy Map Data Alfalfa % Corn-Soybean % Rice % Cotton % Potato % Wheat-Barley % Other-Crops % Fallow % Total Producer Accuracy33.33%98.50%0.00%72.22%0.00%92.86%50.00%41.67% 72.55% One example from Zone 6 ZonesCrop types Zone 2Corn-Soybean Zone 5Rice, Potato Zone 6Rice, Potato Zone 8Potato Zone 9Potato Zone 10Alfalfa Zone 11Wheat-Barley Zone 12Wheat-Barley ZonesOverall Accuracy Zone % Zone % Zone % Zone % Zone % Zone % Zone % Zone % Zone % Zone % Zone % Zone % Crop types with zero User’s and Producer’s accuracy in few zones i.e., No correct diagonal samples

OVERALL ACCURACY Reference Data CroplandNo-CropTotalUser Accuracy Map Data Cropland % No-Crop73,5683, % Total 6093,5754,184 Producer Accuracy 98.85%99.80% 99.67% Reference Data Alfalfa Corn- SoybeanRiceCottonPotato Wheat- Barley Other- CropsFallowTotalUser Accuracy Map Data Alfalfa % Corn-Soybean1572, , % Rice % Cotton % Potato % Wheat-Barley , , % Other-Crops , % Fallow % Total 7912, ,3941, ,537 Producer Accuracy67.13%93.52%64.33%67.16%33.16%82.64%69.56%57.41% 75.80% Crop/no-crop assessment Crop type assessment

REFERENCE DATA PROTOCOLS TUNISIA REFERENCE DATA Samples in the same field: Avoid spatial autocorrelation Validation samples should be placed either across the road or in different crop type field Validation samples: Blue Training samples: green Correlation: Red

CONTD.. Training and Validation split: 60-40% Refer reference data collection protocols and the summary notes on recent discussion on reference data from VHRI on cropland.org Based on the protocols, refine Tunisia data and ingest into the database Joint workshop on reference data collection has been proposed to be conducted in Flagstaff before July meeting (on July 19) (Prasad’s suggestion)

Thanks…!!