Version: 27 May 2007 New Models for Collaboration: Patients as Drivers and Partners in Neurological Research Integrating Patient Input Within the Drug.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.
Advertisements

Role of the Executive Secretary Gail Dapolito Advisory Committee Coordinator Div. Scientific Advisors and Consultants Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
Involving the Public in Risk Communication Katherine A. McComas, Ph.D. University of Maryland.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee September 6, 2006 ODAC and the FDA Arms-Length or Arm-In-Arm? Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs.
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research The Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Web Seminar Series presents:
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
Understanding the Pre-IDE Program: FDA Perspective
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
FDA Office of Orphan Products Development
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
Examining Drug Quality Regulation Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Public Meeting on 21 CFR February,
FDA’s Patient Advocacy Programs: Patient Representative Program & Patient Network Andrea Furia-Helms, MPH James Valentine, MHS Office of Special Health.
Department of Health and Human Services1 Update: October 2006 Public Meeting on Emergency Research Diane Maloney, J.D. Associate Director for Policy FDA.
Patient Engagement throughout the Biopharmaceutical Lifecycle: Tips for Effective Patient Advocate/Industry Collaboration to Improve Patient Access and.
Topic #1: EOP2A Meetings Please comment on the goals of the proposed EOP2A meeting and the impact that such meetings could have on optimizing dose selection.
Civil Society Participation and Contribution to the UNCAC Review Process Towards Transparency – TI National Contact Vietnam UNCAC Self Assessment Process:
Tim Friede Department of Medical Statistics
BLM Decision Making Process
Renee Markus Hodin, JD Director, Integrated Care Advocacy Project
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
A capacity building programme for patient representatives
Community health nursing Presented by: Abdalrahman Mustafa Taha BSc of Nursing MSc of Community H Nursing University of Khartoum.
Clinical Review Process for New Drug Development and Application
Jeff Shuren, MD, JD Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
Sustainable Community Based Rehabilitation at local and national levels Presented by Professor Gwynnyth Llewellyn (University of Sydney) and Darryl Barrett.
PATIENT FOCUSED DRUG DEVELOPMENT MEETING
Patient Involvement in the HTA Decision Making Process
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
MUHC Innovation Model.
CMS and FDA The History and Horizon of Regulatory Coordination
The FDA Early Feasibility Study Pilot and the Innovation Pathway
Good Participatory Practice (GPP) Guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials 2011, Second Edition Note to trainer/presenter: You may use all or.
Patient Engagement: How a Patient Advisory Board Keeps the Patient in the Center of the Patient-Centered Medical Home Westfield Family Physicians, PC.
Lessons Learned: Past Present and Future Japan-USA Regulatory Interactions Erica Takai, PhD US Food and Drug Administration
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Regulator’s View - US FDA
What is NASOMH? The National Association of State Offices of Minority Health (NASOMH) is the national association for the 47 existing State Offices.
Tracking of Medical Students and their Attitudes and Career Intents
Participation of Patient Advocates in Community Advisory Boards A case-study: the HIV European Community Advisory Board (ECAB)
Western Michigan University
Strategic & Operational Planning:
Strengthening our Commitment to Accountability to Beneficiaries
Clinical Trials.
Strengthening our Commitment to Accountability to Beneficiaries
Strategies to increase family engagement
Strengthening our Commitment to Accountability to Beneficiaries
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Jason Gerson, PhD Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
Indiana Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Advisory Board
Community Involvement Training
Community Integration and Development USP Conference May 2013
Levels of involvement Consultation Collaboration User control
Suzanne M. Sensabaugh, MS, MBA
IND Review Process Seoul National University
CanMEDS Roles Covered X
Jeremy Sugarman, MD, MPH, MA
Stakeholder Involvement in Nuclear issues Workshop: Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development November 5-9, 2007 Why Stakeholders are.
Trial Funding and Engagement: The NIH Sponsored CTSA Program
Pediatric Clinical investigator training workshop
SSC School Site Council Purpose To Provide Input to and Approval of
CanMEDS Roles Covered X
MIDD: Perspectives and Possibilities
Slides for Module 2 Topic: Community Planning
RESPONDING TO STUDENT VOICE: PRINCIPLES OF PRACTICE
An Agency Perspective on Plain Language Summaries of Publications
CanMEDS Roles Covered X
Presentation transcript:

Version: 27 May 2007 New Models for Collaboration: Patients as Drivers and Partners in Neurological Research Integrating Patient Input Within the Drug Approval Process Russell Katz, M.D. Director Division of Neurology Products Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

2 Two main areas in which patients can influence drug development and approval Patients can play an important role during the development, and conduct, of clinical trials (IND) Patients can play a role in the decision about whether a particular drug should or should not be approved (NDA)

3 Patient input during drug development Patients can play an important role in the general development of drugs for a particular indication Patients can also play an important role in the development of a specific drug

4 Patient input for a specific indication Numerous venues to interact with the FDA FDASIA (2012) –Public meetings to consider 20 different disease areas over the next 5 years –Federal Register (FR) Notice 9/24/12-invited public comment on potential disease areas- Meeting held 10/25 –Over 4000 comments received-1/3 for neurology

5 Patient input for a specific indication Part 15 Hearing –This is a mechanism for the public to speak directly to a panel of FDA officials on a specific topic –Written comments are also solicited –Meeting on ALS held this week

6 Patient input for a specific indication Meetings with specific patient “communities” –Small meetings with Agency staff –Larger, more public meetings arranged by “consortia” of patient (advocacy) groups –Similar meetings arranged by academic groups

7 Patient input for a specific indication Formal qualification of outcome measures, (e.g., Patient Reported Outcomes [PROs]) These instruments are entirely dependent on solicitation of patient input (and not just PROs) The creation of outcome measures provide an extremely important mechanism for direct patient influence of drug development

8 Patient input for the development of a specific drug FDASIA discusses the Patient Consultant Program –Patients with a specific condition may participate in meetings between FDA and sponsors –We have attempted this in the past-logistical problems have prevented very meaningful participation

9 Patient input for the development of a specific drug Generation of outcome measures is relevant here also In particular, patient specific outcome measures (goals) can be extremely important, but are very rarely used This activity, in general, is, clearly, primarily the purview of the sponsor But we encourage these efforts

10 Patient input in the decision on a specific application FDASIA refers to the Patient Representative Program –Representatives serve on Advisory Committees (in addition to a Consumer Representative); we have had such representatives in the recent past –Equally important (in my view) are comments from patients in the public sessions of AC meetings

11 Other ways patients can contribute to drug development Especially for orphan conditions, advocacy groups can help facilitate the conduct of clinical trials In particular, advocacy groups can create and maintain patient registries Critically, advocacy groups can urge patients/families to enter clinical trials, especially for marketed drugs

12 Summary Patients and advocates can play important roles in the design and facilitation of clinical trials Patients and advocates can play important roles in the decision on a specific application FDA’s actions must be driven by science and conform to regulations, and we recognize that these goals may be more efficiently achieved with more direct patient input along the way