Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vatican City, 14 th November 2007 Gemma Rauret Director ESG and the current QA trends in Southern Europe: Spain Current trends in the European Quality.
Advertisements

ENQA’S CONSULTATIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE BFUG - WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL
ENQA, Bologna, London and beyond
Bergen Communiqué – results and implications for quality assurance Christian Thune President, ENQA Presentation at ENQA workshop: "AFTER THE BERGEN MINISTERIAL.
Executive Director of the Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA)
An Overview of Quality Assurance in the EHEA by Prof. Andreas G. Orphanides President of EURASHE, Rector of European University Cyprus, and Ex-President.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries.
Employability in context of the Bologna Process Gayane Harutyunyan Bologna Secretariat Yerevan, May 2014.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
BOLOGNA PROCESS and the COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONTRIBUTION RUDN, Moscow, 12 December December 2007 Katia Dolgova-Dreyer, Council of Europe.
Bregenz, Austria 7 June 2015 Shaping our future: higher education helping create the society we want Gayane Harutyunyan.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
‘Approaches to programme planning and budgeting’ Experience of Regional Centre for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in South-Eastern Europe.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
Quality Assurance in the European HEA Enrique Lopez-Veloso University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain Agustin Merino National Team of Bologna Experts.
The European Network for Quality Assurance in VET Dissemination Conference Eurobanqua LdV Project Athens 15/2/2008 Giorgio Allulli Vicechairperson of ENQAVET.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Judicial component.
BFUG Work Program on QA Agenda Gayane Harutyunyan Astana, Kazakhstan Ensuring quality higher education is one of the most important.
ENQA a key player in the European Higher Education Area Meeting of the Belarus University System representatives Minsk, March 2013 Josep Grifoll / Жузэп.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Expert group meeting on draft delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) under cohesion policy
María Amor Barros del Río Gender as content in research in Horizon 2020 GENDER AS CONTENT IN RESEARCH IN HORIZON 2020 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR RESEARCHERS.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
The RDI Governance System Vasileios Pitsinigkos Head of Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia - Thrace Region.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
The European Network for Quality Assurance in VET Giorgio Allulli Vicechairperson of ENQAVET Board MEDA-ETE Annual Forum2008.
Revisions Proposed to the CIS Plan by the Global Office Misha V. Belkindas Budapest, July 3-4, 2013.
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Cristi Popescu – Executive Committe Member European context of QA ESPAQ Training Yerevan,
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Future needs for capacity building and recommendations to the OIE Dr Sarah Kahn Consultant to the OIE
Towards a European Qualifications Framework Relevance beyond Europe? Moscow 18 April 2006 Jens Bjornavold European centre for development of vocational.
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.
REPORT OF THE AD HOC WG ON THE THIRD CYCLE SRWG meeting May 2014, Warsaw Marzia Foroni.
A "Jean Monnet" project in terms of Erasmus + programme
Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines
Access to Information, Participation in Decision-Making and Justice in the OECS: some thoughts Peter A. Murray OECS Secretariat.
Democratic Institutions and Governance Department
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK IN SERBIA
Activity of the High-Level Group for Partnership, Coordination and Capacity Building for Statistics for Agenda 2030 on Sustainable Development (HLG) Gulmira.
HERE Study Visit Quality culture in practice: Scotland and the University of Edinburgh   5-6 October 2016 Edinburgh, Scotland.
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
WORK PROGRAMME to support the implementation of the Recommendation
European Labour Law Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli: Please, check the web site for.
TOWARDS THE YEREVAN 2015 MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE: A NEW AGENDA FOR THE EHEA Hayk Sargsyan 11 March 2015 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Part 2: How to ensure good project management?
PROGRESS AND CHANGES IN
DIRECTION OF TVET POLICY IN LAO. PDR
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
Institutional Framework, Resources and Management
Introduction to the training
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
…and still actual for a post-2010 strategy!
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
Competitiveness of the regional market, importance of statistics and innovations THE ROLE OF RESEARCH CENTERS IN PROMOTING OF RESEARCH Sarajevo, 8th.
European Labour Law Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli: Please, check the web site for.
European Style Pilot Evaluations in Azerbaijan Higher Education Baku 20 June 2017 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Project Leader.
A "Jean Monnet" project in terms of Erasmus + programme
Indicators&Criteria in External Quality Assessment
Conseil de l'Europe Union européenne
National Correspondents for Qualifications Frameworks (QF-EHEA)
Presentation transcript:

Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova

Project Partners: Lead Applicant: European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova – think tank established in 2003 by the Council of Europe; CEDOS Think Tank (former Center for Society Research) from Ukraine Belarusian Independent Bologna Committee – civic initiative oriented towards breaking Belarusian higher education isolation from EHEA.

The project: focuses on the assessment of the national quality assurance structures and their impact on higher education institutions. will reflect on the main challenges and country differences regarding the functionality of the quality management structures. aims to contribute to a better understanding of the role of cross-country cooperation on ensuring quality assurance in higher education in the Eastern Partnership countries (Moldova, Ukraine, and Belarus). will assess the importance of quality assurance mechanisms developed within the Eastern Partnership countries’ higher education institutions and will expand and disseminate the results for all the targeted stakeholders.

The background: One of the main priority of the Bologna Process in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) is strengthening quality assurance in higher education. Qualitative higher education is central to the expanding of the EHEA. The first conceptual approaches were reflected during several meetings of Ministers of Education in Prague (2001), Berlin (2003) and Bergen (2005). "The Standards and Action Guidelines for quality assurance in the EHEA" were approved as a reference framework for the all European universities necessary for developing comparable methodologies and criteria of assessment. In 2015 in Yerevan was approved the revised “Standards and Action Guidelines for quality assurance in the EHEA”.

