Jeffrey Lively Chief Scientist Radiological Services & Engineering Amec Foster Wheeler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Objectives Terminal Objective
Advertisements

1 MARLAP, MARSSIM and RETS- REMP: How is All of this Related…or NOT? Robert Litman, Ph.D. Eric L. Darois, MS, CHP Radiation Safety & Control Services,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Streamlined.
RETS – REMP Workshop NRC Activities June 25, 2007 Presented by Steve Garry.
Managing Uncertainty through Better Upfront Planning and Flexible Workplans Albert Robbat, PhD Tufts University, Chemistry department Center for Field.
Presented by: Jonathan Silvester Oliver Kiernan. Maxey Flat Site Located in Fleming County, Kentucky Low level Nuclear Disposal Facility o Isolate waste.
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Lean Operations for Water and Wasterwater Controlling Cost While Improving Efficiency… A Real World View.
Environmental Health XIV. Standards and Monitoring Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
Wenxin Zhang Department of Civic Design University of Liverpool
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Consultants’ Meeting to develop a guidance document on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an.
30 September 2008BRMF & SAFESPUR, Radioactive v Non-Radioactive Contamination 1 Regulatory Framework for Contaminated Land on Nuclear and Other Radioactively.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual: MARLAP Presentation to the Radiation Advisory Committee/Science Advisory Board April.
Challenges in developing a Safety Case WG5. How to Develop a Safety Case SC can be a tool for providing information to stakeholders other than regulators.
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Authorization for the Decommissioning of the Facility.
PROCESSES AND ISSUES TO CONSIDER ON WHETHER OR NOT TO AMEND AGREEMENT STATE STATUS Uranium Working Group August 2, 2012.
1 International Working Forum on Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) Technical Meeting Amel MELLOUK – ASN / DRC Jérémie VALLET – MEDDE/MSNR Regulatory.
Performance Assessment Issues in Waste Management and Environmental Protection Annual Meeting of the Baltimore-Washington Chapter of the Health Physics.
EPA's Radiological and Nuclear Emergency Response Program June 18, 2009 Presented by: Ronald Fraass, Lab Director National Air and Radiation Environmental.
Clean-up of former nuclear sites and the role of the Planning regime Jim Cochrane.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” WASTE MANAGEMENT SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
1 A Consultancy on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation ~ Experience on aftermath of Fukushima Daiichi NPS accident.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “DECOMMISSIONING PROCESS” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
Clear thinking on Nuclear: Waste disposal 1.One site for high-level radioactive waste is easier to monitor, regulate, and secure 2.A repository will provide.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Dr. Abraham Gregorio de Rosa,Sp.Rad Radiologist in HNGV Dili, Timor Leste 2 Perspectives on regulatory models.
Nuclear Research and consultancy Group European Radiation Survey Site Execution Manual Leo van Velzen ENVIRONET Kick-off meeting Vienna 23 – 26 November.
Argonne National Laboratory Experience and Perspectives on Environmental Remediation Karen P. Smith Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
AGU Fall 2006 Meeting Neptune and Company, Inc. Radioactive Waste Disposal in Hydrologically-Challenged Environments: Opportunities for Waste Disposal.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Created by Decontamination and Decommissioning of UK Pharmaceutical R&D Sites: a Radiological Protection Perspective Vincent Hart, Alan S Muir* and Glenn.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
Management and Safe Disposal of Radioactive Waste COUNTRY STATUS:ZIMBABWE By Rujeko Lynette Mpandanyama Tunis, March 2014.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
LTP and FSS Plan Project Status Overview Presented by Bill Barley September 28, 2015.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Laboratory Decommissioning : Essential Tools and Lessons Learned Jim Carscadden Division of Environmental Protection Office of Research Facilities.
Proposed EPA Power Plant Cooling System Regulations.
Performance-Based Management for Brownfields - Best Practices and Approaches November 2006 Eliana Makhlouf, Ph.D., P.E. Marsh Environmental Practice.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC’s Risk-Informed and Performance- Based Approach to Decommissioning DOE Workshop on Risk-Based End States.
Requirements for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Minimization Plans Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
by John Mitchell, Director Division of Environment
TENORM in Ohio Michael Snee
Pesticides in Groundwater
OCNI Workshop Kathryn A. McCarthy, VP R&D 2017 September 6
Lisa Edwards Senior Program Manager LLW Forum April, 2017
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Scalable and Cost-Effective Azure Platform Empowers Complex Document Data Extraction “After serious investigation, it became apparent that the finest cloud.
Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management Update
مدیریت داده ها و اطلاعات آزمایشگاه پزشکی
Consultants’ Meeting to develop a guidance document on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation 04, Feb. – 08, Feb.
Tom Wolf, Governor Patrick McDonnell, PA DEP Secretary
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS
Objectives Provide an overview of the triad approach and its application Describe the elements of the triad approach for practical application Describe.
Managed Content Services
Licensed Process for Disposal of Low-Activity Wastes in the WCS RCRA Cell Chris Shaw – May 2018 Corporate RSO & TSPM.
U.S. Department of Energy Perspectives on Waste Classification
Licensed Process for Disposal of Low-Activity Wastes in the WCS RCRA Cell Chris Shaw – 2019 Corporate RSO & Head of Licensing.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Presentation transcript:

