Laminar Velocity Bunching A. Bacci V – LI 2 FE Collaboration meeting, 15-16 March 2011, Frascati.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg Short Bunches at FLASH.
Advertisements

The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Radiation Physics | ELBE | SRF Photo Injector for Electron- Laser Interaction LA 3 NET conference: Laser applications at accelerators, Mallorca,
Velocity bunching SPARC Daniele Filippetto on behalf of SPARC team.
J. Rudolph, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin EuCARD 2nd ANNUAL MEETING Slice emittance measurements at the ELBE superconducting RF photoinjector.
Advanced beam dynamics experiments at SPARC Alberto Bacci on be half the SPARC group PITZ Collaboration meeting, October 2011, Zeuthen (Berlin)
SPACE CHARGE EFFECTS IN PHOTO-INJECTORS Massimo Ferrario INFN-LNF Madison, June 28 - July 2.
C.Limborg-Deprey ERL Workshop, Jefferson March 20th 2005 Optimum electron distribution for space charge dominated beams.
EuroNNAc Workshop, CERN, May 2011 External Injection at INFN-LNF ( integrating RF photo-injectors with LWFA ) Luca Serafini - INFN/Milano High Brightness.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
Contributions to ELI-NP on RF accelerator activities Andrea Mostacci Università di Roma, Sapienza The joint Sapienza/INFN-LNF group is active in the field.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
TTF2 Start-to-End Simulations Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Zeuthen, 22 Jan 2004.
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Module 5 A quick overview of beam dynamics in linear accelerators
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
Christopher Gerth DL/RAL Joint Workshop 28-29/4/04 Modelling of the ERLP injector system Christopher Gerth ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Velocity bunching from S-band photoinjectors Julian McKenzie 1 st July 2011 Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop Cockcroft Institute STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
HINS Linac Simulations : Benchmarking, Jitter and Stripping. Jean-Paul Carneiro FNAL Accelerator Physics Center Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
ICFA Workshop on Future Light Source, FLS2012 M. Shimada A), T. Miyajima A), N. Nakamura A), Y. Kobayashi A), K. Harada A), S. Sakanaka A), R. Hajima B)
Ultra-short electron bunches by Velocity Bunching as required for Plasma Wave Acceleration Alberto Bacci (Sparc Group, infn Milano) EAAC2013, 3-7 June,
X-band Based FEL proposal
Abstract: We present on overview of the STAR project (Southern european Thomson source for Applied Research), in progress at the Univ. of Calabria (Italy)
ELI PHOTOINJECTOR PARAMETERS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND SIMULATIONS C. RONSIVALLE.
Beam dynamics and linac optics studies for medical proton accelerators
Advanced beam dynamics experiments at SPARC Alberto Bacci on be half the SPARC group PITZ Collaboration meeting, October 2011, Zeuthen (Berlin)
A.Variola Frascati SuperB meeting 1 Injector and positron source scheme. A.Variola, O.Dadoun, F Poirier, R.Chehab, P Lepercq, R.Roux, J.Brossard.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Ultrashort electron beams generation and bunchers performance Alberto Bacci infn-Milano Physics and Applications of High Brightness Beams conference, March.
LCLS-II options: CuRF → SXR, VPU, HXR harmonics G. Marcus 5/13/2015.
Matching free space propagation to plasma focusing S. Barber UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy FACET II Workshop October 15, 2015.
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
Structured Electron Beams from Nano-engineered Cathodes
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Dielectric Wakefield R&D programme at Daresbury Lab.
Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration in hollow plasma
Previous presentation
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
402.5 MHz Debunching in the Ring
Plans of XFELO in Future ERL Facilities
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Stefano Romeo on behalf of SPARC_LAB collaboration
OTR based measurements for ELI-NP Gamma Beam Source
Where Do We Stand With Start-End Simulations
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL?
G. Marcus, Y. Ding, J. Qiang 02/06/2017
calculation with 107 particles
Simulation Calculations
Single Side Coupler for input coupler of L0-1
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Status of FEL Physics Research Worldwide  Claudio Pellegrini, UCLA April 23, 2002 Review of Basic FEL physical properties and definition of important.
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
Electron beam dynamics
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
COMB beam: TSTEP simulations up to THz station
Proposal for Smith-Purcell radiation experiment at SPARC_LAB
New VUV-FEL Simulation results
Injector for the Electron Cooler
S2E Meeting on Yauhen Kot.
Presentation transcript:

Laminar Velocity Bunching A. Bacci V – LI 2 FE Collaboration meeting, March 2011, Frascati

Giotto – Genetic Interface for OpTimising Tracking with Optics New Genetic code able to find, more or less complex,beam-line configurations, useful to answer at many different problems, by using fully 3D simulations. The search for the best beam-line settings is driven by a fitness function which can by freely defined from the user. The fitness function can be wrote using all data computed by the tracking code (Astra), or computed by a post processor, which is dedicated to multi bunches simulations: PosZ, time, En,Den,SigZ,Xemit,sigX,divergX,Yemit,SigY,divergY,emitY Multi bunches post_pro:SCurrent(NSpike), SemitX(Nspike),SemitY,Sdist(Nspike) All variable definite in the Astra input file (or in the Astra generator) can be chosen as a Giotto variable to be optimized (genes) (ex. Phi(1)…Phi(50),maxe(1),maxb(1), sig_x,sig_clock --- No limit in the number) A typical simulation works with 3-15 variables and takes from 1h up to 2 days (by using a quite old 8 core workstation) - The speed scale linearly with the cpu number. Giotto can be switched from Genetic Optimizations to Statistical Analysis. Each Astra variable can be analyzed and the sampling interval used for the optimization analysis becomes the jitters interval, which can be sampled in uniform o Gaussion way – A statistical analysis is quite fast; 300 test cases take just some hours. Used for Vbunching strongly space charge dominated – TNSA Proton Acceleration – Laser Comb - Single spike FEL, ecc… --- Next upgrade (switchable Astra-Tstep-Homdybn) ---

Q=1nC – sig_x=0.5 mm – dt=10ps Flat-Top C=11.3 emit=1.2 [mm-mrad] E=170 MeV Best Emit&Curr Push-up Energy by VI,VII,VIII,IX cavities C=10.6 emit=2.0 [mm-mrad] E=340 MeV 1)2) Current & emit distribution Is it necessary to add coils on the III S-band Cavity? The emittance and envelope are in opposition of phase (emit.correction) 1Slice=σ z,s =3.8 μm = 1KA σ z =78 μm Full velocity bunching -Sband

Envelope equation for a round Kapchinskii-Vladimirski beam. Ellipsoidal uniform charge distribution with and rms longitudinal semi-axis : External forces: VB longitudinal focusing gradient Internal forces: space-charge – emittance pressure Longitudinal laminarity (space- charge/emit): VB Compression in longitudinal beam laminarity regime :

Equilibrium between space charge and longitudinal compression is preserved until the LINAC end; No over compression – Longitudinal Laminar Beam

Under particular conditions (*) it is possible to find an Analytical solution (*)

All VB 9 TW VB over-compression – 3 TW on crest – 3 TW VB 5 TW – 4 on crest E=170 MeV E=340 MeV

Electron density, current and ρ z Conclusion: New simulations with C band cavities are under study. These will be performed by Giotto controlling the ρ z parameters along the simulation. The analytical study needs further considerations.

Short bunches: the compressing factor can be pushed at very high values: It is not true for very short bunch! Considering A=(R/L) >> 1 Very strong de-bunching: Sub-fs e- 1 pC SPARC First attempt