The relevance of the project Promoting cooperation in quality assurance in higher education IS an important factor in increasing the attractiveness and competitiveness of EaP countries’ higher education in the EHEA, in ensuring high quality standards and in facilitating qualifications’ comparison across Europe. Project partners are signatories of the Bologna Accord and members of European Higher Education Area – Moldova (2005), Ukraine (2005) and Belarus (2015)  different progress has been made in improving the quality and relevance of higher education, in establishing trustworthy national quality assurance systems and in setting up quality assurance bodies in the framework of each higher education institution.

National background - Moldova Once with the approval of the Education Code adopted by Law no. 152 (July 2014) and Strategy on Education 2020 (2014) the intended reforms in correspondence with the Bologna process take a significant orientation toward ensuring quality of higher education in Moldova A priority related to quality assurance in higher education was establishing the National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education - Government Decision no. 191 of 22 April 2015 has been approved the Rules of organization and functioning of the National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher and Professional Education The Agency performs the state policies in the field of quality assessment in the higher education. The Agency has as a priority the development of assessment tools in order to authorize the accreditation of the educational programs. The assessment covers several aspects: institutional capacity, academic outcomes, quality of programs, results of scientific research, institutional management. Institutions of higher education in Moldova established their own quality management structures, developed and implemented quality management guidelines, internal quality control mechanisms and their own internal quality assurance systems.

National background - Ukraine The establishment and functioning of the National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education was designed in accordance with the New Law of Ukraine on Higher Education adopted in 2014 The system of higher education quality assurance is comprised of: a system by which higher education institutions ensure quality of education activity; a system of external quality assurance for education activity of higher education institutions and higher education; a system of assuring performance quality of the National Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education and independent agencies for assessment and quality assurance of higher education. Main Responsibilities of the National Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education: define requirements for the higher education quality assurance system; design regulation on accreditation of programmes of study; carry out accreditation of programmes of study offered to higher education learners; define criteria for evaluation of education activity quality, including quality of research accomplishments, for higher education institutions of Ukraine which may serve the purpose of institutional ranking

National background - Belarus In 2015 Belarus joined the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and started the Belarus Roadmap for Higher Education Reform implementation. In accordance with the Roadmap for Higher Education Reform, Belarus must incorporate key EHEA principles into national educational system over the period of In particular, it envisages among other priorities establishing of independent quality assurance system, the main obstacle to the Roadmap implementation and inclusion of the key stakeholders in higher education reform process is the absence of a clear regulatory and legal framework that would serve as a basis for the fulfillment of Belarus’ obligations with respect to the Roadmap implementation as well as a non-transparent process of creating such a framework.

The objectives of the project: To create a cross-country civil society platform of discussion involving Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine on the monitoring of the education policy reform, with a focus on the quality assurance mechanism assessment. To raise awareness within the National Platforms on quality assurance mechanism assessment through a cross-border cooperation and exchange of experience (Moldova, Belarus and Ukraine). To increase the level of assessment on the major challenges regarding the functionality of quality assurance structures developed in accordance with the Bologna process. To establishing a set of cross-country recommendations to improve quality and relevance of higher education.

Target groups: The direct beneficiaries of the project are quality assurance structures, including the institutional quality management departments, National evaluation and accreditation structures form Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine, community of experts in the field of education The indirect beneficiaries are the students and university academic staff/teachers from the Eastern Partnership countries and in general, the higher education institutions, due to the fact that the present study intends to come up with recommendations for raising the quality of higher education.

Project activities: Activity 1: To conduct an experts’ opinion assessment The experts’ opinion assessment will be developed in each partner country: the analysis of the legal framework, institutional framework regarding quality assurance, institutional quality management in order to assess the main issues faced by the quality assurance representatives from different management structures. The qualitative research will be conducted in order to identify best practices and develop recommendations of improving the quality assurance management activity. In this context, in-depth interviews will be conducted with different stakeholders in the field of education in order to identify the already existent regional practices and concrete actions taken to improve the quality education policies in higher education.

Project activities: Activity 2: To develop a Policy Paper A policy paper based on the cross-country comparison which would integrate qualitative data. The policy study will present the main differences, but also the main similarities in the field, taking into consideration the national, but also, the regional context. The policy paper will cover both current challenges and main issues in ensuring the quality of education and recommendations for future measures. A set of recommendations will be developed that will emphasize the importance of an increased level of cooperation between Eastern partnership countries on consolidating a common space for education, research, innovation and learning opportunities.

Project Activities: Activity 3: To organize round tables Organize a round table with local stakeholders in the field of higher education at the level of each country (for the presentation and dissemination of study results. The developed recommendations will be highly promoted, encouraging concrete actions on behalf of the stakeholders for an efficient monitoring of the education policy reforms and for improvement of the functionality of quality assurance national structures.

Expected impact of the project: will increase the level of cooperation between the project partners and national experts involved in the project from all EaP countries ; will consolidate the platform between the EaP partners countries in the field of education policy reform, with a focus on quality assurance in higher education; will assess the current quality assurance mechanisms in the higher education and will raise awareness on the mechanisms on evaluating the quality in higher education in the context of Bologna process education reform; Also, the research will contribute to the identification of the specific issues in the field, enhancing the knowledge and professional skills of involved stakeholders.

Thank you!