Jeffrey Lively Chief Scientist Radiological Services & Engineering Amec Foster Wheeler

Fundamental Problems ► Radiologically contaminated sites typically have large volumes of soil which are heterogeneously contaminated by radioactivity from historic operations ► There is a severe shortage of disposal space for this type of material worldwide ► Available space is very expensive ► Radiologically-impacted land must be appropriately characterized and remediated to achieve “no-further- action” status

The Traditional Approach Typical soil remediation/decommissioning process: ► Is subject to large uncertainties ► Heterogeneity vs. sample data density ► Depth of contamination ► Is expensive to implement ► Scan/excavate, scan/excavate, scan/excavate… ► Can result in large waste volumes ► Significant project expense ► Consumption of available disposal space ► Dependent upon laboratory sample analysis ► Equates to extended project schedule

A New Approach Design all-in-one conveyor-based system capable of isotopic quantitative measurements and real-time segregation of contaminated material (soil & debris). ► Must have very low detection limits ► Must be able to speciate various isotopes ► Must be capable of handling a variety of materials ► Must overcome common material handling problems ► Must be capable of producing high quality data with acceptable survey throughput rates ► Must be rugged and reliable for field operating conditions ► Must be cost effective ► Must be acceptable to the regulators

The Solution AMEC Foster Wheeler’s Orion ScanSort SM system sets the standard ► Achieves very low detection limits ► Performs real-time isotope specific analyses ► Handles a wide variety of flowable materials (including crushed concrete and a variety of other materials) ► Confidently segregates radioactive from compliant materials ► Produces high-quality, reliable data with acceptably high material survey throughput rates ► Is rugged and reliable ► Operates in both ideal and adverse field environments ► Is cost effective ► Provides 100% assay of processed materials

How Does ScanSort SM Work? 7

How Does ScanSort SM Work? ORION ScanSort SM uses ► Large volume (4-liter), spectroscopy grade, NaI detectors ► Proprietary operating and control software that enables the system to operate as a scanning spectrometer ► Advanced, computer-controlled, electro-mechanical material handling and sorting system components Detects gamma-emitting radionuclides as the soil on the belt moves past the active area of the detector(s) Other specialized detectors can also be fitted to the system to detect isotopes that are not amenable to detection by NaI spectroscopy

How Does ScanSort SM Work?

Example Project-Specific Installation Adaptable & scalable to the specific needs and circumstances of the site

Established Technology & Performance Orion ScanSort SM technology has been proven and accepted by: ► U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) ► U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) ► U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ► U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) ► Various State Agencies Approved on-site waste acceptance ► Reduced transportation risk exposure and waste acceptance uncertainty to site owner

Process Rate Dependent upon isotopes, limits and applicable monitoring volumes Example 1 ► Cs-137, Bq/g (2 pCi/g), 900 kg monitoring volume ► Process Rate ~90,000 kg/hr Example 2 ► Cs-137, 0.2 Bq/g (5.2 pCi/g), 80 kg monitoring volume ► Process Rate ~140,000 kg/hr

System Deployed at U.S. NASA Site Contaminant of Concern Cs-137, 0.2 Bq/g (5.2 pCi/g) Monitoring Volume 80 kg Production Rate 140,000 kg/h Total Production 90 million kg of material

Collection of “below criteria” confirmatory samples Walk-over radiation surveys of “below criteria” discharge material Data Quality Measures

Data Quality Comparison

Orion ScanSort SM Key Advantages Minimizes waste volumes and cost of waste disposal ► Waste volume reduction, realized by the system’s ability to segregate contaminated soil from clean soil, is typically greater than 90% (10:1) ► Where the radioactive contaminant was extremely heterogeneous, a waste volume reduction of approximately 1,000:1 has been realized Superior detection limits and process rates

Large volume detectors provide ► Superior sensitivity ► Isotope specific measurements Real-time spectral stripping - dramatically improves accuracy and improves detection limits 100% assay of processed materials ► Outstanding data quality ► Engenders high confidence in end-state radiological condition Need not be limited to radiological assay Orion ScanSort SM Key Advantages

Conclusion ► ScanSort SM soil sorting system is designed with the most technologically-advanced scanning and sorting system features available. ► ScanSort SM provides the most Cost-Effective & Confident solution for remediation and radioactive waste management. ► ScanSort SM is a modern, proven technology, having assayed and sorted more than 500 million kilograms of material to date. ► Amec Foster Wheeler’s unique expertise and experience in soil screening & sorting technology enables us to provide clients with unparalleled flexibility and cost savings over a wide range of radiological decommissioning challenges.

Conclusion In decommissioning and environmental remediation, the most important product is a defensible document set that accurately describes the site’s end state ScanSort SM provides this in a way that no other technique or system can achieve!